
Trump Dismantles Government Fight Against Foreign Influence Operations
The administration has already reassigned several dozen officials working on the issue at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and forced out others at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, they said.
The cuts have focused on people who were not only combating false content online but also working on broader safeguards to protect elections from cyberattacks or other attempts to disrupt voting systems. In last year's election, the teams tracked and publicized numerous influence operations from Russia, China and Iran to blunt their impact on unsuspecting voters.
Experts are alarmed that the cuts could leave the United States defenseless against covert foreign influence operations and embolden foreign adversaries seeking to disrupt democratic governments.
Arizona's secretary of state, Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, warned in a letter to President Trump that the cuts were comparable to shutting down the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ahead of hurricane season.
'This decision undermines Arizona's election security,' he wrote, 'at a time when our enemies around the world are using online tools to push their agendas and ideologies into our very homes.'
Mr. Trump and other officials have said that in the guise of fighting misinformation and disinformation, the government had infringed on free speech rights of Americans. Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant secretary at D.H.S., said that the cybersecurity agency 'is undertaking an evaluation of how it has executed its election security mission with a particular focus on any work related to mis-, dis-, and malinformation,' and that while that is continuing, personnel who had worked on those issues 'have been placed on administrative leave.'
Acting on one of Mr. Trump's first executive orders, Attorney General Pam Bondi on Feb. 5 shut down a Federal Bureau of Investigation task force that had been formed after Russia intervened in the 2016 presidential election and reassigned several dozen officials and agents who had been involved, the officials said.
CISA has also forced out more than a dozen officials who had been monitoring foreign influence operations targeting the nation's elections. They were among the more than 130 positions eliminated in total at the agency, according to a department statement.
On Friday, an internal memorandum from the agency's acting director, Bridget E. Bean, announced the suspension of funding for a program that coordinated election security on the federal, state and local levels.
Even before Mr. Trump returned to the White House, Republicans on Capitol Hill had refused to renew the mandate for the State Department's Global Engagement Center, the most prominent government agency fighting propaganda from Russia and China. It shut down in December. Many of its staff of 125 have since been reassigned, while others have left or not had their contracts renewed, officials said.
In recent years, many Republicans have been skeptical of warnings about disinformation campaigns. They accused Democrats of demonizing political views with which they disagreed as 'Russian propaganda,' and they viewed warnings about 'disinformation' as a way to pressure social media companies to censor speech supporting Mr. Trump's views.
In one of his first major foreign policy speeches as vice president, JD Vance said that the Biden administration had 'bullied social media companies to censor so-called misinformation.'
Republican supporters of Mr. Trump had telegraphed many of the administration's steps ahead of his election. But the breadth and speed of the efforts to abolish the teams put in place to fight malign activity online have surprised those involved, including engineers at companies like Google and Meta, who have for years regularly exchanged information with government officials, including during Mr. Trump's first term.
CISA has already removed a 'Rumor v. Reality' page on its website, which had provided tips to dispel disinformation about the reliability of the voting process. The internal memorandum from Ms. Bean, first reported by Wired, said that the agency would also conduct a review to correct 'any past activities identified as past misconduct by the federal government related to censorship of protected speech.'
The new director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has made repeated promises to depoliticize the spy agencies. American officials briefed on her plans say that will include a review of the work done by the office's Foreign Malign Influence Center, which was established by Congress in 2022.
That office, along with the F.B.I. and the cybersecurity agency, regularly disclosed foreign influence operations during last year's presidential campaign, including one from Iran that targeted Mr. Trump, which officials said was trying to prevent his re-election. Many of the officials involved with the efforts to warn the public about foreign influence campaigns at the time emphasized that the work was nonpartisan, and that they had avoided calling out Americans who amplified foreign narratives because of the right to free speech.
A recent report by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a hawkish research organization in Washington, credited the government effort for blunting the impact of foreign influence ahead of November's election by informing voters, for example, that numerous videos being spread online were created by Russia and showed fake people.
'The U.S. government should continue to treat foreign malign influence as a national security issue,' the report said, calling for the agencies to receive 'the proper funding to continue their work.'
Instead, the new administration has followed the recommendations of Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for restructuring the federal government from which Mr. Trump sought to distance himself during the presidential campaign and has now embraced.
Project 2025 called for the closing of the election security unit at CISA, as well as the F.B.I.'s task force. Republicans in Congress and several states have also waged a legal and political campaign against what they claimed was a sweeping 'censorship industrial complex' under the Biden administration.
