Strategic defence review live: Starmer pledges to make UK ‘battle-ready' amid row over forces spending
The prime minister outlined new defence measures — including extra attack submarines, £15 billion on nuclear warheads and thousands of new long-range weapons — to put Britain on war footing, after the government's long-awaited strategic defence review concluded that the nation should be ready for war in Europe or the Atlantic.
Speaking in Glasgow, Sir Keir said: 'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly, to show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength.'
He pledged to make the UK 'a battle-ready, armour-clad nation', insisting that 'every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play'.
But questions remained about his plans to increase defence spending to the recommended level.
The government will increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product from April 2027 with an 'ambition' – but no firm commitment – to increase it to 3% during the next parliament.
Growing anger among MPs over lack of briefing
The Independent's Political Editor David Maddox reports:
Just two hours before the strategic defence review is set to be presented to parliament many MPs are complaining that they have still not seen a copy.
While lock in briefings were available for journalists most MPs, including opposition shadow defence ministers, are still in the dark, The Independent has been told.
As previously reported Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has been described as "fuming" over leaks to Sunday newspapers.
It means the government's big moment has been delayed by not one but two urgent questions.
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 15:04
'Starmer on a warpath': Green Party
The Green Party has criticised Starmer's new defence plans, arguing that the government should strive to 'look at the deeper causes of insecurity' around the world.
'Keir Starmer is sounding like he is on a war path with his "battle-ready, armour-clad nation" rhetoric,' Ellie Chowns MP, who holds the defence brief for the Parliamentary Green Party, said.
'Security is not just based on arms expenditure and threats, but on real leadership that uses diplomacy and development too. There must be a real commitment to an international order based on human rights, equality and genuine cooperation.
'To avoid the horrors of war and armed conflict, we need to look at the deeper causes of insecurity, including poverty and climate breakdown.'
She added that the Green Party's position is to support 'the restoration of the international aid budget to at least 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI)'.
She added: 'We will continue to argue that real patriotism means ending UK-made weapons or components being sold to dictators, human rights abusers or for use against civilians anywhere in the world.'
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 14:55
Will Starmer have to raise taxes to pay for defence?
The Independent's Political Editor David Maddox reports:
Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), believes that the unspoken truth about the commitment to 3 per cent of GDP on defence is it can only be funded with tax rises.
Speaking to Times Radio this morning, he said: 'It looks like the government wants to reinstate the winter fuel payment. It's thinking about the two-child limit for benefits.
'We've got a spending review next week. And if we're really going to spend another £10-15 billion a year on defence, whilst inevitably we're going to spend more and more on health and pensions and so on, you really do have to ask that question, what are the choices that you're going to make?
'And I mean, bluntly, it really does seem to me that the only choice that is available, if we're going to go through all of those things, is some really quite chunky tax increases to pay for it.
'But of course, that's not something the prime minister or the chancellor is willing actually to say."
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 14:44
Chunky tax hikes will be needed to fund defence, warns IFS
The Independent's Political Correspondent Archie Mitchell reports:
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that 'quite chunky' tax hikes will be needed to fund Sir Keir Starmer's planned uplift in defence spending.
Paul Johnson, director of the economic think tank, told Times Radio: 'It looks like the government wants to reinstate the winter fuel payment. It's thinking about the two-child limit for benefits.
'We've got a spending review next week. And if we're really going to spend another £10-15 billion a year on defence, whilst inevitably we're going to spend more and more on health and pensions and so on, you really do have to ask that question, what are the choices that you're going to make?
'And I mean, bluntly, it really does seem to me that the only choice that is available, if we're going to go through all of those things, is some really quite chunky tax increases to pay for it.
'But of course, that's not something the prime minister or the chancellor is willing actually to say."
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 14:31
Still to come today
After Sir Keir Starmer launched the government's new strategic defence measures, ministers will face more questions from fellow MPs.
At around 4:15pm, there will be urgent questions in the Commons on the future of the UK's nuclear deterrent.
This will be followed by a statement delivered by Defence Secretary John Healey.
We will bring you the latest updates here.
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 14:14
Speaker unhappy over pre briefing of defence plan
The Independent's Political Editor David Maddox reports:
It appears Sir Lindsay Hoyle is annoyed at the government "leaking" it strategic defence review before announcing it to parliament.
The Speaker is quite a stickler for this and has clashed with ministers before.
This time he has granted an urgent question for 3.30pm regarding the SDR being leaked and announced outside the House of Commons.
This of course in itself will delay the SDR being presented to parliament.
