Which are the most popular retirement states? Not the ones you think.
Financial experts urge seniors to consider cheaper retirement states, like Arkansas and Missouri.
But where do Americans actually go to retire? Not where you think, according to a new study.
Wyoming, home to Grand Teton National Park, has gained retirees at a faster pace than any other state in the past decade, according to a June analysis by BizInsure, the online insurance agency.
South Carolina ranks second. Here's the full top 10:
Neither Arizona nor Florida ranks among the states with the highest move-in rates for seniors, based on Census data from 2013 to 2023.
Retirees are looking beyond Florida and Arizona
That analysis and others suggest that older Americans are looking beyond traditional retirement meccas when they choose to relocate after they stop working.
'That whole line of thinking has changed dramatically,' said Chip Lupo, a writer and analyst at WalletHub, a site that ranks best cities and states for retirement. 'A generation ago, you just went to Florida.'
According to the BizInsure report, today's retirees are 'moving to escape, chasing locations better known for hiking trails than beaches and bunko nights.'
(We had to go to the dictionary on 'bunko.' Turns out it's a dice game.)
Their analysis concludes that today's retiree wants 'fewer neighbors and more nature.' Several popular retirement states have populations – and population densities -- below the national average.
Some classic retirement states, including Florida, Arizona and Nevada, experienced negative retiree growth between 2013 and 2023, according to the BizInsure report.
But those states still have their charms. The analysis includes a list of 10 'best' retirement cities, considering their popularity among retirees, healthcare services and affordability, among other factors. Several of the top cities sit in time-honored retirement states.
Peoria, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix, tops the list of best retirement cities. Here's the full Top 10:
Where do seniors move to retire: A second source
There are, of course, many ways to slice and dice the data on top retirement destinations.
AARP does a regular analysis of destinations for American retirees, also drawing on census figures. Their report looks at people moving to a new state specifically for retirement.
The latest report, published in March, yields a very different ranking than the one above, but it's no less surprising.
The top retirement destination, according to AARP, is Massachusetts, not a state most of us associate with retirement. Florida, more predictably, ranks second.
Here's the full Top 10:
Lupo, of WalletHub, said retirees are looking 'way beyond weather' when they retire in another state, weighing such factors as health care quality and the local cost of living index.
'For some, it might be strictly affordability,' said Rudri Patel, a senior financial expert at GOBankingRates. 'For others, it might be green space, weather, property taxes.'
Here, from WalletHub, GOBankingRates and other sources, are a few other recent reports on best and worst places to retire.
Where are the cheapest retirement states?
The cheapest retirement state in 2025 is West Virginia, birthplace of Don Knotts and home to George Washington's bathtub.
To retire comfortably in the Mountain State, you'll need an estimated $712,913 in savings and an annual budget of $50,954, according to GOBankingRates.
Retirement in America now costs $1 million or more in 15 states, GOBankingRates found. The priciest state is Hawaii: You'll need $2.2 million in savings for a comfortable retirement.
GOBankingRates calculated annual living expenses for retirees using data from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics and local cost-of-living figures.
Don't have a million dollars stashed away? Here are a few popular retirement states with lower costs than Hawaii.
Which are the best retirement states?
WalletHub did a recent ranking of best and worst states for retirement. Their analysis looks at 46 indicators of 'retirement-friendliness,' from tax rates and cost of living to quality medical care.
Here are WalletHub's Top 5 states to retire in 2025:
The worst retirement state? Kentucky, according to WalletHub. Yes, the same Kentucky that ranks fourth among retirement destinations, according to AARP.
And here are WalletHub's Top 5 cities for retirees:
What are the best states for seniors living alone?
More than one quarter of seniors live alone, according to the Census. Living solo can present unique financial perils.
A recent report from the senior care platform Caring.com ranks the best states for over-65 Americans who live alone. The report assigned a score to each state based on more than a dozen factors, including living costs and health care.
Three middle-of-America states, Arkansas, Missouri and Kansas, rank first, second and third in the Caring.com report.
While Caring.com didn't rank least desirable states for seniors who live alone, the report includes a heat map that gives a good idea of which states a cost-conscious senior might want to avoid, including California and Massachusetts.
