logo
Could Donald Trump's power struggle with Federal Reserve create next financial crisis?

Could Donald Trump's power struggle with Federal Reserve create next financial crisis?

Physics often has a funny habit of accurately describing human behaviour.
Take Newton's third law that, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
It's a maxim that could apply to all manner of geopolitical events and upheavals right now from the wars tearing apart the Middle East to Vladimir Putin's disastrous military adventure in Ukraine.
And then there is America.
After just five months in power, US President Donald Trump predictably has driven a wrecking ball through the foundations of American society with his attacks on the legal system, various arms of government, academia and the media.
In recent weeks, he's re-opened an old front from his first term, the independence of the US Federal Reserve and, particularly, its chair Jerome Powell — who, incidentally, Trump appointed.
It's a battle that could have profound impacts on the US economy and, by extension, the rest of the world.
For Trump, this is unfinished business, you might say, after belittling and demonising Powell during his first term for not slavishly following his orders. Now, he's at it again.
This time, however, he has met an intractable force.
Unlike Congress, the Republican party and some in the courts, the Fed boss is standing his ground and refusing, point blank, to bend to Trump's will to immediately slash interest rates.
Late last year, when asked whether he would resign if Trump demanded it, Powell gave an uncharacteristically blunt answer.
"No."
When pressed as to whether he was worried the new president would remove him, he uttered a simple retort, twice:
Unsurprisingly, Powell has been met with a barrage of schoolyard insults from the Commander in Chief — "dumb", "stupid", "numbskull" and "a disaster", to name a few. That's just in public.
With just under a year of Powell's term to go, the president seems hell bent on announcing his replacement within months, possibly sooner, to stymie his power.
The reaction could be severe and ultimately may destabilise America's economy.
Powell threw down the gauntlet to Trump last week in a hearing before Congress.
When questioned as to why the Fed had decided to keep interest rates on hold, the Fed chair calmly sheeted the blame back on the president and his tariff policies.
"We do expect tariff inflation to show up more," Powell said.
That's an eminently responsible course of action. Cutting rates ahead of a potential inflation spike could spell disaster for the US and the rest of the world.
And then there's the potential impact on global growth. Even the vastly reduced proposed impost on China — now set at 40 per cent — is expected to have widespread and damaging consequences.
In the meantime, the president is racing to have his "One Big Beautiful Bill" pushed through the House by July 19. Beyond that date, the whole thing lapses, and the process will need to start all over again.
There are two reasons Trump wants interest rates cut to almost 1 per cent immediately.
The first is that it will lift his approval ratings. But the second is the ballooning US government debt. The annual interest bill on its $US36 trillion debt is now bigger than America's defence spend.
Cutting rates would dramatically reduce the interest bill and make it appear as though the new administration is successfully managing the economy.
Given Trump's signature Big Beautiful Bill — with its tax cuts for the rich and increased spending — will dramatically blow out that debt over the next 30 years, he's desperate to create that illusion.
Right now, US debt is around 120 per cent of GDP, the kind of levels that caused a full-blown debt crisis with Greece and the European Union just over a decade ago.
With Trump's bill, it could grow to between 170 per cent and 190 per cent of GDP by 2054.
Stock markets finished the financial year on a high. Our market delivered returns just shy of 10 per cent, while Wall Street hit records over the weekend.
They've cast aside the chaos caused by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs in April, which are about to get second airing, and a war in Iran.
But bond markets remain uneasy, pushing US market interest rates higher, as global investors continue to shift money out of America. The US dollar is now at a three-year low.
Uppermost among the concerns is the independence of the US Federal Reserve and whether it can maintain its role as a responsible agency for monetary policy.
The president, half in jest, pondered aloud a fortnight ago whether he may be able to appoint himself to replace Powell.
Back in April, he canvassed sacking him, but dismissed the idea as bond markets went into revolt over his tariff plans.
Trump now seems convinced that Powell's replacement could be named early and possibly even sit as a "shadow chair" on the Fed board.
Some commentators are concerned that such a move would make Powell a lame-duck chair.
But the greater risk surely would be that the Federal Reserve would be a lame-duck central bank.
For whoever Trump appoints — regardless of their ability or standing — may well be tainted by the perception that they are nothing more than a presidential puppet with a primary focus on securing another election win rather than managing the economy.
Such a move could spark a repeat of April's bond market panic. Back then, investors dumped US government bonds, which pushed US market interest rates sharply higher.
Cutting official US rates could have the opposite reaction, pushing market rates higher as confidence ebbs and perceived US risks rise.
That, in turn, could put serious added strains on America's ability to service its debt.
But the showdown between Powell and Trump goes deeper than debt servicing ability. It goes to the heart of credibility at the world's most powerful financial institution.
That's dangerous territory to be playing in.
This time next week, Michele Bullock and the rate-setting gurus at the Reserve Bank of Australia will settle in for yet another nail-biting decision on where domestic interest rates are headed.
Financial markets have all but signed off on another 0.25 percentage point rate cut to 3.6 per cent.
Economists, who were divided last week, are mostly coming to the same conclusion.
The most recent GDP figures were weak, and inflation is cooling at a faster clip than expected.
While the RBA in the past has been extremely cautious with rate cuts and could easily wait until August — after the June quarter inflation data drops — the weak domestic data and the rising wave of offshore uncertainty is probably enough to tip the balance.
The fallout from a US bond market conniption in reaction to a loss of confidence in the Fed could be severe.
There'd be the inevitable financial markets jolt. But that would feed through to the broader financial system, the complex structure that oils the wheels of business and feeds through to the fragile emotions that determine much of our worldly wellbeing.
Trust, confidence and optimism can quickly evaporate and turn to fear.
Actions and reactions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas seeks ceasefire guarantees as scores more killed
Hamas seeks ceasefire guarantees as scores more killed

