Combating climate chaos: call to action
His message basically highlights the fact that climate change is no longer a distant threat; it is already upon us and accelerating. From record-breaking heatwaves in Europe and North America to cycles of deadly floods and droughts in South Asia and Africa, climate-related disasters are exacting a rising toll on human lives, economies, and ecological systems.
A key issue on the agenda in Seville was the urgent need to reform the international financial system to help poorer nations free themselves from mounting debt burdens that inhibit their respective capacity to achieve progress in healthcare, education and climate resilience.
As per UN data, the total external debt of the least developed countries has more than tripled over the past 15 years. Many nations in the Global South, like Pakistan, have too small a carbon footprint, yet are most vulnerable to climate disasters brought on by global warming. Already facing the brunt of floods and droughts, they are forced to divert scarce resources away from economic development to debt servicing.
The result is perpetuation of underdevelopment, vulnerability, and inequality. No surprise, then, that there is growing criticism from the Global South of the US-dominated global financial system, created in the aftermath of World War II, which they argue no longer reflects realities of today's interconnected world.
Greater representation and equity are urgently needed. The UN chief has also highlighted a glaring imbalance: while some nations continue to subsidise fossil fuels, others are left struggling to fund clean energy transitions or recover from climate catastrophes. This is not only unfair; this is dangerously short-sighted. Since we are all in this together the response must reflect that reality.
The industrialised wealthiest nations, responsible for the vast majority of historical greenhouse gas emissions, owe a climate debt to developing nations. The Seville conference offers a vital opportunity to reset the climate and development agenda. For far too long, the international financial architecture has served the interests of the rich and powerful nations.
What is needed now is major reform of the international finance system, with a focus on increasing access to concessional finance, restructuring unsustainable debt, and introduction of innovative instruments such as climate-resilient debt clauses and green bonds.
No less important, institutions like the IMF and the World Bank need to evolve from crisis lenders to proactive enables of sustainable development. The time for decisive, collective action is now. The longer the transition is delayed, the more costly and painful it will become.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Greater Israel agenda threat to stability of Pakistan: JI
KARACHI: Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Pakistan Deputy Chief Dr Osama Razi has warned that the "Greater Israel" agenda is a major threat to the stability of Pakistan and the wider Muslim world. He made the remarks while addressing a day-long party convention in Karachi's Gadap area on Monday evening, as part of a series of similar events held across the city. Dr Osama Razi pointed to US-backed Israeli aggression against Iran and India's hostility towards Pakistan as examples of this broader agenda. He said both military campaigns failed in their objectives by the grace of Allah Almighty, but emphasized that the underlying threat remains. He noted that regional geopolitics is now closely tied to domestic affairs, urging Islamic movements to remain alert and develop strategic responses in line with this reality. He also called on JI workers to strengthen their spiritual connection with Allah, calling it the only sustainable path in these challenging times. Dr Razi warned that a concerted effort was underway to destabilize Balochistan, comparing it to the events that led to the fall of East Pakistan. He also condemned Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza and criticized the lack of freedom to protest in Pakistan. 'Protests against Israeli genocide can be held in the British parliament and outside the Prime Minister's residence in London, but such voices are silenced in Islamabad—even within our own parliament,' he said. He reminded participants that Pakistan's Constitution clearly states that sovereignty belongs to Allah Almighty, and urged citizens to play their role in defending constitutional and Islamic values. JI Deputy Chief Dr Attaur Rehman, speaking at the same convention, described the Quran as a revolutionary guide against social injustice. He called for spiritual purification and reflection on Quranic teachings, saying that true peace would only come through an Islamic caliphate. JI Deputy Secretary General Muhammad Usman Farooq highlighted Karachi's worsening civic problems, including water shortages, power outages, broken infrastructure, and the burden of inflation and over-taxation. He urged citizens to raise their voices and support JI's rights movement. Other speakers included Dr Wasay Shakir, Taufiquddin Siddiqui, and Dr Merajul Huda Siddiqui, who emphasized Islamic unity, civil rights, and public empowerment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Taliban regime recognition
History is subject to strange twists and turns. One such is the decision by Russia to recognise the Afghan Taliban regime, the first and only country so far to do so. One hardly needs reminding of Russian sensitivity on the issue, given that the Afghan Taliban emerged from the womb of the Mujahideen who fought the Soviet occupation with the help of Pakistan and the US-led west for a decade, following which Russia (then the Soviet Union) finally decided to call it a day and withdrew in 1989 after Gorbachev assumed the leadership in Moscow. Arguably, that defeat, or rather being fought to a stalemate, fed into the troubled waters afflicting the Soviet Union and its ultimate collapse. The intriguing question is, why has Russia, given this painful past, 'jumped the gun' in this regard before China, India or even Pakistan?