What is left of Scotland's steel sector can play an important role for years to come
But that's not to say that's what left of the sector cannot play an important role for years to come. The Dalzell works in Motherwell is one of only two mills left in Scotland and specialises in the production of heavy steel plate used in military shipbuilding.
But no finished product is leaving the site at present as its 140-strong workforce is either furloughed or on care and maintenance duties. Dalzell, like the Clydebridge steel works near Cambuslang, has been mothballed by its private foreign owners.
Keir Starmer is right to ask questions on what happens next for steel in Scotland. The UK Government has taken steps to nationalise the giant steel works in Scunthorpe and negotiated a reduction in tariffs with the US on exports.
The takeover of Dalzell and Clydebridge in 2016 by metals tycoon Sanjeev Gupta was facilitated by a Scottish Government-backed loan. With public money involved, the public has a right to know what's happening with the steel works in Lanarkshire.
Labour and the SNP can't make this another blame game, similar to how the last months of Grangemouth's oil refinery played out. There is no reason why the Lanarkshire steel works can't play a part in a wider UK industry linked to Scunthorpe.
But this will require grown-up cooperation between Holyrood and Westminster, not petty political point scoring.
Legends united
Football legends Graeme Souness and Scott Brown may have been on different sides of the Old Firm divide.
But they're joining forces to back a campaign by skin charity DEBRA to help people suffering from 'butterfly disease' EB. This agonising condition sees skin blister and fall off at the slightest touch.
Scots teenager Isla Grist is among the EB sufferers desperate for an effective treatment. To raise funds for research DEBRA are urging Scots to take part in a fundraising summer challenge.
Graeme and Scott are among thousands of Scots taking up the challenge – which is being backed by the Daily Record. You can do any challenge – a run, walk, cycle, swim, dance, or anything else you fancy.
So as the sun comes out at the start of a fine summer please take a look at Debra's website to see how you can join in. It's all for a great cause – and might do you some good too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
38 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Celtic pounced on transfer trend in post Covid era and it's part of why Euro giants now love Scottish players
The Hoops dipped into Japan for the same reason European football's big guns now love a Scot Bjorn Hamberg believes the fallout from the Covid pandemic has forced European big guns to make Scottish football 's market a must-go port of call. The former Feyenoord assistant boss has watched a host of clubs look for tartan talent after traditionally turning their nose up at recruiting talent from these shores. He said: 'It's great see Scottish players now making a mark at clubs across Europe. It's a relatively new frontier and the Covid pandemic has been a factor in that. 'Clubs had to reassess how to do business and run their recruitment departments at a more sustainable level. 'A lot of these clubs had to look deeper into different markets and Scotland has become one of them where value for money can be found. 'It's similar to what Celtic did with the Japanese market – and they did amazingly well. "It has been too easy to target proven footballers and players for the here-and-now. 'Scouting for talent is now about having a belief you can find quality footballers anywhere in the world. 'The trend for British players moving abroad is now well established with the likes of Jude Bellingham and Trent Alexander-Arnold being Real Madrid players. 'You look back and see David Beckham moving to AC Milan and PSG – at the time it seemed unbelievable. 'Now it's far more commonplace and Scottish players are part of that trend as the lines are far blurrier with moves from country to country in Europe. ' Lawrence Shankland moved to Beerschot in Belgium a few years ago and is now a Scotland striker. 'Moves like that are now routine. Scott McTominay and Billy Gilmour have had an amazing season as title winners at Napoli. Josh Doig and Lewis Ferguson are doing well playing in Serie A.' You can get all the news you need on our dedicated Rangers and Celtic pages, and sign up to our newsletters to make sure you never miss a beat throughout the season. We're also on WhatsApp where we bring all the latest breaking news and transfer gossip directly to you phone. Join our Rangers community here and our Celtic community here.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tories warned Labour about Rachel Reeves' tears 17 minutes BEFORE PMQs started
