Scepticism and hope for end to Gaza war before Trump-Netanyahu meeting
This is the third time this year Netanyahu will be meeting US President Donald Trump, who claims the US and Israel 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme during a 12-day war and that he would resume bombing Iran if it restarts nuclear activities.
Last week, Trump said Israel had agreed to conditions for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, which would allow all parties to work towards an end to Israel's 21-month-long war on the besieged enclave.
On July 4, Hamas gave a 'positive' response to Qatari and Egyptian mediators about the latest ceasefire proposal.
On Friday, after Hamas's response to the proposal, Trump said there could be a 'deal next week' and promised to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu to ensure a ceasefire.
Israel has since said that Hamas has requested changes to the proposal that it found 'unacceptable', but that Israeli negotiators would be going to Qatar on Sunday to discuss the proposal.
According to a leaked copy of the deal obtained by Al Jazeera, the ceasefire entails a 60-day pause in hostilities and a phased release of some of the 58 Israeli captives held in Gaza since a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 57,000 people, mostly women and children, in what United Nations experts, legal scholars and human rights groups describe as a genocide against Palestinians.
Many experts told Al Jazeera that they are not optimistic a temporary ceasefire will lead to a permanent end to the war.
'The way [the ceasefire talks] are being framed leaves me sceptical,' said Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the Middle East Council for Global Affairs.
Rahman added that he believes Trump was focused on getting the Israeli captives released, but not on ending the war and the suffering of the people of Gaza.
Trump previously promised an end to the war after pushing for a ceasefire just days before he became president in January.
However, two months later, Trump did nothing when Israel unilaterally resumed its attacks on Gaza, killing thousands more people.
Mairav Zonszein, an expert on Israel-Palestine for the International Crisis Group, said that could happen again.
'It all rests on Trump and the US to sustain real pressure [on Netanyahu], but that is highly doubtful,' she told Al Jazeera.
'I'm optimistic there could be some kind of ceasefire, but longevity and the terms are highly questionable,' Zonszein said.
'It's also possible we could see a ceasefire that does not last because … Israel still every so often just bombs something without repercussions [in Gaza],' she added.
Yaser al-Banna, a Palestinian journalist in Gaza, said many in the Strip are divided over whether a ceasefire will end the war. While everyone prays it will, some people cannot imagine Netanyahu sticking to a deal.
Netanyahu insists that the war will not end without a 'total victory' over Hamas, a concept he has not defined.
'About half the people in Gaza are very pessimistic… The other half believes this time could be different due to shared interests among Israel, the Palestinians, Arab states and the US to end this war,' he said.
Many analysts believe that Trump is driven by his desire to strike grandiose deals in order to boast about his achievements in global affairs.
On Monday, he is likely to take credit for ostensibly dismantling Iran's nuclear programme – even though that may not be true – and express his desire to retrieve the rest of the Israeli captives in Gaza.
He also wants to get the 'Gaza issue' out of the way to pursue more normalisation deals between Israel and neighbouring Arab states, said Khaled Elgindy, an expert on Israel-Palestine and a professor of Arab Studies at Georgetown University in Washington, DC.
'Trump wants to be able to say that he got back the Israeli hostages… and got a Palestinian state… Then he can call himself master of the universe, but getting those things is much harder than he thinks,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera.
It's unclear whether Netanyahu's political calculations align with Trump's ambitions.
Israel's next parliamentary elections have to take place before October 2026, and Netanyahu could go to the polls sooner, riding on a likely wave of popularity if he succeeds in returning the remaining captives.
Like Trump, he would also tout what he terms a stunning victory against Iran to the Israeli public.
Those considerations are important because it is likely that Netanyahu's frail far-right coalition, held together by pressure to prolong the war on Gaza, would collapse if a permanent ceasefire is reached, said Hugh Lovatt, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the European Council on Foreign Relations.
'At the end of [the possible] 60-day ceasefire, [Netanyahu] could go to elections by committing to a full end to the war and collapse his coalition; or he could go back to war to keep his [far-right] coalition together should he judge the time not right for elections,' he told Al Jazeera.
Staying in office is particularly important for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who faces several domestic legal charges of fraud and bribery.
During his much-anticipated meeting with Trump, experts expect them to discuss Netanyahu's trial, which many believe plays a large role in dictating his political calculations.
