Can Netanyahu deliver a ceasefire Gaza can trust?
With news swirling of a potential ceasefire agreement in Gaza, brokered during a high-profile meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump at the White House last week, Palestinians — particularly those in Gaza — find themselves once again suspended between cautious hope and deep skepticism. The promise of peace may be inching closer, but the lingering question remains: can the world really trust Netanyahu to honor such an agreement? And more fundamentally, can a permanent ceasefire hold in the face of Israel's historical record of violating its own commitments?
The Gaza Strip, shattered by relentless airstrikes and years of blockade, is yearning for a pause, for a reprieve. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, families torn apart and basic services like food, water and electricity remain scarce. In this humanitarian wasteland, any talk of a ceasefire sparks a flicker of hope — but that hope is deeply guarded.
Both Netanyahu and Trump have much to gain politically from a ceasefire. Netanyahu is mired in domestic turmoil, battling corruption charges, protests and an increasingly fractured coalition. Trump is keen to present himself once again as a global statesman capable of forging historic deals. The stakes are high — but so too is the distrust.
Palestinians have seen this story play out before. Ceasefire after ceasefire — brokered by Egypt, Qatar or the UN — has collapsed due to Israeli violations, continued settlement expansion or renewed military operations. Despite declarations and photo-ops, Israel has consistently returned to tactics that violate Palestinian sovereignty and humanitarian norms. The Netanyahu government, heavily influenced by its far-right members, has shown little willingness to seriously engage with the Palestinian cause beyond security concerns.
And yet, Palestinians are not rejecting the idea of peace — they are rejecting hypocrisy. A genuine and lasting ceasefire must be more than a tactical maneuver or an electoral prop. It must include an unequivocal end to Israeli military operations in Gaza, the lifting of the suffocating blockade and a credible international mechanism to monitor compliance on both sides. Any agreement must address not only the symptoms of war, but also the root causes: occupation, displacement and political disenfranchisement.
While the US continues to play the role of chief negotiator, the international community cannot remain a bystander. It must step forward — not just to endorse any agreement, but to provide binding guarantees that Palestinians' rights will be protected and upheld. The Arab world, the EU and the UN should demand oversight mechanisms that ensure Israel complies with its commitments and that the Palestinian people are not once again left to suffer the consequences of broken promises. International actors must insist on a framework that goes beyond ceasefire management and toward a sustainable political solution.
The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war.
Hani Hazaimeh
The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war. They need assurance, accountability and, above all, dignity. The ceasefire must not be a reward for violence nor a temporary de-escalation until the next round of bloodshed. It must be the beginning of a broader peace process that affirms the right of Palestinians to live freely in their homeland, with access to food, water, safety and a future.
Netanyahu and Trump may seek to shape the headlines in Washington, but history will judge them by what follows on the ground in Gaza. If the proposed ceasefire does not include real protections, real oversight and real political engagement, it will join the long list of failed truces that have left Palestinian civilians to bury their dead in silence.
A meaningful ceasefire must be built on trust — but trust is earned, not imposed. And until Israel demonstrates a consistent commitment to peace and until the world holds it accountable for its actions, Palestinians will remain wary of agreements signed with smiles abroad and broken with bombs at home.
The people of Gaza are watching. The world must do more than just watch with them — it must stand with them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
EU foreign policy chief: Israel needs to do more to address Gaza humanitarian situation
Israel needs to take more concrete steps to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza and fully implement the agreement it made with the European Union last week, the EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Tuesday. 'Israel needs to take more concrete steps to improve the humanitarian situation on the ground. The European Union will keep a close watch,' Kallas told reporters after meeting EU foreign ministers in Brussels.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
At SCO summit, Pakistan slams Israel for using ‘aggression as tool of policy' in Middle East
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's deputy prime minister and foreign minister, Ishaq Dar, on Tuesday criticized Israel for using 'aggression as a tool of policy' in the Middle East, condemning Israeli military actions against regional states and demanding an end to its 20-month war on Gaza. Dar said this while addressing a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization's (SCO) Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM), which came in the backdrop of heightened tensions in South Asia and the Middle East, particularly after the Pakistan-India conflict and Israeli military actions against several Gulf countries. Israel's war on Gaza, which began after Oct. 2023 attacks by Hamas on Israel, has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, over half of them women and children, according to the Palestinian health ministry. On Tuesday, the UN rights office said it had recorded at least 875 killings within the past six weeks at aid points in Gaza. Speaking at the CFM meeting, Dar said Pakistan was seriously concerned at the trends of using aggression as a tool of policy, emphasizing the resolution of disputes through peaceful means and according to the principles of international law, justice and fairness. 'Israel has shown a reckless disregard for international norms and humanity through its relentless and disproportionate use of force in Gaza resulting in the death of tens of thousands of civilians causing the worst humanitarian crisis in Gaza,' he said. 'We call for immediate halt to Israel's atrocities.' Dar said the only viable remedy to the Palestine dispute was the realization of the two-state solution, which includes the establishment of Palestine as a viable, secure and contiguous state on the basis of pre-1967 borders. He also condemned the 'unjustified and illegitimate aggression' by Israel against Iran and the United States (US) strikes on its nuclear facilities. 'Such illegal actions directed against SCO member states are unacceptable,' Dar said. The 12-day war between Iran and Israel, which began on June 13 Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military leadership, killed around 1,000 Iranians and more than two dozen Israelis. The SCO, comprising China, Russia, Pakistan, India, Iran, Belarus and Central Asian states, is seen by some Western analysts as a regional grouping by Beijing and Moscow to counter United States influence in Asia. The CFM meeting, a key diplomatic gathering aimed at preparing the groundwork for the upcoming SCO Leaders' Summit later this year, was convened to review progress on multilateral cooperation and set the agenda for endorsement by heads of state.
