Serbian police remove barricades and make new arrests as protesters block roads
Demonstrators are demanding the release of dozens of university students and others arrested after a massive weekend rally, accused of attacking the police or plotting to overthrow the government.
Advertisement
Police dismantled metal fences and moved garbage containers blocking traffic in Belgrade's Zemun district on Monday, while several dozen protesters raised their hands in the air and chanted anti-government slogans.
Serbian gendarmerie officers prepare to remove a street blockade that was set up as part of a protest in Belgrade, Serbia (Darko Vojinovic/AP)
Police also intervened separately in a city centre area.
Protesters later changed tactics and continuously walked over a pedestrian crossing, thus blocking traffic again.
The protests and blockades began after a train station canopy collapsed in November, killing 16 people.
Advertisement
Many in Serbia blamed the tragedy on corruption-fuelled negligence in state infrastructure projects.
Thousands of demonstrators halted traffic at various locations in Belgrade and elsewhere throughout the country on Sunday evening, including a key bridge over the Sava River in the capital.
Police removed those blockades early on Monday.
Police said in a statement that a number of people were detained but did not specify how many.
Advertisement
Video posted on social media showed police vehicles driving at high speed through a blockade in one Belgrade street and people fleeing in panic.
Serbian gendarmerie officers stand in front of anti-government protesters in Belgrade, Serbia (Darko Vojinovic/AP)
Mr Vucic praised police action in a statement during a visit to Spain, saying: 'Citizens should not worry, the state is strong enough to secure law and order.'
On Saturday, tens of thousands of people demanded a snap parliamentary election at a student-led rally they hope will oust Mr Vucic's right-wing government.
Groups of protesters clashed with police after the official part of the rally ended.
Advertisement
Dozens were later detained.
Mr Vucic has refused to call the election, which is scheduled to be held in 2027.
University students and professors are a key force behind nearly eight months of almost daily protests and Mr Vucic has accused them of 'terror' and attempts to destroy the country.
Riot police used batons, pepper spray and shields to charge at demonstrators who threw rocks and other objects at police cordons.
Advertisement
Nearly 40 people face criminal charges over the clashes, police said.
People react as Serbian gendarmerie officers remove a street blockade that was set up as part of a protest in Belgrade (Darko Vojinovic/AP)
Authorities detained at least eight university students for alleged acts against the constitutional order and national security, accusing them of planning attacks on state institutions.
Critics say Mr Vucic has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power over a decade ago, stifling democratic freedoms while allowing corruption and organised crime to flourish, which he has denied.
Serbia is formally seeking entry to the European Union, but Mr Vucic's government has nourished relations with Russia and China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Is reform of the welfare system still possible?
During the chaotic debate that led to the implosion of the government's disability benefit reforms, Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, acknowledged: 'Welfare reform is never easy, especially perhaps for Labour governments.' The question after her full-scale retreat on disability benefit cuts is whether it is possible at all. How did we get here? Alarm has been growing over the surge in sickness benefit claims since Covid, with total spending of £81 billion this year, almost £30 billion higher than in 2019. Numbers claiming both for incapacity, because they cannot work, and disability, to compensate for the extra costs of sickness, have been rising. But the jump in the latter is been particularly stark: a thousand people a day start claiming, double pre-pandemic levels, and another two million claimants are projected by the end of the decade. The Conservatives announced plans to deal with it shortly before losing power and Labour took office pledging to control spending. What was Labour proposing? As well as an overhaul of Jobcentres and employment services, Kendall is pledging contentious reforms to benefits to get people back to work. This included a new requirement on the long-term sick to discuss plans to get back to work, and halving of incapacity benefit for new claimants to increase incentives to get a job. But the most controversial were cost-cutting plans that would have made it harder to claim personal independence payments (PIP), the main disability benefit. These were junked in a chaotic climbdown in the face of a mass revolt from Labour MPs. What's left? The universal credit health element will still be halved for new claimants deemed unfit to work, costing 730,000 people about £3,000 a year, while Labour MPs have largely accept the long-term sick do need to do more to consider work. A ban on those under 22 claiming incapacity benefits also remains. But so too does extra spending from boosting the standard rate of universal credit for 3.9 million people who get an extra £265 a year, cancelling previous Tory cuts and boosting spending on employment support by £1 billion a year. What happens now? Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister, will lead a review into the future of PIP, promising that this will be 'co-produced' with disability groups and will not set out to make savings. Tom Pollard of the New Economics Foundation think tank, said it was possible this would lead to plans that could enjoy widespread support while controlling costs, but warned: 'There has been a lot of trust lost, and disability groups will go in alert to the idea that the government wants to save money, so the risk is you end up with a stalemate through lack of trust.' Campaigners said that the cuts to public services and restrictions on social welfare would be detrimental to people receiving disability assistance CARL COURT/GETTY IMAGES Politically will Labour MPs accept welfare reform? Most Labour MPs agree that Kendall's case for reform is strong. One loyalist said that PIP has 'become totally unmoored from its original purpose' and that more fundamental rethinking is now needed. But no one can agree who should lose out: squaring the circle of pleasing disability groups while saving money appears all but impossible. Ben Zaranko of the Institute for Fiscal Studies warns that 'there is no way to save big sums without taking big sums off people who are currently classed as disabled', and many Labour MPs have shown they will not accept this. Even the loyalists have been burnt by repeatedly defending contentious changes which were subsequently junked. What happens if welfare is not reformed? Spending on sickness benefit is back on course to top £100 billion by the end of the parliament, leaving less for public services. Zaranko warned that the benefits system 'clearly isn't on a sustainable trajectory' and that any government would have to make changes. 'We do need to have a view about slowing that rise and targeting support at those who need it most,' he said. When can the government expect savings? Most now accept that any reforms are going to take too long for the government to persuade the Office for Budget Responsibility to bank savings in the short term. Deven Ghelani, director of the consultancy Policy in Practice and one of the architects of the universal credit system, said the reforms were 'bungled because Treasury-led reforms don't work. While the government can score the savings at the start of the parliament, they are never able to deliver on them.' MPs and experts point out that welfare reform is notoriously slow — universal credit was introduced more than a decade ago and many claimants will not move on to it until next year. What other ideas are there? With MPs saying that 'tinkering' has not worked, there may be appetite for more radical options. The Centre for Social Justice has suggested those with milder mental health conditions should no longer be able to claim, with a portion of the savings ploughed back into NHS therapy. Joe Shalam, its director of policy and former DWP adviser, said that 'all is not lost for welfare reform', arguing: 'By targeting mental health benefits and investing in therapy and back-to-work support, ministers will save money and change lives'. Zaranko said PIP was 'designed with an old-fashioned view of disability when a lot of the fastest growth has been for mental health conditions'. He suggested that it should be 'redesigned from the bottom up. We need to think about what the most appropriate kind of support is, which for some people may be counselling'. What about addressing the underlying problems? While benefit claims have outpaced the rise in disability, there is no doubt we are becoming sicker. 'What's going on in the benefits system is symptomatic of an ill society where there is poor health, poor public services and a lot of poverty,' Pollard said. 'Ultimately the path to savings is to have fewer health problems because you're spending more on prevention.' Yet in the short term, that too is very costly. Whatever the future for welfare reform, the certainty is that there is no quick fix.
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer is by far the worst PM of my lifetime. But having Angela Rayner installed in No 10 would be a new order of catastrophe: STEPHEN GLOVER
Will we one day look back at Sir Keir Starmer 's disastrous prime ministership with something like nostalgia? Might we come to see his ill-starred stint in No 10 as shipwrecked sailors recall a nasty squall before the deadly hurricane that destroyed their ship, and left them utterly stranded?
