logo
Don't let the season go by without making strawberry shortcake

Don't let the season go by without making strawberry shortcake

On a recent visit to see my son at the University of California, Davis, I wandered into a lab at the Robert Mondavi Institute for Wine and Food Science … as one does. A bunch of students were preparing for a tasting to evaluate some of the strawberry breeds they have been developing.
My food nerd heart swelled, and for the first time in decades, I missed school.
When strawberries are in season, it is incumbent upon us to make the most of those fleeting weeks.
And I can't think of a better way to put them to use than in a classic strawberry shortcake. If you can find wild strawberries, or at least really flavorful ones from a farmers market (or if you are getting your PhD in food studies with a concentration in strawberries in California), this treat is nothing short of heavenly.
There is nothing difficult about strawberry shortcake. A few components come together in a gorgeous stack of sweetness.
First, the biscuitsI like my shortcake biscuits slightly sweet, but not overly sugary. The natural sweetness in the sliced strawberries will be augmented with a bit of sugar to amp up those ruby red juices. Plus there's the whipped cream, which can be as sweet or restrained as you like.
Cut out the biscuits as close together as you can, with as little dough left behind on the cutting board as possible. Yes, you can roll the scraps up and cut out another couple of circles, but the more you handle the dough the less tender it becomes.
The tops of the biscuits are brushed with a bit of half-and-half or milk and sprinkled with sugar before they go into the oven, resulting in a beautifully browned and slightly crunchy top.
Make biscuits with some height to them, as you will be cutting them horizontally and then filling them with the strawberries and cream.
The layersI like a double-decker strawberry shortcake, which definitely requires a knife and fork.
To assemble: The bottom half of the biscuit goes first, then some whipped cream, then strawberries. Then the top half of the biscuit. And then, yes, more whipped cream and more strawberries.
The addition of sour cream to the whipped cream is a pastry chef hack that I learned over the years. It adds more richness, stability and body to the whipped cream, and gives the whole shebang a whole other layer of lushness.
Strawberry ShortcakeServes 6
Ingredients:2 ½ cups all-purpose flour, sifted
6 tablespoons granulated sugar, divided
4 teaspoons baking powder
½ teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon kosher salt
Finely grated zest of 1 lemon
¾ cup (1 ½ sticks) cold unsalted butter, cut into small cubes
¾ cup half-and-half or whole milk
2 tablespoons melted butter
2 pints (4 cups) fresh strawberries, hulled and sliced
For the Whipped Cream:
1 cup heavy cream, chilled
2 tablespoons sour cream, crème fraiche or mascarpone (optional)
2 tablespoons confectioners' sugar
1 teaspoon pure vanilla extract
Directions:1. Preheat the oven to 425°F. Very lightly flour a clean counter or work surface.
2. Combine the flour with 2 tablespoons of the granulated sugar, the baking powder, baking soda, salt, and lemon zest in a medium bowl. Cut in the butter with a pastry blender or use your fingers to rub it into the flour until the mixture resembles coarse crumbs. Or, pulse the butter into the flour mixture in a food processor.
3. Add the ¾ cup half-and-half or milk and stir until just barely combined. Turn the mixture onto the lightly floured surface. Use your hands to lightly mix the dough until it barely holds together. Pat it out into a circle or a rectangle 1/2-inch thick.
4. Use a 3-inch round biscuit or cookie cutter to cut out the shortcakes, keeping them as close together as possible to minimize extra dough. Use a sharp biscuit cutter rather than a glass, and press down and pull straight up, without twisting; twisting will hinder their rising as they bake. If you dip the biscuit cutter in flour between each biscuit cutting, it will help prevent sticking. Collect the scraps and re-pat them out into a ½-inch disk, and cut out another 2 or 4 circles when you are done. Try to handle the dough as little as possible.
5. Butter a baking sheet or spray it with nonstick cooking spray. Transfer half the biscuits to the sheet. Brush the tops with a bit of the melted butter. Top the butter-brushed dough with the remaining cut-out biscuits. Brush the tops with a bit of milk or half-and-half. Sprinkle 2 tablespoons of sugar over the shortcakes.
6. Bake for about 15 minutes, until light golden brown. Transfer to a wire rack to cool.
7. Meanwhile, put the berries in a medium bowl and sprinkle with the remaining 2 tablespoons of sugar, or to taste. Toss with a fork, and lightly crush some of the berries so you have some different textures going on and some of the juices are released. Let the berries sit for at least 15 minutes.
8. Once the berries are macerating, make the whipped cream. Place the heavy cream, sour cream, confectioners' sugar and vanilla in a clean bowl (if you chill it first, the cream will whip up faster.)
9. Use a whisk or a handheld electric mixer on high speed to beat the cream until it starts to form stiff peaks. Refrigerate until ready to use.
10. Just before serving, cut each biscuit crosswise. Place the bottom halves on plates, layer on some strawberries, then some whipped cream. Replace the top of the shortcake, then spoon over some more strawberries and whipped cream. Serve immediately.
___
Katie Workman writes regularly about food for The Associated Press. She has written two cookbooks focused on family-friendly cooking, 'Dinner Solved!' and 'The Mom 100 Cookbook.' She blogs at https://themom100.com/. She can be reached at [email protected].
___
For more AP food stories, go to https://apnews.com/hub/recipes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chickpeas can significantly lower your cholesterol. Here are 5 tasty recipes scientists recommend to improve your health.
Chickpeas can significantly lower your cholesterol. Here are 5 tasty recipes scientists recommend to improve your health.