Keir Starmer 's claim that he did not know Rachel Reeves was in tears was branded 'nonsense' last night after the Tories insisted they gave Labour 'early warning' of her distress. Tory MPs revealed they alerted Labour whips to the fact that the Chancellor was weeping in the Commons to ensure she got help. They say that was at 11.43am – 17 minutes before Prime Minister's Questions when Ms Reeves had tears rolling down her cheeks as she sat next to an apparently oblivious Sir Keir. One Tory MP said: 'It simply beggars belief that with that much warning, the PM wasn't told. 'Nearly 20 minutes before PMQs began, we could see Reeves was already tearful sitting on the front bench and we alerted Labour whips to the problem. 'It's nonsense to say Starmer wouldn't have been aware.' Last night Downing Street was still insisting Sir Keir spent the entire half-hour session of questions unaware of her trauma. But amid continued confusion, party sources claimed last night that Labour whips were so worried at Ms Reeves' state of mind, they tried to stop her appearing alongside Sir Keir. They said whips pleaded with Ms Reeves – who had briefly come out of the Chamber – not to go back inside. But sources close to the Chancellor said there was 'no truth' in that claim. Ms Reeves said yesterday she regretted going into PMQs in tears 'after a tough day in the office'. She told The Guardian: 'It was a personal matter but it was in the glare of the camera. 'And that's unfortunate, but I think people have seen that I'm back in business and back out there.' The events – which sparked turmoil on financial markets – began after Ms Reeves was rebuked by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle as she entered the Commons over taking too long to answer Treasury questions the previous day. She was overheard replying that she was 'under so much pressure' before briefly taking her seat but then leaving afterwards in what appeared to be distress. To the surprise of some Labour MPs, Ms Reeves then reappeared to take her place at Sir Keir's side when he arrived for PMQs. But to the horror of colleagues, the self-styled Iron Chancellor then wept beside the PM. MPs were surprised that Sir Keir was seemingly oblivious to how upset she was, even after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch pointed out how 'absolutely miserable' she looked. Sir Keir also forgot to guarantee that his Chancellor's position was safe after her role in last week's humiliating U-turn on saving almost £5 billion from controversial welfare cutbacks. The Government was forced to deny reports that Sir Keir and his deputy Angela Rayner had rows with Ms Reeves over the benefits fiasco which had upset her. The Treasury insisted her distress was caused by a personal matter, while Ms Reeves sought to bounce back next day with an unexpected appearance at the launch of the Government's ten-year health plan. But questions have remained over how Sir Keir could not have been aware of her state of mind – especially as his parliamentary aide Chris Ward tapped her on the shoulder to check she was OK. Later on Wednesday, Sir Keir told the BBC that Ms Reeves would be Chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. Reeves Paves Way for Tax Rises Rachel Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the wake of the Government's embarrassing – and expensive – U-turn on welfare reforms. The Chancellor, whose tears in the Commons on Wednesday spooked the financial markets, said: 'I'm not going to apologise for making sure the numbers add up. 'But we do need to make sure that we're telling a story, and a Labour story. We did that well in the Budget and Spending Review, we increased taxes on the wealthiest and businesses.' Asked whether she was prepared to rule out further tax rises, she said: 'I'm not going to because it would be irresponsible for a Chancellor to do that. 'We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement. 'So we'll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.' Reacting to the welfare U-turn, she said: 'It's been damaging. I'm not going to deny that.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
LORD ASHCROFT: Humiliating U-turns. Broken promises. A Prime Minister deemed so weak that he can't even control his own party. As Sir Keir Starmer marks his first anniversary, voters issue their damning verdict
