
Every text watched, every word changed: Inside Kim Jong Un's phone surveillance network
Autocorrect with an agenda
The censorship system is built directly into North Korean smartphones. The phone examined by the BBC showed that common South Korean terms are automatically corrected to fit the regime's ideology. For instance, typing 'South Korea' is immediately changed to 'Puppet State'—a phrase the state uses to characterise Seoul as an American-controlled outpost.
Another example is the word 'Oppa', widely used in South Korea to refer to older male friends or boyfriends. On a North Korean phone, the word is forcibly replaced with 'Comrade'. A message on the keyboard warns: 'This word can only be used to refer to siblings.'
Silent surveillance: Screenshots every five minutes
Surveillance goes beyond word filters. The phone automatically captures a screenshot every five minutes. These images are stored in a hidden folder not visible or accessible to users. Only state officials can retrieve them, allowing continuous monitoring of a user's activities—apps opened, messages typed, and what content is consumed.
This covert logging system enables authorities to build a detailed digital profile of individuals without their consent.
Live Events
No room for modifications
North Korea's approach to communication technology is tightly locked down. All devices—be it radios, televisions, or smartphones—are pre-configured to receive only government-approved content. Tampering with these settings or trying to access foreign media is classified as a serious criminal offence.
Phones are sealed to prevent hardware changes. The internet is entirely off-limits to the general population. The result is a tightly policed digital environment designed to keep citizens ideologically aligned with the regime.
Crackdown intensifies under Kim Jong Un
According to a human rights report by South Korea's Unification Ministry, the regime's censorship efforts have only grown stronger under Kim Jong Un. The report, based on testimonies from 649 defectors, details how officials routinely inspect phones for slang, contact names, or media suggesting exposure to foreign—especially South Korean—culture.
K-pop and Korean dramas are entirely banned. Cultural imports from the South are seen as subversive. One case cited in the report is particularly stark: a 22-year-old man was reportedly executed in public for listening to and sharing South Korean music and films.
The government's aim is clear—complete insulation from external cultural influences.
North Korea's censorship model is extreme even by authoritarian standards. By embedding surveillance and propaganda tools directly into everyday devices, the regime doesn't just limit what people see—it controls how they think and behave.
As the BBC report shows, the phone is not merely a communication tool in North Korea—it is an instrument of control. Every typed word, every action, is tracked. For North Koreans, privacy does not exist.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
8 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US bets $400 million on rare earth champion; Should India rethink its industrial policy?
Agencies MP Materials is not an American company that many would have heard of. It is the only integrated rare earth producer in the US, covering the entire value chain from mining to processing and magnet production. Last week, the US invested $400 mn in it, an attempt to use industrial policy to counter China's might in rare earths. Economics 101 frowns on the use of industrial policy - that is, government 'picking winners'. But it can work if used judiciously. India can learn, particularly from the US experience. In the current mood of de-globalisation and associated economic nationalism, industrial policy has become a global buzzword. But there is a great danger in applying it indiscriminately, particularly in a country like India, which has a long history of largely unsuccessful industrial policy. The fact is that India still does not have a global champion. The key to success lies in three principles: use only for select sectors, front the private sector, and ensure that the supported firms are competing globally. India has often flouted all three. In the most strategic sectors, it is usually the public sector that gets preference. India's industrial policy is oriented towards protection, creating firms or industries that serve the domestic market but are not competitive globally. In the US context, Trump's tariff bluster and blitzkrieg are not industrial policy. They represent a mercantilist strategy to reduce America's trade deficit. They are a political strategy to address key political constituencies. But it's not industrial policy. What the US is doing with MP Materials is. The US government has, for long, supported sectors that are hi-tech or inputs to hi-tech (critical minerals and rare earths in today's world). America's defence manufacturing industry (all of it privately owned) is what it is because of state procurement, an underrated instrument of industrial policy. The rise of SpaceX also owes a great deal to procurement by Nasa. The development of the internet also happened courtesy of R&D spending committed by the US. In India, this is another aspect of industrial policy that is under-recognised and under-funded. Direct state investment in firms is another MP Materials, the US government is now the largest shareholder