logo
‘Whenever we could': Couple that moved to Australia in 2006 now own over 18 homes

‘Whenever we could': Couple that moved to Australia in 2006 now own over 18 homes

News.com.au2 days ago
A strategic couple have revealed how they own 18 properties after only moving to Australia in 2006.
Rasti Vaibhav, 48, and his wife Rupali Rastogi, 43, moved to Australia from India with 'pretty much nothing' apart from permanent residency and a drive to build their lives together.
When they arrived they stayed at Mr Vaibhav's cousin's home until they eventually secured a rental in Sydney's inner west.
The pair secured solid jobs in IT and banking, earning a combined income of around $190,000 a year. However, they were both stunned by the high cost of living in Australia.
'The first few years we were just getting our footing in this country and it is so expensive here,' Mr Vaibhav told news.com.au.
'Your salary looks big on paper but, once you pay tax, what you have in your hand is pretty much nothing.'
According to Mr Vaibhav, the couple always planned to buy property in Australia and build a secure home, but, shortly after arriving they realised it would be an uphill battle.
Even as a dual-income couple with no dependants, it didn't take long for them to accept they couldn't afford a home Sydney.
'It took us no time to figure out that if we bought our own home to live in we would have to wait a lot longer because our savings rate wasn't much and the prices of properties were going up and up,' he said.
'The community we lived in was expensive.'
Mr Vaibhav has a background in data analysis, architecture and banking, and the couple spent a considerable amount of time determining where to invest in property if they couldn't afford to buy where they were living at the time.
'When it became clear we couldn't afford our own home, we worked out how much we could afford and let that decide where we should buy,' he said.
In the beginning, the couple were apprehensive about having to change their home buying plans, but there was simply no way their rate of saving was going to outpace a booming property market.
In 2011, they bought a block of land in Newcastle, NSW, for $180,000 with a tidy 10 per cent deposit.
On that block of land, they built a four-bedroom home and rented it out for $575 a week.
It was positively geared 'from day one', boosting their income practically overnight.
'It raised our income by $30,000 and that allowed us to go back to the bank and increase our borrowing power more and more,' Mr Vaibhav said.
The savvy pair have rinsed and repeated that cycle ever since. They analyse data in areas with high growth, purchase homes and then rent out the properties.
'It isn't about buying any property, it is about buying the right property, in the right area, at the right price,' he said.
'Banks lend money based on income and it isn't just about value of the property but the rent you're expecting from the property.'
They now have 18 properties across four states, two of which feature granny flats, resulting in a total of 20 tenants.
Their portfolio, as a whole, is positively geared but the amount they owe in mortgages is pretty staggering, at the moment it is sitting at over $5 million.
The more they've built up their property empire, the more they've been able to take measured risks.
For instance, buying a property and having it negatively geared, but that cost can then be covered by a positively geared property.
Mr Vaibhav and his wife's property portfolio is conservatively valued at around $11.3 million and they're making $122,000 a year in pure income.
The landlord emphasised that none of this was a mere happy accident; they had worked diligently to understand the market.
'We did a lot of digging and looked at data,' he explained.
They're also not constantly offloading properties to cash-up, but rather see it as a long-term plan.
'People make the mistake of selling the property to get the profit out of it, but the challenge is there are lots of transaction costs,' he said, adding that he and his wife 'buy for the long term'.
Mr Vaibhav said their strategy as always been to buy 'whenever we could' and they have always leveraged their current properties to buy more.
The couple have also been careful to minimise risk by always having a financial nest egg.
'We've always followed the rule - and the number keeps changing as the portfolio has grown - but you should have (enough cash to cover) six months' worth of mortgage repayments,' he said.
The couple are now living in the Northern Beaches, renting a $4 million mansion and living the good life.
'We're living the dream in the suburb we like to live in while our money is working really hard for us,' he said.
Mr Vaibhav argued that, if he bought a $4 million property, he'd be spending over $200,000 a year on interest alone.
He would rather invest his money in more affordable properties and keep buying multiple homes, than let it get chewed up in interest.
Mr Vaibhav is very proud of what he and his wife have managed to achieve and said the biggest lesson they've learned is to think outside of your own suburb.
He argued that the most common 'mistake' people make is trying to buy where they live, rather than where they can afford.
'Rentvesting is a powerful strategy that allows you to live the lifestyle you desire, while building long-term wealth through property investment,' he said.
'By renting where you want to live and investing where the financial opportunities are strongest, you can achieve both your dream lifestyle and financial security.
'It also opens the door to buying your dream home later, paying it off, and building the retirement funds you need.'
The couple now run Get RARE properties an independent buyer's agency where they work to help other Aussies build their own property empires.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSW Premier Chris Minns warns trains a ‘massive' election issue after brutal report
NSW Premier Chris Minns warns trains a ‘massive' election issue after brutal report

