
Poll: RFK Jr.'s food agenda finds appeal across partisan lines, but vaccines are a different story
A significant majority of U.S. adults support using vaccines to prevent diseases, including majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents, according to the NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey. And the share of people who believe vaccines are most to blame for chronic health issues is small, two dynamics that are at odds with Kennedy's repeated efforts to cast doubt on the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Kennedy has long spread misinformation about the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines. As health secretary, he recently dismantled the country's premier group of vaccine experts — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's independent committee of vaccine advisers — and replaced former members with several well-known vaccine skeptics.
The poll results suggest those actions don't resonate with the majority of adults.
But Kennedy's focus on overhauling the nation's intake of ultraprocessed food — a key part of his "Make America Healthy Again" agenda — is an issue many adults can get behind.
The most popular answer to the poll question about what deserves the most blame for America's chronic health problems was the food industry, at 35%, followed closely by the choices of individuals, at 32%. Kennedy has also targeted environmental toxins as one of the most urgent health issues in the United States, but 6% of respondents agreed that such toxins were the most important reason behind chronic health problems.
The public is fairly closely divided over its view of Kennedy himself, with a 51% majority viewing him favorably and 48% viewing him unfavorably. The majority of Democrats' view Kennedy "strongly unfavorably," while a slim majority of Republicans view him "somewhat favorably."
Those who identify more with the MAGA movement, as opposed to considering themselves primarily supporters of the Republican Party, are far more likely to have "strongly favorable" views of Kennedy.
On vaccines, 49% of adults say they "strongly support" using vaccines to prevent diseases, with 31% more saying they "somewhat support" it.
Another 13% "somewhat oppose" using vaccines to prevent diseases, and 7% oppose it "strongly."
About three-quarters of Democrats "strongly support" the use of vaccines (and another 16% somewhat support it) and majorities of Republicans and independents support vaccines either "strongly" or "somewhat."
Across ages and genders, the most popular answer was that people "strongly support" using vaccines, including majorities of people ages 18 to 29 and those 65 and older, who were kids when illnesses like measles and polio were common.
People between those two groups — ages 30 to 64 — were slightly less likely to signal strong support for vaccines, even as a plurality still chose the option.
The survey didn't differentiate between Covid vaccines and routine childhood vaccines, like the measles-mumps-rubella shots.
While Kennedy's vaccine skepticism has been a hallmark of his long career inside and outside Washington, he has also waged war on the food industry and accused producers of ultraprocessed foods, environmental toxins and vaccines of contributing to an epidemic of health problems in America.
The poll data suggests a significant chunk of adults are sympathetic to at least part of that pitch, around the food industry.
Among adults, 35% say the food industry deserves the most blame for chronic health problems in the United States like obesity and heart disease. That factor was narrowly the top pick of respondents ahead of "the choices of individuals," which 32% of people chose as deserving the most blame for chronic health problems.
Socioeconomic status (12%) and health insurance companies (10%) were the only other choices of the seven provided that drew double-digit support. Environmental toxins were the top pick of 6%, another 3% chose vaccines, and 2% chose genetics.
Younger adults, a segment of the population that typically leans more liberal, were likelier to choose the food industry as most to blame, while older adults were likelier to choose "the choices of individuals."
