ERL's "Wild Bunch" Collection Thrives in Chaos
ERLhas unveiled 'The Wild Bunch,' its latest collection, crafted atEli Russell Linnetz's Venice Beach atelier. Deconstructed styling, tattered finishes, and leather-laden numbers illustrate the cinematic narrative of a rowdy gang in ERL's Hollywood-rooted style.
The fictional 'Dudley Dozens' are a notorious Venice Beach gang of 'mercenary henchmen turned anarchists,' described by ERL as 'handsome, charismatic, and completely unhinged.' Artisanal leather jackets have been ripped apart and sewn back together, a baby blue polo is torn up and stained with dirt, motorcycle tees, undershirts, and mesh tops are cropped and distressed. There are distinct references to queer subculture, evocative of the Tom of Finland's erotic portraits of leather-adorned muscle men.
Unveiling its first-ever artist collaboration, the collection also presents pieces inspired by the work of seminal queer erotic photographerPeter Berlin, who happens to be one of Tom of Finland's subjects. A charcoal muscle tank is collaged with vintage photography by the legendary image maker, centring on a large full-body shot of the artist posing in his underwear, like many of the models in the campaign.
Behind the playful theatrics, ERL emphasizes its commitment to artisanal and local producers. The collection introduces ERL's locally-sourced California denim, dyed and sun-faded for a unique lived-in quality. Elsewhere, the hand-knit varsity cardigans have passed through the hands of local artisans, using wool spun in the US.
See the full campaign in the gallery above and stay tuned to Hypebeast for the latest fashion news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jeremy Renner Just Told Us the High-Protein Breakfast He Eats Every Day on Set (Exclusive)
Jeremy Renner eats an egg white omelet with veggies and meat every morning while working on set. Renner wears super-cushioned sneakers to protect his joints and help him stay active during recovery. He focuses on stretching, eating healthy foods and mental health to keep healing after his Renner is known for his roles in action movie franchises, from The Avengers to Mission: Impossible, but in recent years the actor has been focused on his recovery following a near-fatal accident in January 2023, which he details in his new book, My Next Breath. We got a chance to chat with Renner about the foods, exercises and other habits that have been instrumental in getting his strength back through his partnership with Brooks Running. As far as what he eats, Renner is following a balanced eating pattern and prioritizing protein—often in liquid form as it's difficult for him to chew following his accident. He eats about 170 grams of protein each day in an effort to hold onto muscle. 'It's harder to build muscle as you [get] older,' he says. Breakfast is typically a bigger meal for Renner, and egg white omelets are his go-to. 'That's what I eat every morning when I'm on set,' he says. 'They give me an egg white omelet, usually with some veggies, onions and some meat. Then I have a snack and a medium-sized lunch and that's it, and a bunch of protein throughout the day, protein shakes and things.' Renner first became acquainted with Books Running after receiving a pair of Ghost Max sneakers, which he started wearing at the beginning of his recovery journey. 'The cushioning really helped me,' he says. 'They might be running shoes, but I used them more as house slippers initially because they were so great on my joints, [particularly] on the tile floors in the house I was recovering in.' When he first started trying to run in the shoes, Renner notes that it was 'really special' and 'quite an emotional moment,' as being able to run again after his accident wasn't a given. These days, Renner is all about mobility, flexibility and strengthening. '[There's] still quite a bit of scar tissue and damage that I have to work through all the time,' he says. 'And stretching is pretty paramount to staying healthy and moving because my body just wants to lock up. So I have to move it or I lose it; I move and stretch as much as I can.' He does a mix of active stretching—'very intentional, purposeful movements'—and trigger point therapy. Like many of us, Renner sometimes struggles with being motivated to go to the gym. 'I think going to the gym every day is a great challenge,' Renner says. 'It is one of the most difficult things to do, but you have to stop thinking about it. You just gotta do it.' Rather than waiting around for motivation, he recommends making it part of your routine and turning it into a habit. Figure out what works for you, whether it's gamifying it or changing your mindset. Beyond movement, Renner emphasizes a holistic approach to health and wellness. 'I work a lot on mental health and mental strength, being outside in nature and getting some vitamin D on my body,' he says. 'Get some sunshine, get joy, right? These things are much more helpful than any [workout] class for me.' We look forward to seeing Renner's return to the screen as Dr. Nat Sharp in the forthcoming Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery. Editor's Note: This interview was edited for clarity and length. Read the original article on EATINGWELL
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Hollywood's pivot to AI video has a prompting problem
It has become almost impossible to browse the internet without having an AI-generated video thrust upon you. Open basically any social media platform, and it won't be long until an uncanny-looking clip of a fake natural disaster or animals doing impossible things slides across your screen. Most of the videos look absolutely terrible. But they're almost always accompanied by hundreds, if not thousands, of likes and comments from people insisting that AI-generated content is a new art form that's going to change the world. That has been especially true of AI clips that are meant to appear realistic. No matter how strange or aesthetically inconsistent the footage may be, there is usually someone proclaiming that it's something the entertainment industry should be afraid of. The idea that AI-generated video is both the future of filmmaking and an existential threat to Hollywood has caught on like wildfire among boosters for the relatively new technology. The thought of major studios embracing this technology as is feels dubious when you consider that, oftentimes, AI