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 14:03
PM's refusal to rule out fresh aid cuts 'disappointing'
The Independent's Political Correspondent Archie Mitchell reports:
Sir Keir Starmer's refusal to rule out fresh cuts to the international aid budget are "disappointing", a network for organisations working in international development and humanitarian assistance has said.
Bond reacted to the PM leaving further aid cuts on the table with a warning that development spending and money for defence are "part of the same triangle".
Policy and advocacy director Gideon Rabinowitz said: "It is disappointing that the Prime Minister has failed to rule out further cuts to the UK aid budget to fund defence spending.
"Defence, diplomacy and development are not competing priorities, they are part of the same triangle. Slashing the development budget while boosting defence breaks this balance and puts long-term global security at risk.
'You don't strengthen our national security by weakening the very tools that prevent global conflict, fight poverty, tackle hunger, and protect us against future pandemics."
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 13:42
Listen: Starmer warns of Russia threat as he launches plan to ready UK for war
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 13:29
How many submarines will the UK have in the future?
Two further Astute-class submarines, HMS Agamemnon and HMS Agincourt, are set to enter service in late 2025 and late 2026 respectively.
Agamemnon is currently going through trials with the Royal Navy as part of a test and commissioning programme, while Agincourt remains under construction.
As part of the joint defence deal between the US, Australia and the UK - known as Aukus - the UK is set to significantly boost its fleet of submarines following the defence review.
An added 12 submarines would bring the UK's fleet up to more than 20 in total. This remains far smaller than the US's fleet of 71, and China and Russia's fleets of 66 each.
Athena Stavrou2 June 2025 13:13
Speaker unhappy over pre briefing of Starmer's defence plan
It appears Sir Lindsay Hoyle is annoyed at the government "leaking" it strategic defence review before announcing it to parliament.
The Speaker is quite a stickler for this and has clashed with ministers before. This time he has granted an urgent question for 3.30pm regarding the SDR being leaked and announced outside the House of Commons.
2 June 2025 13:10
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Children's author Michael Rosen attacks Palestine Action ban
Michael Rosen is among a group of 300 Jewish figures who have condemned the ban on Palestine Action as 'illegitimate and unethical'. The children's author has signed a letter which will be delivered to Sir Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper on Tuesday, calling for them to 'proscribe genocide, not protest'. The delegation, organised by Jewish Voice for Labour and also made up of Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC, director Mike Leigh and playwright Gillian Slovo, is calling for the state of Palestine to be recognised immediately as well as a trade embargo with Israel. The move comes after Palestine Action was proscribed by Ms Cooper, the Home Secretary, on July 5 after a group of its members allegedly entered RAF Brize Norton and damaged two military aircraft. The Metropolitan Police said it would arrest anyone who protested in support of the now-banned group. However, in the letter to be delivered to No 10, the group said: 'Opposing the brutality of genocide, apartheid, and ethnic cleansing taking place in Gaza and the West Bank, including taking direct action, is not anti-Semitic. Nor is it terrorism. 'We consider the proscription of Palestine Action to be illegitimate and unethical. 'It is time to end the Government's hand-wringing over the level of slaughter and suffering in Gaza and the West Bank, mixed with tacit support to the Israeli state. 'We oppose genocide as human beings. We oppose it because we are Jews who have learnt from our history to be vigilant against injustice and stand up for justice for all people, everywhere.' They continued: 'The actions of the UK Government expand on a disturbing trend of attempts by successive governments to restrict peaceful protests intended to save lives. 'Lengthy prison sentences have been given to climate protesters as well as those opposed to arms sales to Israel. It has made the UK among the most repressive countries in Europe according to UN representatives, especially since the proscription of Palestine Action.' Publicly declaring support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act 2000, punishable by up to 14-years in prison. However, under plans revealed by the Telegraph, organisers are seeking to challenge the Government's proscription of Palestine Action by gathering on such a scale that it overwhelms the police and renders the law unenforceable. The events, which are being coordinated by the campaign group Defend Our Juries, are expected to see at least 500 people gather in London and other cities on Saturday, with the intention of deliberately flouting terror laws by publicly declaring their support for the group. Those taking part have been asked to hold up signs saying: 'I Oppose Genocide, I Support Palestine Action.' The Metropolitan Police said it was 'aware' of the planned protest, in which organisers were 'encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system'. The force warned that anyone showing support for the group 'can expect to be arrested'. The police have also been urged to investigate a former Guantanamo Bay detainee after he called on Muslims to attend protests to declare their support for Palestine Action. Speaking at a meeting in Birmingham, Moazzam Begg urged members of the Muslim community to take part in the planned mass demonstration this weekend. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said that 'without a doubt' the police should launch a probe into the comments made by Mr Begg. He told The Telegraph: 'Given the threats we are facing from Palestine Action, if the state does not impose its authority now, it will lose it completely.' He added: 'This is a proscribed organisation, a virtual terrorist organisation. Without a doubt, the police should investigate him [Begg]. 'This sort of organisation with its Islamist agenda is one of the most frightening things I have seen in my life.' Last week the co-founder of the group won the right to bring a legal challenge against proscription, arguing that the ban breached the right to freedom of expression and protest. A judicial review over the legality of the group is due to be heard in the autumn and could see the ban lifted.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ex-councillor warns of 'venom' in politics after attacks
