logo
Cleaner accused of taking photos of overweight colleague awarded €12,500 for unfair dismissal

Cleaner accused of taking photos of overweight colleague awarded €12,500 for unfair dismissal

A cleaner on a ferry service who was accused of photographing a former colleague with a weight problem to make fun of her has been awarded €12,500 in compensation for unfair dismissal.
Fiona Carroll was also alleged to have used profane and demeaning language in relation to other staff members, as well as using derogatory terms to discuss a former colleague's weight.
Advertisement
There was a 'mini mutiny' against Ms Carroll among ISS Facilities workers aboard a client's ferry service in early 2024, according to Patsy Doyle, an adjudication officer with the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).
During a series of meetings with the company's operations manager, six staff members raised concerns about Ms Carroll, four of whom indicated that they wished to make formal complaints.
Ms Carroll had also been invited to a meeting, but was stood down after the operations manager ran out of time. No attempt was made to reschedule the meeting, the WRC was told.
Investigation
An investigation into the complaints was commenced and Ms Carroll was suspended from work on March 26th, 2024.
Advertisement
She confirmed that she had used 'profane language' when discussing colleagues, but claimed that this had occurred in private conversation. The lack of physical evidence of a photograph meant that one of five allegations was withdrawn.
Following a disciplinary meeting on April 11th, it was decided that Ms Carroll's behaviour had amounted to gross misconduct and warranted dismissal. Lesser sanctions were considered, but the company feared that her return to work would intensify toxicity.
Ms Carroll claimed that she had been targeted by untruths from staff members who wanted her fired. She said there was a 'historical interpersonal conflict' with one colleague who had demonstrated 'challenging and aggressive behavior'.
She alleged that this colleague had 'networked' new staff members with a view to forcing her exit from the company.
Advertisement
In her decision, Ms Doyle said the allegations against Ms Carroll had been 'vague' and were not underpinned by date lines or firm contextual backdrops. It was unclear who authored the allegations, she added.
An earlier letter of complaint from the colleague with whom Ms Carroll claimed to have an 'interpersonal conflict' was ultimately conflated with the allegations. This was not disclosed from the outset of the inquiry, Ms Doyle noted.
'Mini mutiny'
By failing to meet with Ms Carroll following the 'mini mutiny', the company acted in a partisan and unfair manner, the adjudication officer found, and she was not provided with detailed notice of the allegations against her.
Ms Doyle said the complainant had not helped her case by adopting a 'combative' approach of denial and personal criticisms, but suggested that she may have reacted differently if she had been presented with more robust, detailed allegations.
Advertisement
Ms Doyle found evidence of procedural unfairness on the part of the employer, which she described as 'chilling'. The earlier complaint by a colleague had been withheld from Ms Carroll, and her suspension was also 'punitive'.
The rush to dismissal rather than taking corrective action to 'mark the cards' of all staff in relation to challenging behaviour was unreasonable, the adjudication officer found.
She concluded that Ms Carroll had been unfairly dismissed, but said the cleaner had significantly contributed to her dismissal by confining her responses to personal criticisms.
She ordered ISS Facilities to pay compensation of €12,5000 to the complainant, and recommended that the company develop a policy for intra-colleague complaints that emphasises an informal approach in the first instance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conor McGregor's legal team withdraws bid to introduce fresh evidence in appeal against civil case decision
Conor McGregor's legal team withdraws bid to introduce fresh evidence in appeal against civil case decision

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Conor McGregor's legal team withdraws bid to introduce fresh evidence in appeal against civil case decision

