
5 years after national security law, has Hong Kong bounced back?
In the second of a two-part series on the national security law, we look at how the city has had to battle a negative narrative over the past five years. Read part 1
here
Soon after Hong Kong reopened in early 2023 as harsh pandemic restrictions were finally lifted, veteran lawmaker Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee embarked on a solo mission to the West.
Visiting Brussels to meet European Union officials in September 2023, she sought to explain fundamental political and legal changes in the city and how it would not be deterred by its critics.
Beijing had reshaped the political landscape, first by imposing a sweeping
national security law in 2020, then by introducing major electoral reforms to ensure that only 'patriots' ruled the city.
By then too, a dark shadow had settled over the city, blanketing more nuanced and varied views about Hong Kong into one coagulated negative narrative that it had become a police state. With the national security law, no one was safe.
Diplomats, bankers and business people were told to carry burner phones when entering Hong Kong. The city's future was over, its past a romanticised era where democracy reigned, or so this gloomy tale went.
It did not help that Hong Kong residents had also left the city in droves, drawn by easier pathways to emigration laid out by Western nations and partly because of the pandemic restrictions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's opposition party folds, citing ‘immense political pressure' and ‘safety fears'
Hong Kong's opposition League of Social Democrats on Sunday cited 'immense political pressure' and 'safety' of its members in folding the party months before its 20th anniversary. 'We sadly announce that facing immense political pressure, and having considered all factors, especially the safety of our members and those who walk with us, we can only sadly announce our dissolution,' the party chairwoman Chan Po-ying said on Sunday. When asked to specify the 'political pressure' it faced, Chan said she could say nothing beyond the 'disbandment statement' the party prepared. The press conference at a Chai Wan industrial building was attended by Chan and six members, such as Figo Chan Ho-wun, Jimmy Sham Tsz-kit, Raphael Wong Ho-ming and Tsang Kin-shing. There was a heavy police presence outside the venue, with dozens of media outlets packing the small room. Reading the statement titled 'rather be ashes than dust' in a press conference, Chan said the party, established for 19 years, recently experienced a 'crisis where almost all of its leadership faced imprisonment due to civil disobedience'.


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
So, Hong Kong has pledged to legalise ride-hailing. Don't hold your breath
This week marks the third anniversary of John Lee Ka-chiu taking up the office of chief executive, with just two years to go in the current term. I wonder if we are getting close to a sensible resolution of Hong Kong's taxi/hired car situation. Though I am an optimist, on the basis of past form, I find it difficult to be confident. Advertisement After all, 2025 also marks the 11th anniversary of Uber setting up in Hong Kong. Yet here we are – two Hong Kong chief executives have come and gone, and a company known around the world for offering a quality transport service still operates here in a legal grey area without a proper regulatory framework . Meanwhile, it and other ride-hailing companies operate smoothly around the world, including in all our competitor cities in the region. But let's start with the taxi situation. I am not going to join the chorus of complaints about poor service overcharging , dangerous driving and geriatric drivers for two reasons. First, these have been well aired and there are mechanisms for addressing them, albeit of doubtful efficacy. And secondly because I have always received reasonable service. Possibly because of my crewcut hairstyle and use of Cantonese in giving directions, the drivers assume I might be a retired police officer and are worried I could still have friends in the force. But I take the basic point that, a quarter of the way through the 21st century, the vast majority of our taxis still require payment in cash. We say we are going all out to attract tourists from around the world but our marketing material advises visitors to bring cash if they plan to take a taxi. Advertisement I know that starting next January , all cabs must have installed equipment for accepting payment by card. But why has it taken so long? And what assurance do we have that passengers will not be hearing the Cantonese equivalent of: 'Sorry gov, the machine's on the blink, is it OK if we just settle this one in cash?'


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
After Nato chaos, ‘irrelevant' Europe shambles towards China summit
For months since the return of US President Donald Trump, there has been a roaring trade in papers and speeches about how to make Europe a truly independent geopolitical player. The term ' strategic autonomy ', championed by the French government during Trump's first term, is back in vogue. But the independence movement was on the ropes this week, when a series of summits thrust Europe's weakness on global affairs into the spotlight ahead of a bout of engagement with China. On Monday, a meeting of the European Union's foreign ministers exposed the bloc's impotence on the ongoing crises in the Middle East. On Tuesday and Wednesday, meanwhile, the world watched as European leaders fawned over Trump to try to keep him engaged at the annual Nato summit in The Hague WhatsApp groups across Europe lit up after Trump published text messages from Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, telling him that he was 'flying into another big success'. They lit up again after he called Trump 'daddy' a day later. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' wrote Rutte, who spent 14 years as the Dutch prime minister until last July, while only once hitting Nato's defence spending targets.