** For one, Russia is seeking to expand its diplomatic footprint globally, including south west Asia, in order to reverse the isolation into which the US-led west has been trying to push it since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war. Its decision to formally exchange ambassadors therefore smacks of realpolitik, strategic opportunism, and positioning itself to engage in economic cooperation with the region in the fields of energy, transport and infrastructure. For Pakistan, troubled as it is by the conscious or tacit hosting of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other hostile groups on Afghan soil, Russian lack of leverage over the Afghan Taliban in this regard offers little hope of the betterment of the fraught situation on the Afghan-Pakistan border. Although recent diplomatic moves aided by China, including a visit to Kabul by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, show signs of improving diplomatic relations between the two neighbouring countries, this is still some way from Kabul halting completely the attacks on Pakistan by the TTP, Hafiz Gul Bahadar Group and other fundamentalist groups based on Afghan soil. Russia's diplomatic initiative may well persuade other countries to follow suit. Moscow has recognised the Taliban regime as an acceptance of its de facto control of the country, with little or no resistance left to its stranglehold. Of the countries interested in recognition, China stands out most. Beijing's interest in rare earth and other minerals in Afghanistan is by now a matter of record. China also seeks to blunt the presence and activities of religious extremist and fundamentalist groups such as Islamic State and al Qaeda based in Afghanistan lest this affliction spills over to its restless Xinjiang region, where an Islamic resistance movement has been controlled after much effort stretching over many years. If the Afghan Taliban were to accept good advice, or be willing to learn from the past, they need look no further than Pakistan's experience of supporting proxies in the long war for control of Afghanistan. Not only did Islamabad's Afghan proxies nurture and give birth to the Pakistani Taliban, by now even the so-called 'good' Taliban (TTP, etc) have long since turned against it. If Kabul hopes to use the TTP and similar groups to change Pakistan into a mirror of what it has implemented in its own territory, it should heed the well-meaning warning about proxies being double-edged swords, as Pakistan can ruefully testify from its own experience. Pakistan has clearly stated after the Russian recognition announcement that it is in no hurry to extend recognition, pending the hoped for improvement in the behaviour of the Afghan Taliban regime in scotching the cross-border attacks of the TTP, etc. If that is the case, that recognition by Islamabad may be some way down the road because Kabul's ostensible moves to prevent cross-border attacks by the TTP and others seem more window dressing than consistent, serious policy. As to the Afghan people themselves, precious little except hope for economic and other betterment in a country afflicted with want and hunger, in the wake of Moscow's decision can be heard from those interviewed in Afghanistan in this regard. On the other hand, not surprisingly, Afghan women hold little hope of any betterment under the patriarchal, male chauvinist order the Taliban have once again imposed. In short, those hopeful of better days and those gloomy at the prospects for the future amongst the Afghan people in the aftermath of Russian recognition can only be pitied and prayed for. Afghanistan not only shows no signs of ending the dark night it has been enveloped in after the (second) Taliban takeover, Kabul is being rewarded with recognition (actual and potential) by countries whose own interests (as usual, no great surprise there) override any other principle. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Rendering FO unaffordable for many
EDITORIAL: The Pakistan government's energy and taxation policies are proving to be a slow poison for many traditional industries. Their numbers are steadily declining, yet the government continues adding fuel to the fire. The latest example is the imposition of a petroleum levy (PL) and a climate support levy (CSL) on furnace oil (FO) totalling Rs 82,000 per ton, which accounts for over 60 percent of its cost. The outcome is predictable — domestic demand for FO is nearly dead. It is, however, important to note that Pakistan's energy woes are not new. During the severe load-shedding days, particularly in the 2010s, industrial survival depended on captive power generation, with some industries relying on gas and others on FO. Subsequently, the government installed excess capacity at higher costs and is now forcing industries to consume electricity at expensive rates. Initially, gas prices increased to unaffordable levels — even exceeding the cost of imported RLNG. The objective was to shift industries from gas to the national grid. However, the new levies on FO are so high that even the most efficient combined-cycle plants find them unaffordable. Many industries with tri-generation facilities quickly moved to FO, which was abundant, as refineries were seeking buyers. Now, with the levies imposed at prohibitive rates, industries must switch again. The brief period of cheap electricity has also ended. Life is becoming increasingly difficult, especially for companies without sufficient grid access or those requiring chillers to cool machines running on electricity. Industrial players are forced to incur additional costs while awaiting imports and infrastructure installation. 'They are killing industries,' lamented, for example, one textile player from southern Punjab. The levies on FO also impact local oil refineries, as they now face a shortage of buyers for the FO they must produce. Exporting FO remains the only option, but it is challenging. Some refineries may be forced to reduce petrol and diesel production, increasing the import of refined petroleum products. This issue is equally problematic for Sui gas marketing companies. High rates have eliminated industrial demand, yet the government remains committed to purchasing 9-10 cargoes of RLNG per month from Qatar. Limited usage and lack of storage mean domestic gas and oil production must be curtailed to accommodate imported gas. The question is: Who benefits from this situation? Industries are suffering, while refineries and Sui marketing companies face existential threat. Ironically, many companies are choosing alternate energy sources rather than shifting entirely to the national grid. When ministers are confronted, they shift responsibility to the IMF (International Monetary Fund). Regarding gas prices, the conditions were included at the government's request. For FO, the levies are linked to IMF funding related to climate commitments. The result is disastrous for energy-intensive industries, rendering them increasingly uncompetitive. Simultaneously, the government's national tariff policy is removing import duty protection that many industries previously enjoyed, revealing a lack of coherent policy. The government also appears unwilling or unable to negotiate effectively with the IMF, reflecting perhaps an underlying indifference toward the manufacturing sector. Unless this situation is remedied the share of industries would continue to shrink. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