Yes, the same Massachusetts that ranks as the nation's top retirement destination, according to AARP.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
15 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
On Eve of Massive Spending Proposal, Resurfacing Presentation from Former Pentagon Advisor Suggests Untapped U.S. Asset Could Quietly Balance the Books
Washington, D.C., July 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As President Trump prepares to introduce a sweeping legislative package—described by insiders as a 'Big Beautiful Bill' with trillion-dollar implications—a released presentation by former White House advisor Jim Rickards may offer a surprising counterbalance. According to Rickards, the U.S. already controls a little-known national asset capable of offsetting many of the bill's fiscal demands—without borrowing, taxing, or printing new dollars. 'The nature of this 'trust' as I call it, is such that politicians haven't been able to raid it… which has allowed it to grow untouched… for decades' . 'This is not some kind of government program like those COVID relief checks,' he adds. 'But it is a chance for the average American to become richer than they ever imagined' . A Resource Base Hidden in Plain Sight The presentation points to a vast store of natural resources—buried beneath federally owned land—stretching across the United States. These include copper, lithium, uranium, and other strategic minerals essential to infrastructure, defense, and energy systems. '$516 billion is here in the Salton Sea area of California… $3.1 trillion in Nome, Alaska. And $7.35 trillion in Midland, Texas…' . Rickards notes that these reserves have been known to government agencies for decades, but effectively off-limits due to environmental red tape and political inertia. 'For the past 50 years, fake-experts have strangled us from within the government,' he says. 'They tied us down with reams of regulation' . Trump's Pivot to Domestic Wealth With the introduction of this new bill—which some expect to prioritize military modernization, industrial revitalization, and energy security—Rickards believes the shift toward using domestic assets isn't just philosophical, it's practical. 'Trump is re-opening our mineral-rich Federal Lands. And fast-tracking companies that could recover trillions of dollars' worth of resources, right here in America'. 'There are certain areas where we have great, raw earth… and we're not allowed to use it because of the environment. I'm going to open them up,' Trump said . Decades of Delay. Days from Decision. The presentation references several high-value resource projects that have been stuck in limbo for years: 'Resolution Copper Mine… 29 years' 'Pebble Mine… since 1990' 'Thacker Pass Lithium Mine… since 1978' Now, Rickards says, the clock may finally be ticking in the other direction. 'We know exactly where these minerals are. We know they're worth trillions of dollars. And now—for the first time in half a century—we can go get them' . A New Path Forward? Rickards argues this isn't a question of what to create—but whether we'll finally use what's already ours. 'It's not earmarked for any specific individual,' he clarifies. 'I'm just trying to use terminology that will make the most sense to viewers' . 'We've had this rich endowment right under our feet… yet for years, we refused to touch it' . As Congress prepares for a new budget cycle, the presentation adds fuel to a growing conversation: Can America build the future… with what it already owns? About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, and U.S. Treasury. He played a key role in the Petrodollar Accord in the 1970s, has counseled the U.S. government through major financial and geopolitical events, and is the author of seven New York Times bestselling books. He now serves as a strategic analyst focused on national resilience, resource policy, and economic forecasting. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Business Insider
38 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I'm a financial independence influencer. There are 3 questions everyone should ask before starting their FI journey.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Brad Barrett, who hosts the ChooseFI podcast. Business Insider has verified his professional history. My journey to financial independence, or FI, started long before I had heard of or read about this term. I'm a Certified Public Accountant, and I began my career at a big accounting firm. I lived at home with my parents when I got my first job and started saving big chunks of my salary. I was frugal and made decisions in the service of a life I wanted in the future. In 2013, I read the Mr. Money Mustache blog, and it all made sense to me. His post on the "shockingly simple math behind Early retirement" has become one of the seminal articles in our community. The article was a thunderbolt in my life, and my reaction was: "Oh, wow, I can actually do this." I left my full-time job in early 2015, at age 35, about 13 years after I started working. Since then, I have gone on an entrepreneurial journey and have worked on a travel rewards website, a newsletter, and a podcast called ChooseFI, which I have been running for nine years. To me, FI is not only about quitting your job early and never working again. It's about reaching a point where we can control the most important and finite aspect of our lives, which is our time. FI can be a yearslong journey that requires making changes and sacrifices. From talking to people on my podcast and answering questions at FI events, here are three questions I wish everyone would ask themselves before starting their journey to FI. 1. Are you ready to make a change? One of the biggest issues people have is that they are