Closing the leadership gap: Kuruva Venkataramana Murthy's AI-driven leadership reimagines dharma in the age of algorithms
In his groundbreaking new book, releasing on August 2, 2025, AI-Driven Leadership: Adapt. Amplify. Accelerate., TEDx speaker and UN-recognised coach Kuruva Venkataramana Murthy offers a powerful response rooted in India's ancient wisdom.
Murthy proposes a Dharmic lens for the digital age, replacing the obsession with speed and scale with conscious precision. His AAA Model reframes leadership as a journey to:
Adapt with Awareness
Amplify with Ethics
Accelerate with Alignment
Far from nostalgia, this fusion of Dharma and tech-readiness delivers a strategic framework for today's founders, CXOs, and change agents navigating AI bias, data-driven decision fatigue, and system misalignment.
The book draws from Panchsheel-inspired principles and real-world case studies — from AI in hiring gone wrong to the human cost of poorly scaled tech solutions. Murthy challenges readers to lead not just intelligently, but soulfully.
Founder of the One in the Universe movement, Murthy's work is more than a book; it's a blueprint for rehumanising leadership in an age of algorithms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk and Tesla's $30 trillion AI supersonic tsunami
Tesla shareholders are used to volatility. Shares dipped 8% on Thursday after Tesla reported second-quarter earnings. Shares bounced about 4% on Friday. Coming into the week of trading, Tesla stock was down 22% year to date and up about 44% over the past 12 months. Tesla CEO Elon Musk offered some pretty eye-popping aspirations for the company during remarks on Saturday. Musk made a virtual appearance at the Tesla Owners of Silicon Valley 2025 'Takeover" party in San Mateo, Calif. The group is, essentially, a fan club and community for Tesla and Musk enthusiasts. Its Takeover event draws attendees from all over the world, according to organizers. The headline from the event might just have been an admittedly aspirational comment about $30 trillion a year in humanoid robot revenue. Tesla is using its artificial intelligence and manufacturing capabilities to build its Optimus humanoid robots. Version three of 'Optimus is the right design to go to volume production," said Musk. Tesla plans to make a few hundred of those by the end of 2025. Originally, Tesla planned to have a few thousand, but the new design slowed things down a little. Tesla still plans to ramp production higher in 2026. Tesla is betting big on AI, using it for robots and to train its self-driving cars. Robots are 'probably the world's biggest product…There's a market for 20 billion robots," said Musk. 'Hypothetically, if Tesla was making one billion of these a year…maybe on the order of $30,000, I'm just guessing here, that's $30 trillion in revenue." It's an incredible prediction. 'Long way to go between here and making one billion robots a year," added Musk. There isn't a significant market for humanoid robots yet. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has said that robots can become the world's largest market. (Housing, consumer electronics, and cars are three of the largest today.) The world spends 'what $50 trillion on human labor a year now?" says Futurum chief market strategist Shay Boloor. Useful robots are 'pretty disruptive if you can conquer it." Musk, for his part, doesn't fear the labor disruption, believing it will end up creating an age of abundance with hard labor essentially eliminated. 'I've never seen any technology advance as fast as AI," said Musk, describing it as a supersonic tsunami. It's all pie in the sky for now, but quite a vision of the future. Investors should pay attention to events like the 'Takeover." It's almost like a Wall Street event for the EV maker. Tesla is more of a retail stock than the megacap companies. Smaller retail investors hold more than 40% of the shares available for trading, according to Bloomberg. The average for the rest of the Magnificent Seven is closer to 25%. Whether the interview will move Tesla's stock on Monday is anyone's guess. Shares dipped 8% on Thursday after Tesla reported second-quarter earnings on Wednesday evening. Shares bounced about 4% on Friday. Coming into the week of trading, Tesla stock was down 22% year to date and up about 44% over the past 12 months. Shares are trading for about 180 times estimated 2025 earnings. That's the second-highest PE ratio in the S&P 500, according to Bloomberg, trailing only Palantir Technologies. That valuation indicates that, to some extent, investors are as optimistic about the future. Write to Al Root at
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Top stocks to buy: Stock recommendations for the week starting July 28, 2025
Top stocks to buy (AI image) Stock market recommendations: According to Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd, the top stock picks for the week (starting July 28, 2025) are VA Tech WABAG, and HDFC Bank. Let's take a look: Stock Name CMP (Rs) Target (Rs) Upside (%) VA Tech WABAG 1621 1900 17% HDFC Bank 2005 2300 15% VA Tech WABAG VA Tech is a global leader in water treatment and a strong play on the long-term structural water treatment theme, with rising demand driven by pollution, scarcity, and regulatory needs. It ranks 3rd as a private water operator globally (up from 6th in 2019 and 10th in 2017). It operates an asset-light model and boasts 125+ Intellectual property rights, focusing on high-margin engineering & procurement and long-term O&M projects. Robust ₹137b order book (4.2x FY25 revenue) & ₹200b bid pipeline support 15–20% revenue CAGR visibility over FY25–28. Strategic initiatives like 'Wriddhi' bolster its growth and profitability outlook. Improving margins, strong FCF (~₹3.5b/year), net cash status, & rising RoCE/RoE make it a high-quality compounder. HDFC Bank HDFC Bank is well-positioned to deliver a strong earnings rebound, supported by improving loan growth across Commercial & Rural Banking (CRB), SME, and retail segments. With normalization of the CD ratio and a granular liability profile, the bank is poised to accelerate credit growth—guided to be in line with the system in FY26 and ahead in FY27. Robust asset quality (GNPA/NNPA at 1.4%/0.5% in 1QFY26) and provisioning buffers (INR366b) provide comfort, while margin recovery is expected as high-cost borrowings are replaced by deposits. We estimate HDFCB to deliver FY27E RoA/RoE of 1.9%/14.9%. