Elon Musk's X sues New York to block social media hate speech law
The complaint, filed on Tuesday in a Manhattan federal court, argues that the law forces companies to disclose 'highly sensitive and controversial speech' that is protected under the United States Constitution's First Amendment, but disfavoured by the state.
Passed in December 2024, the law requires social media companies to clearly explain their terms of service to users and submit reports on those terms to the attorney general.
'We are taking bold action to hold companies accountable, strengthen protections, and give consumers the transparency and security they need and deserve,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said at the time.
X Corp is seeking a court order to block enforcement of the law, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act.
Deciding what content is acceptable on social media platforms 'engenders considerable debate among reasonable people about where to draw the correct proverbial line', X said, adding 'this is not a role that the government may play'.
The complaint also quoted a letter from two legislators who sponsored the law, which said X and Musk in particular had a 'disturbing record' on content moderation 'that threatens the foundations of our democracy'.
New York's law requires social media companies to disclose steps they take to eliminate hate on their platforms, and to report their progress. Civil fines could reach $15,000 per violation per day.
The law was written by state Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly Member Grace Lee, both Democrats, with help from the Anti-Defamation League.
X said that New York based its law on a nearly identical 2023 California law whose enforcement was partially blocked by a federal appeals court last September because of free speech concerns.
California agreed in a February settlement with X not to enforce the law's disclosure requirements.
This marks the latest in a series of lawsuits by the company targeting US states over free speech concerns. In April, X sued the state of Minnesota over a law banning deepfakes intended to harm political candidates or influence elections.
Musk has long described himself as a free speech absolutist, yet he has also been criticised for censoring political voices he disagrees with. As Al Jazeera reported ahead of the 2024 presidential election, Musk, then a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, regularly suppressed Democratic voices and suspended several accounts on X that were critical of Trump or of Musk's views.
The platform has also faced ongoing accusations of fostering hate speech under Musk's leadership. In 2023, the Center for Countering Digital Hate found that X failed to act on 99 percent of hate-filled content posted by users subscribed to Twitter Blue, the company's premium service.
Reports by watchdog groups, including Media Matters, eventually led several major brands to pause advertising on the platform, which prompted X to file lawsuits in response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visiting the United States on Monday, a visit analysts expect will focus on celebrating Israel and the US's self-anointed victory against Iran and discussing a proposal for a ceasefire in Israel's war on Gaza. This is the third time this year Netanyahu will be meeting US President Donald Trump, who claims the US and Israel 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme during a 12-day war and that he would resume bombing Iran if it restarts nuclear activities. Last week, Trump said Israel had agreed to conditions for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, which would allow all parties to work towards an end to Israel's 21-month-long war on the besieged enclave. On July 4, Hamas gave a 'positive' response to Qatari and Egyptian mediators about the latest ceasefire proposal. On Friday, after Hamas's response to the proposal, Trump said there could be a 'deal next week' and promised to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu to ensure a ceasefire. Israel has since said that Hamas has requested changes to the proposal that it found 'unacceptable', but that Israeli negotiators would be going to Qatar on Sunday to discuss the proposal. According to a leaked copy of the deal obtained by Al Jazeera, the ceasefire entails a 60-day pause in hostilities and a phased release of some of the 58 Israeli captives held in Gaza since a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 57,000 people, mostly women and children, in what United Nations experts, legal scholars and human rights groups describe as a genocide against Palestinians. Many experts told Al Jazeera that they are not optimistic a temporary ceasefire will lead to a permanent end to the war. 'The way [the ceasefire talks] are being framed leaves me sceptical,' said Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. Rahman added that he believes Trump was focused on getting the Israeli captives released, but not on ending the war and the suffering of the people of Gaza. Trump previously promised an end to the war after pushing for a ceasefire just days before he became president in January. However, two months later, Trump did nothing when Israel unilaterally resumed its attacks on Gaza, killing thousands more people. Mairav Zonszein, an expert on Israel-Palestine for the International Crisis Group, said that could happen again. 