logo
Global birth rates crisis: People do still want to have children, but many can't - here's why

Global birth rates crisis: People do still want to have children, but many can't - here's why

Sky News10-06-2025
Two in five people over 50 say they have not had as many children as they wanted - with economic issues, health concerns and fears about the state of the world among the main barriers.
More than half said financial factors such as affordable housing, childcare options and job security were things that had limited, or would limit, their ability to grow their families.
One in four said health issues were holding them back, while a fifth of respondents mentioned fears about global issues including climate change, wars and pandemics.
The findings come from a new survey of over 14,000 people by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) - spanning 14 countries on five continents that are home to a third of the world's population.
Birth rates have been declining across almost all regions of the world, while life expectancy continues to grow.
There are concerns, from politicians and commentators like Elon Musk, that future generations of working age people will find it more difficult to economically support people of pension age as the ratio of workers to pensioners shifts.
"Vast numbers of people are unable to create the families they want," said Dr Natalia Kanem, executive director of the UNFPA.
"The issue is lack of choice, not desire, with major consequences for individuals and societies. That is the real fertility crisis, and the answer lies in responding to what people say they need: paid family leave, affordable fertility care, and supportive partners."
Differences around the world
The survey was carried out in four European countries, four in Asia, three across Africa and three from the Americas.
The countries were picked to try and represent "a wide variety of countries with different cultural contexts, fertility rates and policy approaches", according to the report's editor Dr Rebecca Zerzan.
It includes, for example, the country with the lowest fertility rate in the world - South Korea. It also includes country with a birth rate among the highest in the world, which also happens to be the most populous country in its continent - Nigeria.
The others, in order of population size, are India, the US, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Germany, Thailand, South Africa, Italy, Morocco, Sweden and Hungary.
In many cases there were significant differences in responses depending on which country people were reporting from.
For example in Nigeria, a third of men (although only 21% of women) reported that they wanted to have four or more children. The numbers were similar in South Africa. However in South Korea, Thailand, Italy, Germany and Hungary, no more than 5% agreed.
Fertility issues were twice as likely in the US (16% of respondents) as in neighbouring Mexico (8%).
In South Korea, three in five respondents reported financial limitations as an obstacle.
But in Sweden, where both men and women are entitled to 480 days of paid parental leave per child (which can also be transferred to grandparents), fewer than one in five said the same.
How paternity leave in the UK compares to other countries
Birth rates in Sweden are still among the lowest in the world, however. Dr Zerzan told Sky News that this shows that no one factor alone contributes to people feeling empowered to have children at the right time.
"A third of people in Sweden say they think raising a child will take up too much time and energy. And a higher number of people there, compared with other countries, are also concerned about climate change and bringing a child in to an uncertain world."
Unintended pregnancies vs not as many children as wanted
A curious finding from the survey is that, while there has been much discussion around declining fertility rates, almost a third of people said they or their partner had experienced an unintended pregnancy.
Globally, as people who become pregnant unintentionally often do so more than once, half of all pregnancies are unintended.
In Morocco and South Africa, around half of people had experience of an unintended pregnancy. In the same two countries, more than half of people had experience of being unable to have a child at their preferred time.
Overall, one in eight people had experienced both an unintended pregnancy and barriers to a desired child.
"Everywhere we look, people are struggling to freely realise their reproductive aspirations," explains the report.
People who had more children than they wanted, and people who had fewer, were present in countries with high and low fertility rates.
"That indicates that barriers to achieving one's ideal family are ubiquitous."
What can be done to help?
The report says that the crisis does require political interventions, but warns against policies that often amount to short-term fixes, or those designed to coerce people to either use or not use contraception.
"Whether the policies are coercive or not, there are real risks to treating fertility rates as a faucet to be turned on or off. Many of the countries that are today seeking to increase fertility have, within the last 40 years, sought to decrease birth rates.
"For example, China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Thailand and Türkiye all reported in 1986 an intention to lower their national fertility rates through policy interventions, deeming their respective fertility rates at that time as 'too high'. By 2015, however, all five countries had switched to policies designed to boost fertility.
"Today all five have total fertility rates below two children per woman."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grandparents are carers out of love – and necessity
Grandparents are carers out of love – and necessity

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Grandparents are carers out of love – and necessity