The legal team for mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor has withdrawn a bid to introduce fresh evidence in his appeal against a decision in a civil case in which a woman accused him of raping her. Former hairdresser Nikita Hand, 35, sued the Irish sports star over an incident at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018. The 36-year-old was said to have "brutally raped and battered" Ms Hand in a penthouse at the Beacon Hotel. During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand. After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found McGregor civilly liable for assault. Ms Hand was awarded €248,603.60 (about £206,000) in damages. McGregor was ordered by a judge to pay Ms Hand €100,000 (£85,000) of the damages and €200,000 (£170,000) of an expected €1.3m (£1.1m) in legal costs before the appeal, which the court heard had been done. Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, lost her case against another man, James Lawrence, who she accused of assaulting her by allegedly having sex without her consent at the same hotel. McGregor has since sought an appeal, which was initially expected to include new evidence. However, on Tuesday morning, the Court of Appeal in Dublin heard that McGregor would no longer be relying on additional evidence that had not been given to the initial trial for his appeal. That evidence was reported to relate to two neighbours of Ms Hand who had alleged they had seen her be assaulted by a former partner. However, his legal team said that after receiving new applications relating to the evidence to be given by pathologist Professor Jack Crane, they could no longer sustain that ground of appeal. John Gordon SC, for Ms Hand, said it was "frankly not appropriate" for the ground to be withdrawn on that basis, adding he had only been told of the development 10 minutes earlier. He objected to the withdrawal of the ground and argued he should still be allowed to cross-examine the neighbours. He said his client had been "put through the wringer yet again" and that the court should not permit the appellant to "waltz in here and then they can walk away from this". Mr Gordon said there could potentially be matters relating to perjury arising out of the developments. Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, alongside Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath, said it cannot be the case that further submissions relating to Professor Crane could solely be the reason to withdraw the appeal matter of the neighbours' evidence. Mark Mulholland KC, for McGregor, said he was applying to withdraw the matter on a "holistic view" of the whole case and after taking instructions. Ms Justice Kennedy said it was "unsatisfactory" that it was being brought to the court at a late stage, but permitted the withdrawing of the ground. Following the withdrawal of that application, Remy Farrell, SC, also for McGregor, advanced the remaining four grounds of the appeal - largely relating to the right to silence and "no comment" answers to questions during garda interviews. He raised the issue of the cross-examination of McGregor during the original trial by Mr Gordon. He said an "enormous amount of no comment material" had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end. Mr Farrell said that Mr Gordon had raised more than 100 "no comment" answers given by McGregor while being interviewed by gardai on the basis that it related to a position put forward by the fighter that he had been fully co-operative with gardai. This was a good old-fashioned courtroom bombshell. Nikita Hand arrived at the Four Courts with her partner, walking past a rolling maul of TV cameras and photographers and a group of supporters with a large "We Stand With Nikita Hand" banner. The media – not expecting Conor McGregor himself to attend – were on high alert for the arrival of the two new witnesses, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins. Former neighbours of Ms Hand, they were expected to tell the court that they may have witnessed her being assaulted by her partner after the hotel encounter with McGregor – explaining her subsequent bruising. But they did not arrive. Inside the small, packed court it immediately became apparent why. McGregor's legal team said they were withdrawing the fresh evidence – there were audible gasps and startled looks exchanged among the benches. The testimony of the neighbours had filled reams of Irish newsprint in the weeks ahead of this highly-anticipated appeal – now it was discarded immediately for various legal reasons. Ms Hand's counsel was furious – demanding an apology and muttering the word 'perjury'. He had only found out 10 minutes earlier, he declared – an unacceptable situation. Ms Hand had "been put through the wringer" by all of this, he said. The mixed martial arts fighter's appeal is now proceeding, but on reduced grounds. As so often with Conor McGregor, whether in an octagon or a courtroom, the unexpected is never far away. Mr Farrell said this was allowed to proceed by the trial judge, with Mr Justice Alexander Owens telling Mr Gordon multiple times to get to that specific purpose of that line of questioning. However, putting forward the appeal, McGregor's counsel said this did not occur - and was in itself based on an "entirely incorrect" paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said. Mr Farrell said his client had said that he had made a comment about wanting to "get everything correct" in seeking out the "best advice" from his solicitors - rather than saying he had been fully co-operative with gardai. He said the plaintiff had used this to construct a "hook" that McGregor had said he wanted to tell everything to gardai, adding: "With respect, that's not what it says." Mr Farrell said it was not the case that McGregor had said he had told gardai everything.

Man jailed for seven years after setting fire to front door of house containing family members
Man jailed for seven years after setting fire to front door of house containing family members

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man jailed for seven years after setting fire to front door of house containing family members

