logo
Leo Varadkar: Marriage equality result was best day of my political life

Leo Varadkar: Marriage equality result was best day of my political life

BreakingNews.ie22-05-2025
Former taoiseach Leo Varadkar has said the marriage equality referendum results day was the best day in his political life.
On May 22nd, 2015, the Irish electorate voted by 62 per cent in favour of same-sex marriage, on a high turnout of 61 per cent. All constituencies voted Yes except Roscommon-South Leitrim, which rejected the proposed amendment by a narrow margin.
Advertisement
"It was just one of those days where everything came together," Mr Varadkar told Newstalk radio on the 10th anniversary of the event.
"I started that day performing the official opening of St Francis Hospice in Blanchardstown, which I'd been able to get funding for as health minister, so I just kind of saw two projects on the one day that were totally different and totally unconnected coming to fruition so it's those kind of days that make it all worthwhile."
Mr Varadkar said it had been overwhelming at the referendum count centre. He had anticipated the results would be similar to the divorce referendum in 1994 – that the Yes vote would be stronger in urban areas with a big No vote in rural areas – but that did not happen.
Leo Varadkar warned there were going to be setbacks in Ireland and around the world. Photo: Paul Faith/AFP via Getty
As the results came in from around the country he said it became obvious that "it was a country that was embracing the idea of equality before the law for everyone, equal rights, freedom, equality of opportunity, and was doing it without a huge rural-urban divide or a class divide."
Advertisement
Mr Varakdar said the day was part "a wave of progress and liberty and freedom" that Ireland was part of.
World
Thai same-sex couples to tie knot in 2025 as marri...
Read More
The former Fine Gael leader, who resigned as taoiseach last year, acknowledged that when he started in politics he had not anticipated how much things would change in Ireland in the space of 10 years.
He also admitted that his decision to "come out" had not caused him great angst, but it did cross his mind that it might have an impact on his future career.
However, Mr Varadkar warned there were going to be setbacks in Ireland and around the world. "I always say that the arc of history bends towards progress, but it's not a straight line. There are always going to be backlashes. And they're going to be setbacks and sometimes they're gonna be severe.
"It's one step forward, two steps back. That's kind of where we are at the moment."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justin Kelly: New Garda Commissioner announced
Justin Kelly: New Garda Commissioner announced

BBC News

time20 hours ago

  • BBC News

Justin Kelly: New Garda Commissioner announced

The Irish Government has appointed a new Garda Commissioner who will be in term for five Kelly was appointed by the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Jim O'Callaghan and will replace former Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) deputy chief constable Drew Harris. A three-week recruitment campaign was held by publicjobs (formerly the Public Appointments Service) in May, including an international search for suitable candidates, which resulted in 14 was appointed to his current role as Deputy Commissioner Security, Strategy and Governance in October 2024. The new commissioner will take up the role on 1 September 2025 with Commissioner Harris continuing to lead An Garda Síochána until that selection process included two interviews and a presentation by candidates as well as a detailed psychometric assessment. Harris will retire after 41 years of service to policing on the island of Ireland, including a total of seven years as Garda O'Callaghan said: "The role of Garda Commissioner is one of the most challenging and impactful leadership positions in Ireland's public service and the appointment process was suitably rigorous."O'Callaghan said he was satisfied that Kelly is both qualified and "particularly well suited" to the role.

One-off payments for businesses ‘not sustainable' response to tariffs
One-off payments for businesses ‘not sustainable' response to tariffs

BreakingNews.ie

time20 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

One-off payments for businesses ‘not sustainable' response to tariffs

One-off payments for businesses are 'not sustainable' as a response to 15 per cent tariffs imposed by the US, the enterprise minister has said. The Irish government has welcomed the certainty of a trade deal between the EU and the US but said more detail is required to assess the impact on the Irish economy. Advertisement Taoiseach Micheál Martin said nobody was welcoming 15 per cent tariffs 'with open arms' but the deal avoided a 'ruinous' trade war. Speaking before briefing Cabinet on the trade agreement struck by US President Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen at the weekend, Peter Burke said Brexit-style supports were not the answer. 'This is a new environment. It is a new trading world. There are huge tensions now on the geopolitical landscape, and that looks like it's going to remain into the future,' he said. 'So we have to try and navigate those sustainably and the answer is not really setting up a Brexit-type response right now, it is working specifically with companies, trying to assist them, like we have been, in a sustainable way. Advertisement 'One-off payments are not sustainable and I think we have to be honest about that. What is sustainable is that if you make your production process more efficient that allows you retain that high-value market despite the tariff rate with the US economy. 'I think one of the key things we're looking to establish is that there's no stacking in tariffs, and that could be a significant win, if it's fleshed out correctly as we think it is, that you won't have a 15% on top of previous tariffs, particularly in our agrifoods and drinks sector. It will be important to see what the carve-outs are in that sector.'

