Oscars 2025: PR experts anticipate ratings and backlash amid 'most toxic season in a decade"
This awards season has been marked by multiple controversies, including resurfaced blackface scandals, racial commentary, and questions over diversity and inclusion. Best Actress nominee Karla Sofía Gascón faced backlash over past social media posts about Islam, George Floyd, and diversity, while Fernanda Torres and Zoe Saldana were criticised for blackface controversies. Torres has since issued an apology.
AI in filmmaking has also fueled debate. Critics have called for Best Picture nominee The Brutalist to be disqualified over AI use, which director Brady Corbet clarified.
Photo: Venice Film Festival
Schiffer warned that the increasing negativity could impact the future of the Academy Awards, stating, 'Will the Oscars ratings get destroyed, or will it attract in ways that people had never imagined?'
Further uncertainty surrounds the Best Actress race, where Demi Moore remains the frontrunner, but Gascón's chances appear to have collapsed following the controversy. She skipped the Oscar nominees' dinner but is expected to attend the ceremony.
Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Academy CEO Bill Kramer stated, "Karla's nomination is historic. That's really important. She's still a nominee. We honor that, but we do not condone hate speech.' adding that, "If Karla joins us for the night, I hope there is an air of respect."
Photo: AFP
The Oscars 2025, which will mark the 97th edition of the Academy Awards, is under scrutiny as public perception of Hollywood shifts. Journalist Raymond Arroyo told Fox News, 'They feel this is the end of the Oscars in some ways.' With political and industry tensions rising, this year's ceremony could define the future of Hollywood's biggest night.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Alleged forced conversion, marriage of three Hindu girls sparks protest
After Sanghar district an identical case of alleged abduction and forced conversion of religion of three Hindu girls has surfaced in Tando Allahyar district where Kolhi and Meghwadh families have also lodged FIRs with the police. Three separate FIRs were registered on Sunday at Sultanabad police station stating that the young women were kidnapped from different localities in the limits of that police station. The parents also alleged that their daughters including Khenchi Kolhi, Lata Devi Meghwadh and Meena Meghwadh were compelled to change their religion to Islam on July 13. The Hindu community also staged sit-in demonstrations, demanding arrest of the alleged kidnappers. According to them, the girls were underage and, therefore, they cannot marry as per the law. Tanveer Brohi and Qadir Brohi have been accused in the FIR for kidnapping Khenchi; Saeed Ahmed Kharal, Ali Akbar Punjabi and Mashallah Brohi for Lata; and Ali Sher Brohi and Abdul Sattar Brohi, both brothers, for Meena. The FIR numbers 44/2025, 45/2025 and 46/2025 have been registered under sections 365/B and 34 of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). The protest ended on the police assurance that they would arrest the accused and recover the young women. Meanwhile, on Tuesday all the three women appeared before the Sindh High Court Hyderabad Circuit Bench along with Tanveer, Saeed and Ali Sher. They declared before the SHC that they have willingly changed their religion and that they have married the three men. The women also changed their Hindu names to Muslim names after the conversion. Their new names are Kalsoom, Bisma and Samaima, they apprised the court which granted protective bail to the couples. The Sindh Human Rights Commission's Chairman Iqbal Ahmed Detho on Tuesday wrote a letter to SSP Tando Allahyar, asking him to ensure a fair investigation of the matter especially with regard to the ages of the young women. He reiterated that if they were underage, the solemnization of the marriages would amount to Sindh Child Marriage Restrain Act, 2013.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Donkey slaughtering project sparks controversy
Listen to article As a nation, we often show little regard for the rights of animals, with the mistreatment of working animals—particularly donkeys—ranking high on the list. Now, it appears that in a couple of years, donkeys, like dinosaurs, will become fictional animals from books thanks to the government's haphazard decision to initiate commercial donkey slaughtering in the absence of any breeding farms. Reportedly, the slaughterhouse in Gwadar is preparing to export donkey bones and hides to China, where they are used to produce gelatin for traditional medicine. This, however, won't stop at Gwadar since applications have already been received from other companies looking to establish slaughterhouses across the country. Animal rights activists, however, argue that with the donkey population already dangerously low and no breeding farms available, slaughtering the working animals will only exacerbate the decline in their population. Speaking to The Express Tribune, Dr Javed Gondal, CEO of Brooke Pakistan, an international organization working for the welfare of working animals, claimed that the slaughterhouse established in Gwadar will have the capacity to annually process and slaughter 216,000 donkeys, who will be transported from different parts of the country to the slaughterhouse before they are exported to China. 