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chickpeas can significantly lower your cholesterol. Here are 5 tasty recipes scientists recommend to improve your health.

Chickpeas are rich in plant compounds that can lower your cholesterol. People who ate a cup of chickpeas per day for 12 weeks lowered their cholesterol to healthy levels. Here are some of the cheapest, easiest recipes they used. Turns out, not all beans are created equal. While black beans seem to be great at fighting low-grade chronic inflammation, chickpeas are more of a cholesterol-lowering powerhouse, according to recent research from Illinois Institute of Technology. In a three-month study, researchers asked a group of roughly 24 prediabetic people to eat a cup of black beans every day, while another group of 24 with prediabetes was given chickpeas. In a third control group, participants cooked white rice. By the end of just 12 weeks, the researchers noticed significant differences in inflammation levels for the black bean eaters, while chickpea eaters had a greater effect on their total cholesterol, moving from at risk (with an average total cholesterol around 200 mg/dL) into a heart-healthy range (186 mg/dL). The reason why different beans house different health benefits probably has to do with the chemicals that color them and make each bean unique. While the phytochemicals that make black beans black are known to have more anti-inflammatory properties, golden chickpeas have more of other plant chemicals called phytosterols, which are cholesterol-lowering compounds. This is why nutrition buffs often recommend eating a wide variety of different colored plants, including fruits, vegetables, beans and whole grains. By eating a rich diversity of colorful whole foods, you'll enjoy the complex natural "food matrix" found inside each one, lead researcher Indika Edirisinghe told Business Insider. "It contains protein, it contains lipid, it contains fiber, vitamins, minerals," and different combinations of each from bean to bean, he said. "Somebody can synthesize artificial bean by adding all the nutrients, but I don't think you're going to get the same effect." Registered dietician Joel Ramdial, who was not involved with this study, is the director of nutrition at Southeast Missouri State University's department of sport sciences. He told BI that beans are one of the most dense and varied sources of dietary fiber you can find, making them a great ingredient to mix into your next meal. "You can blend them up and mix them into things, you can roast," he said. "You can put them in soups, you can mix them into sauces." In order to make it easier on research participants to include a cup of chickpeas per day in their diets, Edirisinghe and his team equipped their study volunteers with canned chickpeas, a measuring cup, and several easy recipes. Ingredients: 2 15 oz. cans of chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1/2 cup of extra virgin olive oil 2 tbsp. of ranch seasoning Directions: Preheat oven to 400F Dry chickpeas well with paper towels Spread onto a large baking sheet in an even layer Bake until golden and crisp, 30 minutes In a large bowl, toss the hot chickpeas with oil and seasoning Spread out onto the baking sheet and bake for five more minutes Remove from the oven. Chickpeas will continue to crisp as they cool. Ingredients: 1 15 oz. can of chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 large cucumber, chopped 1 pint of cherry tomatoes, preferably multi-colored, halved 1/2 white onion, chopped 1/2 cup of feta cheese 1/4 cup of extra virgin olive oil 2 tbsp. of red wine vinegar Salt Pepper 2 tbsp. of fresh cilantro, chopped Directions: In a large bowl, combine the cucumber, tomato, chickpeas, and onion In a small bowl, whisk together the oil and vinegar. Season with salt and pepper. Add to the large bowl and toss to combine. Top with feta and cilantro Ingredients: 1 15 oz. can of chickpeas 1 small onion, diced 2 cloves of garlic, minced 1/2 cup of honey 1/3 cup of soy sauce 2 tbsp. of toasted sesame oil 1 tbsp. of rice wine vinegar 2 tbsp. of vegetable oil 1/4 tsp. of crushed red pepper flakes 1 tsp. of fresh grated ginger Cooked rice, for serving Sesame seeds and sliced scallions, for garnish Directions: Put the diced onion, minced garlic, honey, soy sauce, sesame oil, vinegar, vegetable oil, red pepper flakes and ginger in a medium saucepan. Add some water and bring to a boil Reduce to simmer and cook for five to 10 minutes, until slightly thick Add the chickpeas and return to a boil Reduce heat to medium-low and simmer for 10 minutes, until chickpeas are coated and sauce is thick Serve over cooked rice, and garnish with the sesame seeds and sliced scallions, if desired Ingredients: 2 cups of chickpeas 4 leeks 1/2 lemon 1 branch of fresh rosemary 1 clove of garlic 1/4 cup of extra virgin olive oil Salt Directions: In a large skillet, heat the olive oil, garlic, and rosemary over medium heat Once the garlic turns fragrant and the rosemary starts to sizzle, remove the rosemary and set it aside Add the leeks to the pan, along with a good pinch of salt Cook, stirring often, until the leeks are soft and sweet but still green, around five to eight minutes Add in the chickpeas, and continue to cook, turning the beans in the oil, for five more minutes. The chickpeas should darken slightly in color. Using a microplane or zester, add a few scrapes of lemon zest into the pan, plus a squeeze of lemon juice Stir to combine Season to taste with lemon juice, zest, or salt as needed Ingredients: 1 15 oz. can of chickpeas 4 pita flatbreads 1 cup of tzatziki sauce 2 lettuce leaves, roughly chopped 1 tomato, sliced 1/4 red onion, cut into strips 1 tbsp. of olive oil 1 tbsp. of paprika 1 tsp of black pepper 1/4 tsp of salt Directions: Preheat oven to 400F Pat the chickpeas dry with paper towels, removing any skins that come off In a large bowl, gently toss the chickpeas with the oil, paprika, black pepper, cayenne pepper, and salt Spread the chickpeas onto a greased, rimmed baking sheet and roast for roughly 20 minutes, until lightly brown but not hard Spread tzatziki on one side of the pita bread, then sprinkle in 1/4 of the chickpeas, and add your veggies Fold and enjoy! Read the original article on Business Insider

