
‘A party of opportunists, jee-huzoors that Congress is now, can never do anything worthwhile': JP to Indira from jail
A characteristically sharp attack that accused Indira Gandhi of resorting to 'fascism', a defence of his own position, and a personal appeal to her as the friend of her father Jawaharlal Nehru to not destroy democracy — Jayaprakash Narayan swung between anger and emotion in a letter he wrote to Mrs Gandhi on July 21, 1975, from the solitary confinement where he was kept by her government.
The letter is preserved in JP's original handwriting as part of his jail diaries at the Prime Ministers' Museum and Library archives in the capital.
'Here was this same Prime Minister who used to accuse us time and again of wanting to destroy democracy and establish fascism. And here is the same Prime Minister herself destroying democracy and establishing fascism in the name of the same democracy,' JP wrote to Indira.
'You know I am an old man. My life's work is done. And after Prabha's (his late wife) going, I have nothing and no one to live for… I have given all my life to the country and asked for nothing in return. So, I shall be content to die a prisoner under your regime,' JP wrote.
His 'parting words of advice', he said, were: 'Please do not destroy the foundations that the father of the nation, including your noble father, had laid down. There is nothing but strife and suffering along the path that you have taken.'
The damage inflicted would take a long time to repair, JP wrote, though he was confident that India would spring back. 'A people who fought British imperialism and humbled it cannot accept indefinitely the indignity and shame of totalitarianism… Indira ji, please do not identify yourself with the nation. You are not immortal, India is.'
Hitting out at the PM for muzzling the press and for imprisoning Opposition leaders, JP dismissed her purported statement that 'democracy is not more important than the nation'. 'Are you not presuming too much, Madam Prime Minister? You are not the only one who cares for the nation. Among those you have detained or imprisoned, there are many who have done much more for the nation than you,' the veteran freedom fighter, who had led the Quit India Movement of 1942 underground after the arrest of the top leadership of the Indian National Congress, wrote. 'And every one of these is as good a patriot as you. So, please do not apply salt to our wounds by lecturing to us about the nation.'
He added, 'There is no choice between democracy and the nation. It was for the good of the nation that the people of India declared in the Constituent Assembly on 26th November, 1949, that 'We the people of India having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign democratic republic… give to ourselves this Constitution.' That democratic Constitution cannot be changed into an authoritarian one by a mere ordinance or a law of Parliament.'
Read the full letter below:
JP also accused Indira of spreading canards to justify her decision and painting him as the villain of the piece. 'Having muzzled the press and every kind of public dissent, you continue with your distortions and untruths without fear of criticism or contradiction. If you think that… you will be able to justify yourself in the public eye and damn the Opposition to political perdition, you are sorely mistaken,' he wrote, challenging her to revoke the Emergency if she doubted his words and hold elections.
On his appeal to the police and Army to not take 'unlawful orders', JP denied the charge that it was an attempt to paralyse the government. What was being done was non-violent civil disobedience, he said, as people had the right to protest non-violently rather than wait for the next elections if they saw large-scale corruption and misgovernance.
The socialist leader said people also had the right to demand the resignation of an elected government in the event of misrule, and said the mammoth anti-government rallies being held were proof of the popular sentiment. In the case of Bihar, JP said, the instances of firing and lathicharge on students had made matters worse.
JP added that all he had tried to do was 'to make the men and officers of the forces conscious of their duties and responsibilities', and that this was 'within the law: the constitution, the Army Act and the Police Act'.
JP mentioned that the evening before the Emergency was clamped, Nanaji Deshmukh had announced at the Ramlila Maidan rally in Delhi a Satyagraha pending the Supreme Court ruling on the Allahabad High Court verdict that had struck down Mrs Gandhi's election to the Lok Sabha.
Instead of responding to the popular demand to step down after the verdict, JP regretted, Mrs Gandhi had tried to cling to power. 'Through your henchmen, you had rallies and demonstrations organised in front of your residence begging you not to resign.' He also mentioned a smear campaign against the High Court judge who pronounced the verdict against her.
