
Daily subject-wise quiz : International Relations MCQs on Drohobych, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, Caroline test and more (Week 116)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on International Relations to check your progress.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for June 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
With reference to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), consider the following statements:
1. The group is the world's largest regional organisation by geographical area and population.
2. It is an international organisation with primarily European members that deals with security issues.
3. The roots of the SCO lie in the 'Shanghai Five', of which India was also a part.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Explanation
— Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to endorse the draft statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) conference because it lacked the reference to the Pahalgam terror assault on April 22, but did include the Jaffar Express kidnapping in Pakistan in March.
— The SCO consists of ten countries: India, China, Russia, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Belarus. The SCO's origins may be traced back to the 'Shanghai Five' of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, which formed in 1996. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
— The collapse of the Soviet Union into 15 independent countries in 1991 raised fears in the region about the rise of radical religious groups and ethnic tensions. To address these challenges, a group was formed to coordinate security efforts.
— The SCO was founded on June 15, 2001, in Shanghai. The organisation is the world's largest regional organisation in terms of geographic area and population. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— The SCO is one of the few international groups dealing with security matters that is primarily composed of Asian countries. The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) meets on a regular basis to exchange information. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
With reference to the Caroline test, consider the following statements:
1. It is a rule of customary international law that says states can use force only when absolutely necessary, to address an imminent, overwhelming threat.
2. It was first used when the Portuguese forces crossed into India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— The Caroline test — a rule of customary international law that says states can use force only when absolutely necessary, to address an imminent, overwhelming threat — stems from 1837, when British forces crossed into the United States to destroy the American ship Caroline, to prevent rebels from attacking Canada. Hence, statement 1 is correct and statement 2 is not correct.
— It is still illegal to employ military action to prevent a non-imminent future attack. Some experts believe Israel's present bombing campaign violates that rule.
— 'There is simply no plausible way of arguing that Iran was about to attack Israel with a nuclear weapon, which it doesn't even have,' Marko Milanovic, a law professor at Reading University in England, wrote in a recent blog post.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow are the nuclear facilities in:
(a) Russia
(b) Israel
(c) Iran
(d) Ukraine
Explanation
— The United States and Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear sites are the first time that any country's operating nuclear facilities have been targeted for destruction. As a result, various worries have arisen in the aftermath of the assaults, including the possibility of radiation leaks.
— While Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the world's nuclear watchdog, have reported no increases in radiation levels thus far, other concerns remain. These include concerns regarding the safety and location of nuclear material kept at the targeted facilities in Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow.
Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer.
With reference to the places in news and the region associated, consider the following pairs:
1. Drohobych – Croatia
2. Cherkasy – Russia
3. Bryansk – Ukraine
How many of the pairs given above are correctly marked?
(a) Only one pair
(b) Only two pairs
(c) All three pairs
(d) None of the pairs
Explanation
— Russia launched its most comprehensive aircraft bombardment on Ukraine overnight, undermining hopes for settlement in the nearly three-year-old conflict.
— According to Ukraine's air force, Russia used 537 aerial weapons, including 477 drones, decoys, and 60 missiles. Of these, 249 were intercepted, and 226 were most certainly neutralised by electronic jammers.
— 'This was the most massive airstrike on Ukraine since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in February 2022,' stated Yuriy Ihnat, the Ukrainian air force's spokeswoman. The strikes hit several places, including the western city of Drohobych, which was far from the front lines and saw a drone strike start a fire at an industrial site and shut out power.
— At least two civilians were killed—one in Kherson and the other in Kharkiv—and six were injured in Cherkasy, including a kid. Ukraine also claimed the loss of an F-16 warplane supplied by Western partners, which fell after being damaged while targeting enemy targets. The pilot has died.
— Russia claims it downed three Ukrainian drones overnight. Seven Ukrainian drones were intercepted in western Russia's Bryansk area, with two persons reportedly injured in a separate strike, according to regional governor Alexander Bogomaz.
Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
The Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) is a United States military facility is near the border of:
(a) Mexico
(b) Canada
(c) Cuba
(d) Bahamas
Explanation
— The Department of Defence is expanding a militarised zone along the southern US border where troops are authorised to detain people who enter illegally for possible federal prosecution on charges of trespassing in a national defence area.
— The Air Force declared the annexation of a sinuous 250-mile (400-kilometer) section of border in Texas, amid a surge of military forces following President Trump's declaration of a national emergency at the border. According to a defensive Department official, the Navy has also been told to build a new national defensive area along the border.
