Navarro on jobs report: ‘It's either incompetence or political interference'
The longtime Trump adviser said the BLS had an 'unsettling pattern' of presenting the public with the wrong information.
'The BLS doesn't seem to be able to get that jobs number right. This has been going on for over a year,' Navarro said during a Friday appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill.'
'It's either incompetence or political interference, either way ahead, roll today, and that's appropriate, because this simply isn't right,' he told anchor Blake Burman.
The BLS reported that 73,000 jobs were created last month after correcting May's report to reflect the creation of 19,000 jobs compared to an initial report of 144,000. The Bureau also corrected the number from June to 14,000 job adds after an initial report of 147,000.
President Trump on Thursday fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, alleging she inflated job reports for the Biden administration ahead of the 2024 election. He said she 'faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory.'
'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump in a Friday Truth Social post.
Navarro told Burman on Friday that Trump's move was 'healthy.'
The BLS did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. The bureau often revises jobs report, but the scale of Friday's changes surprised experts.
Navarro, in his Friday interview, said the revisions cost the Fed much needed inflationary cuts, which held rates steady on Wednesday.
'It's is that if we had gotten that data when, when we should have got that data, the Federal Reserve yesterday would have lowered interest rates by at least 50 basis points. So you think so kind of incompetence or political no question about it,' Navarro told Burman.
'I mean, look, you had three months that were two months that revised significantly downward, one which was lower than expectations. I mean, the Fed, that's a completely different picture. I mean, there was a strong case for a 50 day there's an overwhelming case for a 50 basis point cut,' he added.
Trump and his allies have pushed Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates to reset the economy for months. The president has threatened to fire Powell who has refused to shift course under pressure.
'The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out?' Trump wrote on Friday.
'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture.; Thank you for your attention to this matter,' he added.
Later in the day, he walked back his stance when Newsmax's Rob Finnerty asked if the Fed chair would remain in place for now during an interview.
'Well, it's very disruptive if you fire,' he told him. 'So, I would say most likely, yeah.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Reddit Post Breaking Down A MAGA Dad's "Awakening" From Two-Time Trump Voter To Trump Critic Is Going Viral
A Reddit post by a user who claims their father voted for Donald Trump twice has recently gone viral for revealing what finally turned their MAGA dad into a Trump critic. At the start of the post, the redditor explained what initially attracted their father to Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. "What got him into Trump was the first primary debate he participated in, in which he brutally attacked Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and the others..." Related: They went on to explain that their father, a business owner, personally benefited from Trump's tax cuts, which made his view of Trump's first presidency a "success," despite events like January 6. According to the redditor, things started to change for their father when Trump's tariff war threw his business into "disarray." Related: The negative financial impact of Trump's tariff war made their father seek out more "accurate reporting" of Trump, and the new information "awakened" him. Related: "He wishes Trump would stop being such an idiotic fuckup." And finally, the post ended with the redditor's realization about changing the minds of "casual Trump voters." "You can bring all that stuff up, and they'll just wave it off. But as soon as he does do something harmful that affects them, they can be turned." After reading the post, people in the comments shared their perspective on "uniformed voters" who supported Trump. "I just think so many people drank the 'John Wayne' kool aid in the Reaganite '80s, the idea that, like the lone gunslinger, Americans are singular, self sufficient individuals, not members of a society. So many in the U.S. bought that BS wholesale, like this guy's Dad," one user wrote. "He thinks he only need care about his business, his family and his bikes, but he forgets that for businesses to flourish he needs society at large to be healthy, he needs trade rules to be enforced, and he needs stability in trade hates paying taxes, but never thinks about why the roads are maintained, why water comes out of the tap or electricity out of the socket. He's been trained and rewarded to see himself as a lone entity, independent of all social bonds. Now he's been uncomfortably reminded he is part of an interdependent society, but I'm sure he'll forget the reminder soon enough. Individualism is too deeply ingrained in his psyche for him to abandon it now." Related: "Everyone keeps saying 'they voted for this.' But in reality, some didn't. There are lots of uninformed voters out there. I'm not excusing it, but it's true. My dad is the same way," another user admitted. "He liked the sound bites he saw about draining the swamp and liked the idea of a businessman instead of a career politician. My dad is woefully misinformed and wouldn't listen to me either. But he's not an evil monster. Just complacent and kinda ignorant. He's also 83, so there's that." "They're not going to figure out Trump sucks until they get burned by the hot stove," this user wrote. "I think there is a large portion of classic Republicans, not the MAGA people, who probably just didn't give a shit about most of Trump's agenda harming other people." And finally, "I feel like the real takeaway from this is that the dad is against something Trump did, but still doesn't regret his vote." "The popular Reddit sentiment is that conservatives are feeling regret now that his policies are hurting them, but the actual sad truth is that given the opportunity at a revote, they'd probably vote for Trump again because they're convinced Harris would've still been worse or as bad as Trump anyway," another user wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70