'I think that they may have drunk their own Kool-Aid in terms of believing that there is this kind of censorship industrial complex that all these people were involved in,' Lawrence Norden, a vice president at the progressive Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, said, referring to the officials now shutting down the teams. 'I'm not sure that they fully understand who everybody is and what they do.'
Lance Hunter, a professor at Augusta University in Georgia, said that eliminating defenses against foreign influence campaigns would leave the United States more vulnerable to them.
'Foreign influence operations are often conducted to attempt to increase the appearance of government ineffectiveness and instability in the country,' he said. 'They are also carried out to disrupt elections and increase division and polarization in the country.'
During his visit to Europe last week, however, Mr. Vance belittled the idea that a foreign adversary like Russia could sway an election in a strong democratic nation, referring to accusations that resulted in Romania overturning the first round of voting in its election.
'If your democracy can be destroyed with a few hundred thousands of dollars of digital advertising from a foreign country,' Mr. Vance said, 'then it wasn't very strong to begin with.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Keep your shoes on
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Why the TSA waited five years after Reid's abortive shoe bombing to institute its shoes-off rule has never been clearly explained, but in all that time no one else has tried to take down a plane using explosive footwear. Nor have any passengers ever been caught with a shoe bomb in the nearly two decades after the rule went into effect. Advertisement In other words, there has never been any evidence that making millions of travelers shed their shoes contributed to anyone's safety. It was all things rather than bad people — with screening for forbidden bottles of shampoo or corkscrews or lighters as if they posed deadly threats, instead of monitoring for behavior that represents a real threat to planes and their passengers. Advertisement From the day it was created, the TSA has specialized in fighting the last war and in overreacting to one-time long shots. One Islamist radical tried to hide explosives in his shoes, so hundreds of millions of travelers had to start removing their shoes. Another would-be terrorist, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, attempted to hide a bomb in his underwear, so we all had to submit to full-body scans or (for several years) pat-downs. British officials learned of a plot to I often reflected in the years after 9/11 that if Osama bin Laden's terrorists had destroyed not four airliners on that terrible day but four crowded movie theaters, then Americans would have had to radically change the way they went to the movies — advance reservations would have become mandatory, audiences would have had to get to the cineplex (with photo ID) two hours early, and X-ray equipment operated by a vast new federal bureaucracy, the Theater Security Administration, would have scanned everyone entering and leaving. But at airports there would be no interminable security lines, a box cutter in your carry-on wouldn't raise any eyebrows, and you could arrive for your flight 20 minutes before departure. We would still be as vulnerable to a hijacking-massacre as we actually were on 9/11 — but almost no one would be thinking about that because the 'last war' would have taken a different form. Advertisement Former TSA administrator And even that they aren't very good at. The government's own 'red team' tests — in which undercover inspectors try to smuggle weapons or contraband through security — have As Americans who travel abroad are aware, other countries never deemed it necessary to adopt the shoes-off rule. That includes countries in which the threat of terrorism is far more acute. In Israel, for example, security screening begins even before passengers enter the terminal, officials make a point of engaging in dialogue with almost everyone who's catching a plane, and travelers remain with their luggage until after the security check is completed. But nobody has to take their shoes off or remove their laptop from their bag to be scanned separately. Security agents there are watching for nervousness, inconsistencies, or suspicious behavior. They aren't preoccupied with confiscating bottled water or whether you're wearing a belt. Advertisement The TSA's ritualized absurdities have come at a steep cost. They waste billions of dollars annually. They consume countless hours of passengers' time. They treat everyone like a potential terrorist. To prove that no one is exempt, they have gone to the extreme of patting down Nearly a quarter-century after 9/11, there is no evidence that any of this has ever prevented a hijacking. 'TSA has played next to no role in the biggest counterterrorism stories of the past two decades,' journalist Darryl Campbell, who writes extensively about air travel and airline security, wrote in 2022. It is widely agreed that the two most effective deterrents to another hijacking have nothing to do with airport checkpoints. One was a physical change: the locking and reinforcing of cockpit doors, so that no terrorist could ever again breach the cockpit during flight. The other was psychological. The passengers on 9/11's United Flight 93, by overpowering the terrorists and forcing them to crash the plane into a field, prevented a far greater catastrophe that day — and thereby taught future travelers of the importance of fighting back. Advertisement The end of the shoes-off rule is long overdue. But it's just one small retreat in a long war of make-believe. The TSA remains fixated on creating the illusion of security rather than actually providing it. If the agency truly wants to protect travelers, it should abandon its theater of confiscated water bottles and trampled dignity and learn to focus instead on what truly keeps passengers safe. But until that happens, we can at least keep our shoes on. It's a start. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
