Veterans Affairs Reverses Course on Large-Scale Layoffs
In a news release, VA said that it was on pace to reduce its total staff by nearly 30,000 employees by the end of this fiscal year, a push that the department said eliminates the need for a 'large-scale reduction-in-force.' The announcement marks a significant reversal for the Trump administration, which had planned for months to cut VA by roughly 83,000 employees, according to plans revealed in an internal memo circulated to agency staffers in March. At the time, VA Secretary Douglas A. Collins said in remarks shared to social media that the cuts were tough but necessary.
'We'll be making major changes, so get used to it now,' Collins said at the time. The White House argued that the downsizing would make a 'bloated' VA more efficient and transparent.
But the proposed staff-slashing quickly drew backlash from veterans and their advocates, who warned that the quality of VA service would decline. Morale plummeted among employees, spurring many to leave their jobs.
VA's decision not to cut more of its workforce through an RIF comes after blowback from several veterans' groups, Congress and VA staffers who warned that an agency with less manpower and fewer resources would negatively impact veterans. Veterans, who make up a disproportionate share of the federal workforce, felt the brunt of the rapid push to shrink that workforce, stirring ire in a reliable political base for Republicans.
Continuing to pursue deep cuts to the VA workforce could have carried major political risks for President Donald Trump, who is highly popular among veterans and who has repeatedly said he would not order cuts to their VA benefits.
In a statement Monday, VA said its original plan to conduct department-wide RIFs to reduce its staff levels by up to 15 percent was avoided after employees left the agency through retirements, normal attrition and deferred resignations. Additionally, a federal hiring freeze helped reduce the number of employment slots, the agency said in the statement. In January, VA recorded roughly 484,000 employees. By June, there were 467,000 staffers left – a loss of nearly 17,000 workers, according to agency numbers. The agency expects that between July and September nearly 12,000 additional staffers will exit through normal attrition, voluntary early retirement, or the deferred resignation program.
In an email VA staffers received Monday, Collins said that 'after nearly four months of careful study, analysis, and action, I am pleased to report to you that VA is headed in the right direction – both in terms of staff levels and customer service.' Collins insisted that even though the agency is expected to lose a total of 30,000 staffers 'performance continues to improve.'
'These improvements include huge drops in the number of Veterans waiting for disability benefits, sizable increases in claims processing productivity, and extraordinary progress regarding our electronic health record modernization,' Collins wrote in the email.
In the statement Monday, VA said it had established 'multiple safeguards in place to ensure these staff reductions do not impact Veteran care or benefits.' Mission-critical jobs, the agency wrote, are exempt from the deferred retirement and early retirement offers. Additionally, 350,000 jobs in the agency are exempt from the federal hiring freeze.
VA, which provides medical care for millions of veterans and their families and is among the largest employers of federal workers, had already seen cuts under the second Trump administration, losing 2,400 workers to layoffs in February. Facing the threat of further cuts, thousands more VA workers opted this spring for an early retirement offered by Trump, The Washington Post reported.
Frustrations began to build this summer over the diminishment of the agency. In June, thousands of veterans rallied in Washington against further reductions, and similar veteran-led protests unfolded at hundreds of locations across dozens of other states.
The reversal may also reflect yet another decline in the power and influence of billionaire Elon Musk and the DOGE team he previously led, which stormed into government in January determined to slash staff and spending. After a few months of frenzied cutting – some of it halted by court challenges – Musk and Trump fell out in a highly public spat over the merits of the president's tax and spending cuts bill. Musk left Washington in a huff, soon followed by some top aides who had been detailed to DOGE.
Other DOGE team members remain ensconced in government and are working toward various Trump policy goals, including revising or canceling dozens of rules and gun restrictions at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Still, DOGE's clout has diminished in other ways. Last month, for example, the team lost its power to control the government's process for awarding billions of dollars in federal funds.
In his email Monday, Collins told the remaining VA staff that they are 'an important part' of the administration's efforts to revamp the agency.
'I thank you for your hard work and dedication to our vital mission,' he wrote.
In a statement to The Washington Post, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), the top Democrat in the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, said Monday's announcement 'makes clear VA is bleeding employees across the board at an unsustainable rate because of the toxic work environment created by this Administration and DOGE's slash and trash policies.'
