Police Scotland 'harass' activists with daily checks amid Trump visit
Another video, taken by a second activist who is also on bail, shows police knocking on their door before an officer verbally confirms it is just after 10pm. The activist then says they already had a visit at noon that same day.
'We're doing this for everyone, OK,' one officer responds.
Pixelated images from two of the videos shared with The National of police officers visiting activists on bail (Image: Supplied) Davidson is on bail after a pro-Palestine protest at an arms factory late in 2024. In the new video, she asks why her first address check since then is happening now, and if there is a suspicion that she has breached her conditions.
'I don't know if it's because there's obviously quite a high-profile visit at the moment,' one of the officers responds, making a reference to US president Donald Trump who was in Scotland from Friday to Tuesday.
Davidson then says that even if she was planning to protest Trump, there is nothing in her bail conditions to stop her doing so, alleging police 'harassment'.
'What a waste of police resource', she adds.
A second video filmed by Davidson shows officers again at her home. Asked why they have knocked on her door, one responds: 'We're literally just to come and say hi.'
READ MORE: Hamza Yusuf: There's a rot in the world's media. Support The National for a new way
After Davidson asked the officers for their names and badge numbers, they say they have come for a bail check.
Activists told The National that they believed the 'so-called 'bail checks' – as admitted by the attending officers – were in fact a direct response to Donald Trump's visit to Scotland'.
'This raises serious concerns. Either it reflects a troubling lapse in intelligence, where monitoring [us] was deemed a justified use of police resources, or it reveals something more sinister: state-sanctioned harassment aimed at silencing dissent and shielding the president of the United States from legitimate protest.
'The real question is – who authorised this?'
Police Scotland did not respond to a request for comment.
READ MORE: Safeguarding concerns raised after Scottish school pipe band plays for Donald Trump
More than 7000 police officers were deployed during Trump's visit to Scotland, including 1200 from other UK nations.
Police Scotland Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said they did not yet have a figure for how much it had cost the taxpayer, but said it would be a "significant amount of money".
In 2018, Trump's four-day visit to the UK cost around £14 million to police, according to Freedom of Information figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Washington Commanders move step closer to $3.7bn DC stadium… but Donald Trump threat still looms large
The Washington Commanders have received the green light to build a new $3.7billion stadium in DC - despite Donald Trump 's threat to scupper those plans if they don't revert their name back to the Redskins. Trump says he intends to block federal support for the stadium project unless the Commanders change back to the name it formerly adopted before being axed in 2020 amid pressure from fans, sponsors and Native American groups who considered 'Redskins' a racial slur. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original "Washington Redskins," and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, "Washington Commanders," I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' the president said on Truth Social last month. With Trump's threat still looming large, the Commanders cleared another hurdle in their aim to return to the site of their former home, RFK Stadium, on Friday when the District of Columbia Council approved the legislation. The bill passed by a 9-3 vote, though it still must be approved a second time by the council before being sent to Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who negotiated the original plan with Commanders owner Josh Harris in April. Washington currently plays at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, but aims to open a new venue in 2030. After the bill was passed, Harris said on Friday: 'Today's approval by the Council is transformational for D.C. and brings the Commanders back to our spiritual home. Like many fans, RFK was the site of memories that fueled my love for this team and this city. Now we're closer than ever to reigniting that energy for a new generation. 'We're incredibly grateful to the Mayor and the Council throughout this process for their leadership and guidance. 'This is a historic moment. This project is about more than delivering a world-class stadium worthy of our players, fans and the region. It's about revitalizing a critical part of our city, creating thousands of jobs and unlocking long-term economic benefits for the District. We look forward to working with our fans, residents, community leaders and elected officials to deliver on this vision.' The ownership group led by Harris has been considering locations in Washington, Maryland and Virginia since buying the team from Dan Snyder in 2022. Congress passed a bill transferring the RFK Stadium land to the city that was signed by then-President Joe Biden in early January. That paved the way for making it possible to replace the old stadium with a mixed-use development, including the new playing field for the Commanders. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson's office recently estimated the redevelopment could generate $26.6bn in tax revenue over 30 years. The district would contribute $1bn toward the stadium project, while the team would fund the remaining $2.7bn. However, Trump is now threatening to stand in the way of the project if his Redskins wish is not fulfilled. That issue did not come up in Friday's council meeting. Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true. Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' He also demanded the same from MLB's Cleveland Guardians, née: 'Indians.' 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past,' Trump wrote.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘First Amendment has limits': Tom Homan insists that Mahmoud Khalil will be deported
