
Skyrocketing Demand For Marketing Content Will Just Keep Growing
The skyrocketing demand comes from broadening customer expectations facilitated by advances in technology. More than 6 in 10 marketers say that customers now expect more personalized interactions with brands. About 46% find that customers now want more audio and video content, while 44% are creating content to enhance a hybrid customer experience—in which a customer interacts with the brand both virtually and in person. And 62% say that customers now expect new content at least weekly.
That adds up to a ton of content, literally. Seven in 10 marketers say their organization creates at least 1,000 assets per year, with nearly a quarter of marketing teams churning out between 10,000 and 100,000 assets annually. Current production workflows make that level of work challenging. Adobe found that nearly half of all marketing teams' workflows involve between 51 and 200 people to create, review, approve and activate each piece of content, and nearly 90% have at least three approval stages before assets can be published. The long approval process makes 36% of marketers struggle to find the time for content creation and ideation.
Generative AI can now help marketers with some of that content creation. Over half use the technology in multiple parts of their production process, and 84% plan to use it in the next year. This can certainly help teams meet the flywheel of demand, but administrative processes also need to be addressed. If the creative process speeds up, approval to use content also needs to be faster. As it stands now, 58% of marketers told Adobe that 41% of content creation time—roughly 25 minutes of every hour—is spent on administration, reviews and approvals.
Reese Witherspoon talks to e.l.f. Beauty CMO Kory Marchisotto at Cannes Lions International Festival Of Creativity.
Much of the marketing world is at Cannes Lions this week, sharing the creative wins, new technologies and challenges facing the industry. WPP Media's midyear report shows that there is a lot for the industry to figure out, Forbes contributor Howard Homonoff writes. Total ad revenue growth for 2025 is projected to be 6%, down from the predicted 7.7% at the beginning of the year. The downgrade extends to revenues for the next several years as well, largely owing to the unstable economy.
Digital advertising continues to dominate, representing 81.6% of all revenue when including streaming TV, digital out-of-home and digital print. Creator-driven ad revenue is projected to reach nearly $185 billion this year, for the first time surpassing projected revenues for traditional and streaming TV ($162 billion). WPP projects digital revenue will take a more than 87% share of all that comes from marketing by 2030.
WPP says search ad revenue, called 'Intelligence Advertising,' is set to grow 7.4% this year. However, that includes generative AI search—and many of the bots and engines people use don't offer advertising just yet.
Walmart
Walmart has a new AI-powered shopping assistant that will be able to do much more than just help customers select products that fit their needs. Forbes contributor Ron Schmelzer writes that Sparky—the assistant personified by Walmart's trademark yellow smiley face—now can do what many AI-powered shopping assistants do: suggest products, summarize reviews and answer a few real-world questions—like which sports teams are currently playing. In coming months, Walmart plans to add features that go several steps beyond basic: reordering and scheduling services, a feature that can take a photo or video and give a sort of 'how-to' guide for tasks—like 'How do I fix this dripping faucet?' or 'How can I make lunch out of these products?' It will essentially become a shopping agent, Schmelzer writes, turning shopping 'from a search problem into a service experience.' If you're planning a cookout, Sparky will present you with grills, check the weather, suggest menus and schedule for the items to be delivered.
It makes sense for Walmart to add these capabilities. According to the retailer's surveys, nearly 7 in 10 customers say quick solutions are the top reason they'd use AI in retail, and 27% now trust AI for shopping advice. Nearly half would be okay with AI reordering household staples, but the same amount said they're unlikely to ever fully hand over control of their shopping to a bot. Sparky combines these two desires: automatic reordering of commonly used items, advice on others. And with such a wealth of information available on Walmart's app, it may also inspire people to begin their shopping on the app itself instead of bypassing it for recommendations provided by an AI-powered search engine.
getty
A generation ago, the way Americans found out something new—from the latest details of presidential scandals to who killed Laura Palmer—was by watching live TV broadcasts. Today, live TV is increasingly turned off, writes Forbes senior contributor Toni Fitzgerald. A new study from consumer research firm Attest finds that 28% of Americans don't watch traditional broadcast TV in an average day, a number that has been rising year-over-year. Traditional TV viewership has especially been decreasing among younger viewers. More than two out of five Gen Zers say they don't typically watch traditional TV, while 27% of adults between 31 and 49 and 20% of those over 50 say the same. However, people are still watching something on their TVs. Attest found that 86% of people watch it daily through streaming services.
