Two injured after car crashes into Piccadilly Circus roundabout
'We sent a number of resources, including ambulance crews, a paramedic in a fast response car, an incident response officer and members of our hazardous area response team (HART). We also dispatched a trauma team in a car from London's Air Ambulance.
'Our first paramedic arrived on scene in less than four minutes.
'We treated two people. We took one patient to a major trauma centre and the other patient to a local hospital.'
'Worried about the driver'
Shamin Mollah, 41, who works at a City Sightseeing London booth overlooking the crash said: 'When I came to work at 9am it was very quiet. Only the police were here and they'd already set up the barricade.
'This area is busy 24/7. It would have been very dangerous. It's very sad.'
Rimi Caur, 29, a souvenir seller at a booth close to the crash site said: 'What can we do? We can't open our other shop on the other side [of Piccadilly Circus]. It's bad for business.
'We had one other crash last year [at Piccadilly Circus] but nothing else like this.
'Of course we are worried about the driver.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action
The home secretary is coming under increasing pressure to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action, as UN experts and hundreds of lawyers warned that proscribing the group would conflate protest and terrorism. In two separate letters to Yvette Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers said that proscribing the group would set a dangerous precedent. Additionally, several UN special rapporteurs, including those for protecting human rights while countering terrorism and for promoting freedom of expression, said they had contacted the UK government to say that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. On Tuesday two people were arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. Avon and Somerset police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. The Netpol lawyers' group letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, was signed by 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, including 11 KCs and 11 law professors. 'Proscription of a direct-action protest group is an unprecedented and extremely regressive step for civil liberties,' they write. 'The conflation of protest and terrorism is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. Our government has stated that it is committed to respecting the rule of law: this must include the right to protest. 'To use the Terrorism Act to ban Palestine Action from direct action would be an abuse of this legislation and an interference with the right to protest. Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Signatories of the Haldane Society letter, which will be handed to Cooper before MPs vote on Wednesday, include Michael Mansfield KC and Imran Khan KC – who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence and victims of the Grenfell Tower fire – and the Labour peer John Hendy KC. It has been signed by thousands of people including the politicians Caroline Lucas, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, the actors Adeel Akhtar and Juliet Stevenson, teachers and vicars. The letter says: 'It [a ban] would leave many ordinary members of the public vulnerable – for example, simply wearing a T-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action' would be seen as violating the proscription and action would need to be taken. 'There are many dangers to proscribing peaceful direct action groups, even if their objectives are those some of us may disagree with. Current and future governments may misuse this precedent to attack other interest groups in future, offering no avenues for peacefully venting dissent.' The prime minister, Keir Starmer, was a member of the Haldane Society but left when he became director of public prosecutions in 2008. The UN experts said: 'Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism … Protest actions that are not genuinely 'terrorist', but which involve alleged property damage, should be properly investigated as ordinary crimes or other security offences.' The Home Office referred the Guardian to Cooper's statement last week announcing the proposed ban, and comments in a press release issued on Monday in which she said that Palestine Action's acts 'do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000'.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Schoolboy, 15, stabbed Harvey Willgoose with a five-inch hunting knife before declaring 'I'm not right in the head', court hears
A 15-year-old schoolboy fatally stabbed a fellow pupil with a five-inch hunting knife before telling a teacher 'I'm not right in the head', a court has heard. Harvey Willgoose, also 15, collapsed less than a minute after he was knifed in the heart at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on February 3. Shocking CCTV footage of the attack was played to a jury as the teenager accused of murdering Harvey went on trial at Sheffield Crown Court today. Harvey's relatives wept and covered their eyes as the video showed the boys squaring up, before the defendant produced a knife and lunged at him twice. The Sheffield United fan could be seen running away before collapsing nearby while the defendant waved the knife in the air. The teenager, who cannot be named, is expected to argue his actions were a loss of control following a long period of bullying, poor treatment and violence. He has admitted Harvey's manslaughter, but denies murder. He has also admitted possession of a bladed article. Richard Thyne KC, opening the case for the prosecution today, said the stab wound that killed Harvey 'was inflicted with such force that the knife cut the bone of one of his ribs'. He added: 'It was just five minutes into the school lunch break when Harvey Willgoose was stabbed to death. It was quarter past twelve in the afternoon on Monday, February 3 this year. 'Harvey was standing in the courtyard at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield, when a knife was thrust into his chest, penetrating his heart. In less than a minute he had collapsed on to the ground, where he lost consciousness and died. He was 15 years old.' After being stabbed and retreating, Harvey was seen attempting to run at the defendant, but again backed away when the pupil moved forward with the knife for a second time. Teachers rushed to the scene and told him to hand over the weapon. One heard him say 'you know I can't control it', which he took to be a reference to his anger issues given the pupil's history of violent behaviour at school. The defendant then handed the knife over and told a teacher: 'I'm not right in the head. My mum doesn't look after me right. I've stabbed him.' It was claimed he had brought the knife to school 'for protection' because he was 'followed over the weekend' and scared of being 'jumped outside school', the prosecutor said. But Mr Thyne revealed the defendant's phone had photos of him posing with weapons and his internet search history included terms such as 'zombie killer knife', 'dagger, pocket knife', and 'machete'. He also told the jurors how, in December 2024, the boy's mother contacted the school about finding what she described as a sword in his bag, which turned out to be an axe. Police then visited his home and gave him advice about the dangers of carrying weapons. Harvey and the accused were said to have become embroiled in a dispute on the weekend before the attack, relating to a row between pupils including the defendant on January 29. On that occasion, he insisted he saw another boy in possession of a knife and the school was put into lockdown. The police were called but no blade was found. The defendant was said to be 'scared of going to school' because of the lockdown. Harvey had not regularly attended school at the time – showing up for only 20 days since the start of term. On the morning of the fatal attack, they exchanged Snapchat messages in which Harvey asked if there was 'beef' between them. The defendant replied at 7.51am: 'Nah but if u (want) beef we can hav it.' Assistant headteacher Morgan Davis that morning spoke to the defendant about the confrontation the previous week and 'specifically asked' if he had brought a weapon to school. He said he had not. CCTV footage was then played to the court of the boys passing each other outside Mr Davis's room, which the prosecutor said showed the defendant 'physically pushing' Harvey, who kept his hands behind his back. The boys were later in the same science lesson and squared up to each other, with teacher Sophie Heath-Whyte recalling them saying: 'Come on, let's take this outside.' When Harvey left the classroom, he was heard by another teacher saying 'something was about to happen'. At 12.10pm, he was stabbed. Moments earlier the accused told another pupil he was 'mad' at Harvey, before mentioning he had a knife. Harvey was declared dead from his injuries at 1.24pm. Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, for the defence, said: '[The defendant] accepts what he did that day. 'That is why he's pleaded guilty to manslaughter. [He] did not set out to kill or seriously hurt anyone. 'The defence say [his] actions that day were the end result of a long period of bullying, poor treatment and violence – things that built one upon another until he lost control and did tragically what we've all seen.'