'It all rests on Trump and the US to sustain real pressure [on Netanyahu], but that is highly doubtful,' she told Al Jazeera. 'I'm optimistic there could be some kind of ceasefire, but longevity and the terms are highly questionable,' Zonszein said. 'It's also possible we could see a ceasefire that does not last because … Israel still every so often just bombs something without repercussions [in Gaza],' she added. Yaser al-Banna, a Palestinian journalist in Gaza, said many in the Strip are divided over whether a ceasefire will end the war. While everyone prays it will, some people cannot imagine Netanyahu sticking to a deal. Netanyahu insists that the war will not end without a 'total victory' over Hamas, a concept he has not defined. 'About half the people in Gaza are very pessimistic… The other half believes this time could be different due to shared interests among Israel, the Palestinians, Arab states and the US to end this war,' he said. Many analysts believe that Trump is driven by his desire to strike grandiose deals in order to boast about his achievements in global affairs. On Monday, he is likely to take credit for ostensibly dismantling Iran's nuclear programme – even though that may not be true – and express his desire to retrieve the rest of the Israeli captives in Gaza. He also wants to get the 'Gaza issue' out of the way to pursue more normalisation deals between Israel and neighbouring Arab states, said Khaled Elgindy, an expert on Israel-Palestine and a professor of Arab Studies at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. 'Trump wants to be able to say that he got back the Israeli hostages… and got a Palestinian state… Then he can call himself master of the universe, but getting those things is much harder than he thinks,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. It's unclear whether Netanyahu's political calculations align with Trump's ambitions. Israel's next parliamentary elections have to take place before October 2026, and Netanyahu could go to the polls sooner, riding on a likely wave of popularity if he succeeds in returning the remaining captives. Like Trump, he would also tout what he terms a stunning victory against Iran to the Israeli public. Those considerations are important because it is likely that Netanyahu's frail far-right coalition, held together by pressure to prolong the war on Gaza, would collapse if a permanent ceasefire is reached, said Hugh Lovatt, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'At the end of [the possible] 60-day ceasefire, [Netanyahu] could go to elections by committing to a full end to the war and collapse his coalition; or he could go back to war to keep his [far-right] coalition together should he judge the time not right for elections,' he told Al Jazeera. Staying in office is particularly important for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who faces several domestic legal charges of fraud and bribery. During his much-anticipated meeting with Trump, experts expect them to discuss Netanyahu's trial, which many believe plays a large role in dictating his political calculations. Netanyahu's position as prime minister has enabled him to undermine the Israeli judicial system by appointing loyalists to high courts and delaying court hearings – an influence he would lose if his coalition unravels. Trump is acutely aware of Netanyahu's dilemma. On June 25, he called on Israel to drop the charges against Netanyahu, referring to the trial as a 'witch hunt'.Trump's comments suggest that he is trying to pressure Netanyahu's opponents to issue a pardon in exchange for ending the war on Gaza, said Georgetown's Elgindy. Elgindy referenced Trump's recent social media post where he alluded to suspending military aid to Israel unless charges against Netanyahu were dropped. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollars a year, far more than any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump wrote on June 28. That would be a major – almost unfathomable – decision to emerge out of the meeting between Trump and Netanyahu, said Elgindy. 'I don't see him following through, but this is a typical [threat] that Trump would make,' he told Al Jazeera. 'His [modus operandi] is to blackmail and coerce. That is his version of diplomacy.' Elgindy added that it was distressing that Trump would threaten to cut military aid to Israel to protect Netanyahu and not beleaguered, starving Palestinians in Gaza. The decision to pardon Netanyahu lies with Israel's President Isaac Herzog, but such a move would be unprecedented, and the president has not indicated that he plans to do so. Analysts believe Herzog may be willing to pardon Netanyahu if he agrees to exit political life, but not simply to secure a ceasefire. Zonszein, from Crisis Group, adds that there are lawyers and justices in Israel who have warned 'for years' that it is in the public's interest to reach a plea bargain with Netanyahu due to the power he holds over the country. Their only condition is for Netanyahu to agree to leave politics. 'I don't think that is something Netanyahu is considering. If he was willing to leave political life, then he could have already negotiated a plea bargain,' she told Al Jazeera.