MAGA comes for one of its own: Pam Bondi
That has parts of MAGA world, which has been obsessed with Epstein since he died by suicide in a New York jail while awaiting trial on federal child sex trafficking charges in 2019, in a twist. 'This is Jeffrey Epstein; this is the most famous pedophile in modern-day history,' Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said during an Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Greene said that Ghislaine Maxwell, a close Epstein confidante convicted of federal child sex trafficking charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison, had 'a little black book' of more than 2,000 names, including 'famous celebrities, world leaders, foreign leaders, and very rich businessmen.' Advertisement Among Epstein's high-profile friends were Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Trump, who once called the mysterious and mysteriously wealthy man with a private island Advertisement From Vice President But some, like far-right extremist For years, right-wing conspiracy theorists have claimed that Epstein was murdered in his jail cell to protect the identities of those who may have been blackmailed by him. Now far-right figures ranging from Before he was reelected, Trump was asked during a While Trump said that he would do so, he also hedged, claiming that he would be wary because 'you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there 'cause it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world.' (He didn't elaborate.) But he added that it would be 'interesting' to find out more about Epstein's death, which he called 'a weird situation.' Advertisement The joint DOJ/FBI memo confirmed that Epstein died by suicide. Now, neither Trump nor anyone in his administration wants to talk about the alleged Epstein client list that was before it wasn't. At a recent Cabinet meeting, he 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this, where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas,' the president said, referring to the catastrophic flash floods that have killed at least 120 people. 'It just seems like a desecration.' As much as Trump wants this subject buried, not all of MAGA is ready to let this go away quietly. This even led to the odd sight of Karoline Leavitt, Trump's press secretary, being From the attorney general's neglect of due process for immigrants being snatched from communities nationwide to her willingness to Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Global week ahead: Trade tensions cloud earnings and the G20 heads south
Earnings season always seems to roll around with alarming frequency. The newsroom approaches each quarter with a nervous energy, but this summer it feels especially heightened. Recent market records in both the U.S. and Europe, alongside an unpredictable economic environment, paint a complicated picture for the second half. It all kicks off on Tuesday with America's banking behemoths, as attention switches from the White House back to Wall Street. But U.S. President Donald Trump's policies still loom large, with Goldman Sachs predicting that, this quarter, U.S. earnings will start to show the impact of the tariffs. The investment bank's economists see "conflicting messages on the margin outlook" as companies have only announced modest price increases, despite the cost hikes associated with higher tariffs. Earnings-per-share growth is also set to come under pressure, with Goldman suggesting, "the consensus estimate among analysts sees S&P 500 companies' earnings-per-share growth decelerating to 4% this quarter relative to the same quarter last year — down from 12% in the first quarter." With the banks set to dominate next week — JPMorgan, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America are all reporting within just two days — maybe Europe can provide some optimism. As reported by CNBC's Jenni Reid, European banks just recorded their best first half since 1997. Gains were driven by strong investment banking returns — something their U.S. counterparts are also likely to capitalize on — as well as stock rallies based on both deal speculation and actual M&A. As someone who grew up in Cape Town, seeing this year's G20 meetings take place in South Africa makes me pine for the sunshine of the Southern hemisphere. Next week's meeting in Durban between finance ministers and central bank governors comes at an interesting time for the country. An Oval Office meeting between South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump went spectacularly wrong back in May, when the latter, flanked by his South African (now former) right-hand man Elon Musk, made false claims of a "white genocide." It seems tensions have not abated. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will skip the meeting altogether, opting to head to Japan instead, according to Reuters. South Africa is also subject to a new 30% tariff rate, the only country in sub-Saharan Africa to be singled out in the latest round of announcements. It does not bode well for the G20 Leaders meeting, due to be held in Gauteng on Nov. 22-23. It remains to be seen if Trump will attend. In May, South Africa's golfing greats — who traveled to the White House with Ramaphosa — failed to win over Trump. But maybe the lure of some of the best courses in the world, along with a South African summer, could see a seasonal change in his mood toward the country later this year.