Perth Now

time24 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Hamas seeks ceasefire guarantees as scores more killed

Hamas is seeking guarantees that a new US ceasefire proposal for Gaza would lead to the war's end, a source close to the militant group says, as medics say Israeli strikes across the territory have killed scores more people. Israeli officials on Thursday said prospects for reaching a ceasefire deal and hostage deal appeared high, nearly 21 months since the war between Israel and Hamas began. Efforts for a Gaza truce have gathered steam after the US secured a ceasefire to end a 12-day aerial conflict between Israel and Iran, but on the ground in Gaza intensified Israeli strikes continued unabated, killing at least 59 people on Thursday, according to health authorities in the territory. On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said that Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas, during which the parties will work to end the war. Hamas is seeking clear guarantees that the ceasefire will eventually lead to the war's end, the source close to the group said. Two Israeli officials said those details were still being worked out. Ending the war has been the main sticking point in repeated rounds of failed negotiations. Egyptian security sources said Egyptian and Qatari mediators were working to secure US and international guarantees that talks on ending the war would continue as a way of convincing Hamas to accept the two-month truce proposal. A separate source familiar with the matter said that Israel was expecting Hamas' response by Friday and that if it was positive, an Israeli delegation would join indirect talks to cement the deal. The proposal includes the staggered release of 10 living Israeli hostages and the return of the bodies of 18 more in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, sources say. Of the 50 remaining hostages in Gaza, 20 are believed to still be alive. A senior Israeli official close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said preparations were in place to approve a ceasefire deal even as the premier heads to Washington to meet Trump on Monday. Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen, who sits on Netanyahu's security cabinet, told news website Ynet that there was "definitely readiness to advance a deal." In Gaza, however, there was little sign of relief. According to medics at Nasser hospital, at least 20 people were killed by Israeli fire en route to an aid distribution site. Further north, at least 17 people were killed in an Israeli strike at a school in Gaza City, according to medics. The Israeli military said it targeted a key Hamas gunman operating there and that it took precautions to reduce risk to civilians. "Suddenly, we found the tent collapsing over us and a fire burning. We don't know what happened," one witness, Wafaa Al-Arqan, who was among the people sheltering there, told Reuters. "What can we do? Is it fair that all these children burned?" The war began when Hamas fighters stormed into Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages back to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry, while displacing most of the population of more than two million, triggering widespread hunger and leaving much of the territory in ruins. Israel says it won't end the war while Hamas is still armed and ruling Gaza. Hamas, severely weakened, says it won't lay down its weapons but is willing to release all the hostages still in Gaza if Israel ends the war.