Donald Trump's border czar is adamant that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil will still be deported from the country despite several court rulings that have kept the Palestinian activist out of detention. A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a request from the Trump administration to re-arrest Khalil and keep him in immigration detention center while he continues to challenge the government's attempts to remove him from the United States. Homan says the administration will continue to appeal. 'We got radical judges just trying to stop the Trump administration from doing our job and enforcing the law,' he told Newsmax on Thursday. He claimed there is 'only one ending' to Khalil's case: 'We detain him and deport him, but regardless, he will be deported.' That same day, the immigration court judge overseeing his case voided her earlier ruling that allowed the government to deport him. Khalil, a prominent student activist against Israel's war in Gaza, was stripped of his green card and arrested in front of his then-pregnant wife in their New York City apartment building on March 8. He was then sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Louisiana, where he was held for more than 100 days and forced to miss the birth of his child. Trump administration officials have accused Khalil of 'antisemitic activities,' allegations Khalil and his legal team have flatly denied. Officials concede that Khalil did not commit any crime, but Secretary of State Marco Rubio has sought to justify Khalil's arrest by claiming that Khalil's presence in the country undermines foreign policy interests to prevent antisemitism. Khalil and his legal team argue his arrest and detention — and attempted removal from the country, which is currently blocked by court order — are retaliatory violations of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and his Fifth Amendment right to due process of law, among other claims. 'Look, First Amendment rights have a limitation, too,' Homan told Newsmax. 'He did a lot of bad things. We're going to hold him accountable. He will be deported.' On June 11, a federal judge granted Khalil's release from ICE detention on bail while legal challenges against his arrest and threat of removal from the country continue in both federal and immigration courts. New Jersey District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled that the administration had unconstitutionally wielded the law against Khalil, whose 'career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled,' the judge wrote. The government has 'little or no interest in applying the relevant underlying statutes in what is likely an unconstitutional way,' Farbiarz added. 'Mahmoud spent 104 days in detention as punishment for speaking out for Palestinian rights,' ACLU senior staff attorney Noor Zafar said in a statement after this week's appeals court ruling. 'That is time with his family that he will never get back, but this decision affirms that he will remain free and that the government cannot pursue his removal based on the likely unconstitutional foreign policy charge as his case moves through appeal,' she added. 'We will not stand by and allow the government to weaponize immigration law to suppress lawful political speech.' Khalil's attorneys have also argued that the administration's secondary basis for his arrest and removal — allegations that he lied in immigration paperwork — are similarly retaliatory and violate his First Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process rights. The White House continues to insist that Khalil can still be deported on those grounds. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told The Independent on Friday that 'Khalil was given the privilege of coming to America to study on a student visa he obtained by fraud and misrepresentation.' 'Despite the lower court judge's wishes to the contrary, the executive branch has the lawful authority to take actions that will protect America's foreign policy interests and promote the overall welfare of the public,' she added. 'The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue.'
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US appeals court indiciates it might declare Trump's birthright citizenship order unconstitutional
Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship appeared on Friday to be headed toward being declared unconstitutional by a second federal appeals court, as judges expressed deep skepticism about a key piece of the US president's hardline immigration agenda. A three-judge panel of the Boston-based first US circuit court of appeals sharply questioned a lawyer with the federal justice department as to why they should overturn two lower-court judges who blocked the order from taking effect. Those lower-court judges include one in Boston who last week reaffirmed his prior decision to block the order's enforcement nationally, even after the US supreme court in June curbed the power of judges to broadly enjoin that and other policies. The San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals last week became the first federal appeals court to hold Trump's order as unconstitutional. Its ultimate fate will likely be determined by the supreme court. Eric McArthur, a justice department attorney, said on Friday that the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th amendment, which was ratified in 1868 after the US civil war, rightly extended citizenship to the children of newly-freed enslaved Black people. 'It did not extend birthright citizenship as a matter of constitutional right' to the children of people in the US without documentation, he said. But the judges questioned how that argument was consistent with the supreme court's 1898 ruling interpreting the clause in United States v Wong Kim Ark, long understood as guaranteeing American citizenship to children born in the US to non-citizen parents. 'We have an opinion by the supreme court that we aren't free to disregard,' said David Barron, the chief US circuit judge who like his two colleagues was appointed by a Democratic president. Trump's executive order, issued on the Republican's first day back in the Oval Office on 20 January, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a 'green card' holder. Every court to consider the order's merits has declared it unconstitutional, including the three judges who halted the order's enforcement nationally. Those judges included Leo Sorokin, a US district judge in Boston, who ruled in favor of 18 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, who had swiftly challenged Trump's policy in court. 'The supreme court has repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens,' Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued Friday. The 6-3 conservative majority US supreme court on 27 June sided with the administration in the litigation by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and the ninth circuit to issue new decisions stopping Trump's order from taking effect nationally. The rulings on appeal to the first circuit were issued by Sorokin and the New Hampshire judge, who originally issued a narrow injunction but more recently issued a new decision in a recently-filed class action blocking Trump's order nationwide. Separately, in an immigration-related ruling on Friday, US district Judge Jia Cobb in Washington DC blocked the Trump administration from fast-tracking the deportation of potentially hundreds of thousands of immigrants who were paroled into the country under humanitarian programs during Joe Biden's presidency. Cobb said it served the public interest to put on hold the Department of Homeland Security's expedited removals for those who entered with temporary parole rather than cause irreparable harm to immigrants by allowing them.