Influencers Adam W, Xandra and Wisdom Kaye.
The creator economy continues to grow and thrive. Forbes ranked the 50 richest creators across Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, finding they earned an estimated $853 million this year—not counting equity deals for partnering with consumer brands. Honorees on this year's list have a combined 3.4 billion followers, up 24% from last year's total.
Leading the pack is Jimmy Donaldson, also known as MrBeast, who is the most followed person on social media. His earnings in the last year are estimated at $85 million, and the YouTube star has expanded beyond digital platforms with candy brand Feastables, fast food chain MrBeast Burger, and his Amazon Prime game show Beast Games. YouTube producer Dhar Mann, who has established his own Hollywood studio with teams of hundreds to create modern back-to-school specials, ranks second on the list.
The ranking also includes Adam Waheed, known online as comedian Adam W, who pulls in more than 1 billion views on social platforms each month. Forbes' Steven Bertoni talked to Waheed about his social brand: sketch videos that are an exaggerated take on everyday life, often using high-quality cinematography and complex props. He definitely approaches the creator life as a full-time job, starting at 9 a.m. and posting a sketch every other day by 2:30 p.m. 'You can get 10 million views on a video, and the next day, someone else is getting 100 million views. You must continue putting up those numbers,' Waheed told Bertoni. 'When my back's against the wall is when I thrive.'
Every marketing job comes with some busywork, which can be a creativity killer. But AI can take care of a lot of those tasks. Here are seven ways to use it to free up your mind for the type of work you prefer to do.
While all of your customer reviews may not be positive, they provide windows into customers' mindsets, as well as opportunities to deliver better customer service and improve your company's processes. Here's how to turn bad reviews around.
Weigel Broadcasting Co. is launching its next specialty TV network. What kinds of programs will it show?
A. Documentaries
B. Talk shows from years past
C. Reality shows from years past
D. Westerns
See if you got the answer right here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
42 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why you need intergenerational marketing
When Barbie turned 65 last year with a major motion picture to celebrate, she dominated the news cycle for weeks. What a lot of people missed amongst the hoopla about an historic icon was her impact as an influencer. She's one of the original influencers, and definitely the original granfluencer. Granfluencers—influencers who are typically over the age of 60—are shaking up social media platforms with inspiring content. Their effect is undeniable, particularly among younger people. They bring wisdom, experience, and charisma in a wide range of topic areas, and they are playing a pivotal role in broadening the horizons of the creator economy. They deserve a central spot in your creator strategy because they increasingly form the bedrock of intergenerational family life. They're leading activities for more active families that are doing more, and doing more together in more ways. Here's how to ensure your marketing includes this too-often-forgotten demographic: STOP PUTTING AN AGE LIMIT ON INFLUENCE Granfluencers are a genuine force and marketing power move. They can broaden your reach and future-proof your brand. Start by understanding that they aren't home baking or watching daytime TV. They're out and about. And they're active on social media, where they are both befriending and coaching people of all ages—most notably, Gen Zers. SHOW YOU'RE A BRAND FOR LIFE When you break free from youth-only marketing, you can tell a deeper story—one that spans decades. By using granfluencers, you can highlight how your offering fits into life's biggest chapters: parenthood, retirement, reinvention, and beyond. Lean into themes like tradition, legacy, shared values, and joy that resonate across generations and you'll make your brand matter to entire families. BE A HELPER, NOT A HAWKER Tailor content and services toward helping granfluencers lead fulfilling lives and make an impact—not owning and using products. You will gain share with them, and they will help you with their families. LOOK BEYOND ADS Create all kinds of content about doing things, experiencing things, and affecting change. While you emphasize legacy, show the generations doing things together. Skip the prototypical holiday dinner pictures in favor of video that shows generations playing and touring together. Granfluencers are real and relatable, and their connection with younger family members is palpable, so let people see and feel it. GIVE FAMILIES A PLATFORM FOR TOGETHERNESS By actively fostering opportunities for shared experiences, your brand can become the very stage upon which family togetherness unfolds. Think beyond merely showcasing intergenerational interactions. Instead, provide the tools, inspiration, or even the venues that empower families—often led by enthusiastic granfluencers—to connect more deeply. For example, in travel, build the itineraries that balance activities (where to go, where to stay, what to do in active and down time) for the generations, and share them from a social media hub. Add in events like a family invitational golf tournament where teams of four, mixing all ages and levels, can 'compete.' The new family dynamic is intergenerational and the opportunity is vast. Marketing together is the key to tapping it.


