Greenland coastal village bracing for potential collision with giant iceberg
The skyscraper-sized piece of ice is on a potential collision course with the harbour of Innaarsuit, a village in Greenland's Avannaata Municipality.
It originally sidled up to the village last week, but seemed to have drifted away before reappearing on Monday and remaining precariously close.
Local authorities have issued warnings to residents as the iceberg sits near the Royal Greenland fish factory and the local grocery store. People have been advised to take care when in that part of the community.
Emergency services are encouraging families not to go in a group towards the store. They are also asking people who have difficulty walking to be extra careful. The fish-processing factory has been temporarily closed.
Meanwhile, locals have been advised to be careful when sailing to or from the settlement.
While some residents are concerned, others are reportedly excited by the rare and dramatic sight.
There are few options for dealing with threatening icebergs. One of the main concerns with a large iceberg is that it will 'calve' (split), with pieces falling into the ocean, resulting in large waves that will swamp nearby coastal communities.
As a result, authorities monitor icebergs for cracks and holes that may result in calving.
The first line of defence is for nearby residents to evacuate. That occurred in 2018, when this same Greenlandic community was similarly threatened.
Other options have been considered but remain experimental. They involve explosives to break up the iceberg and towing. These tactics present monumental challenges.
The U.S. Coast Guard says aside from difficulty involved in successfully getting onto an iceberg, demolition would require 'a 1,000 lb. charge of conventional explosives…to break up approximately 70,000 cubic ft of ice (an iceberg weighing 1,960 tons).' Further, a hundred of these charges would be needed to destroy an average iceberg, (presumably more for the mammoth berg threatening Innaarsuit at this time).
Melting a medium-sized iceberg of 100,000 tons would theoretically require heat from the 'combustion of over a quarter of a million gallons of gasoline' says the Coast Guard.
'Such methods are, of course, economically, as well as practically unsound.'
Icebergs drift south after calving from Arctic and western Greenland glaciers. They are regular sights in spring-early summer. Transported by Atlantic Ocean currents to waters off Greenland, Newfoundland and Labrador, as well as Cape Breton Island, they eventually melt in somewhat warmer southern climes. An iceberg that drifts south rarely lasts more than a year.
Icebergs flow at speeds of up to seven kilometres a year, first floating in Arctic bays before passing into the Labrador Current and south into what is known as 'Iceberg Alley.'
Every year about 40,000 medium to large icebergs calve from glaciers but only 400-800 make it as far south as St. John's. However, those numbers can vary greatly from year to year based on temperature, ocean current, wind direction and sea/pack ice.
Often huge, ninety per cent of an iceberg sits below the ocean surface.
Black iceberg spotted off Labrador could be result of an asteroid strike
Unusual iceberg with giant hole attracts onlookers to Eastern Newfoundland cove
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
18 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Uncover Surprising Link Between Tides and Earth's Biggest Icebergs
In 2021, researchers in Antarctica noticed giant cracks developing on the Brunt Ice Shelf, an enormous stretch of ice on the continent's northwestern corner. Two years later, the fracture grew so large that a gigantic iceberg almost twice the size of New York City broke free in a process called calving, sending scientists scrambling to investigate the icy chunk, which they named iceberg A-81. A team of researchers affiliated with the British Antarctic Survey sought to understand the forces driving this 'crack behavior' in the huge ice shelf. By devising a mathematical model to account for natural forces affecting ice shelves, the researchers found that iceberg A-81—and most other icebergs, for that matter—likely snapped off from tidal forces buffeting the ice shelves in spring, when the currents are strongest. The paper, published in Nature Communications on July 24, supports common-sense assumptions about environmental forces playing a major role in driving calving events, but the proposed model could also improve prediction models for calving events, a historically challenging task. 'Understanding what controls the timing of these events is crucial, because calving not only affects the shape and melt rate of ice shelves but also their long-term stability,' said study lead author Oliver Marsh, in a statement. 'It's incredibly exciting to uncover a link between something as predictable as the tides and the dramatic, sudden process of iceberg calving.' For the paper, Marsh and his colleagues first devised a mathematical model to calculate the threshold for crack behavior in the ice shelves using ocean tides or wind patterns as potential stressors. Next, they tested their predictions against GPS and radar data, paying close attention to the subtle movements and stresses that appeared within the ice shelf over time. They noticed that the fractures tended to grow most in spring, which happens to be when tides are strongest. The model, however, is a simplified interpretation of real-life dynamics in Antarctica, the study authors admitted, and it better explains smaller, gradual changes in crack behavior. This means that more dramatic events—like extreme temperatures from climate change—will cause even bigger rifts in the ice. 'Tides and wind are key to the timing of small individual rift growth events here,' the authors wrote in the paper, 'but it is notable that an iceberg collision in 2021 caused more substantial rift growth in a single event than throughout 2020.' Nevertheless, the study marks a crucial step in modeling the role of environmental drivers in calving events, which the authors argue will subsequently inform our models of iceberg calving under such extreme atmospheric or ocean conditions. Large icebergs also influence ocean circulation and local ecosystems, so the new model could serve as a useful tool for structuring research projects in Antarctica, Marsh explained. 'Icebergs like A-81 can be thousands of square kilometers in size and account for roughly half of all ice lost from Antarctica each year,' Marsh said. 'This kind of insight brings us closer to forecasting major ice loss events and their impact on sea level with far greater precision.'