models' output simply isn't the kind of stuff that could be fashioned into a quality movie or series. That's an impression that filmmaker Bryn Mooser wants to change with Asteria, a new production house he launched last year, as well as a forthcoming AI-generated feature film from Natasha Lyonne (also Mooser's partner and an advisor at Late Night Labs, a studio focused on generative AI that Mooser's film and TV company XTR acquired last year). Asteria's big selling point is that, unlike most other AI outfits, the generative model it built with research company Moonvalley is 'ethical,' meaning it has only been trained on properly licensed material. Especially in the wake of Disney and Universal suing Midjourney for copyright infringement, the concept of ethical generative AI may become an important part of how AI is more widely adopted throughout the entertainment industry. However, during a recent chat, Mooser stresses to me that the company's clear understanding of what generative AI is and what it isn't helps set Asteria apart from other players in the AI space. 'As we started to think about building Asteria, it was obvious to us as filmmakers that there were big problems with the way that AI was being presented to Hollywood,' Mooser says. 'It was obvious that the tools weren't being built by anybody who'd ever made a film before. The text-to-video form factor, where you say 'make me a new Star Wars movie' and out it comes, is a thing that Silicon Valley thought people wanted and actually believed was possible.' In Mooser's view, part of the reason some enthusiasts have been quick to call generative video models a threat to traditional film workflows boils down to people assuming that footage created from prompts can replicate the real thing as effectively as what we've seen with imitative, AI-generated music. It has been easy for people to replicate singers' voices with generative AI and produce passable songs. But Mooser thinks that, in its rush to normalize gen AI, the tech industry conflated audio and visual output in a way that's at odds with what actually makes for good films. 'You can't go and say to Christopher Nolan, 'Use this tool and text your way to The Odyssey,'' Mooser says. 'As people in Hollywood got access to these tools, there were a couple things that were really clear — one being that the form factor can't work because the amount of control that a filmmaker needs comes down to the pixel level in a lot of cases.' To give its filmmaking partners more of that granular control, Asteria uses its core generative model, Marey, to create new, project-specific models trained on original visual material. This would, for example, allow an artist to build a model that could generate a variety of assets in their distinct style, and then use it to populate a world full of different characters and objects that adhere to a unique aesthetic. That was the workflow Asteria used in its production of musician Cuco's animated short 'A Love Letter to LA.' By training Asteria's model on 60 original illustrations drawn by artist Paul Flores, the studio could generate new 2D assets and convert them into 3D models used to build the video's fictional town. The short is impressive, but its heavy stylization speaks to the way projects with generative AI at their core often have to work within the technology's visual limitations. It doesn't feel like this workflow offers control down to the pixel level just yet. Mooser says that, depending on the financial arrangement between Asteria and its clients, filmmakers can retain partial ownership of the models after they're completed. In addition to the original licensing fees Asteria pays the creators of the material its core model is trained on, the studio is 'exploring' the possibility of a revenue sharing system, too. But for now, Mooser is more focused on winning artists over with the promise of lower initial development and production costs. 'If you're doing a Pixar animated film, you might be coming on as a director or a writer, but it's not often that you'll have any ownership of what you're making, residuals, or cut of what the studio makes when they sell a lunchbox,' Mooser tells me. 'But if you can use this technology to bring the cost down and make it independently financeable, then you have a world where you can have a new financing model that makes real ownership possible.' Asteria plans to test many of Mooser's beliefs in generative AI's transformative potential with Uncanny Valley, a feature film to be co-written and directed by Lyonne. The live-action film centers on a teenage girl whose shaky perception of reality causes her to start seeing the world as being more video game-like. Many of Uncanny Valley's fantastical, Matrix-like visual elements will be created with Asteria's in-house models. That detail in particular makes Uncanny Valley sound like a project designed to present the hallucinatory inconsistencies that generative AI has become known for as clever aesthetic features rather than bugs. But Mooser tells me that he hopes 'nobody ever thinks about the AI part of it at all' because 'everything is going to have the director's human touch on it.' 'It's not like you're just texting, 'then they go into a video game,' and watch what happens, because nobody wants to see that,' Mooser says. 'That was very clear as we were thinking about this. I don't think anybody wants to just see what computers dream up.' Like many generative AI advocates, Mooser sees the technology as a 'democratizing' tool that can make the creation of art more accessible. He also stresses that, under the right circumstances, generative AI could make it easier to produce a movie for around $10–20 million rather than $150 million. Still, securing that kind of capital is a challenge for most younger, up-and-coming filmmakers. One of Asteria's big selling points that Mooser repeatedly mentions to me is generative AI's potential to produce finished works faster and with smaller teams. He framed that aspect of an AI production workflow as a positive that would allow writers and directors to work more closely with key collaborators like art and VFX supervisors without needing to spend so much time going back and forth on revisions — something that tends to be more likely when a project has a lot of people working on it. But, by definition, smaller teams translates to fewer jobs, which raises the issue of AI's potential to put people out of work. When I bring this up with Mooser, he points to the recent closure of VFX house Technicolor Group as an example of the entertainment industry's ongoing upheaval that began leaving workers unemployed before the generative AI hype came to its current fever pitch. Mooser was careful not to downplay that these concerns about generative AI were a big part of what plunged Hollywood into a double strike back in 2023. But he is resolute in his belief that many of the industry's workers will be able to pivot laterally into new careers built around generative AI if they are open to embracing the technology. 