logo
Insolvency proceedings cannot sidestep PMLA process: NCLT

Insolvency proceedings cannot sidestep PMLA process: NCLT

Time of India5 days ago
Proceedings under the Insolvency &
Bankruptcy Code
cannot be used as a mechanism to "frustrate or sidestep" the process going under the
Prevention of Money Laundering Act
, the
National Company Law Tribunal
(NCLT) said.
Rejecting the plea for dissolution of
Shakti Bhog Snacks
, which is under the lens of the
Enforcement Directorate
(ED) with a special PMLA Court taking cognisance of the complaint filed by the probe agency, NCLT said it "would amount to
judicial overreach
".
This will also "impair the ED's ability to complete its investigation, pursue trial, and recover proceeds of crime," said NCLT while dismissing the plea of the Resolution Professional of Shakti Bhog Snacks.
A two-member NCLT bench further said the Supreme Court has already held that NCLT and the appellate tribunal NCLAT do not have jurisdiction to interfere with proceedings or orders passed under the PMLA, including attachment orders or criminal prosecution.
"In view of the foregoing, we are of the considered opinion that permitting dissolution despite the pendency of the Special Court's cognizance over the
Corporate Debtor
would amount to judicial overreach and would impair the ED's ability to complete its investigation, pursue trial, and recover proceeds of crime," said a 14-page-long order by NCLT.
Live Events
NCLT cannot assume jurisdiction in a manner that would render Shakti Bhog Snacks unavailable for criminal liability, particularly when it stands named as an accused, and assets, however meagre, are under attachment.
"It is not the quantum but the character of the proceedings that is determinative," said the NCLT bench comprising Members Sanjeev Ranjan and B V Balram Das.
Shakti Bhog Snacks Ltd (SBSL) is the group company of Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd (SBFL), which was once a leader in the wheat flour segment.
Insolvency proceedings
against SBSL were initiated by NCLT in January 2023 after default was established by one of its operational creditors. It also appointed an interim resolution professional, who also formed the Committee of Creditors (CoC) as per the provisions of the IBC.
However, RP could not get control of SBSL's physical assets and records as it was sealed by the Enforcement Directorate. Moreover, the company was not in operation. No person was available, and its land and building situated at Noida were already sold by the
State Bank of India
under the SARFAESI Act.
Moreover, in CoC, SBI was the sole member, and it could not even liquidate SBSL due to the absence of assets, records, operations, and personnel. The CoC recommended dissolution of SBSL instead of liquidation and the RP approached NCLT, filing plea under Section 54 of the IBC for dissolution.
NCLT on August 20, 2024, issued notice to the Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Department and others. After that, ED filed its reply before NCLT, opposing the dissolution of Shakti Bhog Foods, in view of the ongoing proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
ED submitted that SBFL defaulted in repaying its loan obligations, and its account was classified as NPA and total outstanding dues to the consortium of banks stand at approximately Rs 3,269.42 crores as on 31.03.2020.
ED submitted before NCLT that investigation revealed that Shakti Bhog Snacks, along with Shakti Bhog Foods was involved in the activities related to money laundering.
SBSL acquired and possessed proceeds of crime to the tune of Rs 97.87 crore from six group entities of SBFL, the probe agency submitted before the insolvency tribunal. It transferred Rs 127.81 crore to these six group entities from FY'08 to FY'15 in the guise of investment and sale-purchase.
The name of Shakti Bhog Snacks was used by Shakti Bhog Foods to rotate its loan funds against bogus invoices. The company layered and siphoned off the proceeds of crime received from Shakti Bhog Foods and further transferred them to the directors/promoters and their relatives.
"The ED further submitted that SBSL carried out these transactions without any actual movement of goods. The group companies of SBFL involved in these transactions were shell entities, and no genuine business activities were conducted therein," said NCLT order while recording ED's submission.
These transactions were carried out to inflate the financials of SBFL so that more credit facilities could be availed from banks," it said.
Consenting to it, NCLT said: "Dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC results in the Corporate Debtor ceasing to exist as a legal entity. Such a consequence would inevitably frustrate the ongoing criminal prosecution under the PMLA and defeat the authority and jurisdiction of the Ld. Special Court, which is statutorily vested with the power to try offences under the PMLA and adjudicate upon related attachments and confiscation proceedings," it said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rs 3.8 crore swindled by Karnataka waqf board staff restituted by ED
Rs 3.8 crore swindled by Karnataka waqf board staff restituted by ED

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Rs 3.8 crore swindled by Karnataka waqf board staff restituted by ED

ED NEW DELHI: Enforcement Directorate provided a big relief to Karnataka waqf board by restituting Rs 3.8 crore worth of assets to the board with the court's permission in a fraud case in which one of its employees cheated the board by depositing its money in his personal account instead of making a fixed deposit in the waqf account. The accused bought a Mercedes car from the laundered money besides creating other assets. ED investigation, which began in 2017, led to attachment of assets of the accused. In a recent order, an additional sessions judge of Bengaluru court allowed restitution of the assets to the rightful claimant, the Karnataka waqf board . After the court order, ED, on July 1, facilitated the release of the entire amount. A banker's cheque of Rs 3.8 crore was handed over to board CEO Jeelani Mokashi. "This release underscores ED's commitment to ensuring justice for victims of financial crimes," the agency said Tuesday, adding that it will ensure that the proceeds of crime are returned to their rightful owners.

