logo
Detectives investigating suspicious death of man in Newry given 36 hour extension to question woman

Detectives investigating suspicious death of man in Newry given 36 hour extension to question woman

Belfast Telegraph18 hours ago

Detectives have been granted a 36 hour extension by a court to question a 50-year-old woman who was arrested following the suspicious death of a man in Newry.
Emergency services were called to the Fisher Park area of the city shortly before 1pm on Saturday, after reports that a man in his 40s had sustained a serious injury.
The man received medical treatment at the scene before being taken to hospital, but later died from his injuries.
In an update on Sunday evening the PSNI confirmed a court had granted detectives an extension to question the woman.
Detective Chief Inspector Tom Phillips said on Saturday: 'Our investigation is at an early stage and we are working to establish the circumstances surrounding the man's death.
'Cordons are in place within the Fisher Park area as officers conduct further enquiries into what happened.'
PSNI stock image. Picture: Aodhan Roberts/Belfast Telegraph.
News Catch Up - Friday 27th June
He appealed for anyone with information that could assist police to contact 101, quoting reference number 721 of 28/06/25.
'Information can also be provided online via www.psni.police.uk/makeareport, or anonymously through Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or www.crimestoppers-uk.org.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law
Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law

Glasgow Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law

An urgent hearing was held in the High Court on Monday related to an application for judicial review on behalf of one of the founders of the direct action group, Huda Ammori. A further hearing will be held on Friday to decide whether the Government can temporarily be blocked from banning the group, pending a hearing to decide whether Palestine Action can bring the legal challenge. A decision on whether the group will be given the green light to bring the legal challenge will be given at a further hearing expected to be held in the week of July 21. Supporting statements have also been submitted by Amnesty International, Liberty and European Legal Support Centre over concerns of unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent, a spokesperson said. It comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation, making membership and support for the direct action group illegal. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper unveiled the intention to ban the group on June 23 (James Manning/PA) Commenting on the hearing, Ms Ammori said: 'I have been left with no choice but to request this urgent hearing and to seek either an injunction or other form of interim relief because of the Home Secretary's decision to try to steamroll this through Parliament immediately, without proper opportunity for MPs and Peers to debate and scrutinise the proposal, or for legal and human rights experts and civil society organisations to make representations, or for those of us who would be denied fundamental rights as a result and criminalised as 'terrorists' overnight, including the many thousands of people who support Palestine Action.' The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The group has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. Its website states the group uses disruptive tactics to target 'corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex' and seeks to make it 'impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians'. Ms Ammori added that causing disruption 'is not terrorism', while Ms Cooper has said proscribing the group is a 'legitimate response to the threat posed' by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al-Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group.

Another Strictly star has phone stolen in London as it travels across the globe
Another Strictly star has phone stolen in London as it travels across the globe

Daily Mirror

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Another Strictly star has phone stolen in London as it travels across the globe

A third Strictly Come Dancing star had their phone stolen while out in central London. In a post shared online, they revealed their phone ended up across the globe Yet another Strictly Come Dancing star was robbed in London as they revealed where their phone ended up. Earlier this month, both Annabel Croft and Michelle Tsiakkas revealed to fans their phones were stolen while out in the city as they issued warnings to their Instagram followers. Michelle, 29, told fans having her phone stolen was 'traumatising' and said she felt 'awful, scared and helpless' when it happened. She explained that she was simply going about her day when a criminal whizzed past her on an electric bike and snatched her phone straight from her hand. ‌ The star said it was early morning when she was on her way to the dentist around Covent Garden. Annabel Croft was also a victim of phone theft and recently recalled the terrifying moment she was mugged in broad daylight in the middle of London. ‌ The brave star being the target of a criminal has prompted her to speak out to make sure others don't suffer the same issue. Annabel, who competed in the 2023 series alongside Johannes Radebe, said she was waiting for a taxi when the incident occurred. Speaking on Instagram, Annabel detailed the moment and thanked those who rushed to her aid. "I just wanted to warn people who are on their own in London. I just got mugged waiting for a taxi outside King's Cross St Pancras," she wrote. "The man was riding a bike and wearing a black balaclava. He rode straight at me and took my phone clean out of my hands. He rode away with it but luckily dropped my phone so I got it back. Terrifying! " Annabel added. She added: "On a positive note, there are some lovely people out there. Luckily a lovely gentleman witnessed it and came over to help me. Thank you to whoever you are." The new Strictly curse didn't stop with Annabel as Seann Walsh recently revealed his phone was stolen in a post shared on his Instagram Stories. ‌ Along with a screenshot from the Find My app, which showed his phone in Guangdong, China, he said: "My phone was stolen (yes, out of my hand and yes, I live in Lond) a week or so ago and it is now in China if anyone happens to be passing by." One person urged the comedian to write a book called "It could only happen to me" and he responded: "If there are any publishers following me, I am open to this but it will be a very long book. I'm calling it Typical." ‌ Unsettled Londoners have been left in disbelief as mobile phone theft has increased at a horrifying rate. New statistics release this month revealed that 231,000 phone thefts and robberies were recorded over the past four years in the city. Analysis by The Times revealed hotspots in London include St James's Park, where Piccadilly and Haymarket meet Pall Mall and Clarence House as well as parts of the West End. Figures released by Scotland Yard figures show a 20 per cent year-on-year increase in robberies - with 81,256 mobile phone crimes were recorded in 2023. The stats also showed that roughly 37 people have their phone snatched on the streets of the capital every day.