'There are filmmakers and VFX artists who are adaptable and want to lean into this moment the same way people were able to switch from editing on film to editing on Avid,' Mooser says. 'People who are real technicians — art directors, cinematographers, writers, directors, and actors — have an opportunity with this technology. What's really important is that we as an industry know what's good about this and what's bad about this, what is helpful for us in trying to tell our stories, and what is actually going to be dangerous.' What seems rather dangerous about Hollywood's interest in generative AI isn't the 'death' of the larger studio system, but rather this technology's potential to make it easier for studios to work with fewer actual people. That's literally one of Asteria's big selling points, and if its workflows became the industry norm, it is hard to imagine it scaling in a way that could accommodate today's entertainment workforce transitioning into new careers. As for what's good about it, Mooser knows the right talking points. Now he has to show that his tech — and all the changes it entails — can work.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Granderson: The spirit of Pride is diversity and progress, not respectability politics
The latest installment of "Jurassic Park" is hitting theaters July 4th weekend, and while normally I detest silly summer sequels, for some reason I do enjoy watching dinosaurs eat people on the big screen. 'Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should,' Jeff Goldblum famously said in the 1993 original. After his character perfectly framed the ethical question nestled in the heart of the Jurassic Park story, I was more than happy to see Newman from 'Seinfeld' get what he deserved. A brilliant line or movie monologue — like Goldblum's gem — can not only advance a fictional plot, but also foster conversations about real life. Consider how Michael B. Jordan's character Killmonger challenged the idea of isolationism and Jack Nicholson's line 'You can't handle the truth' explored what it takes to defend this country, morally. One of my all-time favorite movie monologues was delivered by the late Philip Seymour Hoffman in the 1999 cult classic 'Flawless.' In the scene, Hoffman — portraying a no-nonsense drag queen — confronts a group of conservative gay men who seek to mute the more flamboyant members of the LGBTQ+ during a Pride march in an attempt to gain broader acceptance. 'You're ashamed of us, but we're not ashamed of you,' the speech begins. 'As long as you go down on your Banana Republic knees … you're my sisters and I love you. I do. And f— off!' I wonder whether Richard Grenell, the former ambassador to Germany who currently serves as an envoy for special missions in the Trump administration, has seen it. I ask because Grenell, who during President Trump's first term became the country's first openly gay Cabinet-level official, spent part of this Pride month trying to drive a wedge within the community in a fashion very similar to what was portrayed in the 25-year-old film. In a Truth Social post back in December, Trump said that in the envoy role, Grenell would 'work in some of the hottest spots around the World, including Venezuela and North Korea.' It seems one of Grenell's special missions was to sell America on the idea that gender identity and transgender healthcare are outside the realm of what 'normal gays' are concerned with. He also suggested the LGBTQ+ community needs to police itself, echoes of the same respectability politics framework that is often employed to gaslight those who have been systematically disenfranchised. Of course Grenell is not the first conservative gay man who has used his station in life to enrich himself at the expense of the collective. Not long after Hoffman's character went off in 'Flawless' in 1999, Ken Mehlman was appointed President George W. Bush's director of political affairs and spent years working against legalizing same-sex marriage — as we now know, from the closet. In 2010, Mehlman, a former chairman of the Republican Party, came out as gay. Biographers have documented J. Edgar Hoover's relationships with men even as he was driving the Lavender Scare. His accomplice, Roy Cohn, has a similar story. As the various letters suggest, the LGBTQ+ community is far from a monolith. However, if there is one thing most of us have in common, it is our tendency not to vote against our own interest. In 2020, Trump won 27% of the vote. In 2024, it was down to 12%. In between the two elections, we saw a relentless Republican-led attack on LGBTQ+ rights of which Trump has often been the instigator. I don't know what Grenell considers 'normal gay' behavior, but he does not represent normal gay voting. The idea that he could speak for the community's core values is not only laughable but also woefully disingenuous. It was the drag queens and gender-nonconforming members of the community who began the Stonewall Riots in 1969. Before Grenell was even born, the first out gay person to run for public office wasn't a 'normal gay' but an extraordinary drag queen by the name of Jose Sarria in 1961. The groups who won progress for queer people have never been monolithically made up of white, Anglo, heteronormative men. That's what makes the gay rights movement so beautiful, so American, so worthy of pride and celebration. And that's also why it's so weird, given the obvious concern rippling through the LGBTQ+ community because of Trump's words and actions, that Grenell chooses to use his station to fight for the members of his community who need his help the least, and to do so at the expense of the LGBTQ+ people who really need a champion. @LZGrandersonShow If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