Iran's latest decision reveals flaw in Trump's big plan
Iran's latest decision reveals flaw in Trump's big plan

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Iran's latest decision reveals flaw in Trump's big plan

If before the strike Iran seemed able to race for a bomb but was not yet quite ready, after the strike it is dependent on playing a giant game of nuclear three-card monte. Iran will keep shuffling its nuclear assets around, as the Mossad, US intelligence agencies and the banned UN inspectors will constantly be looking for human intelligence or satellite evidence of the tunnels and caves where the projects might be hidden. 'After the strike the old problem remains: Iran has enriched uranium, it has centrifuges and there are no inspectors,' said Jake Sullivan, who helped refine strike plans against the Iranian program when he served as national security adviser under president Joe Biden, who decided against using them. 'With mowing the lawn, you have uncertainty, instability and continued military action,' he said. 'Yet if you try to do a deal, President Trump will confront the same problem he had before: Do you insist on complete dismantlement, which Iran probably won't agree to even now? Or try to contain the program,' allowing for some form of low-level, highly inspected enrichment, 'in a way that gives you confidence they can't go for a nuke?' The Pentagon is not exactly encouraging that confidence. Its chief spokesperson, Sean Parnell, said on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) that he believed Iran's nuclear program had been pushed back 'probably closer to two years' – an assessment that, if accurate, would mean that Trump bought less time with the attack than president Barack Obama did when he signed the 2015 accord that froze Iran's program. With their main production facilities buried beneath the rubble, the only leverage the Iranians have these days is the suggestion – with no proof – that their stockpile of 10 or so bombs' worth of fuel survived, and their surviving nuclear scientists have access to it. Maybe they are bluffing. But it is the best card they have to play. And the only way to be sure, Sullivan noted, is 'with a deal, one that ensures every inch of the program is inspected'. Other experts agree. 'We can't yet judge how likely the covert nuclear weapons production scenario really is,' said Robert Einhorn, a former US diplomat and Brookings Institution nuclear expert who dealt with the Iranian program a decade ago. But, he noted, 'it is a potential pathway for Iran building a small nuclear arsenal relatively soon, and so we must do what we can to block it', chiefly getting International Atomic Energy Agency monitors back into the country's widely distributed nuclear facilities, including two suspected new enrichment centres. Iranian officials have accused the agency's director-general, Rafael Mariano Grossi, of complicity in the attacks. Grossi says he had no involvement or advance warning. Early talk of a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to reach a post-strike nuclear deal – presumably a more restrictive one than was on the table before the attack – has melted away, at least for now. The Iranians insist they want assurances they will not be attacked during negotiations again. It is unclear that they would believe such a commitment even if it is offered, since Trump declared in mid-June that he was giving them two weeks to respond to a final US offer. The B-2 bombers were over their targets two days later. With Iran's leaders portraying the end of the conflict with Israel as a victory, and downplaying the damage done by US strikes, experts see little hope of an accord that would satisfy both sides. 'They are not going to agree to unconditional surrender next week or even next month,' said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, using the term Trump employed before he ordered military action. 'I think that's a process which plays out the more we tighten the economic grip on their ability to export oil.' The central question, of course, is what lesson the Iranians emerge with as they survey the damage done. Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have declared there is only one lesson for the Iranians: their nuclear program is over. That is why Trump and Hegseth are so invested in the narrative that the program was 'obliterated', suggesting it could never be revived. Loading Most experts expect Iran to come to a different conclusion; that countries that inch toward a nuclear weapon – but stop short of crossing the line, as Iran did – get bombed. In contrast, countries that race for an arsenal do not. The Israelis bombed the Osirak reactor in 1981 to keep Iraq from getting the bomb, though Saddam Hussein resurrected the program before the first Gulf War, only to have it discovered and dismantled. (He famously did not build it anew before the US-led invasion in 2003.) A little more than two decades later, Muammar Gaddafi gave up his nascent nuclear program, before many of the components were unboxed, a move he may have regretted as he was chased across Libya and killed eight years later. In 2007, Israeli jets took out a Syrian nuclear reactor that was being constructed with the help of North Korea, to prevent the Assad government from going down the nuclear road. In all three cases, the countries had not yet made it to the cusp of a bomb. Loading Iran may conclude from the events of the past 10 days that its wiser choice for the future is to follow the path of North Korea. Rather than walk up to the nuclear line, it stepped over it, conducting its first nuclear test in 2006, when president George W. Bush was in office. Since then, North Korea has developed an arsenal of 60 or more nuclear weapons, experts say, and it is creeping up on a capability to reach the United States with its missiles – one of the reasons Trump is pushing so hard for a 'Golden Dome' defensive shield. One former senior intelligence official noted that if Iran already had nuclear weapons, rather than inching toward them, neither Israel nor the United States would have taken the risk of attacking. It is a mistake, he added, that the Iranians are not likely to make twice.