ashamed of their financial lives. They feel that they've made mistakes and are stuck. My question to them is, are you ready to make a change? If you've messed up financially, are you ready to stop beating yourself up about past mistakes? I've made calamitous money mistakes, but I've still reached FI. If you are working toward building a nest egg, are you willing to think long term and forgo everyday convenience in exchange for building a better life in the future? It's about not succumbing to instant gratification like buying fancy cars and going out to dinner all the time. It's also about the little things, like planning a week's worth of meals that you can cook at home, so you don't end up getting fast food just because it's 6 o'clock on a Tuesday evening and no one's eaten yet. On the other hand, if you are someone who has a significant savings rate, are you willing to spend more of it to ensure you are making your life better? 2. Can you rethink what 'afford' means? In modern American society, saving money is seen as countercultural and unusual. And that's ridiculous. In order to live a functioning life, you need to have a savings rate. And you need to account for that rate every time you ask yourself whether you can afford something. Some people make $5,000 a month and think that means they can spend up to $5,000 that month. That mindset needs to change to, "Hey, I need a savings rate. Can I afford this if I'm ever going to retire or have any kind of financial security?" If you decide your savings rate is 30%, that means you only have $3,500 to spend a month. This doesn't mean you're depriving yourself. It's about prioritizing spending on what is most important to you and saving to have freedom in the future. 3. Are you ready to have conversations about money? While no one should stuff financial independence down other people's throats, you have to have conversations about money with your family or partner. I've seen every combination of FI relationships work — many where one partner is working and the other has retired early. Those were the result of significant conversations that weren't just, "Hey, I'm retiring today, but can you still pay the bills?" Getting on the same page financially is important for any couple, whether in the FI community or not, because we know, money is one of the biggest stressors in life and in relationships. It's OK to date somebody who has significant debt, because that happens. But are you on the same page? Are they trying to pay that debt off? There's, of course, no requirement that you have this certain net worth to date somebody in the FI community. But is it going to go well if you have a 50% savings rate and the person you're dating is going more and more into debt every month? No.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If EPS Growth Is Important To You, Objective (ASX:OCL) Presents An Opportunity
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But the reality is that when a company loses money each year, for long enough, its investors will usually take their share of those losses. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad. If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Objective (ASX:OCL). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If a company can keep growing earnings per share (EPS) long enough, its share price should eventually follow. That means EPS growth is considered a real positive by most successful long-term investors. It certainly is nice to see that Objective has managed to grow EPS by 21% per year over three years. So it's not surprising to see the company trades on a very high multiple of (past) earnings. Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. The music to the ears of Objective shareholders is that EBIT margins have grown from 28% to 32% in the last 12 months and revenues are on an upwards trend as well. That's great to see, on both counts. The chart below shows how the company's bottom and top lines have progressed over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. See our latest analysis for Objective In investing, as in life, the future matters more than the past. So why not check out this free interactive visualization of Objective's forecast profits? Prior to investment, it's always a good idea to check that the management team is paid reasonably. Pay levels around or below the median, can be a sign that shareholder interests are well considered. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Objective, with market caps between AU$611m and AU$2.4b, is around AU$1.7m. The Objective CEO received total compensation of just AU$215k in the year to June 2024. First impressions seem to indicate a compensation policy that is favourable to shareholders. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. It can also be a sign of a culture of integrity, in a broader sense. If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into Objective's strong EPS growth. Strong EPS growth is a great look for the company and reasonable CEO compensation sweetens the deal for investors ass it alludes to management being conscious of frivolous spending. We think that based on its merits alone, this stock is worth watching into the future. Of course, profit growth is one thing but it's even better if Objective is receiving high returns on equity, since that should imply it can keep growing without much need for capital. Click on this link to see how it is faring against the average in its industry. While opting for stocks without growing earnings and absent insider buying can yield results, for investors valuing these key metrics, here is a carefully selected list of companies in AU with promising growth potential and insider confidence. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