National Herald case: No transparency in shares, says ASG Raju on argument of respondents
National Herald case: No transparency in shares, says ASG Raju on argument of respondents

India Gazette

time3 hours ago

  • India Gazette

National Herald case: No transparency in shares, says ASG Raju on argument of respondents

New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): The Rouse Avenue court on Tuesday heard the rebuttal arguments by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju on the cognisance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others. ASG Raju submitted that there was no transparency and that other shareholders were dummies for Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. 'Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi may not be getting a dividend today, they may get their due share the moment they quit,' he contended. The Special Judge, after hearing part of the arguments, listed the matter for July 12 for hearing the remaining arguments by the ASG. At the outset, ASG submitted that as per the Companies Act, a 'not-for-profit company' can undertake commercial activities. 'They got the shares at a cheaper price...,' ASG said. It was also submitted by the ASG that shares held by Congress leaders Motilal Vohra and Oscar Fernandes, who have passed away, were transferred. He said that their shares were not sold in open market as it would have disclosed the actual price of share. It was also argued that there was a criminal breach of trust, adding that any property acquired by a criminal breach of trust is stolen property. The possession of stolen property attracts section 411 of IPC, which is a scheduled offence under PMLA. ASG submitted that there was a criminal breach of trust by AICC and AJL in relation to Rs 90 crore. Young Indian had also obtained a loan from a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), identified as Dotex. During the pre-lunch session, Senior Advocate Pramod Kumar Dubey, appeared for Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd. He submitted that Dotex was registered as a Non-Banking Financial Company by the Reserve Bank of India in February 2010. 'There is no cancellation of my registration. When RBI has given a recognition. The ED can't overreach by calling Dotex a sham accommodation entry operator,' Dubey said. For the day-to-day functioning of the Young Indian company, a loan was required. A loan was obtained from Dotex, the Senior Advocate stated. 'Is this written anywhere that the loan was given to acquire the property of AJL. My knowledge was that the loan was taken for the day-to-day function of the company,' Dubey added. There is no criminal intent on the part of Dotex, no role in alleged offence, he said. The Senior Advocate rejected allegations of conspiracy. 'Jiske khilaf koi case nahi, uske khilaf Conspiracy hai.' (the ones who have no case against them, they have a conspiracy) As per the judgment of the Supreme Court, the theory of conspiracy is not applicable in the cases of PMLA, the Senior Advocate argued. The ED's claim of the cheque of Rs 1 crore being dated as October 24, 2010 was also disputed with the claim that the cheque was of December 24, 2010. It was also submitted that loan was given on the basis valid documents though it was not on stamp paper. 'Dotex got interest at the rate of 14 percent. The repayment of loan was also done. Every information was given to ED, it was not considered,' said Dubey. 'Dotex has not committed any offence, then where is the question of Sunil Bhandari doing offence being a director. He has done nothing, they (ED) cannot connect me with the other accused,' the Senior Advocate said. 'My act is not a part of criminal activity, my giving loan is not a criminal activity,' he added. Advocate Soujanya Sankaran appeared for Sunil Bhandari, whose name is in the ED chargesheet, and submitted that this court has no jurisdiction to take cognizance. 'The foundational fact has to be produced by the ED,' she added. She also submitted that this case is based on a complaint filed by Subramaniam Swamy. There is no foundational basis to proceed against accused Sunil Bhandari, who is director of Dotex, she submitted. (ANI)

ED releases Rs 3.82 cr assets to Karnataka State Waqf Board in money laundering case
ED releases Rs 3.82 cr assets to Karnataka State Waqf Board in money laundering case

India Gazette

time3 hours ago

  • India Gazette

ED releases Rs 3.82 cr assets to Karnataka State Waqf Board in money laundering case

New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): In a significant move to restore the Proceeds of Crime (POC) to the rightful claimants, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bengaluru Zonal Office, has taken a significant step by releasing properties valued at Rs 3.82 crore to the victims of money laundering and the legitimate claimants in the case of Shusheela Chintamani & Others, currently under investigation by the ED, the agency said. According to the ED, it initiated investigation on the basis of an FIR filed against two Vijaya Bank officials and Syed Siraj Ahmed, a First Division Assistant with the Waqf Board. In this case, the Waqf Board issued two cheques amounting to Rs 4,00,45,465/- to open Fixed Deposit accounts at Vijaya Bank. However, instead of opening the fixed deposits, the money was siphoned off by transferring to fictitious entities. Further, Rs 4 Crore was transferred to M/s. Verkeys Realities Pvt. Ltd., which spent Rs 1.10 Crore purchasing a Mercedes car from Ghatge Motors Pvt. Ltd. Further, Rs 2,72,74,444/- was transferred back to the account of M/s. Ajay Sharma Trading Corporation, the agency said. The Enforcement Directorate said that upon uncovering these illicit financial transactions and a proper money trail of Proceeds of Crime (POC), ED issued a Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) totalling Rs 3,82,74,444/-. On March 31, 2017, ED filed a Prosecution Complaint (PC) before the Special PMLA Court in Bengaluru, against six individuals and entities, including M/s. Verkeys Realities Pvt. Ltd. In line with the PMLA and its core objective of ensuring the restitution POC to the legitimate victims, the ED did not raise any objections when the Additional Sessions Judge considered the release of the funds to the Karnataka State Waqf Board, the rightful claimant in this case, the agency said. On July 1, 2025, in a further demonstration of its commitment to justice, ED facilitated the release of the entire amount. A banker's cheque of Rs 3,82,74,444/- was handed over to Jeelani H. Mokashi, CEO (Additional Charge), of the Karnataka State Waqf Board. This marks a significant step forward in the ED's ongoing mission to restore the misappropriated funds to those who have been wronged, the ED said. This release underscores the ED's commitment to ensuring justice for victims of financial crimes. ED remains resolute in its dedication to combating money laundering and ensuring that the Proceeds of Crime are returned to their rightful owners, the agency emphasised. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store