How long $1 million in retirement savings will last as a 70-year-old depends on a number of factors, including where you live, what type of lifestyle you lead, how healthy you are and how much insurance coverage you have. Here's a look at how these factors affect how long your savings will last, using Bureau of Labor Statistics data regarding average expenses in that age group. Check Out: Read Next: BLS Statistics The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts an annual survey of the average annual expenditures of Americans across various age groups. The most recent data, for the year 2023, shows that Americans 65 and older — of which 70-year-olds are obviously a part — spent an average of $60,087 for the year. Using a straight mathematical average, this would suggest that for the average 70-year-old, $1 million would last approximately 16.64 years, or until they are nearly 87. Watch Out: How Health and Insurance Play a Role Generally speaking, healthcare costs increase after you retire. Even if you consider yourself relatively healthy, there's no telling how many injuries, illnesses or chronic conditions you may have to deal with as you get older. While genetics and personal lifestyle choices can prolong your life, there are no guarantees when it comes to health. Obviously, frequent trips to doctors and hospitals can quickly add to your expenses, shortening the duration of your $1 million. This is one of the reasons why good health insurance is essential in terms of the survival of your $1 million nest egg. If you have to pay out of pocket for your healthcare as you age, you could quickly increase that 'average' $60,087 annual spend to $100,000 or more, rapidly depleting your savings. Another factor to consider is that if you actually remain healthy and live a long life, you'll need to stretch that $1 million in retirement savings even further. A nest egg that only lasts for 17 years after average spending won't do you much good if you're going to live 30 years or more in retirement. In that scenario, you'll either need to boost your savings or learn how to live off less. Budgeting and Lifestyle Factors The way you live your life can have a huge effect on how long your money will last in retirement. Assuming an 'average' lifestyle, a pot of $1 million would last you about 17 years. But few retirees living in Manhattan, for example, could get by on $5,000 per month, even if they consider themselves frugal. In that scenario, $1 million may only last 10 years or less. But if you live a simple life in a rural community in Mississippi, for example, your money might last 30 years or more. The key to making your retirement savings last is to create a realistic budget. It's this simple — if you can live well beneath your means, then your $1 million will last longer. If you live a rockstar lifestyle, it will last less. The Importance of Investment Returns Very few people with $1 million simply keep it 'under a mattress,' or in an account that doesn't earn any interest. At the very least, most people with seven-figure account values keep that money in a low-risk, low-return investment like a high-yield savings account or a U.S. Treasury bill. Those with a bit more risk tolerance may keep some or even all of that amount potentially higher-yielding investments like intermediate-term bonds or dividend-paying stocks. Either way, it's highly likely that by taking on even a little bit of risk you can earn much more than 0% on your $1 million nest egg in retirement — and with higher returns, you can greatly extend the life of your nest egg. As shown above, it would take roughly 17 years for the average 70-year-old American to spend $1 million. But if you could earn even a 3% return on the $1 million, it could instead last for about 21 years. Boosting that return to 6% would nearly double the time that your money would last, to over 33 years. This simple example shows the immense power of investment returns when it comes to the longevity of your nest egg. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Buzz Feed
6 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Dad's Viral Journey Away From Trump
A Reddit post by a user who claims their father voted for Donald Trump twice has recently gone viral for revealing what finally turned their MAGA dad into a Trump critic. At the start of the post, the redditor explained what initially attracted their father to Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. "What got him into Trump was the first primary debate he participated in, in which he brutally attacked Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and the others..." They went on to explain that their father, a business owner, personally benefited from Trump's tax cuts, which made his view of Trump's first presidency a "success," despite events like January 6. According to the redditor, things started to change for their father when Trump's tariff war threw his business into "disarray." The negative financial impact of Trump's tariff war made their father seek out more "accurate reporting" of Trump, and the new information "awakened" him. "He wishes Trump would stop being such an idiotic fuckup." And finally, the post ended with the redditor's realization about changing the minds of "casual Trump voters." "You can bring all that stuff up, and they'll just wave it off. But as soon as he does do something harmful that affects them, they can be turned." After reading the post, people in the comments shared their perspective on "uniformed voters" who supported Trump. "I just think so many people drank the 'John Wayne' kool aid in the Reaganite '80s, the idea that, like the lone gunslinger, Americans are singular, self sufficient individuals, not members of a society. So many in the U.S. bought that BS wholesale, like this guy's Dad," one user wrote. "He thinks he only need care about his business, his family and his bikes, but he forgets that for businesses to flourish he needs society at large to be healthy, he needs trade rules to be enforced, and he needs stability in trade hates paying taxes, but never thinks about why the roads are maintained, why water comes out of the tap or electricity out of the socket. He's been trained and rewarded to see himself as a lone entity, independent of all social bonds. Now he's been uncomfortably reminded he is part of an interdependent society, but I'm sure he'll forget the reminder soon enough. Individualism is too deeply ingrained in his psyche for him to abandon it now." "Everyone keeps saying 'they voted for this.' But in reality, some didn't. There are lots of uninformed voters out there. I'm not excusing it, but it's true. My dad is the same way," another user admitted. "He liked the sound bites he saw about draining the swamp and liked the idea of a businessman instead of a career politician. My dad is woefully misinformed and wouldn't listen to me either. But he's not an evil monster. Just complacent and kinda ignorant. He's also 83, so there's that." "They're not going to figure out Trump sucks until they get burned by the hot stove," this user wrote. And finally, "I feel like the real takeaway from this is that the dad is against something Trump did, but still doesn't regret his vote." "The popular Reddit sentiment is that conservatives are feeling regret now that his policies are hurting them, but the actual sad truth is that given the opportunity at a revote, they'd probably vote for Trump again because they're convinced Harris would've still been worse or as bad as Trump anyway," another user wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.
