‘Significant gap' between Australian companies' climate commitments and how they actually invest, analysts find
A report from climate consultancy group Pollination included analysis of the public climate disclosures of 12 major Australian companies, looking especially at their decisions on how and where to spend capital.
'What we've found is a significant gap between ambition and action,' said Richard Proudlove, the director of corporate engagement at the Investor Group on Climate Change, which commissioned the research. IGCC's members manage some $35tn of assets globally.
Proudlove said the report was the first 'deep dive' on whether Australian companies 'are actually backing their net zero commitments with real investment'.
The companies analysed were AGL, BHP, BlueScope Steel, Dyno Nobel, Orica, Qantas, Origin, Rio Tinto, Santos, South32, Woodside and Woolworths.
All those companies have been targeted for engagement by investors as part of a project called Climate Action 100+.
But the report does not single out individual companies, or name which companies had performed better than others.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Researchers at Pollination assessed companies against eight criteria related to capital investment, and found only one 'achieved high alignment' in more than half the criteria.
For example, one criteria asked whether a company was moving capital away from fossil fuels. A company with no policy to phase out the use of oil, gas and coal and no meaningful cuts in investments would have 'low alignment'.
A company with public commitments on fossil fuels, and that had cut fossil fuel spending and quantified the financial implications of those decisions, was in 'high alignment'.
Only three out of eight applicable companies on that question were in 'high alignment', with three assessed as being in 'low alignment'.
The report, called Financing Australia's Corporate Climate Transition, also describes a framework and set of guiding principles for companies on how they source, manage and spend capital.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Zoe Whitton, the managing director at Pollination Group, said: 'Companies are announcing capital expenditure numbers, but our analysis shows these disclosures don't provide enough detail for investors to assess whether the capital is sufficient or appropriately targeted to achieve their stated decarbonisation goals.'
The Australian government is expected to announce its 2035 emissions reduction target by September, and is also working on detailed plans to reduce emissions across six different industry sectors.
Whitton said: 'Without clear policy frameworks like sectoral pathways, companies lack the guidance they need for effective capital allocation, and investors can't properly evaluate their transition strategies.'
Proudlove said the level of ambition articulated in the government's plans and in the target would influence the capital investment decisions of many Australian companies.
'We're in a year where the Australian government needs to ratchet up its [climate goals] with a 2035 target. It's important that's an ambitious target.
'The detail in those [industry sector] plans and the ambition of the climate targets is an essential signal for investors and companies to commit.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Melbourne grocer's threatening note to customers sparks heated debate over common act
A controversial sign erected in a Melbourne store has sparked a heated debate over an act many have considered doing. In an attempt to stop customers from breaking off broccoli stalks prior to purchase, an unnamed greengrocer has erected a stern warning sign in their store's produce section. The cautionary notice next to the broccoli display reads: 'DO NOT BREAK Brocooli [sic]'. 'You will pay $1 extra for each you break if we find out.' The broccoli in the picture was being sold for $6.99 per kilo, which is a standard current price for the green vegetable. A Melbourne shopper spotted the sign at their local fruit and veg store and shared a picture of it to Reddit 's 'Melbourne' thread alongside the caption: 'Don't break the broccoli or else'. As Aussie households grapple with cost-of-living pressures, it would appear shoppers are trying to pay less for the weight of broccoli by removing the stalk prior taking it to the checkout. The recent post quickly ignited debate on the forum - but perhaps surprisingly, several commenters defended the store owner's sign. One person felt the store owner was justified in their insistence of charging customers for the whole broccoli. 'The reason for this is because they buy broccoli from wholesalers/farmers by weight - so when people break the stalk off broccoli, they end up losing money because no one is going to pick a discarded stalk off the shelf to buy it,' they said. The commenter, who 'used to work at a small fruit and veggie shop' added that removing stalks was their former bosses' pet peeve. 'If we were serving a customer and noticed the stalks had been removed, we had to call the boss and he would find the stalk and make the customer pay for it/put it in their bag of broccoli,' they said. Another said that removing the stalk was akin to 'stealing' from the small business because 'the stem is priced into the broccoli'. To this point, one person added they believed that the new 'epidemic of broccoli breaking bandits' was definitely a result of the 'cost of living crisis'. Another added that it would also be easy for store staff to enforce the rule because it would be blatantly obvious when someone came to the checkout with a 'stemless broccoli'. But in an interesting twist - some commenters took the thread as an opportunity to defend the overlooked broccoli stalk. 