HTET scheduled for July 30-31 in Panchkula
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Deputy commissioner Monika Gupta reviewed the preparations for the exam, emphasising the need for peaceful and transparent conduct. Strict security arrangements are being implemented, including intensive checking before entering the exam centres. All examination halls have been equipped with CCTV cameras, which will be monitored in real-time by the Haryana School Education Board's control room. Jammers will also be installed at exam centres to prevent the use of electronic devices.
Section 163 of the BNSS will be enforced during the exam days. Flying squads have been appointed to prevent malpractice and irregularities. Officials and staff have been instructed to wear identity cards and follow guidelines strictly. These measures aim to ensure a fair and secure examination process for all candidates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Restaurant owners move Bombay HC against police raids despite earlier court order allowing ‘herbal hookah'
Twelve restaurant owners from the city serving herbal and tobacco-free hookah have approached the Bombay High Court against visits by police officers without notice and threatening the restaurants to shut down and stop serving herbal hookah. The petitioners claimed that such actions were being taken despite the HC verdict of August 2019 which permitted restaurants to serve herbal hookah and the same was complied with by the owners. A bench of Justices Shree Chandrashekhar and Manjusha Deshpande was hearing a plea by 12 restaurant owners argued through advocates Rajendra Rathod and Dhruv Jain. The petitioners include owners/operators of Ustaadi at Crawford Market, The Nest in Bandra, Rustico in Fort, Faham restaurant in Kala Ghoda among others. The high court granted time to state government lawyer to take instructions to respond to the plea and granted liberty to the petitioners to amend the petition with additional information. The actions were allegedly being taken based on June 6, 2025 circular of the home department to police which stipulated that if illegal hookah parlours are found at any location, the responsible police officers must be held accountable and strict action should be taken against them. 'These acts of illegally and unlawfully shutting down the service of herbal hookah at the petitioners' restaurants and threatening to shut down the petitioners' restaurants completely, are not only causing huge monetary losses to the petitioners but also directly affecting the earning capacity and livelihood of their employees,' the plea stated. The petitioners sought direction from the court to the respondent police authorities not to enter their restaurants for any purpose including search without following due procedure under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioners also sought direction to the authorities to comply with the August 2019 order of the HC enabling them to serve herbal hookah and to stop 'illegal and unlawful raids' and threats to the petitioners' restaurants. The plea also sought no coercive action against petitioners for serving herbal or tobacco-free hookah at their establishments. The petitioners also sought direction to authorities that the June 6 circular would not be applicable to them as they are serving herbal/tobacco-free hookah. The HC is likely to hear the plea next on August 6.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Court at place where complainant woman resides can take up Dowry Act cases, rules Kerala HC
Kochi: High court has held that, in cases under the provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, courts at the place where the victim woman takes shelter and temporarily resides are empowered to conduct an inquiry and trial in respect of those offences. The bench of Justice G Gireesh issued the ruling in a petition filed by a 34-year-old woman from Mavelikkara, challenging the decision of the judicial first class magistrate court-I, Mavelikkara, which had returned her complaint on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction, as the alleged incident occurred elsewhere. The petitioner, an estranged wife, had filed a complaint before the JFMC alleging that her in-laws demanded and accepted dowry in the form of gold ornaments at her husband's family house in Thiruvalla, in connection with her marriage. Initially, the JFMC recorded her sworn statement and proceeded with the complaint. However, her in-laws challenged the maintainability of the complaint on the ground of territorial jurisdiction, following which the magistrate returned the complaint. This prompted the petitioner to approach HC. Upon reviewing the case, the court held that if the victim of an offence under the Dowry Prohibition Act suffers mental trauma due to the offence at a place where she temporarily resides, the court having jurisdiction over that place is competent to entertain the complaint and proceed with an enquiry and trial. This is in view of the provisions contained in Section 199 of BNSS. Accordingly, HC directed JFMC, Mavelikkara, to accept the complaint and proceed with the inquiry and trial.
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Rape FIR under POCSO can't be quashed on ground of compromise: Punjab and Haryana HC
Chandigarh, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that an FIR under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for a minor's rape cannot be quashed on the ground of a compromise even if the victim subsequently married the accused and had children. Rape FIR under POCSO can't be quashed on ground of compromise: Punjab and Haryana HC The court held that such compromises are unenforceable in law, being illegal and also contrary to public policy. At the time of the registration of FIR in 2013, the victim was a 13-year-old girl and her father had then alleged that she was enticed away by the accused. The accused allegedly raped the girl in Gurugram and was declared a proclaimed offender after being on the run for nine years before being arrested in 2023. The FIR was registered in August 2013 under the provisions of the IPC and POCSO Act in a police station in Gurugram. The accused approached the high court and sought the quashing of the FIR as he married the survivor and they had four children. However, the court dismissed his plea. "In fact, the competence of minors to consent is inherently ambiguous, even in circumstances where such consent appears to be given freely," the bench of Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri observed. The court, in its July 29 order, also observed that the rationale behind fixing the age of marriage and consent for sexual activity to a fixed statutory minimum is based upon the recognition that minors lack the requisite mental maturity and psychological competence to give informed consent to sexual acts. "This position emanates from a protectionist objective, whereby the law operates on the presumption that minors lack the capacity to fully apprehend or appreciate the nature, implications and potential consequences of indulging in sexual activities," the court held. The petition had been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of an FIR registered in August, 2013, under Sections 363, 366-A and 34 IPC , registered in a police station in Gurugram on the basis of compromise with the victim and the complainant. The present petition had been filed by the accused for quashing of the FIR based on a compromise which was stated to have been entered into by the brother of the petitioner with the respondents who are the complainant and the victim. "....The law provides ex-ante protection to minors by criminalising sexual activities involving persons below eighteen years of age, who by virtue of their age are deemed to be legally incapable of giving informed consent. "In this way, the POCSO Act has adopted the 'brightline rule' which is based upon the principle that minors do not possess the legal or developmental capacity to give informed consent in matters of sexual activity, and reflects a clear and consistent legislative intent to create an unambiguous zone of protection for minors from sexual exploitation...," the court said. The court observed that the allegations pertain to the offence of rape committed upon a minor girl, attracting the provisions of the POSCO Act, FIR and its consequential proceedings cannot be quashed based upon compromise. It was held that the offences under the POCSO Act are statutory crimes against society and marriage, with the victim, especially where she is a minor, cannot absolve the accused of criminal liability and normalising such compromise undermines the deterrent effect of the POCSO Act and sends a regressive message that child sexual abuse can be legitimised via subsequent marriage and erodes public confidence in child protection laws. According to the reply filed by the State, after the FIR was registered, the petitioner was later apprehended from Bihar along with the minor-victim who was recovered from the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner was granted the concession of regular bail during the course of trial but he misused the concession of bail and thereafter, he was declared a proclaimed person on December 19, 2014. He was again apprehended by the police on December 21, 2023 in Amritsar after a long gap of nine years. This was after he was declared a proclaimed person by the trial court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel said the matter has been amicably settled between the parties with the intervention of the "respectables" and it has been stated in the "compromise" that the FIR was lodged on the basis of some misunderstanding and the trial is still pending. He submitted that considering the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the present FIR may be quashed based on compromise. He further submitted that the victim had left her house on her own free will and got married with the petitioner and thereafter, four children were born out of the said wedlock and the victim has otherwise also attained the age of majority. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, whereby the petitioner and respondent victim have already got married to each other and four children were born out of the wedlock, it will be just and proper in case the FIR is quashed based on compromise to prevent miscarriage of justice, the counsel had submitted. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