Harvard Business Review
an hour ago
- Harvard Business Review
Research: Marketing Tech Is Broken. Here's How to Fix It.
Although companies invest considerably in marketing technology (martech), it is often under-utilized, and its impact is modest. As part of our research compiling The CMO Survey, we (a team of two academics, two consultants, and a CMO) asked 292 senior marketers how they use the technology and why they may not be getting the best results. Marketing leaders told us that they intend to spend 24% of their budgets on martech this year. Nearly a third (31%) of survey respondents noted that marketing spend on martech five years from now will increase by 55%. Few companies are unaffected by martech, and these budgetary trends suggest that its influence is accelerating. In response to the question, 'How much impact are your current martech tools having on your company's performance?' the marketers reported an impact-score of 4.7 on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all and 7 = a great deal). A concerning 49% told us that their expected outcomes aren't matching the technology's real-world impact. They also told us that 44% of purchased martech tools remain unused. The stark contrast between the large and growing investments in martech and its uneven performance raises two questions: 1) What factors underpin this gap, and 2) How should companies systematically manage their martech activities? Our findings suggest that the investment-performance disconnect arises from an overemphasis on martech's operational aspects when compared to its organizational ones. The Martech Organization Report Card To help redress this concern, we offer the Martech Organization Report Card. It summarizes the organizational 'best practices' for driving martech usage and effectiveness. It offers a systematic approach to identifying and remediating specific impediments to martech's integration into the company based on self-reported measures. Companies can benchmark their martech integration strategy on these ten best practices to help improve organizational elements. 1. Refocus attention—look past budget. The CMO survey indicates that martech spend and performance are not related—more spend does not lead to more performance. This means that leaders should look past spending and think more about how they can better leverage these systems. 2. Pursue the right goals. Leaders adopt martech for many reasons, including some problematic motivations like imitating a competitor or a fascination with shiny new marketing technologies. Our survey contrasted these motivations against those with stronger strategic intent, such as alignment with company objectives and strategy and enhancing customer value. Results reveal that when organizations implement martech for strategic reasons they experience 20% higher usage rates and substantially greater impact. This premium likely emerges because strategically-sound motivations can position martech as a valuable decision-making resource rather than another marketing toy. A strategic focus is often more easily embraced. 3. Increase the reach of martech across the company. Martech can be siloed into marketing. But marketing is typically more effective when tightly woven into the operations of the broader organization. To test this idea, we measured how well martech tools enhance the performance of each part of a company's strategy across six strategy areas: marketing, CRM, sales, CX, customer insights, and operations. In some companies, only marketing and CRM benefited, while in others, the average performance benefits were more evenly spread across the six areas. Results show that when martech's benefits are deployed company-wide, its overall organizational impact increases from 4.2 (narrower focus) to 5.4 (broader deployments) on the 7-point impact scale. To achieve cross-functional use, you should involve managers from across the company in martech adoption and goal setting. You should also increase training on the use of martech in each functional area. 4. Get the right people involved. Survey data indicates that companies are not prioritizing martech talent. When asked to 'Rate the event to which you focus on the following activities when managing your martech strategy,' the lowest performing area is 'Hiring or retaining talent for managing/implementing martech strategy. Respondents rated retention 4.1 on the 7-point scale. By contrast, 'Optimizing or streamlining existing tools' commands far greater attention. Marketers rated it 5.3. This imbalance needs addressing. Martech's objective value may weaken and its perceived credibility may be undermined if you haven't assembled the right team. Getting the most out of new martech solutions requires leaders to cultivate an always on-culture for learning and development. They should also establish dedicated programs for onboarding and productively using these solutions. 