In the name of Palestine, Ireland is sacrificing its own interests
In the name of Palestine, Ireland is sacrificing its own interests

Telegraph

time21 hours ago

  • Telegraph

In the name of Palestine, Ireland is sacrificing its own interests

The past few weeks have seen the worst deterioration in Irish-US relations for many decades. What is widely seen as Ireland's extreme anti-Israel obsession collided with the realities of American business and geopolitical interests. It was the war in Gaza that changed everything. The Irish political elite, which for complicated historical reasons was never very sympathetic to the Jewish state, became hyper supportive of the Palestinian cause. President Higgins, the grand old man of the Irish Left – cast in the mould of a Jeremy Corbyn – led the offensive. Nearing the end of his second seven-year presidential term, Michael D, as he is widely known, is hugely popular in Ireland. Within days of the Hamas October 7 massacre, EU president Ursula von der Leyen visited Israel to show solidarity with the victims and express support for Israel in the wake of the unprovoked attack. Speaking in Rome a few days later, President Higgins called Ms von der Leyen's actions 'reckless' and said she 'wasn't speaking for Ireland.' President Higgins continued, we cannot 'ignore the long-neglected source of much of this conflict, which is the Palestinian issue.' This was interpreted by some Jews as offering a ham-fisted and very misguided justification for the Hamas invasion of ten days earlier. Under the Irish Constitution, the presidency is primarily a ceremonial institution. Like the King, Irish presidents are meant to be above politics with no role in setting policy. In his multiple statements on Israel, Gaza, and Palestine, President Higgins has comprehensively undermined this constitutional boundary. Other senior politicians have been equally vociferous. Tánaiste (deputy prime minister) Simon Harris boasted: 'We are the first government in the European Union to say what Israel is doing is genocide.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has also claimed repeatedly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. As relations between Ireland and Israel continued to deteriorate, last December Israel closed its embassy in Dublin because 'of the extreme anti-Israel policies of the Irish government.' It was against this toxic background that the Occupied Territories Bill (OTB), a piece of legislation that had lain dormant for years, was suddenly revived. The proposed legislation seeks to ban trade between Ireland and the Israeli occupied territories. Last year, Ireland exported goods to the value of €73.6bn to the US – larger than those of the UK (€64.5bn). Total US corporate investment in Ireland comes to almost half a trillion dollars – greater than the combined US investment in the EU's four largest economies, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. US firms account for 70 per cent of Ireland's annual corporate tax revenue, and for one in six private sector jobs. These astonishing statistics show how Ireland's current and future prosperity is fundamentally dependent on America. Incredibly, the Irish government now seems willing to put the nation's economic wellbeing at risk, ostensibly because of imports from the occupied territories of mainly avocados, dates, and olives – with an annual value of just €136,000. The considerable economic myopia of the OTB is matched only by its political naïveté. Its definition of occupied territories even includes areas that America recognises as being fully under Israeli sovereignty. Take Jerusalem. The bill compounds its US political problems by describing the area of Jerusalem where the American embassy is located as an illegal 'Settlement'. Recently, there have been many dire warnings of the potentially severe consequences of passing the OTB. Jim Risch, the Chair of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, did not pull any punches. Ireland, he said, is 'on a hateful, anti-Semitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering. If this legislation is implemented, America will have to reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties.' Two weeks ago, an Irish Times poll suggested that the Irish public is becoming increasingly concerned about the bill's potential negative consequences. Displaying classic signs of buyer's remorse, almost half of those polled were in favour of either not passing it, or wanted further clarification on its economic implications. There are signs too that the government is catching up with the changing public mood. In a let-this-chalice-pass-from-me moment, a government minister said that the whole issue of the boycott 'should be dealt with at EU level. Frankly that would be the best solution.' Indeed, as that would get the government off the hook on which it had impaled itself. It was a belated recognition that Ireland may have gone too far out on a limb on this issue. With the Dail in summer recess, the government has some breathing space to assess its options before the OTB comes up for legislative review in the autumn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store