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Elon Musk launches the America Party as feud with Trump escalates
Billionaire Elon Musk has followed through on his pledge to create a new political party in the United States after President Donald Trump signed his controversial budget legislation, the so-called 'One Big, Beautiful Bill', into law. Musk in a post on X on Saturday declared the formation of the 'America Party', to 'give back' the people of the US their freedom and challenge what he called the nation's 'one-party system'. He cited a poll, uploaded on Friday – the US's Independence Day – in which he asked whether respondents 'want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system' that has dominated US politics for some two centuries. The yes-or-no survey earned more than 1.2 million responses. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote on Saturday. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' he declared. The move comes amid a worsening of the feud between the world's richest man and Trump over the new budget law, which the Tesla and SpaceX CEO said would bankrupt the US. Musk was Trump's main campaign financier during the 2024 election, and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term, aimed at slashing government spending. The two have since fallen out spectacularly over disagreements about the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill, which experts say will pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the US deficit. 'They will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk had said. There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government, and to deport the South African-born tycoon. 'We'll have to take a look,' the president told reporters when asked if he would consider deporting Musk, who has held US citizenship since 2002. It is not clear how much impact the new party will have on the 2026 mid-term elections, or on the presidential vote two years after that. On Friday, after posting the poll, Musk laid out a possible political battle plan to pick off vulnerable House of Representatives and Senate seats, and for the party to become 'the deciding vote' on key legislation. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' Musk posted on X. All 435 US House seats are up for grabs every two years, while about one-third of the Senate's 100 members, who serve six-year terms, are elected every two years. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly is a tall order, given that it has dominated US political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 percent, despite the president's often divisive policies.
Al Jazeera
19 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Wrong': Trump administration completes deportations to South Sudan
The United States has confirmed it completed the deportations of eight men to South Sudan, a day after a US judge cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to send them to the violence-hit African country. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Saturday that the men were deported a day earlier, on US Independence Day on Friday, after they lost a last-minute legal bid to halt their transfer. The eight detainees – immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam – had been held under guard at a US military base in Djibouti for weeks. A staffer working at Juba airport in South Sudan told the Reuters news agency that the aircraft carrying the men had arrived on Saturday at 6am local time (04:00 GMT). Their current location is not known. In a statement, DHS said the eight men had been convicted of a range of crimes, including first-degree murder, robbery, drug trafficking and sexual assault. Their case had become a flashpoint in ongoing legal battles over the Trump administration's campaign of mass deportations, including removals to so-called 'third countries' where rights groups say deportees face safety risks and possible abuses. 'These third country deportations are wrong, period. And the United States should not be sending people to a literal war zone,' progressive Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal wrote on social media earlier this week, urging the deportations to be blocked. The eight men had been held in a converted shipping container in Djibouti since late May, when an earlier deportation flight to South Sudan was halted by the courts over due process concerns. The US Supreme Court has twice ruled that the Trump administration could deport them to countries outside of their homelands, issuing its latest decision on Thursday (PDF). That same night, the eight detainees had filed an appeal, arguing that their 'impermissibly punitive' deportation to South Sudan would violate the US Constitution, which prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment'. But Judge Brian Murphy of Boston, whose rulings had previously halted efforts to begin deportations to the African country, ruled on Friday evening that the Supreme Court had tied his hands, clearing the way for the deportations to go ahead. On Saturday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin hailed the removals as 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people'. The US State Department advises citizens not to travel to South Sudan due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'. The United Nations has also warned that a political crisis embroiling the African country could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. Last week, Blaine Bookey, legal director at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, condemned the US's use of deportations to third countries. 'The administration's increased use of third country transfers flies in the face of due process rights, the United States' international legal obligations, and basic principles of human decency,' Bookey said in a statement.
