Calgary pair accused of bilking Bowness non-profit of more than $66,000
Two Calgary men face fraud charges, accused of embezzling more than $66,000 from a Bowness non-profit.
Two Calgary men face fraud charges, accused of embezzling more than $66,000 from a Bowness non-profit.
One has a history that includes manslaughter in B.C.
According to police, Bowness Ratepayers Scout and Guide Hall Association directors were approached by two men in 2022 about rebranding and handing off day-to-day operations.
The hall became BowCommon, with events hosted under Discover Bowness.
Police say they were contacted in April 2024, after 'a significant amount of missing funds' was discovered.
Police say investigation placed the missing amount at more than $66,000.
It's believed this was done 'by hosting events using organization funds without paying attributed fees, falsifying documents to obtain financial control and creating false receipts for services never rendered, which were then sent to fabricated email addresses and deposited into their personal bank accounts.'
'It's over $66,000 of embezzlement, (and) in a small community association that's struggling to keep a community hall going, supporting the community, this could be a really big fraud and it could have a huge financial impact—a potentially devastating impact,' said Insp. Keith Hurley, commander for District 2.
Tuesday, police arrested a pair of suspects:
Nathan Michael Mizera, 41; and
Joshua Tyler Bredo, 40.
Two Calgary men face fraud charges, accused of embezzling more than $66,000 from a Bowness non-profit.
Two Calgary men face fraud charges, accused of embezzling more than $66,000 from a Bowness non-profit.
Both are charged with fraud over $5,000 and both are scheduled to appear in court on Aug. 6.
Hurley said given the victimization of a community group, police felt there was 'a strong public interest in knowing the charges that have been laid.'
There is no expectation of additional suspects identified, additional charges laid or additional missing monies discovered.
On Wednesday, shortly after police issued their statement, Mizera and Bredo issued a joint statement of their own.
They denied any wrongdoing and accused a pair of police officers of targeting them and of corruption.
'The allegations against us are entirely false and have no credible evidentiary foundation,' the statement read.
Hurley said an investigation like this 'isn't just (built on) a singular source of information.'
'People who are involved with this spent quite a bit of time on it and we're very confident in the charges we've laid,' he said.
Gord Barge, president of the Bowness Ratepayers Scout and Guide Hall Association, told CTV News Calgary on Wednesday he is 'happy to see charges are finally being laid.'
'The Executive of the hall has been dealing very closely with Calgary Police Service since Bredo and Mizera were removed from the hall by CPS at the end of April 2024,' he said.
'It was hard to ignore social media posts from them but we were told by the detectives that it was in our best interest to not engage with them in any way until we are in court.'
According to Mizera's LinkedIn page, he's intending to run for Calgary Board of Education trustee.
CTV News Calgary has learned Bredo was sentenced in June 2017 for the August 2011 manslaughter of a Revelstoke man in Victoria, following a guilty plea.