'This is not 'natural' attrition, it is not strategic, and it will inevitably impact veterans' care and benefits – no matter what blanket assurances the VA Secretary hides behind,' Blumenthal said.
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee Chairman Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) struck a more celebratory tone, saying he spoke with Collins about the change in plan earlier Monday. Moran said he appreciated Collins's 'efforts to make certain veterans are at the center of any changes at the VA.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump says he will impose 50% tariff on US copper imports
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he will announce a 50% tariff on copper later in the day, aiming to boost U.S. production of a metal critical to electric vehicles, military hardware, the power grid and many consumer goods. Trump's decision to impose copper tariffs surprised markets -- coming earlier and at a higher rate than the industry had expected. U.S. Comex copper futures jumped more than 12% after the announcement to a record high. Trump told reporters at a White House cabinet meeting that he planned to make the copper tariff announcement later in the day but he did not say when the tariff would take effect. "I believe the tariff on copper, we're going to make 50%," Trump said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on CNBC on Tuesday that the copper tariffs would likely be put in place by the end of July or Aug. 1. The Trump administration announced a so-called Section 232 investigation into U.S. imports of the red metal in February. The deadline for the investigation to conclude was November, and it was unclear whether the fresh tariffs meant the investigation had concluded. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The National Mining Association declined to comment, saying it preferred to wait until details were released. The American Critical Minerals Association did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Copper is used in construction, transportation, electronics and many other industries. The United States imports roughly half of its copper needs each year. Major copper projects across the U.S. have faced strong opposition in recent years due to a variety of reasons, including Rio Tinto and BHP's Resolution Copper project in Arizona and Northern Dynasty Minerals's Pebble Mine project in Alaska. Shares of the world's largest copper producer, Phoenix-based Freeport-McMoRan, shot up nearly 5% in Tuesday afternoon trading. The company, which produced 1.26 billion pounds of copper in the United States last year, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Freeport, which would benefit from U.S. copper tariffs but worries that the duties would hurt the global economy, has advised Trump to focus on boosting U.S. copper production. Countries set to be most affected by any new U.S. copper tariff would be Chile, Canada and Mexico, which were the top suppliers to the United States of refined copper, copper alloys and copper products in 2024, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Chile, Canada and Peru -- three of the largest copper suppliers to the United States -- have told the Trump administration that imports from their countries do not threaten U.S. interests and should not face tariffs. All three have free trade deals with the United States. Mexico's economy ministry, Chile's Foreign Ministry and Canada's Finance Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Chile's Mining Ministry and Codelco copper miner declined to comment. A 50% tariff on copper imports would be a hit to U.S. companies that use the metal because the country is years away from meeting its needs, said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank. "The U.S. has imported a whole year of demand over the past six months, so the local storage levels are ample," Hansen said. "I see a correction in copper prices following the initial jump."
