SC senators advance DOGE plan, with eye toward regulations
COLUMBIA — A panel of senators advanced a resolution Thursday creating a commission proponents say aims to reduce burdensome regulations and cut down on government spending.
After changing the commission's name to the Delivery of Government Efficiency — or DOGE, to mirror the federal Department of Government Efficiency — the six-member subcommittee advanced the resolution without objection. House Republicans, including members of leadership, have made a nearly identical proposal, which has not yet had a hearing.
Like the name, the idea for the commission came from the federal initiative that has begun to slash government spending, said Sen. Stephen Goldfinch, chief sponsor of the legislation.
If approved, it would create a 10-member commission tasked with combing through state spending and reporting its recommendations for potential savings by Oct. 1. The report would go to legislative leaders and Gov. Henry McMaster.
The commission would then spend the next year doing the same for the state's regulations, looking for those that are duplicative or overly burdensome, said Goldfinch, R-Murrells Inlet.
He doesn't expect commissioners to find a bunch of waste in agencies' spending. The commission's bigger impact, he said, will come from examining state regulations on businesses.
Red states create their own DOGE efforts to cut state government
No legislators would sit on the panel. Instead, the House speaker, Senate president and governor would each appoint three people, and a representative from the state Department of Administration would oversee the group.
The key will be to select people who know the state's processes and how they affect business owners, Goldfinch said.
'A lot of times, we hear from our constituents, but we're insulated, and we don't always know what the problems are out there,' said the attorney. 'This is a great way to find out what the actual problems are.'
McMaster called for similar reductions in regulations during his State of the State address last month.
He specifically wants to examine whether to eliminate any of the more than 40 professional licensing boards, 'run by 350 appointed board members, who license and regulate over 500,000 South Carolinians in the workplace,' he said.
'Each year, the licensing of these professions seems to become more complicated and burdensome,' McMaster said in his Jan. 29 speech. 'I agree with my colleagues that it's time we pause, review the laws that created these boards along with their statutory requirements and determine whether they are necessary, effective, and balanced.'
Churches, charities with little track record among nonprofits in line for $90M in SC budget
The commission's findings could also be a chance for legislators to reevaluate some of their own spending, Goldfinch said. For instance, legislators could rein in the hundreds of millions of dollars they have spent on local projects annually through the last few state budgets.
'A little self-reflection is not always a bad thing,' Goldfinch said.
The state already has safeguards against unnecessary spending, other senators pointed out.
The Legislative Audit Council audits agencies and programs at legislators' request. The Office of the State Inspector General examines agencies, colleges and school districts. And oversight committees in both the House and Senate investigate state agencies over a seven-year review schedule.
'I'm not seeing the necessity for it, if we can maybe expand the responsibilities of the oversight commission as it is,' said Sen. Margie Bright Matthews, D-Walterboro.
But she didn't vote against it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Republican: Johnson needs to ‘show some leadership,' end redistricting ‘chaos'
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) called out Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) over their responses to redistricting efforts across the country, saying the chaos needs to end. 'Ultimately I think that the Speaker needs to step up and show some leadership here because even our own members in states that might in some theoretical way, mathematical way stand to benefit from new maps, they don't like what's going on either,' Kiley told MSNBC's Chris Jansing on Tuesday. 'They don't like the prospect of having their district broken up or having communities they've represented, been voted in by, taken out of their district.' Kiley, who represents a competitive House district, said on Monday he will introduce legislation on Monday that would block states from redrawing their congressional districts prior to the 2030 census. 'It's not a good thing for either Democrats or Republicans. It's certainly not a good thing for the country,' he continued. 'So I think that the Speaker and Leader Jeffries need to show some leadership here to bring this chaos to an end, and I think that the bill that I have offered gives them the opportunity to do just that.' In the same interview, Kiley also criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) efforts to redraw maps in California as a means of fighting back against Republican redistricting efforts in red states. Newsom has said he wants to abolish the state's Independent Redistricting Commission. 'The old saying is that voters should choose their representatives; representatives shouldn't choose their voters,' Kiley said. 'And I think that what's happening right now across the country, and especially in California, is a very unhealthy thing for democracy.' The redistricting fight jumped into overdrive in Texas this week after state Democratic lawmakers fled the Lone Star State for blue states including Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York.