with a 15% stake, but it allows the company to remain in private hands and function independently. And, in most cases, the goal is to create best-in-the-world companies/industries that can dominate all markets, not just the has a legacy of central planning, like China. While much has changed post-1991, the legacy of central planning lives on - most tellingly via 250-plus PSUs. These are usually given preferences, particularly in strategic sectors. GoI has not moved ahead with privatisation, but at least in defence, there is now a deliberate, welcome attempt to encourage private sector participation. But a challenge long as PSUs exist, GoI will always have to give them business, even when private sector companies are more efficient. In natural resources, GoI gives preference to PSUs (they don't always have to compete in auctions, for example). Even in the race to acquire overseas mineral assets, GoI prefers this un-level playing field, PSUs don't have an incentive to be efficient, while the 'competing' private sector bears the cost. GoI also spends resources propping up PSUs with little future, like BSNL, instead of supporting productive firms and R& also overextends itself. PLI, for example, is a good scheme. It trusts the private sector and has worked well in electronics. But there is less evidence of it working in other sectors. It's better to focus on one or two sectors than spread the greatest challenge for India is to change the mindset from creating firms that produce for India to firms that sell to the world. For this, reliance on protectionist measures like trade barriers must go. GoI should insist that it will only support firms that will be global winners. The writer is chief economist, Vedanta. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Paid less than plumbers? The real story of freshers' salaries at Infy, TCS. What if Tata Motors buys Iveco's truck unit? Will it propel or drag like JLR? As deposit ground slips under PSU banks' feet, they chase the wealthy If data is the new oil, are data centres the smokestacks of the digital age? Stock Radar: M&M likely to break out from 1-year consolidation range; time to buy? Will consumer stocks see a comeback this festive season? 12 stocks to keep an eye on even when analysts are not bullish Don't fear volatility, focus on businesses: 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 27% Best way to deal with volatility, just ' Hold' for wealth creation: 7 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 41%


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
US tourist dies after collapsing in Rishikesh resort room
Haridwar: A 36-year-old American tourist from California died after collapsing in her resort room in the Shivpuri area near Rishikesh in Teri district on Saturday afternoon, shortly before the family was scheduled to check out. Police said Cassandra Ayan, was accompanied by her husband, Jasan Stuart, and their three children. Stuart attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and rushed her to a local hospital, but she was declared dead on arrival. Muniki Reti SHO Pankaj Chauhan said, "The American family had come to Rishikesh on July 17 and were staying at a resort in Shivpuri. We later sent the body for post-mortem. While the final report is awaited, doctors found signs of pulmonary edema. Viscera samples have been preserved for further investigation. Her body was handed over to her husband."


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man confesses to killing uncle in inebriated state with spade handle
1 2 Kanpur: A tragic incident had occurred on Saturday night in Sen Paschim Para Nayapurwa when an inebriated nephew brutally murdered his sleeping uncle with a spade handle. At the DCP South office on Monday, the nephew admitted that his uncle's persistent irritating conduct led him to kill him. The victim, Shivbalak Rajput, aged 50, a farmer from Nayapurwa, was resting on a cot near the animal shed when his intoxicated nephew Neeraj repeatedly struck his head and face with a spade handle, causing his death. Following the assault, Neeraj disposed of the blood-covered handle on Shivbalak's roof and returned home while shouting abuse. Shivbalak's wife Anita and sons, Rahul and Rohit, rushed him to a local nursing home where he was pronounced dead. Police subsequently arrested Neeraj at his residence. Rahul lodged a murder case complaint implicating Neeraj, his father Jagdish, village head uncle Samar Singh, and Ram Vilas. At Monday's case presentation, DCP Deependra Chaudhary revealed that investigations indicated that Neeraj suffered from mental instability. Regular disagreements between Neeraj and Shivbalak regarding fields and pathways previously led Neeraj to threaten the latter with dire consequences, though family members managed to pacify him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo On Saturday night, while in a drunken state, he recalled his uncle's vexing behaviour, obtained a spade handle, and fatally struck him before throwing the bloodied weapon onto the roof of the victim's family. The DCP confirmed that investigations found no evidence linking the village head or other accused parties to the incident. A recent altercation involving the village head and one of Shivbalak's sons, who was caught misbehaving on the road, resulted in family tensions. This animosity led to the inclusion of the village head and his brother in the complaint.