Netanyahu's position as prime minister has enabled him to undermine the Israeli judicial system by appointing loyalists to high courts and delaying court hearings – an influence he would lose if his coalition unravels.
Trump is acutely aware of Netanyahu's dilemma.
On June 25, he called on Israel to drop the charges against Netanyahu, referring to the trial as a 'witch hunt'.Trump's comments suggest that he is trying to pressure Netanyahu's opponents to issue a pardon in exchange for ending the war on Gaza, said Georgetown's Elgindy.
Elgindy referenced Trump's recent social media post where he alluded to suspending military aid to Israel unless charges against Netanyahu were dropped.
'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollars a year, far more than any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump wrote on June 28.
That would be a major – almost unfathomable – decision to emerge out of the meeting between Trump and Netanyahu, said Elgindy.
'I don't see him following through, but this is a typical [threat] that Trump would make,' he told Al Jazeera. 'His [modus operandi] is to blackmail and coerce. That is his version of diplomacy.'
Elgindy added that it was distressing that Trump would threaten to cut military aid to Israel to protect Netanyahu and not beleaguered, starving Palestinians in Gaza.
The decision to pardon Netanyahu lies with Israel's President Isaac Herzog, but such a move would be unprecedented, and the president has not indicated that he plans to do so.
Analysts believe Herzog may be willing to pardon Netanyahu if he agrees to exit political life, but not simply to secure a ceasefire.
Zonszein, from Crisis Group, adds that there are lawyers and justices in Israel who have warned 'for years' that it is in the public's interest to reach a plea bargain with Netanyahu due to the power he holds over the country.
Their only condition is for Netanyahu to agree to leave politics.
'I don't think that is something Netanyahu is considering. If he was willing to leave political life, then he could have already negotiated a plea bargain,' she told Al Jazeera.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump threatens ‘un-American' BRICS countries with 10-percent tariff
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to hike tariffs against the BRICS economic bloc, after the group offered indirect criticism of trade wars and the recent military attacks in Iran. On Monday, Trump took aim at the 10-member bloc, which seeks to strengthen emerging economies, framing its interests as adversarial to the US's. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff,' Trump wrote in a post. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' BRICS is named for its founding members, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. But it has grown to include other countries including Indonesia, Egypt, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Over the weekend, the group held its 17th summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The meeting culminated in a declaration angled at promoting peace and global cooperation. But several items in the joint declaration appeared aimed at the US and its ally Israel, even though neither was identified by name. Under a section entitled 'Strengthening Multilateralism and Reforming Global Governance', for instance, the BRICS leaders called out the increasing use of tariffs in global trade. This seemed directed at Trump, who has threatened US trading partners with a suite of tariffs in order to negotiate more favourable trade deals and exact policy concessions. The US president has also called tariffs 'the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary', though many economists warn the cost of such import taxes is often offset onto consumers. Trump has also championed the use of other protectionist economic policies, under the banner of his 'America First' agenda. But the BRICS leaders warned that these kinds of policies could backfire. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,' the BRICS leaders said in their statement. Such measures, they continued could 'reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities'. The BRICS leaders also used their declaration to denounce the recent military strikes on one of the bloc's member nations, Iran. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law,' they wrote, adding that 'peaceful nuclear facilities' had been targeted. Israel carried out the first attacks against Iran in the 12-day war on June 13, and on June 22, the US sent seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Iran to strike three nuclear facilities. Both Israel and the US have maintained these actions were necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, though Iran has denied seeking one. In the wake of Trump's tariff threat, BRICS leaders rushed to assure their US counterparts that they are not seeking confrontation. Others, however, chafed at Trump's remarks. 'I became aware of what President Trump tweeted, and I think there needs to be greater appreciation of the emergence of various centres of power in the world,' said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. 'And this should be seen in a positive light, rather than in a negative light.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took an even blunter approach to Trump's threats. 'I don't think it's very responsible or serious for the president of a country as big as the United States to go around threatening the world through the internet,' Lula said in a question-and-answer session with reporters. 'It's not right. The world has changed. We don't want an emperor.'
