logo
Three-quarters of Brits believe floundering Rachel Reeves will smash Labour vow not to hike income tax, NICs or VAT with fears of £40BN bombshell in Autumn Budget

Three-quarters of Brits believe floundering Rachel Reeves will smash Labour vow not to hike income tax, NICs or VAT with fears of £40BN bombshell in Autumn Budget

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Three-quarters of Brits believe Rachel Reeves will smash Labour 's vow not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT.
A poll has revealed the depth of scepticism among the public about the manifesto commitments holding, despite repeated assurances from the Chancellor and Keir Starmer.
The YouGov research comes amid mounting fears that tax hikes - and big ones - are the government's only option to balance the books at the Autumn Budget.
Economists have warned that stalling growth and U-turns on welfare curbs could mean the scale has to be similar to the last fiscal package, which added a record £41billion to the burden.
Labour promised at the last election that there would be no changes to income tax, VAT or NICs.
But some 35 per cent of Brits regarded action on the 'big three' tax areas as 'very likely', and a further 37 per cent said it was 'fairly likely'.
Only 10 per cent thought it was unlikely, while 17 per cent said they did not know.
Even among Labour supporters 70 per cent expected the move, and the figure for Tories was 84 per cent.
The grim findings came as the Chancellor dropped another heavy hint that taxes will go up at the next Budget.
Ms Reeves said the package would 'reflect' the 'cost' to this week's U-turn on welfare reforms - which the Treasury hoped would save £5billion by 2029.
But she insisted she would not change her 'fiscal rules' constraining borrowing, leaving tax rises as the most likely option.
Ms Reeves has also repeatedly stated she will not bring in a tax bomb as big as the £41billion imposed last year.
However, Ben Zaranko of the respected IFS think-tank said the increase in the burden could be of a 'similar scale'.
He said 'avenues are closing' after department spending plans were fixed for the next three years and the government backed down on welfare.
'It's not hard to imagine a world where they are of a ballpark similar scale to last autumn,' Mr Zaranko said.
'If you have the perfect storm of economic forecasts being downgraded, additional spending commitments because these reforms haven't got through parliament and the world is in a gloomier place generally, you could comfortably be into double figures billions even before you talk about any retail offers.
'A £20, £30, £40billion budget is not what the government would want but it's not impossible by any means.'
The Budget last year was the biggest tax raising package on record, including an eye-watering hike to employer national insurance that has been blamed for crushing business investment and recruitment.
Analysis by Deutsche Bank has suggested that the hole Ms Reeves needs to fill could be between £18billion and £32billion.
It pointed to market conditions adding £2-£3billion to borrowing by 2029, and Donald Trump's trade war impact costing approximately £5billion.
Productivity growth downgrades could degrade the fiscal position by another £15billion, while welfare backtracking is estimated to add up to £9.5billion to spending.
The analysts speculated that revenue-raising measures could include extending the hated freeze on income tax thresholds, with that stealth raid potentially raising £7billion a year.
Council tax reform was mooted to bring in £1 billion, raising the Bank Levy another £1.5billion and pension tax reliefs £2 billion.
Other measures including tax collection could drum up some more cash towards the gap.
But Deutsche Bank cautioned that if the shortfall is more than £20billion breaking the Labour manifesto and hiking income tax, VAT or NICs could be unavoidable.
It has emerged previously that Angela Rayner wrote to the Chancellor in March urging eight tax hikes, seemingly as a way to avoid benefits curbs.
They included reinstating the pensions lifetime allowance, changes to dividend taxes, a raid on a million people who pay additional rate income tax and a higher corporation tax level for banks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after Labour's £5billion welfare U-turn
Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after Labour's £5billion welfare U-turn

The Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after Labour's £5billion welfare U-turn

LABOUR will not scrap the two-child benefit cap despite pressure from left wing MPs, according to Downing Street sources. Plans to shelve the rule have reportedly been binned because of Labour's £5 billion welfare U-turn. 3 3 3 Earlier this year Starmer told his cabinet he wanted to scrap the cap and asked the Treasury to identify ways to fund the plan. However, a No 10 source has now told The Sunday Times: "My assessment is that is now dead in the water." And a No 11 source warned MPs there has to be 'trade offs' for not introducing major welfare reforms, reports the outlet. 'Whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two child benefit cap,' they added. Parents have only been able to claim child tax credit and for their first two children since 2017. Imposed in April 2017, parents can not claim child tax credit or universal credit worth up to £3,455 per year for more than two children. An exception is made for children born as a result of rape. Lifting the cap would cost an estimated £3.5 billion and the Labour party has long been divided over the issue - with Sir Keir Starmer ruling out scrapping the cap in 2023. He then said Labour wanted to remove it, but only when fiscal conditions allowed. Following Labour's landslide victory last July, the prime minister refused to bow to pressure within his party, and suspended seven MPs for six months for voting with the SNP to scrap the cap. Ministers have toed the party line for months, but the narrative started to shift in May, with Sir Keir reported to have asked the Treasury to see how scrapping it could be funded. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir Starmer into a U-turn last week had set their sights on lifting the benefit cap. But it looks like that plan is now set to be scrapped once and for all with a decision on the cap set for the autumn. Speculation has been mounting that ending the two-child benefits cap will be the third welfare U-turn after those relating to winter fuel payments and disability benefits, which have already cost Rachel Reeves billions. Sir Keir recently suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. Just minutes before voting began, ministers announced that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments were being dropped. Sir Keir had already been forced into a U-turn the week before when more than 130 Labour MPs turned rebels and signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the bill off. Among the concessions announced then was a plan to impose tougher eligibility rules only on future PIP claimants, leaving existing recipients unaffected. It comes after analysis of official figures previously revealed that ditching the child benefits cap would hand thousands of pounds a year in extra benefits to 180,000 large families in which no one goes out to work. But critics of the cap claim it has worsened child poverty. The hard-hitting rule, which slashes payments like Universal Credit and Child Tax Credit, is costing struggling households an average of £4,300 each, according to a recent report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Official figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show a staggering 450,000 families were stung by the cap last year. Most of those hit - around 280,000 families – have three kids, while 120,000 have four, and 56,000 are raising five or more little ones. The DWP doesn't reveal exactly how much the biggest families are missing out on.