Taking time served into consideration, Bredo was released in November 2018.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
'Political expediency': Lawyer for IDF soldiers critical of war-crimes probe
There is a growing backlash after the RCMP announced this month it is investigating whether Canadian citizens involved with clashes in or around Israel were in contravention of this country's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Article content Amid outcry from Jewish groups, the force said it wasn't a criminal probe, but to 'collect, preserve and assess information' for potential future prosecutions. Article content Article content Article content Foreign governments, such as Belgium and Brazil, have also opened investigations into their own citizens who served with the Israel Defense Forces. Article content Article content Lt.-Col. (ret.) Maurice Hirsch, director of the Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform, at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, suggests these are politically motivated probes. Article content He has been retained by IDF soldiers who have been questioned by foreign government representatives. Hirsch has previously served as senior legal analyst for Human Rights Voices in New York, lawyer for the Israel Defense Forces, director of the legal department for Palestinian Media Watch, senior military consultant for NGO Monitor, and adviser to the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Article content I can't tell you exactly as to what their motivation is, but I believe that it's somewhere in the realms of political expediency, and internal demographic politics. It requires these governments to almost change what they've been doing traditionally, even to the point of potentially abandoning allies. Article content Article content Their voter base has changed. And so now you have a situation where you need to almost pander, to cater, to a more fringe population. Article content Article content In May, U.K. government lawyers told the High Court that there was no evidence Israel was deliberately targeting civilians in Gaza, and that evidence exists of Israel making efforts to limit harm to civilians. If the government doesn't believe that war crimes are being committed, then obviously they won't then take that forward, and actively engage in an investigation of something that they don't believe is happening. Article content But if the government is so prejudiced, and predisposed, that war crimes are being committed, then obviously you launch an investigation. Article content Video footage, forensic analysis, operational logs — all impartially examined. What they have is so weak and poor, it's impossible to say it's 'evidence.' I think it's just so circumstantial and flimsy, even imagined.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Family fighting deportation to Italy gets another shot at staying in Canada
A dual citizen of Italy and Ethiopia who brought her two Italian children to Canada more than a decade back, using aliases and falsely claiming they were Eritrean citizens subject to religious persecution, has won another chance for her family to stay here. Article content The Refugee Protection Division, which weighs refugee claims in Canada, initially accepted the 2014 claims of Tsegereda Tsegaye Wigebral and her two kids, Nobel and Melody Esayas Fisihatsion, now 19 and 17 respectively. But it nullified their refugee status and rejected their claim in December 2022 after learning their story was fake. Article content Article content Article content That same month, the family was declared inadmissible to Canada. They were ordered deported in August 2023, but applied for a pre-removal risk assessment, their last-ditch bid to stay here. Article content Article content Last April, a senior immigration officer 'reviewed the applicants' file and held that they were not at risk of persecution, or subject to a danger of torture, and nor did they face a risk to their lives or a cruel or unusual punishment if they were removed to Italy,' according to a recent Federal Court decision out of Ottawa. Article content 'While the applicants had alleged that they faced serious discrimination, social exclusion and abuse there, due to their race, and had alleged that they could not rely on the police or authorities for protection, the officer determined that there was not sufficient evidence before them to substantiate those claims,' wrote Justice Darren Thorne. Article content The officer 'accepted that the applicants may have been subjected to 'less favourable treatment' due to their race, but found they had failed to establish that this rose to the level of persecution,' said Thorne's decision, dated June 25. 'In one of the central findings, the officer noted, in relation to mistreatment in Italy, that the principal applicant had provided 'little to no further elaboration or evidence as to how she came to the conclusion that the Italian authorities would not help her.'' Article content Article content The trouble is, immigration officials had asked the older child, who had turned 18, to file his own application, but the immigration officer handling their case didn't look at what Nobel submitted before making a decision. Thorne said the immigration officer's decision was 'clearly' made without viewing the totality of the family's applications. Article content Article content 'The right to be heard is among the most basic aspects of procedural fairness. When a decision has clearly been made without considering all of the materials submitted by an applicant, this right has been compromised,' said Thorne, who sent the family's case back to a different immigration officer to re-evaluate. Article content A lawyer representing Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, who was fighting for the family's removal, couldn't explain why that happened, although they noted the officer may not have seen Nobel's application. Article content The same lawyer argued Nobel's submissions 'were immaterial, as they contained broadly the same information as had been provided by the principal applicant,' and that the information he provided 'also did not establish that the treatment suffered by the applicants rose to the level of persecution, so it would not have changed the officer's decision, even if it had been considered.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Suspended lawyer banned from filing appeals in Manitoba after 'multitude of meritless' motions: decision