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Epstein had no ‘client list' and died by suicide: US Justice Department
A United States government review has found no evidence that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein kept a secret client list, and reaffirmed that he died by suicide in federal custody in 2019, undercutting years of conspiracy theories. The acknowledgement that Epstein did not maintain a list of clients who received underage girls marks a clear retreat from a narrative once promoted by members of US President Donald Trump's administration. Earlier this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi even claimed in a Fox News interview that such a document was 'sitting on my desk', awaiting her review. The memo, released on Monday by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI, stated that a 'systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'.' It also found no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent figures, or grounds to pursue investigations against uncharged third parties. 'After a thorough investigation, FBI investigators concluded that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on August 10, 2019,' the memo said. 'This conclusion is consistent with previous findings, including the August 19, 2019 autopsy findings of the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, the November 2019 position of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York in connection with the investigation of federal correctional officers responsible for guarding Epstein, and the June 2023 conclusions of DOJ's Office of the Inspector General.' It concluded by saying that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted'. The Justice Department also released 10 hours of surveillance footage from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. The footage revealed that no one entered Epstein's cell on the day he died by suicide. 'We were all told more was coming' Conservatives who have sought proof of a government cover-up of Epstein's activities quickly expressed outrage at the announcement. Far-right influencer Jack Posobiec posted: 'We were all told more was coming. That answers were out there and would be provided. Incredible how utterly mismanaged this Epstein mess has been. And it didn't have to be.' Separately, former Trump ally, billionaire Elon Musk, shared an image of a scoreboard reading, 'The Official Jeffrey Epstein Pedophile Arrest Counter', which was set at zero. On June 5, Musk claimed that Trump appeared in the Epstein files and later posted a video on X showing Trump at a party with Epstein. These posts, now deleted, were part of an ongoing feud between Musk and Trump linked to Trump's new tax cuts and spending bill. What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again … — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025 Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones wrote, 'Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed',' calling the conclusion 'over the top sickening'. 'Epstein's crimes and death' On Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the Justice Department's 'exhaustive investigation'. When questioned about the client list mentioned in February's Fox News interview, Leavitt clarified that Bondi was actually referring to the broader collection of Epstein case files. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in August 2019, weeks after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, in a suicide that foreclosed the possibility of a trial. The Justice Department and FBI's disclosure that Epstein took his own life is hardly a revelation, even though conspiracy theorists have continued to challenge that conclusion. In November 2019, for instance, then-Attorney General William Barr told the Associated Press news agency that he had reviewed security footage that revealed that no one entered the area where Epstein was housed on the night he died, and expressed confidence that Epstein's death was a suicide. However, Epstein's ties to the rich and famous have led many to believe, without evidence, that others were behind his death, in an effort to cover up their own crimes. If you or someone you know is at risk of suicide, these organisations may be able to help.
Qatar Tribune
4 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Qatar's quiet revolution: How a small state is redefining power, credibility & global influence
Khaled Al Hameidi Doha In a world fractured by crises and recalibrated by the tides of emerging alliances, one nation has quietly but steadily rewritten the rules of engagement, not through might or dominance, but through intellect, vision, and credibility. Qatar, a nation once viewed solely through the lens of its geographic size and energy wealth, is now being reimagined as a model for 21st-century statecraft: a small state wielding profound influence by mastering the language of diplomacy, soft power, and strategic neutrality. Here, credibility is not a badge worn for appearances, but a philosophy etched into every policy, alliance, and intervention. It is the art of balancing values with interests, principle with pragmatism, navigating the turbulent waters of global geopolitics not as a passive actor or proxy, but as a confident bridge-builder between worlds. This is the story of Qatar's rise, not just as a state, but as an idea whose time has come. Qatari diplomacy: The rational power behind the curtain Dr Khaled Hammad, a Qatar-based expert in Middle Eastern affairs, described Qatar as a geopolitical outlier, saying: 'Qatari foreign policy doesn't operate in reaction to events but emerges from a profound philosophical framework, one that reimagines the possibilities for small states in the international system.' According to Hammad, Qatar's diplomacy transcends its physical borders by generating what he called a 'surplus of rationality,' allowing it to serve as an impartial mediator in some of the world's most intractable conflicts — from Palestine to Afghanistan and beyond. 