I look after my grandchildren – at least a few hours for one day a week, often more ('There's an overwhelming bond of love': the grandparents whose kids rely on them to raise a family, 29 July). I love them deeply, and want to offer them whatever steadiness I can, while I can. But love alone isn't what holds this together. I also care for them because their parents, like so many others, are stretched to the edge. Childcare is unaffordable. Work is relentless. There's little left in reserve. Many grandparents step in not as a choice, but as the only available buffer in a fraying system. But that help comes at a cost. Caring for young children is tiring at any age; for older adults, after a full day or more, the next day is often a write-off too, which seems to be something almost no policy takes into account. This reflects the gradual withdrawal of social responsibility from care, and the assumption that families will absorb the shock. We're seeing the effects of this every day through exhaustion, silence and strain carried behind closed doors. As a systemic psychotherapist, I try to pay attention to patterns; what holds people together, and what pulls them apart. One pattern I see is that the work of care has become more vital, yet less visible. Grandparents, like many others, are holding families together behind the scenes. But we rarely speak about it, and policy almost never accounts for it. In this era of rapidly evolving climate disruption and growing social fragility, care is the connective tissue that keeps communities alive. If we fail to recognise and support it, we weaken the very systems we'll need to face what's Hugh PalmerPocklington, East Yorkshire I read your article with great interest as the grandparent of four children, but was sad that you did not take the opportunity to comment on the benefits and burdens for those of us who care full-time for our grandchildren. Over half of the estimated 140,000 children in kinship care are with grandparents full-time, and we are most definitely 'taking on a level of grandparenting that looks a lot more like parenting'. We do miss out on 'just being Granny' as we perform the parenting role with the grandchildren in our care. One of the losses I feel as we parent our 12-year‑old grandson towards adulthood is that he misses out on grandparents and we miss out on grandparenting. Unlike part-time grandparent carers, we don't have less anxiety as we deal with loss of work and income, lack of support, and difficult relationships with biological parents. And our chances of pursuing our own retirement plans are not limited – they're gone. We also struggle with the cost, the sense of obligation and the feeling of having no choice, but to a much greater extent. And we most certainly 'plug the gaps of a system not fit for purpose'. In our case, this is the children's social care system. The alternative forms of care for our grandchildren continue to have persistent deficits that lead to very poor life chances. There are so many benefits to us in terms of the loving relationships we have with our grandchildren, but the deficits are often serious and damaging to our mental health and, sometimes, the stability of our kinship and address supplied When I read about grandparents caring for and loving their grandchildren I feel such utter sadness and envy. Not because my children don't have grandparents but because their grandparents aren't interested in being around them. It's a certain kind of heartache, not to mention the practical side of living with the exhaustion of not having help and having a disabled child. I know they are busy, they have their lives to live, and I understand their desire to protect that. But I will never understand their indifference to their grandchildren and our situation. Everyone who has parents who are involved in their grandchildren's lives are the luckiest people – I hope they know and address supplied Surely grandparents being heavily involved in child raising is only new for the middle classes? Nans at the school gate was absolutely the norm when I was growing up in the 80s, and as a mother of 10, my mother's Mam always had a houseful of HoughtonNewport Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Why your matcha obsession may be messing with your iron levels, nutritionists explain
Why your matcha obsession may be messing with your iron levels, nutritionists explain

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why your matcha obsession may be messing with your iron levels, nutritionists explain

The world has developed a thirst for matcha – a bright green Japanese drink that's sought after for its health benefits and caffeine. However, the drink of choice for many may have a downside. Not only is its popularity drying up global supplies, but drinking too much of it could contribute to an iron deficiency. Nutritionists warn the green lattes can affect iron absorption and vegetarians are at a higher risk than meat eaters. Matcha is made from the green tea plant, Camellia Sinensis, which is ground into a powder. Because it's grown in the shade the plant produces more chlorophyll, which not only gives it a deep green colour but also means it contains more nutrients. Rob Hobson, a nutritionist and author of Unprocess Your Family Life, explains the drink does have health benefits. 'It contains polyphenols which protects the body against oxidative damage. So, it helps to reduce inflammation which then helps to protect against chronic diseases,' he told the Independent. 'Because it contains caffeine it helps with mental focus. But it also contains L-theanine which helps to lessen that jittery edge that you get from caffeine,' he added. Research has also suggested these polyphenols in matcha can reduce the risk of heart disease. But the same health boosting polyphenols also make it harder for the body to absorb iron. Gunter Kuhnle, a professor of nutrition and food science at the University of Reading explained matcha tea can affect iron absorption by binding the (non-haem) iron that is found in many plant foods – such as lentils, leafy greens and tofu. 'It contains the compounds catechins and tannins – which are both polyphenols – that can bind to iron in the digestive tracts, and this stops them from being taken up by the body,' Professor Kuhnle told the Independent. 'These complexes then pass through the gut and are not useful for the body – this can reduce iron uptake by up to 50 per cent, but this varies a lot between individuals and depends on the timing of the meal and the type of food,' he added. He explained there is a similar problem with green tea because it also contains high levels of polyphenols. Although rare, in one instance a 48-year-old man became anaemic from excessive green tea consumption Professor Kuhnle said. Mr Hobson stressed that you don't need to worry if you have a balanced diet, but warned vegetarians are at a greater risk. That's because it only affects non-haem iron which is in tofu and lentils and not haem iron which is found in meat. 'If you are vegan or vegetarian and you are relying on lentils, leafy green and tofu for your iron, then you might want to avoid drinking matcha with your meals because it can inhibit iron absorption in the gut,' Mr Hobson said. He also stressed that if you are low in iron anyway and take iron supplements, you should avoid taking these at the same time as drinking a matcha. An iron deficiency, also called anaemia, can cause tiredness, shortness of breath, paler skin, headaches and heart palpitations, according to the NHS. Low iron is common among teenage girls, vegans and vegetarians with a study by Lund University in Sweden finding 38 per cent of participants who were teenage girls and 70 per cent of participants who were vegetarian or vegan, affected by the deficiency. If you want to reap the health benefits of matcha, in addition to not drinking it at mealtimes, make sure to avoid adding a lot of syrup or cream. Mr Hobson instead suggests the healthiest option is to drink it plain.