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Why the MCC's Continuation is in the Interest of Nepal — and the US
After putting MCC projects on hold in January this year, the Trump administration recently said that its projects in Nepal would go ahead. The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), an American bilateral foreign aid agency, has been mired in controversy in Nepal since the get-go. It signed a $500 million compact with Nepal in September 2017. Proposed projects aimed to maintain road quality, increase the availability and reliability of electricity, and facilitate cross-border electricity trade between Nepal and India, which in turn would 'spur investments, accelerate economic growth, and reduce poverty.' As part of the deal, besides the $500 million the Americans were giving, Nepal would pitch in $197 million for the completion of the MCC projects. The projects ran into controversy after senior American officials started linking them to the Indo-Pacific Strategy (IPS), an American military construct designed to curtail China's rise. The common sentiment was that Nepal should not be a part of any military or strategic pact, especially one that harms its relations with China, the large neighbor to the north. Early in 2022, senior American officials like the MCC's then-Vice President Fatema Z. Sumar and the then-U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu threatened Nepal's political leadership that the failure to ratify the MCC on time could lead to a 'review' of America's ties with Nepal. The compact's stipulation that future disputes in the projects would be settled in line with the compact's provisions — and not Nepal's domestic laws — also irked Nepalis. At the height of the MCC disputes in 2022, Nepali political leaders, especially senior hands in the country's largest party, the Nepali Congress, strongly backed the MCC projects, even when it was not a popular thing to do. Many left-leaning leaders, too, lent their tacit support to the compact — provided it was amended before parliamentary ratification. Eventually, a middle way was found: Nepal's parliament would ratify the compact while also passing an accompanying 'interpretative declaration.' Among other things, the declaration clarified that the compact's endorsement did not mean Nepal will be 'a part of any United States' strategy, military or security alliance including the Indo-Pacific Strategy.' And in case of disputes, the Constitution of Nepal would prevail over the compact. The ratification came at the end of 2022, and the Americans accepted the interpretative declaration, clearing the way for project implementation. Nepal's interests had been secured and the country had locked in an advantageous deal. First, the MCC projects would be built on grants, thus creating no additional liability on the Nepali state. Second, its time-bound nature would be a breath of fresh air in a country where vital infrastructure projects tend to be delayed by years or even decades. Third, as the power lines being built with American money would be used to take Nepal's excess energy to India, it would help Nepal realize its old dream of prospering through the export of its electricity. Then, Donald Trump came to power in January 2025 and declared that all American aid projects, including the MCC, had been put on hold. This created confusion in Nepal as it was unclear whether the funds for Nepal would be exempted. In fact, the common belief was that the Nepal compact was dead and buried — even though it had been signed during Trump's first term as U.S. president. Nepal's liberal-minded politicians had staked their careers and credibility to push for the compact's ratification—and now the Americans were seemingly backing out. Pulling the plug on the compact would thus have made it difficult for the Nepali political class to endorse any future American project or funding. Amid this uncertainty, in the middle of June, the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu announced that Nepal had been exempted from budget cuts and the MCC projects were still scheduled for completion by their original August 2028 deadline. The announcement was timely. The projects' cancellation would have damaged bilateral ties and harmed Nepal's interests. The U.S. helps balance the oft-overwhelming influence of India and China, Nepal's two big (and only) neighbors, which is why the U.S. is often called Nepal's 'sky' or 'third' neighbor. When India blockaded landlocked Nepal in 2015-16, the United States consistently highlighted the resulting hardships of Nepali people, helping build international pressure on India to quickly lift the embargo. Even for the United States, reneging on the compact would have backfired. (It still could if Trump changes his mind again.) If their goal is to check China's rise in the region, it can only be done by winning the confidence of smaller countries like Nepal and helping them in their development endeavors. The lofty democratic ideals American officials like to emphasize tend to grate when not backed by such solid support. Of late, the U.S. has taken some dubious decisions like the suspension of visa interviews for Nepali students wanting to study in the U.S., and shutting down the USAID that was supporting key health initiatives in Nepal. But the continuity of the MCC projects suggests the Americans are not 'abandoning' Nepal. Even more importantly for Nepalis, the MCC's presence in Nepal undercuts the 'foreign policy myth' that the U.S. views Nepal through Indian lens.
8 hours ago
Yen Tumbles to 2-Week Low over Trump Tariff Letter
Tokyo, July 8 (Jiji Press)--The yen tumbled to a two-week low around 146.50 per dollar on Tuesday after U.S. President Donald Trump said in a letter to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba that his country will impose a 25 pct reciprocal tariff on goods from Japan, higher than the 24 pct he announced in April. At 5 p.m., the dollar stood at 146.03-04 yen, up from 145.19-20 yen at the same time Monday. The euro was at 1.1759-1760 dollars, up from 1.1744-1745 dollars, and at 171.73-75 yen, up from 170.52-53 yen. Trump's tariff letter prompted yen selling, as speculation grew that Japan's trade deficit could expand, and that an economic slowdown could make it difficult for the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates, market sources said. The Japanese currency was also dampened against the dollar by a rise in U.S. Treasury yields amid concerns that Trump's tariffs could rekindle inflation in the United States, they said. On the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the benchmark Nikkei 225 average closed at 39,688.81, up 101.13 points from Monday's closing, with export-oriented stocks supported by the weaker yen. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]