12 minutes ago
Texas redistricting: What's at stake as Republicans aim to pick up 5 House seats
President Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed Republicans are "entitled to five more seats" in Texas, where a redistricting battle is playing out among state lawmakers. But the Lone Star State's political showdown has national implications, with control of the U.S. House potentially at stake. Republicans started the 119th Congress with the smallest House majority in nearly 100 years. Currently, the party has a 219-212 majority with four vacancies. When those vacancies are filled, Democrats would need to only net three seats next November to win back the House. House Speaker Mike Johnson can only afford to lose three Republican in any vote where all members are present. The slim margin created some headaches for Johnson in delivering Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill, rewriting cryptocurrency rules and more. In a bid to defend the fragile majority, or even expand it, Trump's political operation approached Texas Republicans in June about redrawing the state's congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Midterm elections historically have been unkind to the president's party, though Johnson said last week when Texas Republicans introduced the new maps that the GOP would "defy history" and "grow the majority in the House" in next year's races. The new map could net Republicans between three and five seats if enacted, analysts previously told ABC News. The proposed changes would impact districts in Austin, Dallas and Houston -- areas that have typically voted blue. The Texas redistricting effort, which are rarely done mid-decade between the census, has prompted swift pushback from Democrats. Democratic lawmakers fled the state in protest, denying Republicans the necessary quorum to vote on enacting the new map. In response, Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to arrest the Democrats and bring them back to Austin. President Trump on Tuesday defended the move in a phone interview with CNBC. "We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas, I got the highest vote in the history of Texas as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats," Trump said. Democratic leaders have pledged to try to counter the Texas Republican effort with new maps of their own. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Monday, at a news conference alongside several Texas House Democrats in Albany, said she will try to gerrymander her state's map -- though noted it was unlikely to be done before the 2026 midterms. "We're already working on a legislative process, reviewing our legal strategies, and we'll do everything in our power to stop this brazen assault," Hochul said. "The gloves are off, and I say 'Bring it on.'" California Gov. Gavin Newsom, too, said if Texas moved forward with the new map then they would respond by putting their own redistricting plan before voters this November. Both states currently use independent commissions to draw their maps following constitutional amendments.


Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Republicans' next redistricting target: Missouri
Kehoe 'will always consider options' which 'provide congressional districts that best represent Missourians,' his spokesperson Gabby Picard wrote in a statement to POLITICO on Tuesday. Both parties are currently locked in a national fight to gerrymander state lines ahead of the midterms. Republicans in Texas have put forward a new map that could flip as many as five seats red — sending Texas Democratic lawmakers scrambling out of the state to deny the legislature the quorum needed to pass the map. And in response, Democrats in other states — particularly California — are eyeing ways to do their own mid-decade redistricting. In an interview with CNBC Tuesday, President Donald Trump said Republicans were 'entitled' to the seats in Texas. A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment about whether Trump is pushing for Missouri to redistrict, but Missouri House Speaker Pro Tem Chad Perkins told The Missouri Independent in July that he had received a call from a White House staffer encouraging it. Cindy O'Laughlin, Missouri Senate's president pro tem, said in a statement to POLITICO 'no decision has been made' yet, but that if Kehoe calls a special session 'the Senate will be ready to engage in those discussions.' Cleaver, the Missouri Democrat whose seat would likely be affected by the potential redistricting, said Democrats in states like California and New York 'are now required to respond' in kind. 'I think this is absolutely awful what they're doing, it's not helpful or wholesome for our democracy,' Cleaver said. 'But, I think Democrats are going to be required not only by their constituency, but by the demands of democracy, to fight back.' Cleaver said he spoke to Kehoe on the phone about redistricting after learning about it on the news, but that neither man made requests or commitments to each other out of respect. However, the lawmaker, who has served in the House since 2005, noted that his team is already working on legal options in the case the plan moves forward. 'If we can't convince Republicans that this is damaging to their brand and to this country, then we'll have to convince a judge,' Cleaver said.