These scientific advances were ‘Made in the U.S.A.' Will they continue?
These scientific advances were ‘Made in the U.S.A.' Will they continue?

Washington Post

time31 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

These scientific advances were ‘Made in the U.S.A.' Will they continue?

I've spent much of my long life studying — and trying to understand — the history of the universe. Along the way, I have been constantly reminded that science is essentially international: Science knows no borders. The next great discovery could be made in Kansas or Kosovo or Kyoto. And yet, as an American patriot, I take pride that so much scientific research bears the imprint 'Made in the U.S.A.' By so many measures, this country — my country — has dominated all branches of the scientific enterprise since World War II: the number of Nobel Prizes in the sciences (nearly 300, with second-place Britain having about one-third of that amount), the number of patents in the sciences (with China rapidly catching up), the sheer number of Big Discoveries. We Americans have walked on the moon and brought back chunks of it for further study. We've whipped polio and fenced in HIV. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement Consider just my small branch of science. I'm an astronomer, so here are some of the things we've learned about our solar system and the cosmos during the six decades of my scientific career: We know the universe started years ago hot and dense, and we know its age — 13.8 billion years. A photo of the galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0, the farthest discovered yet. Most of the colored smudges in this infrared photo taken by the James Webb Space Telescope are galaxies, not stars. Each can contain billions of stars and planets. A star in our galaxy This is the most distant galaxy ever confirmed, as it looked 13.5 billion years ago — just about 290 million years after the Big Bang. Galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 Sources: NASA, ESA, CSA, Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz), Ben Johnson (CfA), Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge), Phill Cargile (CfA), Joris Witstok (Cambridge, University of Copenhagen), P. Jakobsen (University of Copenhagen), Alyssa Pagan (STScI), Mahdi Zamani (ESA/Webb), JADES Collaboration Most of the colored smudges in this infrared photo taken by the James Webb Space Telescope are galaxies, not stars. Each can contain billions of stars and planets. A star in our galaxy This is the most distant galaxy ever confirmed, as it looked 13.5 billion years ago — just about 290 million years after the Big Bang. Galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 Sources: NASA, ESA, CSA, Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz), Ben Johnson (CfA), Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge), Phill Cargile (CfA), Joris Witstok (Cambridge, University of Copenhagen), P. Jakobsen (University of Copenhagen), Alyssa Pagan (STScI), Mahdi Zamani (ESA/Webb), JADES Collaboration Most of the colored smudges in this infrared photo taken by the James Webb Space Telescope are galaxies, not stars. Each can contain billions of stars and planets. A star in our galaxy This is the most distant galaxy ever confirmed, as it looked 13.5 billion years ago — just about 290 million years after the Big Bang. Galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 Sources: NASA, ESA, CSA, Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz), Ben Johnson (CfA), Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge), Phill Cargile (CfA), Joris Witstok (Cambridge, University of Copenhagen), P. Jakobsen (University of Copenhagen), Alyssa Pagan (STScI), Mahdi Zamani (ESA/Webb), JADES Collaboration Most of the colored smudges in this infrared photo taken by the James Webb Space Telescope are galaxies, not stars. Each can contain billions of stars and planets. A star in our galaxy This is the most distant galaxy ever confirmed, as it looked 13.5 billion years ago — just about 290 million years after the Big Bang. Galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 Sources: NASA, ESA, CSA, Brant Robertson (UC Santa Cruz), Ben Johnson (CfA), Sandro Tacchella (Cambridge), Phill Cargile (CfA), Joris Witstok (Cambridge, University of Copenhagen), P. Jakobsen (University of Copenhagen), Alyssa Pagan (STScI), Mahdi Zamani (ESA/Webb), JADES Collaboration We know the Earth has been around for only one-third of that time — and how long it will be before the dying Sun engulfs the Earth. (Reassuringly, 4 billion to 5 billion years from now.) We know ordinary matter — the stuff that makes up people and planets and stars — is only about 5 percent of the total mass in the universe. We know what powers the stars, and that some stars end their lives in the blink of an eye by exploding spectacularly. Here's one example: the Crab Nebula, what remains of a star that exploded 1,000 years ago, in an infrared photo taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. The Crab Nebula, a supernova remnant located 6,500 light-years away in the constellation Taurus. (NASA/ESA/CSA/Tea Temim/Princeton University) We know black holes are real; some are dead stars and some, 1 million or more times more massive, squat at the centers of galaxies, including our own Milky Way. The magenta spots in the image below show two black holes in the Topsy Turvy galaxy, about 13 million light-years away from us. The magenta spots in this image show two black holes. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/IRAP) We know neutron stars — stars so dense that a speck the size of a sesame seed would weigh more than a few thousand elephants — are common. The X-ray image below was made by NASA's Chandra mission. The numerous colorful dots are possible neutron stars or black holes located in a distant galaxy like our own. An image of neutron stars and black holes in a distant galaxy. Possible black holes or neutron stars Galaxy nucleus (NASA/CXC/ & Possible black holes or neutron stars Galaxy nucleus The red areas are light from stars in the galaxy (NASA/CXC/ & Possible black holes or neutron stars Galaxy nucleus The red areas are light from stars in the galaxy (NASA/CXC/ & Possible black holes or neutron stars Galaxy nucleus The red areas are light from stars in the galaxy (NASA/CXC/ & We know some of these neutron stars spin as fast as a car engine, with a regularity better than the best clocks we can manufacture. We know how all the chemical elements are made: helium in the first few minutes of the long history of the universe; carbon in stars such as the Sun; and gold in stellar explosions or collisions of neutron stars. Our robot ambassadors have trundled across the rust-red surface of Mars, and we've mapped its deep canyons and monstrous volcanoes. The image below shows a canyon in Mars that's longer than the continental United States, known as Valles Marineris. A mosaic of 102 images from the Viking Orbiter. (NASA/JPL-Caltech) Our American robots have visited every one of the planets of our solar system and many of its myriad moons. An image of a volcano eruption in Io. An ice volcano eruption on Io, a moon of Jupiter. The volcanic plume is this photo from 1997 is mostly ice and extended about 60 miles into space. (NASA-JPL, DLR) An ice volcano eruption on Io, a moon of Jupiter. The volcanic plume is this photo from 1997 is mostly ice and extended about 60 miles into space. (NASA-JPL, DLR) An ice volcano eruption on Io, a moon of Jupiter. The volcanic plume is this photo from 1997 is mostly ice and extended about 60 miles into space. (NASA-JPL, DLR) And we've discovered thousands of planets revolving around other stars. All this knowledge can be labeled 'Made in the U.S.A.' All this is our legacy, enabled by federal funding. In just a few months, the Trump administration has undermined U.S. dominance in science, built up over many decades. The federal funding that made America the world's science leader is threatened with crippling reductions, not just for astronomy and space science but also for fundamental research in energy, chemistry, computer science and preventive medicine. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement Consider, for example, the proposed budget for the National Science Foundation, the federal agency that has funded many U.S. contributions to astronomy (including mine), as well as research in physics, chemistry and computer science. Last year, NSF supported more than 330,000 scientists, students and teachers; next year, the budget allows for only 90,000. The funding rug will be pulled out from under nearly a quarter of a million American scientists, engineers and future scientists. Why? Does science cost too much? I've been involved in some of the discoveries listed above. The total cost to the average American taxpayer for all of my research, from my first article in 1961 to now, is less than a penny. The entire National Science Foundation budget for all research in astronomy costs each American about $1 a year. Is the scientific enterprise riddled with waste and fraud, as some in Washington insistently allege? Some experiments don't work — I've had some duds. But we learn from our mistakes; failure is not always a waste. And allegations of widespread fraud in the scientific enterprise are not just entirely unproven; they make no sense. If I receive funds from NASA, I have to account for them, and officials at both my college and NASA review my accounts. Carefully. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement If, instead, the gutting of science and so much else the federal government does for us is just a whim, it is a costly one. Investments in basic research have been one of the most cost-effective expenditures of government money in my lifetime. It is not just the faster computer chips, the better weather forecasts, the cheaper batteries and the more potent vaccines American science has pioneered. Scientists at colleges and universities across the country have trained the scientists and engineers who go on to found companies that now employ millions. In the last letter he wrote, Thomas Jefferson pointed to the value of 'the light of science.' Whatever the reasons are — real or proffered — for dimming this light, we risk surrendering leadership in an enterprise of proven value to our health, prosperity and sense of wonder at the marvels of the natural world.

