Alaska Legislature passes budget with $1,000 dividend and adjourns for the year
The Alaska Legislature adjourned its regular session on Tuesday, one day earlier than expected, after passing a 'maintenance level' state budget that contains a $1,000 Permanent Fund dividend. Legislators do not expect a special session this year.
'I would like to thank all of you for getting to this point: a day early, and before midnight. Pretty remarkable,' said Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak.
Legislators adjourned hours after overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy's veto of a major education bill. During the time in between, they passed a series of bills, including a ban on payday lending, changes to tax collection for Turo, and policies for prisoners' use of tablet PCs, among others.
This year, the first of the two-year 34th Alaska State Legislature, 32 bills were passed by both the House and the Senate.
After the House ended its formal work for the year, legislative aides began celebrating with music and pizza, filling the Capitol's fourth floor with singing and cheering.
During the session, legislators contended with falling oil revenue. Legislators didn't pass any tax increases, instead adopting significant budget cuts. The Alaska House navigated partisan divisions that left its majority coalition — 14 Democrats, 5 independents and 2 Republicans — with only a one-vote margin over a 19-person House Republican minority.
That coalition majority, and a similar one in the Senate, had to negotiate with a governor who has significantly different policy views from the coalitions.
Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, said the early adjournment is something to be proud of.
'I'm pretty pleased that we achieved it,' he said.
It was the first time since 2018 that the Legislature did not reach the constitutional limit of 121 days to complete the session, though the 2020 session was interrupted by a seven-week break due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
'In a year where the House was sharply divided in terms of numbers, oil prices sank, we did our best to work with the governor, who, at many times, was not seemingly here in the building, and we put it all together,' Edgmon said.
House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, said her caucus wasn't satisfied with the result.
'I think we're disappointed that we didn't address more issues related to energy and the challenges we have and the opportunities that we have with resource development and energy and dovetailing with the president and our congressional delegation,' she said. 'So we wanted more legislation in that area. But as far as adjourning, it is what it is, and we're just going to gear up for next year.'
One of the Legislature's final acts before adjournment was to pass the state's operating budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
'You could say that both the operating and the capital budget, the two main budgets, were maintenance-level budgets,' Edgmon said.
The capital and operating budgets, including money for next fiscal year and changes to the current fiscal year, spend $6.2 billion, when looking only at general-purpose state spending. If federal funding and things like fees, college tuition and other money is included, the budget bills spend $16.3 billion.
General-purpose state spending is down significantly. The enacted budget bills from last spring totaled more than $6.5 billion.
Legislators started the budget-drafting process with the expectation that North Slope oil prices would average $68 per barrel in the next fiscal year.
By the end, that expectation had dropped to $64, and the federal government — which pays for about 40% of the combined budget bills — had begun cutting its contributions.
As revenue projections declined, legislators slashed programs from the budget, including things like new state troopers for the Matanuska-Susitna Borough.
A relative handful of budget increases made it through the process — money for mental health treatment in Anchorage, early childhood education programs, and child advocacy centers, which help the survivors of child sexual abuse.
Those increases — and all other parts of the budget — are subject to approval by the governor, who has the power to veto individual line items. Every year of his term, Dunleavy has vetoed significant amounts from the budget.
In the House, legislators failed to pass one part of the budget — a roughly $200 million draw from the state's principal savings account, the Constitutional Budget Reserve, in order to pay for a deficit in the current fiscal year, which ends June 30.
Conditional language in the budget says that if the CBR vote fails, the state will instead take up to $100 million from the accounts of the state's investment bank — the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority — and the state's higher education investment fund.
The vote failed after members of the House Republican minority opposed it. Thirty votes are required to spend from the reserve.
'I wasn't comfortable going into savings,' said Costello. 'I felt like we could have done more work on the budget and involved our House Finance Committee team, which has a lot of experience, so I just wasn't willing to give my CBR vote to go into savings.'
Costello said she feels that other members of the minority felt similarly.
Next year, legislators expect that they will need to spend heavily from the CBR in order to balance the budget.
In addition, legislators are expected to pass major policy bills, including a revival of the state's pension program for public employees, and election reform bills.