A former county councillor has raised concerns over "the venom that has spread in politics" following personal attacks, blackmail attempts and damage to his car during recent Fifield served as the deputy leader of Gloucestershire County Council for the Conservatives before losing his seat earlier this said he had noticed an increase in "political outrage" since standing for election in 2017 – and said support was "non-existent" for councillors and council said it provided councillors with "comprehensive guidance and resources as part of its induction and ongoing training programme". Its leader, Lisa Spivey, said it was "not acceptable" for them to be targeted. Mr Fifield said that, during the 2024 Cheltenham Borough Council elections, his car was keyed twice while canvassing, his car window was smashed, and election leaflets were said he had also received threatening emails and aggressive notes through his letterbox, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Fifield said he believed the quality of public discourse had worsened in recent years."When I got elected in 2021, the attitude was that you must put your address on the website so people know that you're local," he said the county council now recommended its members did not put their private address online."That's indicative of what's happened," he said. 'Toxic environment' Mr Fifield said a more aggressive type of discourse had made its way into council debates."The heightening tone as part of the political outrage has become more common in recent years and it's creating a toxic environment," he Fifield believes this is putting off potential candidates."Would a councillor who was older than me, or may have had mental health challenges in the past, want to put themselves under that sort of duress?" he asked."We talk a lot about the mental health of society, but it seems we've decided that politicians don't have mental health."He said candidates in particular had "no support network" and were simply advised to report abuse issues to the Fifield added: "I think we need to have a bit more of an open discussion if we want a good mixture of people coming in to stand as councillors."
South Wales Guardian
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
France treaty to return Channel migrants is not ‘silver bullet', Cooper says
The Home Secretary said the agreement, which begins on Tuesday, was about the principle rather than the number itself. Ms Cooper pointed to a similar accord between Greece and Turkey in 2016 which she said brought down numbers of migrants to Greece. Migrants for the swap will begin to be detained from Wednesday, she told broadcasters. It is hoped the first migrants will be returned by the end of August. In exchange Britain will receive asylum seekers who have ties to the country through a legal route. Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Ms Cooper said: 'We never claimed that there is a single silver bullet on this. So this goes alongside the 28% increase in returns of failed asylum seekers that we have brought in. 'It goes alongside the change to those French maritime rules that I referred to which means France taking action in French waters to prevent boat crossings in the first place, and the much stronger law enforcement that we announced earlier this week with the additional National Crime Agency investigators and police to be able to go after the criminal gangs. We have to do all of these things.' Ms Cooper said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount of Channel migrants that will be returned to France, as she believed it could aid criminal gangs. It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year. She told BBC Radio 4: 'We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. 'Of course, it will start with lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme.' She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' The initial agreement will be in place until June 2026. Ms Cooper told Nick Ferrari on LBC that the UK will do security checks in France on the asylum seekers who are brought to the UK in exchange for returned Channel migrants. They will have their biometric data taken. She also said any family members of successful asylum seekers brought to the UK would be included in the quota, so would have an equivalent number sent back to France. Some 25,436 people have already made the journey this year, according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office figures – 49% higher than at the same point in 2024. She continued: 'I think this is the right principle that we should be pursuing, that people who are arriving on small boats should, frankly, be returned to France. They're coming on illegal boats, they're paying thousands of pounds to people smugglers. That money should be lost, and they should be returned. 'And also the principle that where we take people from other countries, we should do so through a legal process, where people have gone through security checks. Those are the right principles to establish.' On Monday, shadow home secretary Chris Philp attacked the plans, saying they would return 'just 6% of illegal arrivals' and 'make no difference whatsoever'. Ms Cooper also told broadcasters that the Government was still aiming to close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. She said just over 200 were still operating. She told BBC Radio 4: 'The big blockage now is in the appeals system, again, a broken system that we've inherited. We're going to have to do some major reforms to the appeals system, setting those out later this year. 'I think it's just unacceptable that if you've got somebody who has been turned down in the asylum system, on a fair basis, they can end up then still being stuck in the system even for years, as a result of delays in the asylum system.'