— The newly declared national defence area on land and water along the Rio Grande comprises two Texas counties and includes the towns of Brownsville and McAllen. It will be treated as an extension of the Joint Base San Antonio. The Air Force stated that it is prepared to immediately erect warning signs prohibiting entry into the area.
The military strategy was pioneered in April along a 170-mile (275-kilometre) stretch of the border in New Mexico and expanded to a swath of western Texas. Hunters, hikers and humanitarian aid groups fear that they will no longer have access.
Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer.
Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 115)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 116)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 116)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 116)
Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 116)
Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 115)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
36 minutes ago
- India.com
How America Redrew The Middle East: Every Time It Intervened
New Delhi: The Middle East has seen the map of power redrawn time and again in the long shadow of the United States. Each turn of the Washington's wheel – whether in Iran, Lebanon, Iraq or Gaza – left behind a trail of upheaval. The reasons varied. Oil, ideology and rivalries. The results often followed a similar pattern. Regimes fell, alliances shifted and people suffered. Let's trace the most defining episodes where America's hand shaped the region and how each one ended up altering not just borders, but lives. 1953, Iran In the early 1950s, Iran's elected leader wanted control over the country's oil. British companies resisted. The United States stepped in, fearing a tilt toward the Soviet bloc. Its Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) backed street protests, media manipulation and palace intrigue. The elected government crumbled. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, returned to power. He ruled with American support for decades. The resentment brewed slowly. In 1979, it exploded into revolution. Tehran has never forgotten that coup. 1958, Lebanon Tension was rising in Lebanon. The Cold War had reached Arab soil. The president, leaning west, faced revolt at home. The United States invoked its new Eisenhower Doctrine and sent troops. Marines landed at Beirut airport. Their mission was to keep things calm, not to fight. It worked for the moment. But it left Lebanon's delicate sectarian balance shaken. The long-term fire had not been put out. Just postponed. 1973, Yom Kippur War On a holy day, Israeli soldiers were caught off guard. Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack. The United States responded with an airlift of weapons and supplies to Israel. The war turned. But the cost was global. Arab states punished the West with an oil embargo. Long fuel lines. Soaring prices. A warning shot for American dependency. And yet, the US-Israel military bond grew stronger than ever. 1991, The Gulf War Saddam Hussein crossed a line literally. His tanks rolled into Kuwait. The world responded with resolutions and warplanes. America led a coalition of dozens. The campaign was swift. The footage, cinematic. Desert Storm was hailed as a success. But it left Iraq isolated, sanctioned and smoldering. A decade of internal repression followed. Children died of hunger and medicine shortages. Saddam stayed in power, but Iraq's spirit dimmed. 2003, Iraq Again A file. A fear. A flawed case. Washington claimed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. None were found. Still, the invasion went ahead. Baghdad fell. Saddam vanished and then was captured. The regime collapsed. But what came next was chaos. Armed groups clashed. Militias rose. The Islamic State grew from the wreckage. Democracy was promised. Instead, instability took hold. Millions displaced. Hundreds of thousands dead. The scars remain. Across Decades, a Pattern Intervention did not always mean invasion. Sometimes it came in secret. Sometimes with soldiers. Sometimes through sanctions or airstrikes. But rarely did it end as planned. Regimes were toppled. But peace rarely followed. Trust evaporated. Generations grew up under rubble and barbed wire. Each time, Washington claimed to act for freedom, stability or self-defense. Each time, the ground beneath shifted. Sometimes for a week. Sometimes forever. What lingers is the memory. In the cities where bombs fell. In the markets where sanctions bit. In the homes where sons never returned.