'The stems are very edible and delicious!' noted one. '[C]ut it up into thin rectangles then stir fry (add in same time you'd add something like a carrot). Waste not want not!' another added. Another person suggested: 'slice it up to put in soupy Thai curries, it's so tender'. A New Zealand expat suggested the problem could be easily resolved by simply selling the broccoli per head, rather than by weight. They wrote: 'This is so bizarre to me because back in NZ, we buy broccoli per unit, fixed price! I'd never heard of buying broccoli by weight before.' But to this point, another commenter rightly pointed out that there can be huge variance in the size of broccoli heads sold in Australia. 'Weight seems to be a better way to go because the broc in the supermarkets near me can vary in size and weight quite a bit,' the person replied. However some conspiracy theorists suggested that stores were nowadays intentionally selling broccoli with longer stems because they're 'charging by the kilo'. '[S]ome of the stem:floret ratios have gotten so out of whack,' one wrote. 'I mean, I make an effort to use the stems as well as the heads but some of the broccoli they sell now is just taking the p***. When you're selling half a foot of stem with a tiny head on top of course people are going to break it off.' Broccoli has reported to have increased in price in recent months, going from around $5 per kilo late last year to the current price of up to $11 per kilo.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Major blow for millions of Aussies with a mortgage - as Reserve Bank boss makes a grim admission
The Reserve Bank has declared it's in no rush to cut interest rates after surprising financial markets this month by keeping them on hold. The minutes of that July 8 meeting, released on Tuesday, have revealed the RBA's monetary policy board was worried about cutting rates again too soon, on the back of relief in February and May. 'They believed that lowering the cash rate a third time within the space of four meetings would be unlikely to be consistent with the strategy of easing monetary policy in a cautious and gradual manner to achieve the board's inflation and full employment objectives,' it said. 'While the flow of recent data had been broadly in line with earlier forecasts, they judged that some data had been slightly stronger than expected.' The RBA this month kept rates on hold at 3.85 per cent, surprising economists at the Big Four banks and financial markets, which had regarded relief as a 97 per cent chance. The experts had expected a July 8 cut after monthly headline inflation data for May showed the consumer price index falling to just 2.1 per cent, putting it on the low side of the Reserve Bank's two to three per cent target. They had ruled out the RBA waiting until August 12 following the late July release of June quarter inflation data. The Reserve Bank's July meeting minutes also expressed concern about headline inflation increasing from late 2025 following the expiry of $75 quarterly electricity rebates in December. 'Looking ahead, headline inflation was expected to pick up temporarily to around the top of the target range in late 2025 and remain there in 2026, reflecting the currently legislated unwinding of government energy subsidies to households,' it said.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why Kmart Australia's $89 'dupe' of a $1,000 buy is causing a huge stir
Shoppers are racing to Kmart to get their hands on the retailer's newest must-have homewares before they completely sell out. However, it's one particular coffee table that has caused the biggest stir online as it looks almost identical to a $999 designer version - but will only set you back $89. The Charles Coffee Table has just landed online and the ultra-modern piece features a sculptural disk-style top perched on bold, rounded legs. Its unique look is almost indistinguishable from the high-end Bon Coffee Table from luxe Aussie furniture brand James Lane. But while the James Lane version comes with a jaw-dropping price tag of $999, Kmart's dupe comes in at $910 less. And it's not the only version out there. Temple & Webster also stock a similar design for $600, while Fantastic Furniture's lookalike will set you back $599. The reason fans are finding the budget buy so appealing starts with its sleek whitewashed finish and bulbous 'bowling ball' legs give it a designer edge. With a compact size of 70cm in diameter and 28cm high, it's the perfect statement piece for smaller living spaces or minimalist interiors. Its unique look is almost indistinguishable from the high-end Bon Coffee Table from luxe Aussie furniture brand James Lane, which retails for $999 'Ok but rounded edges are perfect for kids,' one fan commented. 'Just saw a heap of these at my local Kmart yesterday,' another informed. 'It's so cute! But it's tiny,' a cautious shopper added. 'I want one so bad just for the legs.' The table is part of Kmart's Anko range, which has quickly become synonymous with trendy, affordable home styling. 'Fast furniture it will be Landfill in 12mths. Buy quality and buy responsibly,' one wrote, in favour of investment pieces. And while it's not handcrafted from mango wood like the James Lane original, most other shoppers have been quick to overlook that when the dupe looks as good as it does. If you're hoping to snap one up, now might be the time as stock is already dwindling online. However your best bet is to call your local store and cross your fingers. 'Kmart can't keep up with the demand for all this new stock. It's either not in all stores or sold out immediately,' said another of the coffee table's instant popularity. If you do miss out, there is still a silver lining. The matching Charles Bedside Tables, featuring the same sculptural legs and chic whitewash finish, are also online and selling for just $39.