Wine of the times: how organic viticulture can help you enjoy a drop without damaging the planet
Wine of the times: how organic viticulture can help you enjoy a drop without damaging the planet

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Wine of the times: how organic viticulture can help you enjoy a drop without damaging the planet

A good bottle of wine can bring joy and flavour to any meal or occasion – however, viticulture stands alongside agriculture as one of the great contributors to global problems like soil fertility loss, water contamination and wildlife habitat loss. Choosing to drink organic wine can push back against some of the more harmful effects of conventional winegrowing. Here's a handy guide for understanding organic wine and what to look for when buying your next drop. Organic wine is, first and foremost, made from organically farmed grapes. There are distinctions between 'organic wine' and 'wine made with organic grapes,' but at the heart of the matter is non-chemical farming. Organic farmers manage insects, weeds, and disease through methods that are labor-intensive but less environmentally destructive. Soil and plant life is prioritised over commercialism. Not only do these organic approaches hold environmental benefits, but in general, organic viticulture is considered key for healthy grapes and great wine. Organic vineyards not only avoid many of the environmental problems caused by viticulture, but form part of the effort to reverse those problems. This also applies to 'regenerative' and 'biodynamic' winegrowing, two distinct but related approaches which have organic farming as their basis. Like most commercial crops, grapevines are susceptible to disease and insect infestation. To deal with these threats, conventional viticulture relies on pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Organic viticulture permits the usage of two primary treatments: copper and sulfur, which are applied primarily for anti-fungal benefits. Some viticulturalists, including in the biodynamic movement, opt to treat vines with plant-based sprays such as nettle or yarrow, with the goal being overall vine health and resilience. Organic farmers embrace two methods of weed management that have the added bonus of carbon sequestration and soil improvement: cover crop planting between vine rows, and no or reduced-tillage. Instead of managing weeds through herbicide, organic growers sow cover crops such as peas, lupins, or clover between vine rows. These fix nitrogen in the soil, enhancing exposure to light and providing nutrients for microbes within, and they also generate more 'organic matter' within the soil. 'Organic matter' refers to humus in soil—the nutrient-rich stuff that makes soil fertile. Cover crops can break down and become organic matter, enhancing soil. Tilling the soil is a known way to release carbon into the atmosphere. Organic farming avoids this by building soil up through cover crops, compost, mulch, and other forms of organic matter, preserving carbon instead of releasing it. South Australian winegrower Frewen Ries, who co-owns CRFT Wines in the Adelaide Hills, converted his vineyard to organic after buying it from conventional farmers in 2013. 'When we took over, the soil under the vines was devoid of grass,' he says. 'It had been sprayed with herbicide. You could knock on it and it was rock-hard. It was essentially hydrophobic, it didn't soak up any water.' Ries and his partner decided to let grass grow under the vines and to not till the soil. Over time, they saw a build-up of topsoil and the wines developed more complexity. 'We've done vertical tastings recently of our Pinot Noir to when we first produced it off the block in 2013, and we found a dramatic increase in colour and depth,' says Ries. While some insects can damage vines in the short term, organic farming prioritises a diverse ecosystem over crop capitalisation. A flourishing ecosystem leads to what's known as 'dynamic equilibrium' and 'biological control'– a situation where plants and microbial life balance each other out when competing for resources, and 'living things control an outbreak of a pest,' according to an organic farming manual provided by the National Association for Sustainable Agriculture Australia (NASAA). When plants, microbes, insects and animals are in harmony, there is less need for intervention and the crop will be overall stronger and more resilient. Look for the 'organic wine' or 'natural wine' section at bottleshops, or ask them if they have one Head to any self-described 'natural wine' shop, where some bottles may not be from certified organic vineyards, but in general producers represented will be farming organically or regeneratively, while also bottling their wine with low levels of sulfur dioxide (a preservative) and minimal or no filtration Look for certifications – in Australia, NASAA is commonly used for winegrowing; certified organic European Union wines (and foods) display a green leaf icon Wine is a luxury that we are lucky to enjoy. If we can put our money behind responsibly farmed vineyards, we're steering the wine market toward better practices and creating a significant cumulative difference in the world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store