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Father of boy, 3, mauled to death by 50kg dog knew the lad could get into the pen where he was killed, manslaughter trial hears
The parents of a three-year-old who died in a savage dog attack at a farm knew he was capable of entering the pen where he was mauled, a jury has heard. Daniel Twigg suffered horrific injuries in the 'furious and prolonged' attack at Carr Farm, Rochdale, on May 15, 2022. His parents Mark Twigg, 43, and Joanne Bedford, 37, are on trial at Manchester Crown Court accused of Daniel's manslaughter. The prosecution allege their negligence meant the toddler was 'alone and unsupervised' when he entered a yard where two large, 'dangerous' and 'powerful' 50kg guard dogs were kept. Although the dogs - a Cane Corsa called Sid and Tiny a Boerboel type dog - belonged to farm owner Matthew Brown it's alleged the couple were looking after the them at the time and should have known the risks to Daniel. But they had ignored warnings from the RSPCA that the animals were a danger, it's claimed. The jury have heard that gates to the dog pen were secured only with a Karabiner clip, rather than a padlock, which could be pressed open John Elvidge KC, prosecuting, said Daniel was 'attracted' and 'confident' around dogs kept at the farm but - due to his age - was incapable of understanding the risk they presented. Daniel's parents Mark Twigg, 43, (left) and Joanne Bedford, 37, (right) pictured arriving for a previous court hearing, both deny charges of gross negligence manslaughter and being in charge of a dog that was dangerously out of control 'He had also demonstrated his curiosity and, the prosecution say, his ability to work the small Karabiner clip, which only had to be pressed open. 'His parents were on clear notice of the risk that if unsupervised he could enter the pen occupied by Sid and Tiny.' Mr Elvidge said there had also been previous incidents at the farm when Daniel's older brother was bitten by dogs. In the aftermath of the tragedy, the couple had provided various accounts of what happened, although Twigg had was not there at the time as he was working. After receiving the news that Daniel could not be resuscitated at hospital, he allegedly told a police officer: 'I don't even know what's happened…I know he's a little shit and he opens stuff himself.' And Bedford later told a detective and a hospital paediatrician that Daniel 'must have walked and unlocked the gate' by unclipping it and 'had previously done this and been told off for it'. In a police interviews months later, the jury heard, Bedford then claimed the couple didn't know Daniel was capable of opening the gate on his own and had 'never' done so. The jury also heard how Bedford had given conflicting accounts of how long Daniel had been out of her sight and whether she was aware he'd left the farmhouse, with the prosecution claiming he was left unsupervised in the pen 'for at least 20 minutes'. CCTV from a neighbours' property played in court showed the youngster moving around inside for a few moments before disappearing from view. At the same time, a dog in an adjacent pen becomes agitated which, the prosecution say, coincided with the attack on Daniel, who suffered catastrophic injuries, principally to his head and neck. The jury heard how Bedford, who dialled 999, had been 'hysterical' and crying after the attack and told police who arrived at the scene: 'Kill that dog'. She had attempted to give Daniel, who was found seriously injured by his older sister, chest compressions on a stone bench in the rear yard. Although it's not known whether both dogs were involved in the attack, the jury previously heard, Sid was 'likely' responsible. He was shot dead at the scene and a post mortem examination showed that he had not eaten for 12/24 hours. Tiny, meanwhile, had been described as 'dangerous' and 'ticking time bomb' by a neighbour. Mr Elvidge said Daniel's parents had breached the duty of care towards him, which they dispute, and had negligently allowed him to enter dog pen and that was a 'significant contribution' to his death. Addressing the jury, Andrew Thomas KC, defending Twigg, said they needed to sure there was a 'serious and obvious risk' to Daniel. He added that Sid and Tiny did not belong to his parents, that Daniel would have had to 'reach through' the gate to unclip it, and Twigg wasn't even home at the time of the attack. Twigg and Bedford, of Radcliffe, Bury, both deny charges of gross negligence manslaughter and being in charge of a dog that caused injury while dangerously out of control. The trial, due to last three weeks, continues.