'Hold on to your hat, Nellie, for next session, because it could be much more challenging, as we all know,' Edgmon said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Democratic lawmakers denied entry to Alligator Alcatraz immigration detention site
A group of Florida Democratic state lawmakers was blocked from entering the Alligator Alcatraz immigrant detention facility in the Everglades Thursday, despite citing legal authority for an official legislative site visit. Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried issued a statement following the incident, saying, "Lawmakers on the ground were just blocked from entering a state-funded detention site because of so-called 'safety concerns.' This is a taxpayer-funded facility, run by the State of Florida. Our elected officials have every legal right to walk through those gates." Fried added, "What are Ron DeSantis and his administration trying to hide? If it's unsafe for lawmakers to visit, how is it safe for anyone inside?" Democrats raise concerns over conditions Ahead of the attempted site visit, the Democratic lawmakers said in a joint statement, "As lawmakers, we have both the legal right and moral responsibility to inspect this site, demand answers, and expose this abuse before it becomes the national blueprint." They also voiced concerns about conditions for detainees. First group of detainees arrives The first group of detainees arrived at the facility, according to a spokesperson for Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier. "Detainees began arriving last night. Under President Trump's leadership, we are working at turbo speed on cost-effective and innovative ways to deliver on the American people's mandate for mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens," said Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. "We will expand facilities and bed space in just days, thanks to our partnership with Florida." The facility, located at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, is expected to house up to thousands when fully operational. Built in just eight days across 10 miles of Everglades terrain, the center includes more than 200 security cameras, over 28,000 feet of barbed wire and 400 security personnel, according to state officials.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want Cheaper Solar Panels, Home Batteries or a Heat Pump? Better Act Soon
(Bloomberg) -- The Republican-led US Senate's passage of legislation to eliminate incentives for clean energy means homeowners likely have until the end of the year to install solar panels, batteries and heat pumps before costs soar. NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees California Exempts Building Projects From Environmental Law The bill must still be reconciled with the House of Representatives version and signed into law by President Donald Trump. But the Senate action has dashed advocates' hopes that it might restore some Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) subsidies, or at least give people more time to claim a 30% tax credit on the five-figure cost of installing rooftop solar and home battery storage systems. The Senate bill terminates those subsidies, along with a $2,000 tax credit for buying heat pumps, after Dec. 31 and repeals a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase of some electric vehicles after Sept. 30. A loophole that allowed carmakers to pass that savings to customers who lease EVs also would end then. 'The repeal of the credits takes away an option for households to gain not just climate friendly appliances but appliances and systems that effectively enabled them to cut their energy bills,' said Ari Matusiak, chief executive officer of Rewiring America, a nonprofit that advocates for community electrification. He noted that 3.4 million households claimed IRA tax credits in 2023. Matusiak said the subsidies' original expiration in 2032 gave homeowners long-term assurance that when a fossil fuel furnace or water heater suddenly failed, they would receive financial help to replace them with high-efficiency but more expensive electric versions and could install subsidized solar panels to power the devices. Now with those tax credits disappearing, homeowners and installers are scrambling. Martyna Kowalczyk, chief executive officer of Solartime, a family-owned Dallas area solar installer, said she's been interviewing prospective project managers to handle an expected influx of customers in the coming months. 'I am trying to prepare for the rabbit race,' said Kowalczyk. 'Everyone who is considering solar will try to get in this year. And next year will be a drought.' For homeowners, there's reason to rush to their local installer. The tax credits would save more than $10,000 on an average $35,000 system. Most solar panels and home batteries are imported and their cost is likely to rise due to US tariffs. But the looming deadline to claim the tax credits means it's crucial to choose an installer with the capacity to design a rooftop array and battery system, obtain the necessary permits and complete the job in a matter of months. Under the House version of the tax legislation, only systems installed and 'placed in service' by a utility before the tax credits' expiration qualify for the incentives. That raises an issue beyond the control of the installer — the time it takes for your local utility to connect a completed solar array to the grid. In Northern California, for instance, utility Pacific Gas & Electric says it usually flips the switch on a new solar system in five to 10 business days but the process can take up to a month. The Senate bill softens the blow a bit by deleting the 'placed into service' requirement. But homeowners would have to pay for solar and battery systems by Dec. 31 to be eligible for the tax credit. The risk is that delays push completion and activation of a solar and battery array beyond the deadline to claim tax credits and a homeowner is left on the hook for the full cost of the system. Other factors to consider include the age of your roof and whether it needs to be replaced before installing solar panels. Also, make sure your home's electrical panel has sufficient capacity to accommodate a solar and battery system or heat pumps. Even before the tax bill, A1 Sun, a Berkeley, California-based installer, was already booked through the end of 2025. 'We are placed in the unfortunate position of both not being able to take advantage of any sort of 'gold rush' for new contracts this year, and also having a lot of anxiety about being able to meet our commitments to install those customers who already had contracts in place,' said Reuben Ly, sales manager for family owned A1 Sun. 'It's just pulling the rug out from underneath us,' he said of the tax bill. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
President Trump wants to celebrate 250 years of independence with a UFC fight at the White House
The Republican president also announced a culminating festival on the National Mall in Washington, and a separate athletic competition featuring high school athletes from across the country. 'So every one of our national parks, battlefields, and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250. And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight,' Trump said. Advertisement ″Think of this on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there," he said, adding that it would be a 'full fight' with 20,000 to 25,000 people. Related : A White House spokesperson said they had no details to share beyond the president's announcement. Trump has recently enjoyed standing ovations and cage-side seats for several UFC fights, including an appearance immediately after his 2024 reelection and another just last month alongside White for two championship fights.