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The high-schoolers who just beat the world's smartest AI models
The smartest AI models ever made just went to the most prestigious competition for young mathematicians and managed to achieve the kind of breakthrough that once seemed miraculous. They still got beat by the world's brightest teenagers. Every year, a few hundred elite high-school students from all over the planet gather at the International Mathematical Olympiad. This year, those brilliant minds were joined by Google DeepMind and other companies in the business of artificial intelligence. They had all come for one of the ultimate tests of reasoning, logic and creativity. The famously grueling IMO exam is held over two days and gives students three increasingly difficult problems a day and more than four hours to solve them. The questions span algebra, geometry, number theory and combinatorics—and you can forget about answering them if you're not a math whiz. You'll give your brain a workout just trying to understand them. Because those problems are both complex and unconventional, the annual math test has become a useful benchmark for measuring AI progress from one year to the next. In this age of rapid development, the leading research labs dreamed of a day their systems would be powerful enough to meet the standard for an IMO gold medal, which became the AI equivalent of a four-minute mile. But nobody knew when they would reach that milestone or if they ever would—until now. This year's International Mathematical Olympiad attracted high-school students from all over the world. The unthinkable occurred earlier this month when an AI model from Google DeepMind earned a gold-medal score at IMO by perfectly solving five of the six problems. In another dramatic twist, OpenAI also claimed gold despite not participating in the official event. The companies described their feats as giant leaps toward the future—even if they're not quite there yet. In fact, the most remarkable part of this memorable event is that 26 students got higher scores on the IMO exam than the AI systems. Among them were four stars of the U.S. team, including Qiao (Tiger) Zhang, a two-time gold medalist from California, and Alexander Wang, who brought his third straight gold back to New Jersey. That makes him one of the most decorated young mathematicians of all time—and he's a high-school senior who can go for another gold at IMO next year. But in a year, he might be dealing with a different equation altogether. 'I think it's really likely that AI is going to be able to get a perfect score next year," Wang said. 'That would be insane progress," Zhang said. 'I'm 50-50 on it." So given those odds, will this be remembered as the last IMO when humans outperformed AI? 'It might well be," said Thang Luong, the leader of Google DeepMind's team. Until very recently, what happened in Australia would have sounded about as likely as koalas doing calculus. But the inconceivable began to feel almost inevitable last year, when DeepMind's models built for math solved four problems and racked up 28 points for a silver medal, just one point short of gold. This year, the IMO officially invited a select group of tech companies to their own competition, giving them the same problems as the students and having coordinators grade their solutions with the same rubric. They were eager for the challenge. AI models are trained on unfathomable amounts of information—so if anything has been done before, the chances are they can figure out how to do it again. But they can struggle with problems they have never seen before. As it happens, the IMO process is specifically designed to come up with those original and unconventional problems. In addition to being novel, the problems also have to be interesting and beautiful, said IMO president Gregor Dolinar. If a problem under consideration is similar to 'any other problem published anywhere in the world," he said, it gets tossed. By the time students take the exam, the list of a few hundred suggested problems has been whittled down to six. Meanwhile, the DeepMind team kept improving the AI system it would bring to IMO, an unreleased version of Google's advanced reasoning model Gemini Deep Think, and it was still making tweaks in the days leading up to the competition. The effort was led by Thang Luong, a senior staff research scientist who narrowly missed getting to IMO in high school with Vietnam's team. He finally made it to IMO last year—with Google. Before he returned this year, DeepMind executives asked about the possibility of gold. He told them to expect bronze or silver again. He adjusted his expectations when DeepMind's model nailed all three problems on the first day. The simplicity, elegance and sheer readability of those solutions astonished mathematicians. The