Times
an hour ago
- Times
The Times letters: Starmer, leadership and the U-turn on welfare
Write to letters@ Sir, Your leading article ('Abject Surrender', Jul 2) outlines very well the vagaries and indecisiveness of our prime minister. You say he has shown how incapable he is of reining in the state and public finances. Further to this it has been widely claimed that he is losing authority. I, and I think many others, would question whether he had any credibility and authority in the first place. Sir Keir Starmer's U-turns and false promises simply make the electorate wonder who is in charge. A leader should lead and if he caves in to 50-odd rebel MPs, as he has done on welfare reform, then what hope is there for the country? Add to this the fact that record illegal immigration is costing the country a fortune and that the government appears to have no plans to tackle it. We lack leaders with substance, clout and an 'action this day' GrundyHartley Wintney, Hants Sir, William Hague is quite right to argue that the prime minister has failed dismally during his first year in office to outline the overarching purpose of his government, let alone offer a vision that is inspiring or even reassuring ('What's Starmer's big idea? He needs to tell us', comment, Jul 1). This should come as no great surprise, however. Even before the general election it was clear that Labour did not have a coherent plan about anything, whether for the economy, education, defence or stopping migrant boats. Having failed to prepare for the realities of power, the party has lurched from one ill-thought-out decision to another, frequently changing tack, in a desperate attempt to mollify everyone. All this does is satisfy no one and that is precisely where we are, 12 months in. Seemingly standing for nothing, always looking for scapegoats and all the while communicating poorly are a recipe for disillusionment and MortimerPerth Sir, Polly Mackenzie says that what is needed is 'a fundamental reset of the prime minister's office' ('Starmer's lost power of political speech', Jul 2). I suggest also that the prime minister needs to be able to rely on a trusted colleague to give him advice, perhaps someone without ambition who has served at the top rank of politics. There must be plenty of candidates to choose from. Margaret Thatcher relied on Willie Whitelaw — 'Everyone needs a Willie' — and his advice proved BenyonBladon, Oxon Sir, Time and again, Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves justify their actions mainly by saying they are doing 'the right thing'. This continual failure to give wider reasons leaves them exposed when they have to make a U-turn. Has the right thing suddenly become the wrong thing? Has the wrong thing suddenly become the right thing?Peter ClarkLondon SE23 Sir, Dr Karin Englehart (letter, Jul 1) should rest assured that nothing has changed since she was denied the post of a medical assessor because she suggested that a benefit claimant's account should not necessarily be taken at face value. Whenever I expressed a doubt that a patient would be granted a benefit, I was assured that they would be guided in how to do so Surinder Bakhshi (ret'd) Birmingham Sir, Regarding Martha's Rule and the training of doctors (letters, Jul 1 & 2), fellow physicians would often consult my father on cases. His skill as a diagnostician was a source of amusement to our family. He would state mysteriously that the person on the table next to us at a restaurant had a particularly interesting condition. Late in his life, I asked him how he became so good at diagnosis. He told me he had studied hard as a medical student and with no immediate family to return home to, would stay behind during holidays and tour hospital wards to extend his education. He would talk to patients, ask to read their notes and discuss with fellow staff. I doubt such access to patients would be allowed HerseeGreat Missenden, Bucks Sir, Dr Rosemary Alexander seems to have forgotten that Martha's Rule was enacted because doctors, not physician associates, made an incorrect diagnosis, gave a wrong interpretation of facts, missed serious problems and then refused help from medical colleagues. Physician associates are not the only professionals who have been guilty of ordering unnecessary expensive tests — private GPs are much more culpable of that ArulConsultant paediatric surgeon,Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital Sir, James Kirkup bemoans the cost to the state of 'doctors' comfortable retirements' (comment, Jun 30). As a house officer in 1997 I was paid less per hour to be on call for five surgical wards overnight than I was the previous year as a general assistant in a supermarket. However, I consoled myself with the promise of a comfortable final salary pension. This pension has since been eroded and we have moved on to career-average schemes. Furthermore, many of my generation have faced tax charges amounting to five or six-figure sums for pensions that they may never receive. It is little wonder that the exodus to foreign climes and the private sector continues David W McCareyConsultant rheumatologist and physician, Glasgow Sir, Further