India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
CPI(M) MP Sandosh Kumar urges RSS to uphold secularism, socialism in Constitution
New Delhi [India], June 29 (ANI): CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP Sandosh Kumar on Sunday wrote a letter to RSS Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat, urging him to recognise the critical role of secularism and socialism as foundational values of the Indian Constitution after RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's call for reconsideration of the words 'secularism' and 'socialism' from the Preamble of the Constitution. In his letter, Kumar criticised recent statements made by the senior RSS functionary, questioning these principles and arguing that they are essential to India's pluralistic and just society. He also urged the RSS to formally accept the Constitution and cease actions that undermine its spirit. 'These principles are not arbitrary insertions but foundational ideals that emerged from the lived experiences of India's oppressed and the visionary imagination of leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, and many others who sought to create a just, pluralistic Republic. In a diverse country like ours, secularism ensures unity in diversity, while socialism promises justice and dignity to each of our citizens. To ridicule or reject these values is to negate the promise made to the people of India at the moment of our nation's liberation from colonial rule,' Kumar wrote. The letter also criticises RSS's historical stance in contrast to CPI(M)'s progressive policies and its active role during the anti-colonial movement. 'While revolutionaries, peasants, workers, students, and patriotic forces, many of them from my party, the Communist Party of India, faced the British with courage and sacrifice, the RSS watched from the sidelines. We played an active role in the anti-colonial movement, participated in mass upsurges, and later, wholeheartedly supported the framing of our Constitution. We upheld the tricolour with pride, stood for land reforms, supported the abolition of privy purses, defended the public sector, fought for bank nationalisation, and worked to institutionalise social justice and labour rights. The RSS, in contrast, mocked these struggles, opposed the national flag, and undermined every progressive policy meant to democratise Indian society,' he stated. The CPI(M) leader further questioned the RSS's commitment to the Constitution, referencing MS Golwalkar, the second Sarsanghchalak of the RSS, whose writings according to Sandosh allegedly viewed democracy and equality as alien to Indian culture and admired Nazi Germany. 'In this light, I wish to ask you plainly: does the RSS truly accept the Indian Constitution and its fundamental values? Or does it draw inspiration from the writings of M.S. Golwalkar, who referred to democracy and equality as alien to Indian culture and held Nazi Germany as a model? Why has the RSS never formally passed a resolution accepting the Constitution as it stands? Why do its members repeatedly undermine the Constitution, provoke communal sentiments, and promote historical distortions? India needs answers--not obfuscations,' Kumar demanded, calling for clarity and accountability. Kumar urged Bhagwat to counsel RSS cadres to uphold the Constitution, warning against the dangers of division. 'It is time the RSS stop inflaming these debates for the sake of polarisation. Our people, Dalits, Muslims, Christians, Adivasis, backward castes, women, and the poor all deserve peace, dignity, and progress, not hatred and fear. I urge you to counsel your cadres to uphold the Constitution in letter and spirit. Let us all learn from history, including the history of Guru Golwalkar's favourite Nazi Germany: those who divide societies may win temporary power, but they leave behind enduring wreckage,' he concluded. Earlier, RSS general secretary Hosabale suggested reconsidering the inclusion of the terms 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. Hosabale was addressing an event on the 50th anniversary of the emergency, held at the Dr Ambedkar International Centre, jointly organised by the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (under the Ministry of Culture) and the Ambedkar International Centre. Speaking at the event, he emphasised that the emergency wasn't just a misuse of power but an attempt to crush civil liberties. Millions were imprisoned, and freedom of the press was suppressed. He remarked that during the emergency, terms like 'socialist' and 'secular' were forcibly inserted into the Constitution -- a move that needs to be reconsidered. (ANI)


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Getting along well': Donald Trump on trade ties with China
United States President Donald Trump signaled that things are going 'well' in China while talking about trade ties with the Asian country. Donald Trump's remarks come after the White House indicated positive developments in trade relations with China last week.(File/AFP) While talking about the trade deficit and ties with China, Trump said, "We're getting along well with China." He made the remarks while appearing on 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' show. 'I think getting along with China is a very good thing, but they are paying substantial tariffs," Trump added. Trump's remarks come after the White House indicated positive developments in trade relations with China last week. According to an official, both countries have come to a mutual understanding on key matters including such as speeding up the export of rare earth materials to the US, reported AFP. The US and China also agreed to temporarily ease the high retaliatory tariffs they had imposed on each other after negotiations in Geneva in May. Trump also bashed former US President Joe Biden and his administration for having a big trade deficit with China. '...We have a big trade deficit with China. Biden let it get up to a trillion dollars, think of it, a trillion dollars deficit with one country. He let them just take over the coals, we're not gonna do that. But we're doing a rare-earths deal but remember, we have all of the airplane parts, they can't fly their airplanes without us. So we had some cards also,' Trump said. 'We have a deal with China, it's a good deal hopefully for everybody. We had a deal with China where it was 145% tariffs, and I will tell you, everything stopped in China. I saw that. Everything stopped, and we did China a favour,' he added. Trump on TikTok deal President Donald Trump has disclosed that 'a group of very wealthy people' will soon purchase TikTok. He said that his government has found a buyer for TikTok, but he did not identify the firm, saying he will reveal so in 'about two weeks.' 'We have a buyer for TikTok… I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it… It's a group of very wealthy people,' he said.