next day, as soon as Luong and his colleagues realized their AI creation had crushed two more proofs, they also realized that would be enough for gold. They celebrated their monumental accomplishment by doing one thing the other medalists couldn't: They cracked open a bottle of whiskey. Key members of Google DeepMind's gold-medal-winning team, including Thang Luong, second from left. To keep the focus on students, the companies at IMO agreed not to release their results until later this month. But as soon as the Olympiad's closing ceremony ended, one company declared that its AI model had struck gold—and it wasn't DeepMind. It was OpenAI. The company wasn't a part of the IMO event, but OpenAI gave its latest experimental reasoning model all six problems and enlisted former medalists to grade the proofs. Like DeepMind's, OpenAI's system flawlessly solved five and scored 35 out of 42 points to meet the gold standard. After the OpenAI victory lap on social media, the embargo was lifted and DeepMind told the world about its own triumph—and that its performance was certified by the IMO. Not long ago, it was hard to imagine AI rivals dueling for glory like this. In 2021, a Ph.D. student named Alexander Wei was part of a study that asked him to predict the state of AI math by July 2025—that is, right now. When he looked at the other forecasts, he thought they were much too optimistic. As it turned out, they weren't nearly optimistic enough. Now he's living proof of just how wrong he was: Wei is the research scientist who led the IMO project for OpenAI. The only thing more impressive than what the AI systems did was how they did it. Google called its result a major advance, though not because DeepMind won gold instead of silver. Last year, the model needed the problems to be translated into a computer programming language for math proofs. This year, it operated entirely in 'natural language" without any human intervention. DeepMind also crushed the exam within the IMO time limit of 4 ½ hours after taking several days of computation just a year ago. You might find all of this completely terrifying—and think of AI as competition. The humans behind the models see them as complementary. 'This could perhaps be a new calculator," Luong said, 'that powers the next generation of mathematicians." Speaking of that next generation, the IMO gold medalists have already been overshadowed by AI. So let's put them back in the spotlight. Team USA at the International Mathematical Olympiad, including Alexander Wang, fourth from right, and Tiger Zhang, with the stuffed red panda on his head. Qiao Zhang is a 17-year-old student in Los Angeles on his way to MIT to study math and computer science. As a young boy, his family moved to the U.S. from China and his parents gave him a choice of two American names. He picked Tiger over Elephant. His career in competitive math began in second grade, when he entered a contest called the Math Kangaroo. It ended this month at the math Olympics next to a hotel in Australia with actual kangaroos. When he sat down at his desk with a pen and lots of scratch paper, Zhang spent the longest amount of time during the exam on Problem 6. It was a problem in the notoriously tricky field of combinatorics, the branch of mathematics that deals with counting, arranging and combining discrete objects, and it was easily the hardest on this year's test. The solution required the ingenuity, creativity and intuition that humans can muster but machines cannot—at least not yet. 'I would actually be a bit scared if the AI models could do stuff on Problem 6," he said. Problem 6 did stump DeepMind and OpenAI's models, but it wasn't just problematic for AI. Of the 630 student contestants, 569 also received zero points. Only six received the full credit of seven points. Zhang was proud of his partial solution that earned four points—which was four more than almost everyone else. At this year's IMO, 72 contestants went home with gold. But for some, a medal wasn't their only prize. Zhang was among those who left with another keepsake: victory over the AI models. (As if it weren't enough that he can bend numbers to his will, he also has a way with words and wrote this about his IMO experience.) In the end, the six members of the U.S. team piled up five golds and one silver, finishing second overall behind the Chinese after knocking them off the top spot last year. There was once a time when such precocious math students grew up to become professors. (Or presidents—the recently elected president of Romania was a two-time IMO gold medalist with perfect scores.) While many still choose academia, others get recruited by algorithmic trading firms and hedge funds, where their quantitative brains have never been so highly valued. This year, the U.S. team was supported by Jane Street while XTX Markets sponsored the whole event. After all, they will soon be competing with each other—and with the richest tech companies—for their intellectual talents. By then, AI might be destroying mere humans at math. But not if you ask Junehyuk Jung. A former IMO gold medalist himself, Jung is now an associate professor at Brown University and visiting researcher at DeepMind who worked on its gold-medal model. He doesn't believe this was humanity's last stand, though. He thinks problems like Problem 6 will flummox AI for at least another decade. And he walked away from perhaps the most significant math contest in history feeling bullish on all kinds of intelligence. 'There are things AI will do very well," he said. 'There are still going to be things that humans can do better." Write to Ben Cohen at