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

NSW Premier Chris Minns warns trains a ‘massive' election issue after brutal report

NSW Premier Chris Minns has given a frank assessment of Sydney's train network, warning if they don't turn things around 'then voters will send a message' next election. Transport for NSW data released on Thursday revealed the bleak reality for commuters, with 16 per cent of city trains not running on time in the 2024-25 financial year. The result is the worst for Sydney's rail network in years and comes after months on instability wrought by protracted industrial action and major technical failures. Mr Minns on Thursday refused to blame industrial action as being the sole cause of the network's issues, admitting it was a 'huge challenge for the government'. 'If we don't rapidly improve performance on our railways in the coming months, then voters will send a message to us loud and clear at the next election,' he said. 'This is a massive issue for us. I'm not running away from it … I'm not putting it down to industrial disputes. 'The pressure and the responsibility is on us, the government, to increase reliability and on-time running in the public transport network. 'I can assure you, we're putting resources into it as we speak.' Mr Minns admitted solving the state's longstanding pay dispute with the Combined Rail Unions had been the government's 'focus'. With a deal reached, Mr Minns said the 'full resources' of senior leadership of Sydney Trains and TfNSW, and the Premier's office, would be on 'punctuality'. 'We're a big international city, (and) the only way big international cities work and people can get to work and from work is using public transport,' he said. 'There is no alternative, and we need to make sure that it's world class'. Mr Minns said the state government had invested $740m into backlog maintenance on the rail network. At the same time, TfNSW secretary Josh Murray announced in an email to staff on Wednesday plans to slash 950 senior positions at the transport authority. It comes after earlier jobs were cut as part of an election pledge by Mr Minns to slash senior echelons of the public service by 15 per cent. Public Service Association general secretary Stewart Little said the union was seeking details on the specific positions to be cut. Asked whether he could assure commuters the cuts would not affect the performance of the network, Mr Minns said: 'Yes, I can. 'I've looked and scrutinised these numbers very closely, and I'm not flippant about this. 'I realise that these are jobs, they're families, they're people's lives and … it's a difficult decision for the government to make. 'The simple truth, however, was that Transport for NSW grew by 48 per cent over four years – a massive, massive increase in the headcount of that department. 'We need more on-the-ground, frontline public servants doing the difficult but necessary job of providing that service, and that's where our focus is going.' Addressing the data later on Thursday, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said it 'came as no surprise' to commuters. 'This is not just a set of statistics. This is a set of failure by the Minns Labour government,' he said. 'We have the worst on-time performance on the city network since data started to be collected in 2019. 'One in six Sydney trains last year were late, and around one in three regional trains were late. 'This is a government that has failed to handle Sydney Trains. The Premier provides an apology but no plans to fix the trains. There's no timeline to get things fixed.' Mr Speakman called on the government to explain which jobs would be cut and how that would impact the network. When asked what he would 'do differently', Mr Speakman said he had 'a plan to get the trains running on time'. 'We have a program with clear timelines and a clear set of performance criteria to get, pardon the pun, the trains running back on track. 'What we'd be doing is having a clear plan with clear performance criteria, so you could mark whether you're making satisfactory progress.' Opposition transport spokeswoman Natalie Ward floated removing Mr Murray as Transport secretary. The Rail, Tram, and Bus Union led the Combined Rail Unions through months of industrial action. Earlier this month, they voted to approve a deal with the state government. While the details of the pay agreement are not known, the opposition has accused Labor of providing the union with 'perks'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store