S&P 500, Nasdaq new record highs on strong labour data
S&P 500, Nasdaq new record highs on strong labour data

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

S&P 500, Nasdaq new record highs on strong labour data

The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq have touched fresh record highs after a stronger-than-expected jobs report pointed to a resilient labour market amid concerns about US President Donald Trump's tariff policies potentially weighing on the economy. Nvidia was trading at a record high, up 2.2 per cent, and was track to become the most valuable company in history, with the chipmaker's market capitalisation nearing $US4 trillion ($A6.1trillion). Data showed nonfarm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs last month after an upwardly revised 144,000 advance in May, while economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls rising 110,000. Unemployment fell to 4.1 per cent last month, against expectations of a rise to 4.3 per cent. "We were all expecting the hard data would start to show some cracks, and we really haven't seen that with the jobs report coming in much better than expected," said Brian Klimke, chief market strategist at Cetera Investment Management LLC. "That just puts the Fed on pause and gives it more time to wait right now because the labour market is really resilient." Traders quickly priced out chances of an interest-rate cut in July, with the odds of a 25-basis-point reduction in September at 69.2 per cent, according to CME Group's Fedwatch tool, down from 74 per cent a week ago. The data was released a day early because of the Independence Day holiday on Friday. Trading volumes were lighter than usual on Thursday with markets due to close early. Another dataset showed the number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell to a six-week low last week. US services sector activity picked up in June as orders rebounded but employment contracted for the third time this year, underlining the impact of policy uncertainty on businesses. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq extended their record-winning session as signs of a resilient economy and easing trade tensions following a series of agreements between the United States and other countries continue to propel stocks higher. Meanwhile, the blue-chip Dow was just 0.8 per cent below all-time highs touched in December. All three main indexes were on track to end the holiday-truncated week on a positive note, if gains hold. Meanwhile, Republicans in the US House of Representatives advanced President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill toward a final yes-or-no vote, appearing to overcome internal party divisions over its cost. The legislation is expected to add $US3.4 trillion ($A5.2 trillion) to the nation's $US36.2 trillion ($A55.1 trillion) in debt over the next decade, according to nonpartisan analysts. In early trading on Thursday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 284.02 points, or 0.64 per cent, to 44,769.03, the S&P 500 gained 41.23 points, or 0.67 per cent, to 6,268.65, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 161.74 points, or 0.79 per cent, to 20,554.87. Shares of chip design software firms Synopsys and Cadence Design Systems climbed three per cent and 3.7 per cent, respectively, in premarket trading after the US lifted export restrictions on chip design software to China, signaling a thaw in trade tensions between the world's top two economies. Tripadvisor climbed 15 per cent after the Wall Street Journal reported activist investor Starboard Value had built a more than nine per cent stake in the online travel company. Datadog jumped 9.4 per cent after the cloud security firm was set to replace Juniper Networks on the S&P 500. US solar stocks jumped in early trading, with First Solar rising about 10 per cent to become the top-performing individual stock on the S&P 500 index. Advancing issues outnumbered decliners by a 2.53-to-1 ratio on the NYSE, and by a 2.29-to-1 ratio on the Nasdaq. The S&P 500 posted 36 new 52-week highs and one new low, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 85 new highs and 13 new lows.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store