Hundreds of Kent properties still have no water for fifth day in a row
Hundreds of Kent properties still have no water for fifth day in a row

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Hundreds of Kent properties still have no water for fifth day in a row

A company says it still cannot provide a "specific time" when water supplies will return to about 500 properties which have experienced issues for the fifth day in a Wednesday, South East Water said up to 3,000 customers in Whitstable, Seasalter and surrounding areas had no water or low pressure due to the recent residents in the affected areas told the BBC how they felt "defeated" by the situation. The company told customers it was "very sorry" and said its teams had worked throughout Saturday night. "We know how distressing and frustrating it is to be without water and have specialists across the business supporting the work being done," it added. The company said although it had removed the trapped air from its pipes, the work was "extremely difficult and time consuming" and about 500 properties would continue to have supply issues through to Sunday added the leak on Canterbury Road, Whitstable, outside The Two Brewers pub, was fixed on Saturday night under a road closure. "Diversions will be in place to safely guide traffic around the affected area," the company added."There are five tankers pumping water into the local area so some customers may see intermittent supplies." Two bottled water stations have opened: a drive-through at Sainsbury's, Reeves Way, Chestfield, Whitstable, CT5 3QS, and a walk-in service at 129C Faversham Road, Seasalter, Whitstable, CT5 4SD.

Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust
Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust

Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Hundreds of staff unpaid after £1bn AI start-up goes bust

Hundreds of former staff at a collapsed AI company once worth £1bn have been left unable to access redundancy payments amid talks over a fire sale of its assets. Workers claim to have been left in limbo after being let go from the failed British AI champion in May. While Builder AI has filed for bankruptcy in the US, it has yet to appoint administrators in Britain where its main operations were based. This has meant around 200 UK-based staff cannot claim redundancy pay from the Insolvency Service, which requires a case number normally supplied by restructuring advisers in the event of an administration. A Builder AI spokesman said it was 'aware of the frustration' of staff, and confirmed investors and creditors were in advanced talks over a potential pre-pack administration, which would see its remaining assets and technology sold. Builder AI has been lining up Alvarez & Marsal, a restructuring consultancy, to handle the administration. One former Builder AI employee complained that they had been left in the dark during the process. They said: 'There's been no communication, no proper closure, and without the right paperwork, a lot of us still can't access the financial help we need.' Former UK employees have not received any money since April. The Telegraph understands that Jungle Ventures, Lakestar and US fund Insight Partners are among the parties involved in advanced talks to salvage parts of the business in a pre-pack deal. Such a deal should raise money to return funds to creditors, including ex-staff. Sachin Dev Duggal, Builder AI's founder, is also understood to have explored launching a rescue bid alongside other investors. However, a source close to the talks said this approach was rebuffed. Builder AI was backed by Microsoft and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, and reached a valuation of $1.5bn (£1.1bn), making it one of Britain's rare 'unicorns' – a private tech company worth more than a billion. But it collapsed in May after lenders pulled tens of millions of pounds in funding amid claims that promised sales had come in far below expectations. The start-up was founded by 42-year-old Mr Duggal in 2016, and developed what he called 'human-assisted AI'. A chatbot called Natasha was assisted by human contractors to help customers, including the BBC, build apps cheaply. The venture unravelled after it emerged that sales forecasts had been wildly unrealistic. The business had predicted sales of $220m in 2024 when raising money from lenders. Sales for that year ultimately came in at around $50m. Mr Duggal was ousted in February and replaced by Manpreet Ratia, of investor Jungle Ventures. The company's lenders, including tech investor, Viola Credit, then pulled $40m from the business's accounts, citing covenant breaches. That decision left the business with almost no cash available to pay staff. The Telegraph understands that New York prosecutors had issued a subpoena to Builder AI prior to its collapse for information about its accounting practices. The Financial Times reported that an investigation into the sales shortfall at Builder AI had raised concerns over potentially inflated sales and circular transactions in past years. A spokesman for Mr Duggal declined to comment. On LinkedIn, he said last month: 'There was no round-tripping,' referring to the allegations of circular transactions. A spokesman for Builder AI said: 'We are working closely with the US administrator to initiate liquidation proceedings for the UK entity. 'The company has actively explored the option of a pre-packaged administration. The company has been actively seeking funding from existing stakeholders. We are now at the conclusion of this process and expect to proceed with formal filings in the UK next couple of weeks.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store