Trump floats revoking Rosie O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship
July 12 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump has suggested he might revoke actress Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship without saying what spurred the notion.
O'Donnell moved to Ireland shortly before Trump was sworn in for his second term as president.
Trump on Saturday morning called O'Donnell a "threat to humanity" and someone who "is not in the best interests of our great country" in a Truth Social post.
The actress in March announced she moved out of the United States on Jan. 15 for political and personal reasons.
"It's been heartbreaking to see what's happening politically and hard for me personally as well," O'Donnell said, as reported by USA Today.
"The personal is political, as we all know," she added.
O'Donnell and Trump have clashed since before he first became president in 2017.
The actress formerly was a co-host on "The View" from 2006 to 2007 and 2014 to 2015.
She asked if Trump is "rattled again" in an Instagram post that included a photo of a much younger Trump with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in 2019 while jailed in New York City on pedophilia-related charges.
"18 years later and I still live rent-free in that collapsing brain of yours," she said in the post.
"You want to revoke my citizenship? Go ahead and try," O'Donnell said. "I'm not yours to silence [and] never was."
O'Donnell referred to herself as a "loud woman [and] a queer woman mother who tells the truth."
She said she "got out of the country [before Trump] set it ablaze."
"You are everything that is wrong with America," O'Donnell said. "I am everything you hate about what's still right with it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Says Trump Should ‘Just Release Epstein Files as Promised'
Elon Musk said President Donald Trump should release the Epstein files as promised. 'Seriously. He said 'Epstein' half a dozen times while telling everyone to stop talking about Epstein. Just release the files as promised,' Musk said in a reply to a post on X.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
PSG and Chelsea in the Club World Cup final reflects the state of the game in 2025
There was a temporary exhibit in the lobby of Trump Tower this week, near the 60-foot waterfall, the gold-plated escalator and the gold-plated elevators, and it looked right at home. FIFA's new Club World Cup trophy was crafted in collaboration with luxury jeweller Tiffany & Co, which is based on the same block on New York City's Fifth Avenue. It is plated in 24-carat gold — 'prestigious, timeless,' says FIFA president Gianni Infantino, whose name appears on it. Twice. Advertisement It is certainly eye-catching. Like some expensive toy, it comes with a key which, if turned three times, allows the trophy to be opened up and transformed — in this case from a shield into what FIFA calls a 'multifaceted and orbital structure'. 'Wow,' President Trump said when Infantino gave a demonstration in front of television cameras in the Oval Office in April. 'You've gotta be kidding.' Trump is expected to join Infantino as part of the presentation party that will hand the trophy to the winning captain — either Paris Saint-Germain's Marquinhos or Chelsea's Reece James — after Sunday's Club World Cup final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey (or 'New York New Jersey' as FIFA appears intent on rebranding it). Quite what the captain does with the trophy at that point — whether he lifts it, or opens it, or opens it and then tries to lift it in its expanded form — remains to be seen. But Infantino will have the moment he craves: fireworks, blaring music and Trump in attendance as the new world champions celebrate with the trophy and the winning club's owners celebrate a windfall in the region of $114million (£84.5million). This summer's Club World Cup has been a strange experience. There has been a lot to take issue with, from the way it was crowbarred into a small gap in a horribly congested calendar to the commercially driven insistence on playing matches in scorching heat at the height of an American summer. The prize fund is only going to compound the issue of financial inequality in the game and then there's the endless bombast from Infantino about how 'the 32 best teams in the world' and their fans have created drama and atmosphere on an 'epic', 'phenomenal', 'incredible' scale, beyond anything previously seen in club football. 'If you want the headline from the beginning — as we are in Trump Tower — the golden era of global club football has started,' Infantino declared on Saturday morning. 