A man who set fire to a car and the front door of a house containing five sleeping family members in an act of 'misplaced vengeance' has been jailed for seven years. The family of five was only awakened by a neighbour who noticed the blaze in the early hours of the morning, and they were lucky they were not killed in the December 2024 incident, Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard on Tuesday. Advertisement This was the second time Jason Flynn (46) had caused fire damage to the same house in Shankill, Dublin, with the court hearing he used to live in the house next door and set fire to that when he was evicted by the local council in 2001. The 2001 fire also caused damage to the house in the current case along with a third house, Garda Stephen Ryan told Karl Moran BL, prosecuting. Flynn, of Longford House, Spencer Dock, Dublin 1, pleaded guilty to one count of arson at an address in Shankill on December 5th, 2024 and one count of possessing cannabis for sale or supply at his home on December 23rd, 2024. Gardaí found the drugs, with a street value of just under €2,000, on his kitchen table when they came to arrest him for arson. Advertisement He has 19 previous convictions, including arson, assault causing serious harm and assault. A letter from Flynn outlining his motive for starting the fire was handed into court, but not read aloud. The court heard it related to a grievance he had with a previous occupant of the house. Defence counsel said Flynn had mental health issues and things went 'awry' when he stopped taking his medication. The mother of the affected family read out her victim impact statement in court, outlining the upset and trauma they have all faced in the wake of the fire. She said she was always very fire and security conscious and had recently installed a new front door and new windows in her home. She said a fire officer later told her that the fire would have entered the house within five minutes if it hadn't been for the new door. Advertisement A five-year-old grandson was staying with another family member that night, and the woman said they often think about how he could have woken up the following morning to find that every member of his maternal family, including his mother, was dead. She said that having lived in the house next door for some years, Flynn would have been aware that the family would have to walk past the source of the fire to escape from the terraced house. She felt Flynn meant to cause them 'great harm', she said. Although he had lived next door to them and had caused fire damage to the house when her elderly parents were living there, she said she had not seen him since 2001 and had no issue with him. CCTV footage played in court showed Flynn approaching the house at 2.45am on the night in question and setting the car in the driveway alright at both the front and rear. He then walked away and surveyed the scene before returning to the front door where he set a Christmas wreath ablaze. Advertisement A neighbour phoned the occupants about 15 minutes after it had started to alert them. The car exploded into flames and they had to walk past the alight front door to escape, getting out a back door. Flynn was easily identifiable to gardaí from doorbell coverage of him setting fire to the Christmas wreath, and when gardaí went to arrest him on December 23rd, they found a bag of cannabis on his kitchen table with a street value of €1,999. Flynn said he was not drug dealing but was 'feeling generous' and going to give it to his friends and not charge them money, the court heard. Defence counsel Michael Hourigan SC said Flynn had a difficult upbringing. 'There are associations he makes with that particular area and his childhood,' he said of the house in Shankill. He said Flynn's partner was in court to support him. Advertisement Sentencing Flynn on Tuesday, Judge Martin Nolan noted Flynn drove 19 kilometres from his home that night to the Shankill address to start the fire 'with malice and forethought'. Ireland Teens 'thrashed' brand new sensory room for childr... Read More 'There was a chance that if the neighbours hadn't notice the fire, the fire would have eventually penetrated the door, entered the house, and much more serious consequences could have occurred,' the judge said. He said Flynn set fire to the house in an act of 'misplaced vengeance towards the house'. 'The problem with fire is once it's started, no one knows where it ends up,' the judge said. 'People could have died on this particular night.' Judge Nolan set a headline sentence of 10 to 12 years and then reduced it to seven years, taking into account the fact that Flynn's guilty pleas were signed guilty pleas from the District Court.

Man jailed after throwing ashes of woman's late partner across room and threatening to kill her
Man jailed after throwing ashes of woman's late partner across room and threatening to kill her

BreakingNews.ie

time2 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man jailed after throwing ashes of woman's late partner across room and threatening to kill her

A man who punched a woman in the face, threatened to kill her, and threw an urn containing the ashes of her late partner across a room has been jailed for 27 months. Shane Casey (32) previously pleaded guilty to threatening to kill the woman at Broad Lane, Great William O'Brien Street in Blackpool, Cork city, on June 14th, 2023. The plea was entered on a full facts basis. Advertisement Garda Michael Abernathy told Cork Circuit Criminal Court that Mr Casey turned up at the house of the woman completely uninvited and in an intoxicated state. Garda Abernathy said that Mr Casey punched the woman four times, causing soft tissue damage to her face. 'He (Casey) struck her with his fist. He ran towards the kitchen and said that he was going to 'finish her (the victim) off.' She believed he was going to get a knife. He followed her and demanded money from her. She gave him €50. He threatened and abused her. He picked up an urn containing the ashes of her ex-partner and threw them across the room.' Advertisement Garda Abernathy said that a neighbour went to the assistance of the woman. Mr Casey was arrested and detained for questioning by gardaí. Mr Casey, formerly of Great William O'Brien Street in Blackpool, Cork, has 53 previous convictions. Defence barrister Jessica Kelleher, BL, said that the plea in the case saved the victim from having to give evidence. She indicated that her client was remorseful for his actions. Judge Helen Boyle also heard that the accused has extremely poor mental health and suffers from psychosis. Advertisement Judge Boyle said that the woman had suffered an 'invasion' of her home by the accused, who then physically assaulted and threatened to kill her. 'A home should be a place of safety. I have no doubt it was a terrifying experience.' Ireland Arsonist (21) who caused blaze at father's home le... Read More Judge Boyle noted serious mental illness of the accused and the fact that the offence occurred when he was highly intoxicated. She set a headline sentence of 3.5 years which she reduced to three years with the last nine months suspended. The entering of a guilty plea was a factor in the sentence handed down to Mr Casey. If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can contact Women's Aid ( 24-hour freephone helpline at 1800-341 900, email helpline@ or Men's Aid Ireland (confidential helpline at 01-554 3811, email hello@ for support and information. Safe Ireland also offers a number of local services and helplines at . In the case of an emergency, always dial 999/112.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store