'High exports of donkeys may lead to their shortage in Pakistan, where the birth rate of donkeys is lower than that of other animals. Some African countries have banned the exports of donkeys after a decline in their population,' said Dr Gondal. Likewise, Altamash Saeed, an environmental and animal rights consultant, expressed his fears that in the aftermath of the project, donkeys will be transported from different parts of the country to Gwadar through inappropriate ways. 'Apart from this, donkeys are the source of livelihood for thousands of families across the country. They are being used for freight, garbage collection, agriculture, industry and mining. Hence, slaughtering donkeys will increase poverty. Moreover, slaughtering donkeys is forbidden on the grounds that Article 2A of the Constitution states that no action can be taken against the fundamental principles of Islam in Pakistan,' highlighted Saeed, who believed that slaughtering donkeys was not only against the Constitution but was also religiously inappropriate. According to the Donkey Sanctuary, a welfare organization working for the protection of donkeys, the African Union has banned the slaughtering of donkeys for skin trade on the grounds that the practice could eventually lead donkeys towards becoming an endangered species just like the rhinos and elephants. Responding to the concerns, Former Animal Husbandry Commissioner Dr Muhammad Akram, who is monitoring this project at the official level, informed that the country was home to 5.2 million donkeys, whose body parts, including the skin were used in the manufacture of cosmetics and other products. 'The main reason behind the decline in the number of donkeys is that their use has decreased. Due to this, donkey farming has never been pursued like other livestock. The company working on the donkey slaughtering project has been required to first work on donkey farming and then start slaughtering. They will be required to farm the same number of donkeys they will slaughter annually. Discussions are currently underway with five companies on donkey farming. These companies want to build slaughterhouses in different parts of the country,' said Dr Akram.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
JUI-F jirga also rejects committee on ex-Fata
Listen to article A tribal jirga organized by the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) has expressed serious reservations about a committee formed to restore the traditional jirga system in the merged tribal districts, which were earlier part of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) The jirga held in Peshawar on Sunday also declared that a decision taken with regard to the merged districts without proper public representation and consultation would be unacceptable. The jirga led by JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman brought together tribal elders and leaders from the merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P). Senior leaders like Maulana Jamaluddin, Maulana Abdul Rasheed, Malik Nasrullah Khan, Malik Shaheen, Malik Khan Marjan, Mufti Baitullah, Malik Nadir Manan, Abdul Khaliq Pathan, MNA Mufti Misbahuddin, Malik Shireen, and Dr GG Jamal addressed the gathering and presented key recommendations. In a statement issued by the JUI-F, the jirga expressed concern about the rising incidents of terrorism and targeted killings in the former tribal districts, and demanded urgent and effective measures to ensure peace and protect lives and property in the region. The jirga also rejected the recently proposed Mines and Minerals Bill, terming it against the interests of the tribal population and the country at large. It emphasized the need to re-engage tribal leaders and Pashtun representatives to devise a comprehensive and inclusive strategy for the region's future. The participants reiterated that no imposed solution would be acceptable in the tribal belt without the voice and will of the people Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has formed a special committee on the merged districts which on July 1 initiated deliberations on revival of the traditional jirga system in former Fata. These districts, earlier called agencies, were merged with the K-P in early 2018 through the 25th Constitutional Amendment. During the July 1 meeting, Minister for States and Frontier Regions Amir Muqam as the chairman of the committee stressed the need for an alternative justice system rooted in tribal customs but aligned with constitutional principles. The committee also decided to form a sub-committee to draft recommendations and agreed to hold its next session in the K-P's capital, Peshawar. The ANP and the PTI have already rejected the committee, which, they claim, does not represent the people of the merged districts.