5. Bring genAI to the martech table. Companies told us they use genAI in 15% of marketing activities, on average. Above-average users use genAI in 32.1% of marketing activities, while below average users leverage it only 4.3% of the time. Above-average users also experience a significantly higher (10-20%) martech impact score. For this reason, genAI and martech appear to be complementary assets. They make each other stronger and are often part of the same systems. Sadly, we heard of a marketer who builds a 27-step process to publish a single blog. That is totally unsustainable and unnecessary with genAI. 6. Empower marketing leadership. A striking difference emerges in martech effectiveness based on leadership. In organizations where marketing leads martech initiatives (66% of companies surveyed), the impact is 25% higher than in those where other functions lead, including IT. This disparity highlights the value of a marketing-centric approach. Marketers' customer-focused perspective can foster more effective identification and deployment of technologies to address specific customer pain points and opportunities. 7. Include metrics for long-term impact. Companies use a range of martech metrics. Some are short-term, such as lead generation, lead conversion, and content engagement. These are used by 60% or more of the companies surveyed. Some are long-term, such as customer satisfaction, loyalty, and lifetime value. These are used by half as many companies. Companies who focus on longer-term metrics realize a greater lift in the impact of martech relative to the lift from short-term metrics, which makes the emphasis on short-term metrics surprising. If 'what gets measured gets managed' holds, the longer-term focus on customer relationships over transactions should equate to managers focusing on generating repeat business and loyalty for the company. In addition, measures convey value. If martech focuses on tactical or short-term activities, it could be viewed as less valuable inside the company. Over time, this will likely undermine martech's credibility as a powerful strategic platform. 8. Infuse creativity to bolster martech impact. Companies increase martech's effectiveness when they infuse it with creativity. To test this idea, we assessed leaders' responses to the question 'My organization's long-term success depends upon its ability to foster creative ideas that can transform the business' (where 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree) and examined how they influenced the performance impact of martech. Results show that martech impact improves as creativity ratings increase. This is most likely to occur when the focus is on elements of the brand, social, and/or CRM strategy. 9. Keep a customer focus. Tech systems can assume a life and entitlement of their own. One can become distracted from the key purpose of generating more revenue and lowering costs. To test this idea, we asked corporate leaders questions regarding their customer focus, such as the degree to which their company 'has clarity around identifying who your most engaged customers are,' 'can harness data focused on your most engaged customers,' and 'effectively use insights to manage your most engaged customers' (where 1=not at all to 7=very well). In all cases, companies that score higher on these customer-focused strategy tasks report higher martech performance. 10. Audit martech systems regularly. Martech acquisition requires considerable effort and expense, and it's not uncommon for companies to have large teams or groups evaluating potential technologies for adoption. Once purchased, however, companies less commonly attend to the technology. While 'set it and forget' is easy, it commonly fails owing to non-use or gaps in the tech stack and rapidly shifting innovations in the space. When asked, 'How regularly are your company's martech tools audited and evaluated, only 30.9% of respondents perform audits at a cadence of six months or less. Yet we find that martech impact drops significantly when companies wait more than a half year to evaluate. The inquiry, data, and discussions that surround evaluation are as important as the audit. The discussion coordinates martech's goals and reminds participants about its proper use. Done well, performance evaluations can remediate martech deficiencies and aid in the decision to cut underperforming components. Importantly, the audit can benefit from use cases and in-motion martech initiatives. . . . Companies are increasing their martech spend because it has the potential to increase customer demand and lower costs. Our evidence suggests that the realization of these benefits is, in part, due to whether martech is integrated into the fabric of the organization. Our Martech Organization Report Card offers leaders across the company a framework to take stock of their investments to optimize their impact.


Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Creative litigation versus creative instigation
I imagine that—like me—many of us got into advertising because it beat the alternatives. No real rules. No 'right way to do it.' No boxes you have to check. That sense of creative freedom chirped and blinked like an EXIT sign in the smoke-filled hallway of career choices. We ran to that EXIT, bypassing doors leading to more stringent, structured careers like lawyer or accountant or 'business consultant.' And before technology and analytics usurped advertising—like it has other entertainment-based industries like sports and film—that creative freedom drove the industry. Look at how analytics has all but eliminated the creativity in the mid-range game in the NBA and the subsequent Finals ratings. Advertising is in a similar state: seeking ideas that feel like predictable, analytically defensible, 'high-value' shots. This thinking is now making us operate more and more like those stringent, structured industries we avoided in the first place. BRAND STRATEGISTS AS CREATIVE LITIGATORS Take brand strategy for instance. Our main role now is 'creative litigator.' We gather stakeholder interviews like depositions, review client's internal documentation and data like evidence discovery, and research competitor companies and culture like case histories, statutes, and laws that give us the precedents to build off of. Then, ultimately, we piece together findings into a cohesive story like an opening statement that lays out the case for creative work. That's great for stakeholders, but not so much for viewers. People are paying $100+/month to avoid the 'disruption and irritation of advertising.' However, being disruptive or irritating shouldn't be the worry for brands. They should worry about being boring. THE RISK OF BEING BORING Jon Evans estimates the ' cost of being boring ' at $189B for brands in the U.S. Creators and influencers know this. Their freedom to 'just shoot' and develop an understanding of 'how not to be boring' enables them to run circles around ad agencies in terms of engagement and efficacy. In fact, a recent Deloitte study showed 56% of Gen Z and 43% of millennials find user-generated social media content 'more relevant than traditional TV shows and movies.' WHAT BRAND STRATEGISTS REALLY NEED TO DO In short, boring inputs result in boring outputs. To change that, in the case of brand strategists, we need to be thinking more often like creative instigators and agitators than just litigators. We need to approach our work like a journalist or a stand-up comedian. Because we're after 'interesting,' not justice. And you don' t get to 'interesting' by filling in funnels or bogus 'white space' quadrants or any assortment of rectangles in a framework. You get there by passively observing rather than actively 'working a case' at all times. Allowing anomalies to appear and not just looking for commonalities. Not looking for white spaces, but for colorful ones. Being able to 'explain the situation like I'm five,' but being able to ask questions like a 5-year-old first. Why? Why? Why? Getting the time to be the dumbest in the room, not the smartest. To be able to find something and show it to someone and say, 'Is this anything?' With the advertising industry's current landscape and dominant forces as they are, the sell of creative work will always require litigation. But it's much easier to sell creative work when the decider is focused on the tears in their eyes and not whether the idea is 'ownable' or 'culturally relevant' or 'shareable' or whatever analytics creativity is foolishly judged against today. Great creative ideas deserve to exist and shouldn't live and die based on their ability to fit in Meta, Alphabet, or Amazon's 'predictable' boxes. Come to think of it—maybe we are after justice after all?