Liver Cancer: Obesity-related liver cancer cases to rise over 10% by 2050; Here's how to prevent it
According to data published in the
Lancet Commission on Liver Cancer
, the number of new liver cancer cases is expected to increase from 870,000 in 2022 to 1.52 million in 2050, with obesity being the key contributing factor behind the surge.
At the same time, deaths from liver cancer are set to rise from 760,000 to 1.37 million, making it one of the fastest-growing causes of cancer-related death worldwide.
That's the alarming backdrop behind the growing toll of obesity-related liver cancer, especially metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as NAFLD.
However, the same study has also revealed that at least 60% of liver cancers could be preventable: lifestyle changes, vaccination, early detection, and public policy could avert up to 17 million cases and save 15 million lives by mid-century.
Obesity's role in liver cancer: What does the study say
The recent Lancet Commission report highlights MASLD, fatty liver linked to metabolic dysfunction, as a rapidly growing cause of liver cancer. The share of cases tied to MASLD (specifically MASH, the inflammatory form) is projected to rise from 8% in 2022 to 11% by 2050.
Earlier
meta-analyses
show that higher BMI significantly increases liver cancer risk, with hazard ratios up to 3.1 in people with obesity versus healthy weight.
In fact, years of data reveal that in men and women, roughly 28% of liver cancer cases are attributable to excess weight.
DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) tied to high BMI surged globally from 292,700 in 1990 to over 1.2 million by 2021, a nearly 323% increase. The trend, as per
research
, is particularly steep in middle and low-middle social development index regions, where metabolic risk factors are accelerating faster than public health responses.
The projected rise: What the numbers warn us
The Lancet Commission projects nearly 1.52 million liver cancer cases by 2050, with deaths increasing from about 760,000 in 2022 to 1.37 million.
Another major modeling study, published in
Nature
last year, put new cases at around 1.39 million by 2040, a 54% rise from 2020 levels.
This rise is being propelled by avoidable risk factors: obesity, alcohol use, and viral hepatitis. While hepatitis-related cases are expected to decline slightly, obesity-linked liver cancers are on the rise across the U.S.,
Europe, and Asia.
What is liver cancer?
Liver cancer is a disease where malignant (cancerous) cells develop in the liver. It can be either primary liver cancer, which originates in the liver, or secondary liver cancer, which spreads to the liver from another part of the body. The most common type of primary liver cancer in adults is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
There are several types of liver cancer:
Primary liver cancer:
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC):
The most common type, originating in hepatocytes (main liver cells).
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma:
Develops in the bile ducts within the liver.
Angiosarcoma/Hemangiosarcoma:
Rare, fast-growing cancers originating in the liver's blood vessels.
Hepatoblastoma:
A rare type primarily affecting children.
Secondary liver cancer:
Cancers that spread to the liver from other organs, like the colon, lung, or breast.
Risk factors:
Several risk factors can increase the likelihood of developing liver cancer.
These include chronic hepatitis B and C infections, heavy alcohol consumption, obesity, and exposure to certain chemicals like aflatoxins. Additionally, conditions like cirrhosis, inherited liver diseases, diabetes, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can also elevate the risk.
Lifestyle factors like heavy alcohol consumption and smoking are associated with a higher risk of liver cancer, often leading to cirrhosis and potentially causing HCC.
Besides, obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), where fat accumulates in the liver without excessive alcohol use, are also linked to increased liver cancer risk.
Why is liver cancer so deadly?
Liver cancer is often deadly due to a combination of factors, including late-stage diagnosis, limited treatment options, and the liver's vital role in the body. Many cases are discovered after the cancer has already spread, and the liver's complex function makes treatment challenging.
Moreover, liver cancer is highly aggressive, especially once MASLD progresses to MASH (steatohepatitis) and then cirrhosis or carcinoma, and there are only limited treatment options for liver cancer, with 5-year survival rates generally under 30%.
As per research, three in five liver cancer cases are linked to preventable risk factors, and global prevention strategies could reduce incidence rates annually by 2–5%, averting millions of cases and deaths.
Experts' take
Professor Jian Zhou of Fudan University, who chaired the study, emphasized the need for global action. 'Liver cancer is one of the most challenging cancers to treat, with five-year survival rates ranging from just 5% to 30%. Without urgent action, we risk seeing a near-doubling of cases and deaths in just 25 years,' he told NBC News.
Professor Stephen Chan from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, lead author of the study, echoed this sentiment, saying, 'Three in five liver cancer cases are caused by preventable risk factors, mainly viral hepatitis, alcohol, and obesity.
This presents a huge opportunity to intervene, save lives, and reduce healthcare burdens worldwide.'