A lawyer previously suspended from practising after being deemed incompetent has now been barred from starting or continuing proceedings in Manitoba's appeals court without permission from a judge, after being deemed a "vexatious litigant." That decision follows a history of Vibhu Raj Jhanji bringing what the Court of Appeal of Manitoba called "a multitude of meritless appeals and motions," including challenges of a decision to suspend him from practising law, a related human rights complaint and a separate lawsuit about a failed real estate transaction. A vexatious litigant is, by definition, someone who repeatedly files unfounded legal actions for improper purposes. "Mr. Jhanji asserts that he is not vexatious, as he has simply taken proceedings and sought remedies that are available to him at law and under the court rules," the June 19 decision from three appeals court judges said. "His position is that the [Law Society of Manitoba] is 'flouting the law' and has had its decisions 'rubber stamped' by the courts." Meanwhile, the appeals court found Jhanji's actions met "most, if not all," elements needed for the legal test it used to determine whether proceedings should be deemed vexatious. That includes starting multiple proceedings to relitigate matters that have already been decided, referring back in written materials to identical or nearly identical grievances from prior hearings and appeals — including allegations of bias against appeals judges — and trying to have lawyers for the law society and other responding parties disqualified, the decision said. It's also "objectively clear that the proceedings will not result in the relief sought," the decision said, adding Jhanji has tried to have unsuccessful appeals heard again and appealed unsuccessful chambers motions. Jhanji, who practised law in India for over two decades, was found incompetent to practise in Manitoba in January 2020, after a Law Society of Manitoba review found significant gaps in his knowledge of Canadian law. That decision also raised concerns about how he was ever allowed to practise in Manitoba in the first place, given his level of incompetence. He was later given a suspension of no less than three years, with the suspension extending indefinitely until he could establish his competency to practise. As of Friday, his status with the Law Society of Manitoba was still listed as suspended. 'Frivolous' lawsuit, human rights complaint Among the frivolous legal actions detailed in the appeals court's June decision was one Jhanji filed against defendants including the Law Society of Manitoba after the court dismissed challenges of his suspension. That claim was later struck, with a judge describing it as an abuse of court process and a "frivolous and vexatious" attempt to relitigate a suspension that was already upheld several times, the decision said. Jhanji then filed an appeal, along with a motion that tried in part to have the law society's lawyers disqualified. The motion was dismissed — a decision he also appealed. Both those appeals were dismissed, as was a motion for a new hearing, and the court moved to declare Jhanji a vexatious litigant, the decision said. Around the same time, Jhanji also filed a complaint against the law society with the Manitoba Human Rights Commission, "alleging systemic bias and that it discriminated against him because of his nationality" during his disciplinary hearings. The commission declined to investigate, saying it lacked jurisdiction and the matter had already been determined by the courts. The commission also concluded the complaint was "frivolous and vexatious," the appeal court decision said. Jhanji then sought a judicial review of the commission's decision, which was dismissed — prompting him to file another appeal. 'A now familiar pattern' In November 2020, Jhanji also filed a separate statement of claim naming himself and a numbered company he's the sole director of as plaintiffs in connection with a failed real estate transaction, the decision said. Jhanji ended up being struck as a plaintiff in that case and barred from representing the numbered company. He appealed and moved for a stay of proceedings, which was dismissed. In the meantime, the deadline for filing an appeal brief also passed, resulting in the appeal being deemed abandoned, the decision said. Jhanji then filed a motion before another judge to extend the time he had to file the brief. It was dismissed, and he appealed. He also brought a motion seeking measures including disqualification of law society counsel and a notice of contempt being issued against them. That motion was also dismissed, then appealed, the decision said. Jhanji's real estate claim ended up being struck — a decision appealed and dismissed by "yet another" judge — then appealed again, the Court of Appeal decision said. In July 2024, Manitoba's chief justice denied a motion to give Jhanji permission to represent the numbered company on its three related appeals. Other appeals related to that matter were also dismissed — and in "a now familiar pattern, Mr. Jhanji filed a motion for a rehearing of these appeals," which was also recently dismissed, the appeal court decision said.