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
'Not our war' — Trump's Nato weapons deal for Ukraine sparks MAGA anger
WASHINGTON — Some conservative members of Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement have reacted angrily to the president's plans to sell weapons to Nato, arguing it is a betrayal of his promise to end US involvement in foreign wars. On Monday, Trump said he would send weapons to Ukraine via Nato, while also threatening Russia with more tariffs if a deal to end the war is not reached in 50 days. Republican Congresswomen Marjorie Taylor Greene, a key Trump ally, and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon are among those who have criticised the decision, with Bannon telling his podcast listeners that Ukraine is a "European war". The White House has emphasised that Europe will pay for the US-made weapons. In an interview with the New York Times, Greene - an isolationist member of Congress from Georgia who has been one of the most loyal Trump supporters on Capitol Hill - said the move was at odds with what she had promised voters on the campaign trail. "It's not just Ukraine; it's all foreign wars in general and a lot of foreign aid," she said. "This is what we campaigned on. This is what I promised also to my district. This is what everybody voted for. And I believe we have to maintain the course."Trump sought to emphasise that the weapons would be paid for rather than given as direct aid, saying on Monday: "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it."But in a rare public disagreement with the president, Greene expressed scepticism that US taxpayers would ultimately avoid bearing any cost and, in a post on social media, criticised "backdoor deals through Nato"."Without a shadow of a doubt, our tax dollars are being used," she told the New York Times, arguing that indirect costs such as US training missions and contributions to Nato qualify as US involvement."I said it on every rally stage: no more money to Ukraine. We want peace. We just want peace for those people," she said. "And guess what? People haven't changed."One former Trump campaign official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to Politico, said Europe's purchase of the weapons "mitigates" the anger from Trump's isolationist supporters."But we still hate it," the official said. "This is not our war, and escalation isn't in America's interest."Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump, said on his War Room podcast that "Ukraine is getting so dangerous"."It's a European war. Let Europe deal with it," he said. "They have the resources. They have the manpower.""We're about to arm people we have literally no control over," Bannon said of Ukraine. "This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the bloodlands of Europe - and we're being dragged into it."In a statement quoted by Politico, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said that Trump's MAGA base "aren't panicans like the media"."They trust in Trump, and they know that this president is restoring peace through strength."The BBC has contacted the White House for comment.A White House official who spoke to Politico on the condition of anonymity disagreed that the president's base opposed his moves. They pointed to one recent poll that suggested nearly two-thirds of Trump voters support continuing to send arms to in the Trump administration have also defended the president's decision, with Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby writing on X that Trump's "America First message is that our alliances have to be fair and equitable"."This is eminently reasonable but was treated for many years as heresy," he added. "Yet now with the historic Nato commitment we see that it can work."That recent commitment from Nato leaders to ramp up defence spending to 5% of their economic output was praised by Trump supporters on Monday, who argued that even with the new weapons deal Europe was taking on more responsibility for its in an exclusive interview with the BBC on Monday, just hours after he met Nato chief Mark Rutte at the White House, Trump said the alliance was now "paying its own bills".He affirmed his support for the organization's common defence principle, and said he was "disappointed but not done" with Russia's Vladimir president said that he had thought a deal to end the war in Ukraine was on the cards with Russia four different times. — BBC
