
Big spending package advanced despite warnings on numbers becoming tighter
The numbers may be revised, we are told, if the economy is hit by further tariffs. And the tariffs in place already and the Government's budget plans mean that the surplus next year will be 'considerably smaller' than the €6.3 billion anticipated in the forecasts published during the spring.
The numbers, in other words, are getting tighter. In this context, it is notable that the Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
and Minister for Public Expenditure
Jack Chambers
, put forward a planned budget package of a still relatively generous €9.4 billion, including a tax package of €1.5 billion.
Spending growth is pencilled in at 7.3 per cent, with a 6.4 per cent rise in day-to-day spending. This may be a reduction from the average of 9.4 per cent-plus seen on average since 2019, but it remains well in advance of inflation.
READ MORE
Current spending is due to rise by 6.4 per cent next year. In recent years there have been regular overruns and this will be the case again in 2025.
Importantly, the Ministers warned that the figures will have to be revised if the tariff situation worsens, as it may well do. So we will have to wait and see what level of tax revenue growth is anticipated next year and what budget surplus the Department of Finance anticipates.
[
Tax and spending package of €9.4bn to form basis of Budget 2026
Opens in new window
]
This is what will determine whether the budget numbers need to be adjusted – and if so, by how much. In recent years, the basic package has also been extended significantly on budget day by a cost-of-living package, including once-off measures. We are told this will not feature this year, probably. Battles may still lie ahead here.
David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city
Listen |
36:51
If there is a need to adjust the figures, we are told that protecting capital investment and the large €102 billion five-year programme outlined in the revised
National Development Plan
will be the priority. Large cuts to State investment during the austerity years after the financial crash have cost the Republic dear. That said, if there is a need to revise the figures, there will surely be tensions.
As things stand, some €850 million of the €1.5 billion tax package will be eaten up by the promised cut in the hospitality VAT rate. This will leave small pickings for income tax cuts, unless revenue is raised elsewhere. Applying the VAT cut to just food-based firms, while administratively difficult, would save some of the cash. But political difficulties loom here.
[
NDP: €275bn spend over next 10 years, with housing receiving biggest boost
Opens in new window
]
The big questions will, however, be about expenditure. Restoring control over day-to-day spending will be a big challenge. And if the budget numbers tighten, then the State will face the choice of borrowing to finance its increased investment plans. In the middle of all this is the commitment to billions into two funds each year, to help pay future bills.
We still have to see how the Department of Finance sees all this fitting together. The summer economic statement, bar its indications of the budget day package, did not take us much further, except for a warning that if a trade war erupts, then all bets are off.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Can former building giant CRH boss Albert Manifold bring clarity to struggling BP?
BP's appointment of Albert Manifold , former CEO of Irish building materials giant CRH , as its new chairman sparked a muted response from investors. BP shares barely budged, reflecting scepticism over Manifold's lack of oil and gas experience. Reports suggest Manifold was not BP's first choice. At 62, he steps into a role far removed from cement and construction, with an energy giant struggling with debt, strategic confusion, and activist investor pressure. It is, said Panmure Liberum, a 'panic' and 'proper left-field appointment'. The counter argument is that Manifold's credentials speak volumes. CRH shares more than tripled under his 11-year leadership, turning a modest regional player into a US-listed $63 billion (€53.6 billion) global powerhouse through disciplined capital allocation, aggressive portfolio reshaping, and operational efficiency. READ MORE BP shareholders will hope his reputation as a shrewd operator who cuts bloat and boosts cash flow is what the company needs after years of costly missteps in renewables and faltering upstream performance. Critics worry Manifold's skills as a CEO may not translate to chairmanship. However, BP's board clearly values his pragmatic approach and investor-focused track record. On that front, there is already speculation Manifold might consider switching BP's listing to the US, as he did with CRH, aiming for a higher valuation. With BP pivoting back to oil and gas, amid ongoing asset sales and cost-cutting drives, Manifold faces a daunting challenge: to bring strategic clarity and restore shareholder faith. It may be an unconventional hire, but BP shareholders will hope a fresh perspective is just what the doctor ordered.


Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘It would be a waste': Little appetite in Sinn Féin for Mary Lou McDonald to run for president
There is little appetite among Sinn Féin for Mary Lou McDonald to run for president as party figures move closer to the idea of backing Catherine Connolly . Sinn Féin's Ard Chomhairle has not yet considered a report consulting the party's membership on its views, and the party will not make a formal decision until September. But a number of figures in the party neither believe nor support the idea that Ms McDonald would run. 'I don't want her in the Áras,' one said. 'It would be a waste.' 'I don't see a universe where she would run.' READ MORE A number of sources within Sinn Féin said they would favour keeping Ms McDonald in the Dáil to lead the party's ongoing bid to get into government. There is a view emerging that to have Ms McDonald run for president could be read as a concession that Sinn Féin was losing its ambition for the office of an taoiseach. Ms McDonald prompted speculation on her possible candidacy for the upcoming presidential election when she declined to rule herself out of the race earlier this month. It was a marked change in position for the leader of the Opposition, who had definitively said she would not be running for president in March. It is understood Ms McDonald's recent comments may have been a recognition of a desire for her to run among party supporters, who were recently consulted on their views. Sinn Féin remains nervous about presidential elections following a bruising run for its then MEP Liadh Ní Riada in the 2018 contest. Ms Ní Riada came fourth with a little more than 6 per cent of first-preference votes. Though Ms McDonald is recognised as a very strong candidate with a massive national profile, party figures are privately reluctant to put 'our best vote getter' up for what can be a bruising and unpredictable contest. There are anxieties within the party that anything less than an overwhelming win for Ms McDonald could feed a media narrative about a dip in Sinn Féin's electoral fortunes. Sinn Féin is generally relaxed about the question of its presidential candidacy and is content to wait until as late as September to make a decision. If Sinn Féin does not run its own candidate, it is likely to support the campaign of Independent TD Ms Connolly. [ Who is Catherine Connolly? The outspoken left-wing campaigner running for president Opens in new window ] Launching her campaign earlier this month, Ms Connolly said 'I think we're going to have united Ireland very soon' but it would not be 'immediate'. This was widely perceived within the party to have been for the benefit of Sinn Féin and an open effort on the part of Ms Connolly to court the party. Few Sinn Féin TDs could remember ever having heard Ms Connolly talk about reunification in her nearly ten years in the Dáil. The independent TD did support a recent Sinn Féin motion which proposed extending voting rights to Northern Ireland. Will Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin abstain from the presidential race? Listen | 40:42


Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Planning ruling on Dublin Airport ramps sends wrong message
The planning authorities have their hands full with Dublin Airport . Between passenger caps and night flights, they have enough to be getting on with, but added to the mix is a Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) plan to knock down the now unused spiral ramps for cars next to Terminal 1. On Wednesday An Coimisiún Pleanála turned down DAA's appeal to demolish the ramps . Doing so 'would diminish the visual amenity on approach to T1 and expose the crude architectural detailing of the existing structures to the rear of the spirals, including the prominent architectural elements of the energy centre screened by the spiral car park ramps and as such would erode the character of the area', the commission said. Please. READ MORE This is not an application to demolish something like a block of Georgian buildings in the city centre. The character of the area around Terminal 1 has changed dramatically since it was built in 1972. What character it has now is that of a hotchpotch of buildings and walkways built at different times in an effort to keep a rapidly expanding airport fit for purpose. It has little resemblance to what was a beautiful, and not always full, building in the 1970s and 1980s. [ Planners just cannot win at Dublin Airport Opens in new window ] The reality is the airport is a key part of the State's infrastructure. It is bursting at the seams as it is, and has to always be in position to evolve to match the changing demands of air travel. This is a much different issue to the likes of the 32 million passenger cap. The cap has been in place since 2007. It was only in the last 18 months or so that it has become an issue, with DAA and airlines railing against a rule in place for almost two decades. An Coimisiún Pleanála sends a very clear message to any owner or manager of a large development in Ireland with this ruling: don't build anything interesting. Don't seek a memorable design or anything that might be architecturally notable. Build something as boring and generic as possible. Think Hawkins House more than Terminal 1. It might be the only way you will be allowed replace it when it has reached the end of its functional lifespan in a few decades.