'We can say definitely that this FIFA Club World Cup has been a huge, huge, huge success. After the final tomorrow we will have (had) two or three billion viewers all over the world, watching the top, top, top-quality football featuring the best players in the best teams in the world.' Advertisement The tournament has had its moments, but is this the showpiece final Infantino would have wished for the first version of the expanded tournament? Probably not; even if he were to look beyond his lifelong affinity with Internazionale, he might have preferred to see a final involving Real Madrid and/or one of the South American teams. The first would have been for commercial reasons, the second because it would have brought a global dimension, as well as a colour and vibrancy, that an all-European final lacks. In many ways, though, a final between PSG and Chelsea seems to encapsulate the state of the game in 2025: a club owned by a Qatari sovereign wealth fund facing a club owned primarily by an American private equity firm. They are two of the three clubs with the biggest net transfer spend in world football over the past decade. (The fact that the other club in that trio is Manchester United, owned by an American family with a real estate empire, at least serves as a reminder that spending fortunes does not always guarantee success.) Money makes the world go around — and no more than in football. The sport did not anticipate the influx of American and Middle Eastern wealth it has seen over the past couple of decades, but it now actively lusts after that investment, whether direct or otherwise. FIFA, football's world governing body, is at the centre of that equation. This is a tournament on American soil, bankrolled by American and Middle Eastern investment. When, shortly after succeeding Sepp Blatter as FIFA president in 2016, Infantino floated the idea of an expanded Club World Cup with a $1billion prize fund for participating clubs, questions were asked about where that money was going to come from. The answer, to a large extent, is from the United States and the Middle East: big commercial deals with U.S. firms such as Coca Cola, Visa and Bank of America as well as with Qatar Airways and PIF (a Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund) and an enormous television rights deal with DAZN, a U.S-based broadcaster that is now part-owned by SURJ Sports Investment, a subsidiary of PIF. Infantino has been unapologetic for chasing Middle Eastern investment. In May he arrived late at the FIFA Congress in Asuncion, Paraguay — to the disdain of delegates from UEFA, European football's governing body — after spending the previous days at various summits and ceremonial events with Trump in Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Advertisement At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in Riyadh, the FIFA president spoke about the 'huge … unexploited potential' — even now — for investment from both countries, telling his audience: 'Invest in the beautiful game! It will be the best investment you can make!' Infantino claims interest in the Club World Cup has been off the scale. But it seems irrelevant to question whether a Qatari airline or a Saudi sovereign wealth fund has extracted value from sponsorship deals if those deals are less about 'value' in the traditional sense than about cementing that nation's government's relationship with FIFA and enjoying whatever benefits might come of that. Next summer the U.S. will co-host the men's World Cup with Canada and Mexico. Three-quarters of the games (78 out of 104) will take place in American cities and the whole affair seems to be shaping into a Trump-Infantino production. Trump has delighted his 'good friend' and FIFA counterpart by becoming the chair of the 2026 World Cup task force — and this at a time when Trump signed executive orders restricting the entry to the U.S. by nationals from various countries while imposing heavy trade tariffs on others, including their tournament co-hosts Mexico. Trump told reporters in March that political or economic tensions between the U.S. and its neighbours and co-hosts might make the World Cup 'much more exciting'. Infantino, alongside him, nodded in agreement. As for Saudi Arabia, it will host the 2034 men's World Cup — despite the concerns raised by various groups about the kingdom's human rights record — and its influence on FIFA and the football industry continues to grow. Infantino's predecessor Sepp Blatter told German TV channel ntv this week: 'We have lost football to Saudi Arabia. We offered it and they took it. Surprisingly, there is no opposition to this within FIFA.' Football revolves around the prestige and profile of the biggest clubs in Europe, which import talent from all over the world but primarily from South America and Africa. But the football economy, increasingly, revolves around the U.S. and the Middle East. Where any of this is leading is anyone's guess. But in a decade that has already seen 12 of Europe's biggest clubs try and fail to establish a breakaway Super League, it is easy to imagine a scenario in which the game's established structure comes under serious threat once more. Advertisement The scene in the VIP section at Wednesday's semi-final at MetLife (below) — Infantino, Real Madrid president Florentino Perez, PSG chairman Nasser Al-Khelaifi and Turki Al-Sheikh, the chairman of Saudi Arabia's General Entertainment Authority — left you wondering just how four of the most influential figures in football in 2025 might proceed if, hypothetically, they felt they had the opportunity to change the game's landscape to their design. It is hard not to imagine that Infantino's vision for the future goes much further than a 32-team tournament every four years when he has been talking about this tournament as a 'big bang' and a 'new era of club football'. At Saturday's chaotic media event at Trump Tower, The Athletic asked the FIFA president if he might push for it to be played every two years. 