Attacking the sycophancy in the Congress, with the exception of leaders like Chandra Shekhar and Mohan Dharia who had been jailed, JP said Mrs Gandhi would not be able to fool the people of India despite all her efforts. '… a party of self-seekers and spineless opportunists and jee-huzoors such as the Congress, alas, has become, can never do anything worthwhile,' he asserted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
DMK govt installed 11 memorials, 63 statues in four years
Chennai: The DMK govt has installed 63 statues and 11 memorials over the last four years, which is more than double the number of statues erected during the 10 year rule of the previous AIADMK govt. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A statement from the govt said the AIADMK had installed only 25 statues between 2011 and 2021. While the DMK govt has installed more than five dozen statues across the state so far, work was underway to construct statues for 28 more leaders and 12 additional memorials, furthering the Dravidian model govt's efforts to preserve and honour the contributions of icons who shaped Tamil identity and history, according to the statement. The statement noted that former chief minister M Karunanidhi was the pioneer in honouring stalwarts. Among the notable structures installed by Karunanidhi was the statue of Tamil poet Tiruvalluvar in 2000 and the govt celebrated 25the anniversary of the statues, recently. Chief minister M K Stalin is continuing the legacy of Karunanidhi by constructing statues for leaders, Tamil scholars and even for leaders from foreign countries who have contributed for the development of Tamil society. Among the statues unveiled by the current govt include Dr B R Ambedkar at the Ambedkar Memorial in Chennai, Col John Pennycuick in England, freedom fighter Anjalai Ammal in Cuddalore and Sir John Marshall, British archaeologist in Egmore. In addition, the house where poet Bharathiyar lived in Varanasi has been converted into a memorial, the statement said.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Kulsi dam, Barduar township face uncertainty amid protests
1 2 3 Guwahati: Two major projects planned by the Assam govt — a 55-MW hydel project on the Kulsi river, and the proposed Barduar satellite township, both near Guwahati — face possible cancellation. The hydel project was planned in collaboration with Meghalaya govt. On Sunday, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma told mediapersons, on the sidelines of a programme, that the proposed hydel project in the upper reaches of the Kulsi river, along the Assam-Meghalaya border, would not proceed if residents continue to oppose it. He also addressed concerns surrounding the Barduar township, planned in and around the British-era tea garden in Kamrup district, saying the project would be abandoned if it faces public resistance. Both initiatives have drawn strong opposition from local tribal communities and several political and apolitical groups, who are concerned about the possible "displacement of indigenous families" — particularly due to the proposed Kulsi power project. Sarma criticised the ongoing protests, saying, "There are some people who love protesting. We, the two chief ministers (Sarma and Meghalaya CM Conrad Sangma), want to build the dam for public benefit, to provide irrigation water. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo If they don't want it, they can just say so. But instead, there are speeches, protests, and the emergence of new leaders — this has damaged Assam." Regarding the proposed Kulsi dam, earlier, Sarma said local opinions would be taken into account before finalising the project, which could displace around 10 villages if executed. On the Barduar township project on Guwahati's outskirts, Sarma said the govt would not proceed against public will. "The same is the case with the proposed Barduar township. We've informed the assembly that if the people there oppose it, the township won't be built. Yet protests continue. What should we do with such agitators? I can't stop them from agitating," he added. Previously, several organisations led by the All Rabha Students' Union wrote to the Kamrup district commissioner, urging issuance of land pattas (documents) to long-settled indigenous communities in the Barduar area. They fear eviction if the township is developed. They said the project would hamper the movement of Rabhas for achieving its prime goal of enlisting the Rabha-inhabited areas under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution for greater autonomy. They also argued that the proposed project would pose a negative impact on community's socio-economic well-being, language, culture, and traditional livelihoods.