As Labour limps to the end of its first year in office, the marks are in and the verdict is brutal. My latest poll finds that based on what they have seen so far, nearly four in ten voters would give Keir Starmer an F for 'fail'. Among the rest, the average grade is a C minus. Even Labour voters can only bring themselves to award a C plus. It's not just that many disapprove of the Government's agenda. Half the electorate, including nearly as many 2024 Labour voters, say they don't understand what it is. This is hardly surprising, given the start they made. We can imagine Keir Starmer's first meeting with his senior officials a year ago this week. 'Congratulations, Prime Minister,' opens Sir Humphrey. 'Might we discuss your early priorities for government? I assume you'll want to focus on economic growth and improving public services.' 'All in good time,' says Starmer. 'First, cut the winter fuel allowance. Then find a way to make it more expensive to employ people. Oh, and make farmers pay inheritance tax.' 'I see,' Sir Humphrey replies hesitantly, casting a nervous glance at a puzzled colleague. 'Anything else, Prime Minister?' 'Yes. Give the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. And rent them back.' If the scene seems fanciful, it's probably because it exaggerates the sense of purpose with which Labour assumed power. A series of U-turns – a feature of Starmer's administration since the early days but now so abundant it's hard to keep up with them – has only added to the sense of incoherence and confusion. Broken promises to the 'Waspi women'; Sue Gray's brief tenure as No 10 chief of staff; reversals on winter fuel, the grooming gangs inquiry, and whether excessive immigration is or is not turning Britain into an 'island of strangers' – these combine to show a Government with little sense of direction. Starmer's colossal turnaround on welfare reform compounds the damage, for three crucial reasons – both political and practical. First, even at its most moderate, the Labour Party has never fully shaken voters' suspicions that it is too soft on welfare and can't be trusted with taxpayers' money. The backbench rebellion and the Government's retreat in the face of it show these doubts to be well founded. Second, Starmer's climbdowns will cost real money: some £4.5 billion, according to ministers' own figures. That means (even) higher taxes or (even) more borrowing, or probably both, at a time when Britain needs neither. It also makes it harder to hit the new Nato target of spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence within ten years – a policy which most voters support, as does (so he currently says) the Prime Minister. Third, while an occasional pivot can show a government that listens and learns, a succession of them erodes confidence and credibility. 'We need somebody strong at the head of our country to go head-to-head with Trump, but he can't even keep control of his own party,' as a woman put it in one of my recent focus groups. 'What's he going to do on other policies?' asked another. 'When he makes hard decisions and gets challenged, he just seems to flip.' In a dangerous world, people want a leader they can rely on. Despite all this, a fair but dwindling chunk of voters still gives Labour the benefit of the doubt. They argue that 12 months isn't long to correct the mistakes of 14 years. But listening to those who turned out for the party, it's clear that many are struggling to look on the bright side. Few see any tangible signs that Starmer's team has started to turn things around. As one of the party's previous backers told us, 'There's no noticeable change that says, "Labour's in, this has happened".' If the Government lacks a sense of purpose, many feel the same is just as true for the Conservatives. More are starting to notice Kemi Badenoch and to like what they see. But the party has yet to break through and her overall grade from voters was a D. They recognise her conundrum: how to be visible and relevant without claiming to have all the answers so soon after being booted out of office. One answer is to show a proper understanding of what they got wrong and what is needed to put it right. Another is to rediscover what one former voter called their 'North Star', the guiding principles that animated and united the Tories when they were at their best. Nigel Farage tops the grade table for the year – the only leader to get an A from his own voters, and a B overall. He has picked up the extra marks by being visible, getting people talking, articulating people's frustration and turning it into local election votes. People see that his party is branching out beyond immigration to talk about energy, industry, welfare, policing and more. But Reform-curious voters wonder about the practicality of some of their ideas – such as reopening Welsh coal mines, or charging non-doms a £250,000 fee in lieu of tax and sharing the proceeds among low-paid workers – and note the party's expensive plan to drop the two-child benefit cap. Some acknowledge Farage's need to win over voters from all sides, but many will want something firmer when choosing the next government. 'Be a bit more grown-up, tone it down. You've got my attention now. Win me over,' one potential supporter said. Attention brings scrutiny. This year was just the mocks. As the final exams approach, the questions will get harder.