Greene to introduce ‘weather modification' bill
Greene to introduce ‘weather modification' bill

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Greene to introduce ‘weather modification' bill

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday she plans to introduce a bill aimed at tackling 'weather modification.' 'I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,' she wrote in a Saturday post on X. 'I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,' Greene added. The Georgia lawmaker said the legislation would resemble Florida's Senate Bill 56, which was signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in late June. The text makes it illegal for individuals to practice geoengineering and weather modification by imposing a $100,000 fine and a five-year prison sentence. The punishment would apply to cloud seeding, an 80-year-old technology that adds tiny particles—usually silver iodide crystals—to clouds to trigger rain or snow, as defined by the Government Accountability Office. Some states have practiced the measure, but it's rarely been undertaken by federal jurisdictions. 'We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,' Greene said of the forthcoming bill. However, lawmakers in the Sunshine State said cloud seeding is a safe practice that has been undermined by conspiracy theories about weather alteration, as contrails, condensation trails left in the air by planes, are sometimes confused as chemtrails. '[They are] kind of two different things, and I think people have got them mixed up, because they think that they've heard that this chemtrail conspiracy theory is about geoengineering and weather modification,' Mick West, a science writer and fellow for the Committee of Skeptical Inquiry, told 12News. 'Then, they discover that there's this thing called cloud seeding, which actually is weather modification. And then they kind of put two and two together and make 17.' Greene made headlines last year when she suggested Democrats were able to 'control the weather' in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, prompting then-President Biden to condemn what he called 'irresponsible' and 'beyond ridiculous' falsehoods. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) poked fun at Greene's bill in a post online. 'I'm introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release or dispersion of stupidity into Congress,' he wrote in a Saturday post, quoting Greene's original announcement. But one of her Republican colleagues has already signaled he'll back her efforts. 'Let's roll Chairlady!' Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) wrote online. Greene's office did not immediately respond to additional requests for comment on the bill and potential federal penalties outlined in the text. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store