Cleaner accused of taking photos of overweight colleague awarded €12,500 for unfair dismissal
Cleaner accused of taking photos of overweight colleague awarded €12,500 for unfair dismissal

BreakingNews.ie

time15 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Cleaner accused of taking photos of overweight colleague awarded €12,500 for unfair dismissal

A cleaner on a ferry service who was accused of photographing a former colleague with a weight problem to make fun of her has been awarded €12,500 in compensation for unfair dismissal. Fiona Carroll was also alleged to have used profane and demeaning language in relation to other staff members, as well as using derogatory terms to discuss a former colleague's weight. Advertisement There was a 'mini mutiny' against Ms Carroll among ISS Facilities workers aboard a client's ferry service in early 2024, according to Patsy Doyle, an adjudication officer with the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). During a series of meetings with the company's operations manager, six staff members raised concerns about Ms Carroll, four of whom indicated that they wished to make formal complaints. Ms Carroll had also been invited to a meeting, but was stood down after the operations manager ran out of time. No attempt was made to reschedule the meeting, the WRC was told. Investigation An investigation into the complaints was commenced and Ms Carroll was suspended from work on March 26th, 2024. Advertisement She confirmed that she had used 'profane language' when discussing colleagues, but claimed that this had occurred in private conversation. The lack of physical evidence of a photograph meant that one of five allegations was withdrawn. Following a disciplinary meeting on April 11th, it was decided that Ms Carroll's behaviour had amounted to gross misconduct and warranted dismissal. Lesser sanctions were considered, but the company feared that her return to work would intensify toxicity. Ms Carroll claimed that she had been targeted by untruths from staff members who wanted her fired. She said there was a 'historical interpersonal conflict' with one colleague who had demonstrated 'challenging and aggressive behavior'. She alleged that this colleague had 'networked' new staff members with a view to forcing her exit from the company. Advertisement In her decision, Ms Doyle said the allegations against Ms Carroll had been 'vague' and were not underpinned by date lines or firm contextual backdrops. It was unclear who authored the allegations, she added. An earlier letter of complaint from the colleague with whom Ms Carroll claimed to have an 'interpersonal conflict' was ultimately conflated with the allegations. This was not disclosed from the outset of the inquiry, Ms Doyle noted. 'Mini mutiny' By failing to meet with Ms Carroll following the 'mini mutiny', the company acted in a partisan and unfair manner, the adjudication officer found, and she was not provided with detailed notice of the allegations against her. Ms Doyle said the complainant had not helped her case by adopting a 'combative' approach of denial and personal criticisms, but suggested that she may have reacted differently if she had been presented with more robust, detailed allegations. Advertisement Ms Doyle found evidence of procedural unfairness on the part of the employer, which she described as 'chilling'. The earlier complaint by a colleague had been withheld from Ms Carroll, and her suspension was also 'punitive'. The rush to dismissal rather than taking corrective action to 'mark the cards' of all staff in relation to challenging behaviour was unreasonable, the adjudication officer found. She concluded that Ms Carroll had been unfairly dismissed, but said the cleaner had significantly contributed to her dismissal by confining her responses to personal criticisms. She ordered ISS Facilities to pay compensation of €12,5000 to the complainant, and recommended that the company develop a policy for intra-colleague complaints that emphasises an informal approach in the first instance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store