'In the future we will see what it brings us. We will make it better,' he said, a vague answer that will cause consternation among traditionalists. Infantino sounds like someone who is looking far beyond the game's traditional structures and architecture, in which everything is built around national leagues. The football business has changed hugely — and some of us would say not for the better — over the first quarter of the 21st century. It threatens to change far more dramatically over the next 25 years. He claimed the Club World Cup has broken all records when it comes to the revenue generated per match, saying that 'no other club competition in the world today comes anywhere close'. Those enormous commercial deals have certainly helped at a time when the organisers have found themselves putting the 'dynamic' into 'dynamic pricing' by slashing ticket prices in a bid to minimise the number of empty seats in the knock-out rounds. Whether the tournament has captured the imagination of the typical football fan — or, to generalise less, of the typical cross-section of football fans — is a different matter entirely. A Champions League or Copa Libertadores semi-final and final is an enormous event that stops people in its tracks and dominates conversations; a World Cup final even more so. Was the football world captivated when PSG tore Real Madrid apart on Wednesday? It didn't feel like it. Will it be any different when PSG take on Chelsea on Sunday? It is hard to imagine so. The Club World Cup has its showpiece event, one that promises to be illuminated by a PSG team that has taken its game to another level since the turn of the year, excelling under the stewardship of Luis Enrique. But whether Sunday's final will represent a showpiece for the game, or merely for FIFA's success in milking it, is another question. In the post-match festivities, that key will be turned three times to unlock the trophy. Infantino might say it is symbolic of club football's true potential being unlocked as part of this new 'golden era' he has been talking about. But … oh, what's that saying? All that glitters is not gold.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Was Asked About His Message To Texas Families Who Are Angry About Late Flood Alerts, And His Response Is Going Viral For Being "Sick Beyond Belief"
At this point in Donald Trump's presidency, many people have given up hope of Trump behaving like a leader during a tragedy. Most recently, a bizarre moment from Trump's visit to Texas after the floods proves that he's not changing anytime soon. Related: A clip of Trump insulting a reporter for questioning Texas's late flood alerts on behalf of victims' families is going viral: Reporter: Several families are upset because they're saying the alerts didn't go out in time. What do you say to those families?Trump: I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances… Only an evil person would ask a question like that — Acyn (@Acyn) July 11, 2025 CSPAN / Twitter: @Acyn "Several families we've heard from are obviously upset because they say that those warnings, those alerts, didn't go out in time, and they also say that people could've been saved. What do you say to those families?" a reported asked. Related: "Well I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances. This was, I guess, Kristi said, a one in five hundred, one in a thousand years, and uh, I just have admiration for the job that everybody did." "Only a bad person would ask a question like that to be honest with you. I don't know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask a question like that." Related: "I think this has been heroism. This has been incredible, really. The job that you've all done. It's easy to sit back and say, 'Ooh, what could have happened here or there,' you know. Like we could've done something differently. This was a thing that's never happened before." As you can guess, this clip is not going over well online. "He fucked up. They fucked up. And the kids died. So he's trying to act like it's an offensive question because he thinks you are stupid," one person wrote. This person called Trump's comments "horrific." Related: "Showing concern for your family is evil to him because he despises his own family. This is sick beyond belief," another person wrote. "This is so so so pathetic. He's like a child who will do ANYTHING except admit a mistake and apologize. Clearly there were things your administration could do better moving forward. Talk about THAT to learn how we can better mitigate this in the future instead of being like." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