Prevention: Lifestyle choices that could make a difference
Despite the concerning projected rise, one of the most highlighted findings from the Commission: 60% of liver cancer cases are preventable. Small steps go a long way and pave the path for liver cancer prevention.
Maintain a healthy weight and active lifestyle:
Adopt a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean protein, and healthy fats, as recommended by the World Cancer Research Fund.
Regular physical activity, as little as 30 minutes a day, can help manage weight, reduce inflammation, and improve liver health.
Screening and early detection:
Individuals with obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or elevated liver enzymes should get regular check-ups. Early detection of MASLD or MASH enables intervention before progression to cancer.
Vaccination against Hepatitis B (and HCV management):
Universal HBV vaccination, especially at birth, has dramatically reduced virus-linked liver cancer.
While no HCV vaccine is available yet, antiviral treatments significantly lower the risk for infected individuals.
Limit alcohol and sugary drink intake:
Alcohol is a known carcinogen tied to about 19% of global liver cancer deaths; excess sugars and processed foods fuel obesity and fatty liver, both risk multipliers.
Weight loss interventions for high BMI:
For individuals with Class II obesity or metabolic syndrome, interventions from dietary change to bariatric surgery may reduce MASLD and liver cancer risk. Surgery has shown about 92% resolution of steatosis in many cases.
Breast Self-exam: Right way to check for lumps and other changes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
21 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Virtual labs with AI scientists show promise: Stanford study
Virtual scientists in a virtual lab at Stanford University are coming up with unorthodox ways to address clinical challenges, researchers reported on Tuesday in Nature. The virtual lab is modeled after a well-established Stanford School of Medicine research group, complete with a principal investigator and seasoned scientists, the report says. As in human-run research labs, the virtual lab has regular meetings during which agents generate ideas and engage in a conversational back-and-forth. They also have one-on-one meetings, allowing the virtual lab members to meet with the virtual principal investigator individually to discuss ideas. Unlike human meetings, the virtual gatherings take a few seconds or minutes. When humans tasked the virtual team with devising a better vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19, they equipped the virtual scientists with tools and software to stimulate creative 'thinking' skills. The virtual scientists even created their own wish list. 'They would ask for access to certain tools, and we'd build it into the model to let them use it,' study leader James Zou said in a statement. Instead of opting for the usual vaccine design using an antibody, the AI team came up with using a nanobody, an antibody fragment that's smaller and simpler. 'From the beginning of their meetings, the AI scientists decided that nanobodies would be a more promising strategy,' Zou said. 'They said nanobodies are typically much smaller than antibodies, so that makes the machine learning scientist's job much easier," Zou said, "because when you computationally model proteins, working with smaller molecules means you can have more confidence in modeling and designing them.' When humans created the AI researchers' nanobody in a real-world lab, they found it was stable and could attach itself to one of the COVID virus variants more tightly than existing antibodies - a key factor in determining vaccine effectiveness. Aside from the initial prompt, the main guideline consistently given to the AI lab members was budget-related. Zou estimates that he or his lab members intervene about 1% of the time. 'I don't want to tell the AI scientists exactly how they should do their work. That really limits their creativity,' Zou said. 'I want them to come up with new solutions and ideas that are beyond what I would think about.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Physicists still divided about quantum world, 100 years on
AI image PARIS: The theory of quantum mechanics has transformed daily life since being proposed a century ago, yet how it works remains a mystery and physicists are deeply divided about what is actually going on, a survey in the journal Nature said Wednesday. "Shut up and calculate!" is a famous quote in quantum physics that illustrates the frustration of scientists struggling to unravel one of the world's great paradoxes. For the last century, equations based on quantum mechanics have consistently and accurately described the behaviour of extremely small objects. However, no one knows what is happening in the physical reality behind the mathematics. The problem started at the turn of the 20th century, when scientists realised that the classical principles of physics did not apply to things on the level on atoms. Bafflingly, photons and electrons appear to behave like both particles and waves. They can also be in different positions simultaneously -- and have different speeds or levels of energy. In 1925, Austrian physicist Erwin Schroedinger and Germany's Werner Heisenberg developed a set of complex mathematical tools that describe quantum mechanics using probabilities. This "wave function" made it possible to predict the results of measurements of a particle. These equations led to the development of a huge amount of modern technology, including lasers, LED lights, MRI scanners and the transistors used in computers and phones. But the question remained: what exactly is happening in the world beyond the maths? A confusing cat To mark the 100th year of quantum mechanics, many of the world's leading physicists gathered last month on the German island of Heligoland, where Heisenberg wrote his famous equation. More than 1,100 of them responded to a survey conducted by the leading scientific journal Nature. The