to your helpful leading article on the royal finances ('Gravy Train', Jul 2), the King and Prince of Wales are, respectively, Duke of Lancaster and Duke of Cornwall by the will of parliament — the Act of Settlement. The revenues of the duchies are not 'private wealth' but a perquisite of the titles parliament bestowed. In the country's perilous financial situation the time has surely come to end this ridiculous fiction, deploy public money for the public good and pay the head of state and his helpers proper salaries and expenses for the duties they carry RossAuchencairn, Dumfries and Galloway Sir, The decision to retire the royal train would end a tradition dating back to 1842 ('End of the line for royal train', news, Jul 1). More than a symbol of royal travel, it reflects our national heritage and the bond between crown and country. Nowhere is that identity more deeply felt than in places such as Wolverton, in my constituency, where the train found its home. Fitted out there in 1977, it is a part of the town's identity, its legacy woven into Wolverton's rich cultural heritage. At a time of rail revival and infrastructure spending, this is a chance to modernise a cherished tradition, not scrap it. There is time to change track: I believe the train has more miles left in it Curtis MPHouse of Commons Sir, Sir Ephraim Mirvis has criticised Bobby Vylan's chant of 'death, death to the IDF' as being antisemitic ('Change needed at BBC after Bob Vylan fiasco, says Chief Rabbi', Jul 1). The inference to be drawn from the Chief Rabbi's remarks is that criticism of Israel's military activities is automatically antisemitic. This is a dangerous route down which to go. The separation of the racial aspect from the governmental one is important, otherwise any action by the Israeli government can be given carte blanche because criticism may be considered AlexanderChichester Sir, Is it not time to stop conflating disapproval of Israel's government with antisemitism? There are Jewish people all over the world, including in Israel, who do not like the way that Binyamin Netanyahu's government is conducting its war in Gaza. If that is regarded as supporting terrorism, then God help CookeClavering, Essex Sir, The science behind cheese and dreaming (news, Jul 1; letter, Jul 2) is straightforward: cheese is rich in tryptophan, one of the building blocks for neurotransmitters that influence sleep and moods. Wallace and Gromit never eat Wensleydale before Jeremy AuchinclossElgin, Moray Sir, James Marriott ('AI will leave a gaping void for workaholic world', Jul 1) repeats the canard that bankers in the past worked only from 10am to 3pm. This was far from the case. We started at 9am. After closing we had to balance the books — this was before calculators and computers — and this often meant working until well after 5pm. Overtime was paid only if we worked until 6pm (it was remarkable how often we were ushered out at 5.55pm). Saturday mornings were worked too, and annual leave was two weeks. My annual salary when I joined in 1954 was £170. I couldn't afford a meal at a café, and there was no staff room at the bank, so I had to cycle six miles home for lunch and be back again within the SprattFormer Lloyds Bank manager, Upton St Leonards, Glos Sir, Rohan Silva (comment, Jul 2) praises the benefits of AI which, with some transitional friction, will do us all good. But he doesn't mention the consequences of AI in the hands of bad people. In future years will we be able to believe anything we see on the internet, TV or newspapers? Only physical meetings will be acceptable for serious decision-makers. Perhaps we can hope that AI can be adapted to recognise lies created by ToozeDarlington, Co Durham Sir, I take issue with Emma Duncan's assertion (Notebook, Jun 30) that 'backing creative kids may do them no favours' and that young people pursuing careers in the creative industries 'will find themselves in their thirties without a profession or a useful skill'. The arts have always been a lottery. But other professions have their dropouts too: many teachers, lawyers and doctors change jobs in their thirties. What should we do — only train armies of bankers and business people? What a sad society it would be that did not encourage the creative spirit and the outspoken, brave young people who make the arts happen. Our country needs their stories, plays, dance and music — they are attempts to understand IrelandAmbassador, Action for Children's Arts Sir, Wimbledon's linesmen and women are rather like the Beefeaters at the Tower of London — not strictly indispensable but the visual essence of their place of work. Wimbledon has lost its unique character without DallingHartley Wintney, Hants Sir, Mark Riley (letter, Jul 2) should be ashamed of himself. Those are eye-stalks on the Daleks' domes, not weapons. Disgraceful knowledge of Dalek HarrisSittingbourne, Kent Sir, Matthew Parris should venture to Northern Ireland to see, and walk, a real wall (Notebook, Jul 2). The Mourne Wall in Co Down is 19 miles long, 5ft high and 2ft wide, built in the early 20th century using only granite boulders and reaching 2, ShieldsBanbridge, Co Down Write to letters@