And the concept that socioeconomic status is most to blame for chronic health issues appears to be resonating on the left and not the right. While 30% of progressives chose it, as did 14% of those who see themselves as more aligned with the Democratic Party, only small shares of Republicans agreed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
US judge dismisses Justice Dept lawsuit over sanctuary laws in Chicago and Illinois
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Justice Department that accused the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago of unlawfully interfering with President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins in Chicago was a setback for Trump's litigation campaign against local "sanctuary" laws that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. White House and Justice Department spokespersons did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, a Republican seeking to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, has sparred with Chicago and other Democratic strongholds over their policies. Democrats, in turn, have criticized the Trump administration's aggressive enforcement tactics, including plainclothes immigration agents covering their faces to hide their identities and arrests of immigrants with no criminal records. Supporters of sanctuary laws have said local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration enforcement would discourage immigrants who are living in the country illegally from coming forward as victims or witnesses to crimes. The Chicago City Council passed an ordinance in 2012 that stops city agencies and employees from getting involved in civil immigration enforcement or helping federal authorities with such efforts. The Illinois legislature passed a similar state law, known as the TRUST Act, in 2017. The Justice Department sued Chicago and Illinois in February, alleging these laws violate the U.S. Constitution's "Supremacy Clause" that states that federal law preempts state and local laws that may conflict with it. Jenkins, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, rejected that argument in Friday's ruling, saying the city's and the state's policies are protected by the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which ensures that states retain significant powers not explicitly granted to the federal government. The Trump administration on Thursday filed a similar lawsuit against New York City over its local sanctuary laws. A similar case against Los Angeles is pending.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Kennedy to oust care task force, WSJ reports; HHS says no decision yet
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is planning to remove all the members of an advisory panel that determines what cancer screenings and other preventive health measures insurers must cover, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. A Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said on Friday that Kennedy had not yet made a decision regarding the 16-member U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. "No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again," the HHS spokesperson said. The Journal said Kennedy planned to dismiss all 16 panel members in what would be the latest in a series of far-reaching actions by Kennedy, a long-time vaccine skeptic, to reshape U.S. regulation of vaccines, food and medicine. In June he fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of vaccine experts, replacing them with seven handpicked members, including known vaccine skeptics. The USPSTF includes medical experts serving staggered four-year terms on a volunteer basis. Its role in choosing what services will be covered by insurers was established under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The 40-year-old group, whose recommendations provide guidance to doctors, looks at everything from routine breast cancer screening to drugs to prevent HIV infection. The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the constitution of the task force and ruled in favor of its recommendation to cover preventive care. Though made up of an independent group of volunteer experts, members are selected by the health secretary without Senate confirmation and it relies on support from the department's Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A group of 104 health organizations, opens new tab, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, in early July sent a letter to Congressional health committees, urging them "to protect the integrity" of the task force. The task force has been criticized by some conservatives, opens new tab as too left-leaning.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Democrats and advocates criticize Trump's executive order on homelessness
Leading Democrats and advocates for the homeless are criticizing an executive order President Donald Trump signed this week aimed at removing homeless people from the streets, possibly by committing them for mental health or drug treatment without their consent. Trump directed some of his Cabinet heads to prioritize funding to cities that crack down on open drug use and street camping, with the goal of making people feel safer. It's not compassionate to do nothing, the order states. 'Shifting these individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment is the most proven way to restore public order,' the order reads. Homelessness has become a bigger problem in recent years as the cost of housing increased, especially in states such as California where there aren't enough homes to meet demand. At the same time, drug addiction and overdoses have soared with the availability of cheap and potent fentanyl. The president's order might be aimed at liberal cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, which Trump views as too lax about conditions on their streets. But many of the concepts have already been proposed or tested in California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic mayors have worked for years to get people off the streets and into treatment. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court made it easier for cities to clear encampments even if the people living in them have nowhere else to go. Still, advocates say Trump's new order is vague, punitive and won't effectively end homelessness. Newsom has directed cities to clean up homeless encampments and he's funneled more money into programs to treat addiction and mental health disorders. His office said Friday that Trump's order relies on harmful stereotypes and focuses more on "creating distracting headlines and settling old scores." "But, his imitation (even poorly executed) is the highest form of flattery,' spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement, referring to the president calling for strategies already in use in California. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has also emphasized the importance of clean and orderly streets in banning homeless people from living in RVs and urging people to accept the city's offers of shelter. In Silicon Valley, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan recently pushed a policy change that makes a person eligible for jail if they reject three offers of shelter. Trump's executive order tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi and the secretaries for health, housing and transportation to prioritize grants to states and local governments that enforce bans on open drug use and street camping. Devon Kurtz, the public safety policy director at the Cicero Institute, a conservative policy group that has advocated for several of the provisions of the executive order, said the organization is 'delighted' by the order. He acknowledged that California has already been moving to ban encampments since the Supreme Court's decision. But he said Trump's order adds teeth to that shift, Kurtz said. 'It's a clear message to these communities that were still sort of uncomfortable because it was such a big change in policy,' Kurtz said. But Steve Berg, chief policy officer at the National Alliance to End Homelessness, called parts of the order vague. He said the U.S. abandoned forced institutionalization decades ago because it was too expensive and raised moral and legal concerns. 'What is problematic about this executive order is not so much that law enforcement is involved — it's what it calls on law enforcement to do, which is to forcibly lock people up,' Berg said. 'That's not the right approach to dealing with homelessness.' The mayor of California's most populous city, Los Angeles, is at odds with the Newsom and Trump administrations on homelessness. Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, opposes punishing sweeps and says the city has reduced street homelessness by working with homeless people to get them into shelter or housing. 'Moving people from one street to the next or from the street to jail and back again will not solve this problem," she said in a statement. ___