results showed there is a "striking lack of consensus among physicists about what quantum theory says about reality", Nature said in a statement. More than a third, 36 per cent, of the respondents favoured the most widely accepted theory, known as the Copenhagen interpretation . In the classical world, everything has defined properties, such as position or speed, whether we observe them or not. But this is not the case in the quantum realm, according to the Copenhagen interpretation developed by Heisenberg and Danish physicist Niels Bohr in the 1920s. It is only when an observer measures a quantum object that it settles on a specific state from the possible options, goes the theory. This is described as its wave function "collapsing" into a single possibility. The most famous depiction of this idea is Schroedinger's cat , which remains simultaneously alive and dead in a box, until someone peeks inside. The Copenhagen interpretation "is the simplest we have", Brazilian physics philosopher Decio Krause told Nature after responding to the survey. Despite the theory's problems, such as not explaining why measurement has this effect, the alternatives "present other problems which, to me, are worse," he said. Enter the multiverse But the majority of the physicists supported other ideas. Fifteen per cent of the respondents opted for the "many worlds" interpretation, one of several theories in physics that propose we live in a multiverse. It asserts that the wave function does not collapse, but instead branches off into as many universes as there are possible outcomes. So when an observer measures a particle, they get the position for their world -- but it is in all other possible positions across many parallel universes. "It requires a dramatic readjustment of our intuitions about the world, but to me that's just what we should expect from a fundamental theory of reality," US theoretical physicist Sean Carroll said in the survey. The quantum experts were split on other big questions facing the field. Is there some kind of boundary between the quantum and classical worlds, where the laws of physics suddenly change? Forty-five per cent of the physicists responded yes to this question and the exact same percentage responded no. Just 24 per cent said they were confident the quantum interpretation they chose was correct. And three-quarters believed that it will be replaced by a more comprehensive theory one day.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Chinese sub discovers deepest-ever creatures 10 km undersea
AP file photo PARIS: A Chinese submersible has discovered thousands of worms and molluscs nearly 10 kilometres (six miles) below sea level in the Mariana Trench, the deepest colony of creatures ever observed, a study revealed on Wednesday. The discovery in Earth's deepest underwater valley suggests that there could be much more life thriving in the hostile conditions at the bottom of our planet's largely unexplored oceans than previously thought, the China-led team of scientists said. Almost all life on Earth is supported by light from the Sun. However, in the total darkness at the bottom of the world, these creatures live off of chemicals such as methane seeping through cracks in the seafloor, a process called chemosynthesis. Last year, the Chinese submersible " Fendouzhe ", or "Striver", dove 23 times into the depths of the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific Ocean with researchers on board, according to the study in the journal Nature. They found colonies of thousands of marine tubeworms and molluscs called bivalves at depths ranging from 2,500 to 9,533 metres (8,200 to 31,000 feet) deep. Video released alongside the study showed fields of tubeworms, which grew up to 30 centimetres (12 inches) long, as well as piles of molluscs and clams. Spiky crustaceans, free-floating marine worms, sea cucumbers, feathery-armed sea lilies and other invertebrates were also recorded in the depths. The study marked "the discovery of the deepest and the most extensive chemosynthesis-based communities known to exist on Earth," its authors said. Given that other ocean trenches are similar, "such chemosynthesis-based communities might be more widespread than previously anticipated," they added. The researchers said they also found "compelling evidence" that methane was being produced by microbes, with the tubeworms tending to cluster around microbial mats that resemble snow. Previous studies have found thriving communities of single-cell organisms on the ocean floor, but few large animals. But a remotely operated vehicle discovered tubeworms and other marine invertebrates living in hydrothermal vents in the crust below the seafloor two kilometres deep in the Pacific, research said last year. Pressure rising The new study was published as nations wrangle over the contentious issue of deep-sea mining. China, the United States and others have expressed interest in mining the depths for valuable minerals. Ocean scientists warn that mining the little-explored seafloor, one of the last wild zones on the planet, could decimate fragile ecosystems that are not yet well understood. Despite recent talks, the International Seabed Authority -- which oversees deep-sea mining in international waters -- has yet to adopt long-awaited rules governing the industry. Chinese media has previously reported that the Fendouzhe submersible mission will conduct research on "deep-sea materials". Only a handful of people have ever visited the bottom of the Mariana Trench, which is a crescent-shaped depression in the Earth's crust that is deeper than Mount Everest is high. The first explorers visited the trench in 1960 on a brief expedition. But after that, there were no missions until Hollywood director James Cameron made the first solo trip to the bottom in 2012, describing a "desolate" and "alien" environment. The water pressure at the bottom of the trench is a crushing eight tons per square inch, more than a thousand times the atmospheric pressure at sea level. Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