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Daily subject-wise quiz : International Relations MCQs on Drohobych, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, Caroline test and more (Week 116)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on International Relations to check your progress. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for June 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at With reference to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), consider the following statements: 1. The group is the world's largest regional organisation by geographical area and population. 2. It is an international organisation with primarily European members that deals with security issues. 3. The roots of the SCO lie in the 'Shanghai Five', of which India was also a part. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to endorse the draft statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference because it lacked the reference to the Pahalgam terror assault on April 22, but did include the Jaffar Express kidnapping in Pakistan in March. — The SCO consists of ten countries: India, China, Russia, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Belarus. The SCO's origins may be traced back to the 'Shanghai Five' of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, which formed in 1996. Hence, statement 3 is not correct. — The collapse of the Soviet Union into 15 independent countries in 1991 raised fears in the region about the rise of radical religious groups and ethnic tensions. To address these challenges, a group was formed to coordinate security efforts. — The SCO was founded on June 15, 2001, in Shanghai. The organisation is the world's largest regional organisation in terms of geographic area and population. Hence, statement 1 is correct. — The SCO is one of the few international groups dealing with security matters that is primarily composed of Asian countries. The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) meets on a regular basis to exchange information. Hence, statement 2 is not correct. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. With reference to the Caroline test, consider the following statements: 1. It is a rule of customary international law that says states can use force only when absolutely necessary, to address an imminent, overwhelming threat. 2. It was first used when the Portuguese forces crossed into India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation — The Caroline test — a rule of customary international law that says states can use force only when absolutely necessary, to address an imminent, overwhelming threat — stems from 1837, when British forces crossed into the United States to destroy the American ship Caroline, to prevent rebels from attacking Canada. Hence, statement 1 is correct and statement 2 is not correct. — It is still illegal to employ military action to prevent a non-imminent future attack. Some experts believe Israel's present bombing campaign violates that rule. — 'There is simply no plausible way of arguing that Iran was about to attack Israel with a nuclear weapon, which it doesn't even have,' Marko Milanovic, a law professor at Reading University in England, wrote in a recent blog post. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow are the nuclear facilities in: (a) Russia (b) Israel (c) Iran (d) Ukraine Explanation — The United States and Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear sites are the first time that any country's operating nuclear facilities have been targeted for destruction. As a result, various worries have arisen in the aftermath of the assaults, including the possibility of radiation leaks. — While Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the world's nuclear watchdog, have reported no increases in radiation levels thus far, other concerns remain. These include concerns regarding the safety and location of nuclear material kept at the targeted facilities in Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. With reference to the places in news and the region associated, consider the following pairs: 1. Drohobych – Croatia 2. Cherkasy – Russia 3. Bryansk – Ukraine How many of the pairs given above are correctly marked? (a) Only one pair (b) Only two pairs (c) All three pairs (d) None of the pairs Explanation — Russia launched its most comprehensive aircraft bombardment on Ukraine overnight, undermining hopes for settlement in the nearly three-year-old conflict. — According to Ukraine's air force, Russia used 537 aerial weapons, including 477 drones, decoys, and 60 missiles. Of these, 249 were intercepted, and 226 were most certainly neutralised by electronic jammers. — 'This was the most massive airstrike on Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in February 2022,' stated Yuriy Ihnat, the Ukrainian air force's spokeswoman. The strikes hit several places, including the western city of Drohobych, which was far from the front lines and saw a drone strike start a fire at an industrial site and shut out power. — At least two civilians were killed—one in Kherson and the other in Kharkiv—and six were injured in Cherkasy, including a kid. Ukraine also claimed the loss of an F-16 warplane supplied by Western partners, which fell after being damaged while targeting enemy targets. The pilot has died. — Russia claims it downed three Ukrainian drones overnight. Seven Ukrainian drones were intercepted in western Russia's Bryansk area, with two persons reportedly injured in a separate strike, according to regional governor Alexander Bogomaz. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. The Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) is a United States military facility is near the border of: (a) Mexico (b) Canada (c) Cuba (d) Bahamas Explanation — The Department of Defence is expanding a militarised zone along the southern US border where troops are authorised to detain people who enter illegally for possible federal prosecution on charges of trespassing in a national defence area. — The Air Force declared the annexation of a sinuous 250-mile (400-kilometer) section of border in Texas, amid a surge of military forces following President Trump's declaration of a national emergency at the border. According to a defensive Department official, the Navy has also been told to build a new national defensive area along the border. — The newly declared national defence area on land and water along the Rio Grande comprises two Texas counties and includes the towns of Brownsville and McAllen. It will be treated as an extension of the Joint Base San Antonio. The Air Force stated that it is prepared to immediately erect warning signs prohibiting entry into the area. The military strategy was pioneered in April along a 170-mile (275-kilometre) stretch of the border in New Mexico and expanded to a swath of western Texas. Hunters, hikers and humanitarian aid groups fear that they will no longer have access. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 115) Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 116) Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 116) Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 116) Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 116) Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 115) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.