'Qatari mediation,' he added, 'is not just about resolving disputes, it's about altering the very grammar of conflict. It encourages parties to move from animosity to dialogue, from stalemate to understanding. That's what makes it transformational.' Reprogramming the region's diplomatic operating system Iraqi political science professor Bandar Al Jaafari noted that Qatar's diplomatic strategy has fundamentally reshaped the Middle East's power dynamics. 'Through what I call 'strategic interwoven diplomacy,' Qatar has succeeded in maintaining relationships with rival actors — Washington and Tehran, Ankara and regional resistance groups. This is not neutrality in the passive sense; it is active engagement, carefully calibrated,' he added. Al Jaafari emphasised the infrastructure behind this success: a network of dialogue forums, negotiation platforms, and international conferences that have positioned Doha as a neutral theatre for global recalibration, not just in the Gulf, but across Africa and Central Asia. 'Qatar's political courage lies in its ability to enter the eye of the storm, and emerge as the calm,' he added. Wealth with purpose: economic diplomacy From an economic perspective, Algerian analyst Sana Ajoui sees Qatar's strategy as a masterclass in how soft power can be built through strategic investments. 'Qatar's wealth is not just a passive asset; it's an active instrument of global influence. From Europe to Africa, Qatari investments have become diplomatic bridges, not just business ventures,' Ajoui said. She pointed to Qatar National Vision 2030 as a blueprint of foresight, saying: 'This is not just a development strategy — it's a declaration of identity. It signals that Qatar is thinking 50 years ahead, investing in education, innovation, and cultural diplomacy.' Ajoui highlighted the role of the Qatar Fund for Development as a cornerstone of this global outreach. 'Through humanitarian investment, Qatar is not only alleviating suffering but also building credibility. It's becoming a preferred partner for the UN and a voice for ethical development,' she said. The humanitarian compass in a cynical world Dr Aisha Al Najjar, a Sudanese expert in international relations, frames Qatar's influence in moral terms, saying: 'In a world increasingly driven by cold calculations, Qatar acts as the humanitarian conscience. Its foreign policy defies the old binary of realism versus idealism. Here, ethics and pragmatism walk side by side.' She underscored Qatar's enduring commitment to the Palestinian cause, its swift humanitarian response in Afghanistan, and its collaborations with global organisations as proof of a state that puts principle into practice. 'Qatari diplomacy extends beyond elite rooms; it nurtures societal healing and intercommunal understanding,' she said. Cultural diplomacy, Al Najjar added, is another powerful vector. 'From museums to international festivals, Qatar embraces its Arab-Islamic roots while inviting the world in. It doesn't mimic the West, it mediates between civilisations.' Media as a strategic mirror of identity Jordanian media professor Ahmed Ziada sees Qatari media, led by Al Jazeera, as a key pillar of its influence. 'Through its global media presence, Qatar has not only projected its narrative but has reshaped the conversation. It offers an alternative to the often simplistic binaries of global discourse,' he said. Ziada emphasised that Qatar's media strategy isn't confined to broadcasting, it's about diplomacy through storytelling. 'Al Jazeera and research institutions provide Qatar with a platform to engage with global audiences in a meaningful way. They create space for nuance and foster international credibility,' he added. He also highlighted the state's savvy balancing act between great powers, stressing: 'Whether in its relations with the U.S., China, or regional rivals, Qatar does not play sides—it plays principles. That's what makes it resilient.' The Qatar model: A blueprint for active statehood in the 21st century Qatar's evolving identity as a global actor is underpinned by a philosophy that weaves together diplomatic agility, humanitarian depth, and strategic foresight. The state has turned conflict resolution into an artform, sustainable development into a global outreach mission, and national identity into a cultural bridge. From mediating peace between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo to launching international platforms for dialogue and development, Qatar proves that power is not always measured in tanks and treaties—but in trust, consistency, and vision. In an era where international politics is often defined by fragmentation, populism, and reactive policy, Qatar offers an alternative paradigm: one where a state can be small but significant, ethical but effective, traditional yet forward-looking. It doesn't seek to dominate the system, but to redesign it. A quiet force in a loud world Qatar's journey from a peripheral Gulf nation to a central player in global affairs is not an accident, it is a deliberate, coherent, and courageous strategy. It shows that a state's true strength lies not in its size, but in its ability to inspire trust, build bridges, and act with purpose. In a world searching for stability, rationality, and moral clarity, Qatar is no longer just participating in global politics, it is shaping its future.