Wall Street Journal
2 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Greenland Sharks Can Live to Be 392. Why Can't I?
As a general rule I do not get jealous of other creatures that inhabit this planet. This is largely because most creatures have a hard time feeding themselves, are constantly in fear of predators and live relatively short lives. But when I found out that the Greenland Shark has been known to live to be 392 years old, for the first time in my life I felt pangs of envy.
Forbes
20-07-2025
- Forbes
NASA-Funded Greenland Survey Reveals ‘Crazy' Amounts Of Ocean Warming
Pieces of ice in front of glacier, barren mountains, Knud Rasmussen Glacier, in far northwest ... More Greenland. Preliminary data from a NASA-funded Greenland survey point to a two-degree centigrade rise in regional ocean water temperatures in less than a decade. For the first time ever, a team of researchers took the data from a subglacial Greenland channel in February of this year using a custom-built, remotely operated vehicle equipped with sonar, laser-ranging and a mass spectrometer. Preliminarily, what we've been able to show is, at least during this year, ocean water in this region is almost two degrees warmer than it was less than 10 years ago, Britney Schmidt, a Cornell University astrobiologist and the ongoing Icefin project's principal investigator, tells me in Reykjavik. It's crazy amounts of warming; we're losing this ice very rapidly and it's much warmer than I would have expected; two degrees in 10 years is insane, she says. The ROV allows us to find channels that are bringing water out from underneath the ice sheet which has huge climate implications, Schmidt tells me during the recent European Astrobiology Institute's BEACON 25 conference in Iceland. But it also has astrobiological implications, because you're bringing samples from under the ice sheet that we otherwise can't get to, she says. This ROV exploration is also trailblazing the way for NASA's potential subsurface lander missions to the icy moons of Europa and Enceladus. At the same time, this research is providing the most current data on climate change in our Northern hemisphere. One of these glaciers has been moving back at about a kilometer a year; others are moving faster, but this system is quite unstable, so we're rapidly losing ice, says Schmidt. NASA-funded and partly funded by the private Simons Foundation, one aim of the research is to simulate the types of exploration, decision making, and analyses that might be required for a mission one of our solar system's icy moons. Cornell University astrobiologist Britney Schmidt gives her presentation at the recent European ... More Astrobiology Insitute's BEACON 25 conference in Iceland. Schmidt is pictured here with an image of Icefin, a underwater robotic operated vehicle (ROV). Retreating Glaciers Working from temporary headquarters atop Greenland's ice cap, the team made its measurements earlier this year by deploying the ROV into subsurface channels and steering the ROV upstream underneath the ice sheet. The team worked near or on three glaciers, including the Knud Rasmussen Glacier on Greenland's Northwestern Coast We're able to resolve exactly how the ocean is getting into these channels and how much fresh water is affecting the base of the ice, says Schmidt. That allows us to put much tighter constraints on how melting is happening, she says. Ice Melt Even so, Greenland has been rapidly losing ice for the last 100 years due to direct human-caused effects in the Northern hemisphere. Three glaciers are calving (or losing) ice directly into the ocean. In the cold part of the season, the team can drive out on snowmobiles to these environments, Schmidt explains in her BEACON 25 talk. The team first drills a hole in the sea ice, then we deploy the vehicle vertically through the ice, then drive it under the ice horizontally, as Schmidt explains in her talk. Future Icy Moon Exploration The ways in which we're exploring beneath the ice are analogous to the types of things we'd need to develop to explore Jupiter and Saturn's icy moons, says Schmidt. You'd melt through the ice shell to be able to pull water samples and decide which samples are interesting and then pass the most interesting ones through to in-situ life detection instrumentation, she says. At the same time, this work is helping the team develop new sample handling systems that oceanographers and climatologists can use on Earth. Mass spectrometers pull in samples of material and analyze their chemistry. in this case, it's what's called a membrane inlet (semi-permeable) mass spectrometer, says Schmidt. It's pulling dissolved gases out of the water and analyzing their composition, she says. That allows us to do is to understand what's going on underneath the ice and measure just how much melting is happening underneath the glaciers, she notes. This basic research will also help further NASA's laundry list of tech development needed to manage eventual subsurface sampling of Europa and Enceladus. How would a subsurface rover on the icy moons of Europa or Enceladus communicate back to Earth? It would probably need a tether or a set of acoustic transponders that can transit through the ice to allow it to radio back to the surface and then radio out back to Earth, says Schmidt. But it's possible, she says. But before such ambitious space missions to Europa or Enceladus, there's practical work to do here on Earth. One involves enabling AI for the Icefin ROV so that it can make at least some of its own exploration decisions in situ. We have a long way to go on under-ice robotic autonomy, both from just how to keep vehicles safe to how to understand the environment, says Schmidt. That's kind of a frontier, not just for space exploration, but also for Earth exploration, she says.
