logo
Warner Bros. Discovery to split into two companies, dividing cable, streaming services

Warner Bros. Discovery to split into two companies, dividing cable, streaming services

NEW YORK: Warner Bros. Discovery will split into two public companies by next year, calving off cable operations from its streaming service as the number of people "cutting the cord" brings with it a sustained upheaval in the entertainment industry.
Warner Bros. Discovery said Monday that Streaming & Studios will include Warner Bros. Television, Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group, DC Studios, HBO, and HBO Max, as well as their film and television libraries.
The Global Networks company will include CNN, TNT Sports in the U.S., and Discovery, top free-to-air channels across Europe, and digital products such as the Discovery+ streaming service and Bleacher Report.
Shares jumped more than 7% before the market opened.
Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav will serve as CEO of Streaming & Studios. Gunnar Wiedenfels, chief financial officer of Warner Bros. Discovery, will serve as CEO of Global Networks. Both will continue in their current roles until the separation.
Just days ago Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders voted to reject the 2024 pay packages of some executives, including Zaslav's pay package of more than $51 million. The vote is symbolic, as it is nonbinding.
"By operating as two distinct and optimized companies in the future, we are empowering these iconic brands with the sharper focus and strategic flexibility they need to compete most effectively in today's evolving media landscape," Zaslav said in a statement.
Warner Bros. Discovery said in December that it was implementing a restructuring plan that would have Warner Bros. Discovery serve as the parent company for two operating divisions, Global Linear Networks and Streaming & Studios. The announcement was taken as a preview of the separation of divisions that was announced Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jurassic World Rebirth dominates Indian box office, earns ₹49.3 crore in 3 days
Jurassic World Rebirth dominates Indian box office, earns ₹49.3 crore in 3 days

Hindustan Times

time21 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Jurassic World Rebirth dominates Indian box office, earns ₹49.3 crore in 3 days

Jurassic World: Rebirth box office collection: The Indian audience has given an overwhelming response to the latest instalment of the Jurassic World franchise. Universal Pictures India's (distributed by Warner Bros. Discovery) Jurassic World Rebirth has opened to an extraordinary start, with a massive box office collection of ₹49.3 crores in the Indian release weekend. (Also read: Jurassic World Rebirth first reviews: Critics hail special effects, but bemoan lack of depth in Scarlett Johansson film) Jurassic World Rebirth box office collection: Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson in a still from the film.(Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment via AP) Jurassic World Rebirth box office record Along with its breathtaking box office performance, Jurassic World Rebirth secured the biggest opening weekend for an MPA Title in 2025 (without sneaks). The film surpassed expectations and climbed up further from the predicted position of #2 biggest opening weekend for an MPA Title in 2025 (with sneaks), trailing behind Tom Cruise-starrer Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning. Meanwhile, the studio estimated that the film opened on Wednesday and earned $147.3 million in its first five days in 4,308 North American theaters. In addition, the film opened in 82 markets including China, adding $171 million to the opening total. So, the film has now taken its global, five-day launch of $318.3 million. Anchored by Scarlett Johansson, Emmy and SAG nominee Jonathan Bailey and two-time Oscar winner Mahershala Ali, this action-packed new chapter sees an extraction team venture into the most dangerous place on Earth, an island research facility for the original Jurassic Park, inhabited by the most uncontrollable giants that were left behind. Scarlett plays skilled covert operations expert Zora Bennett, contracted to lead a skilled team on a top-secret mission to secure the genetic material. Mahershala plays her team member, Duncan Kincaid, and Jonathan plays palaeontologist Dr Henry Loomis. The film is directed by Gareth Edwards and written by David Koepp. Although the film opened to mixed reviews, it has since found a broad audience.

How Sony might double down on their anti-consumer practices as PlayStation becomes the only hardware in console space
How Sony might double down on their anti-consumer practices as PlayStation becomes the only hardware in console space

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

How Sony might double down on their anti-consumer practices as PlayStation becomes the only hardware in console space

(Image via Getty Images) As Xbox pivots to a multiplatform strategy, and Nintendo carves a unique niche, PlayStation might expectedly cement its position as a primary hardware in the console market sooner. The possibility of such an unprecedented market position being enjoyed by Sony has raised some serious concerns—without any fierce competition, could Sony intensify its anti-consumer practices that have priority over profits and not player choices? Historical evidence suggests a troubling path forward. Sony might double down on anti-consumer move: What does its playbook suggest? With the company's past as a prologue, there's a pattern of Sony leveraging market control to restrict user freedom while maximizing revenue. Sony is popularly known for blocking cross-platform for many years. It was only after being under pressure, as Microsoft supported and promoted the feature, that the company gave in. As the data reveals, Sony got exposed demanding royalties from the publishers just to enable the online cross-play. It was a clear tactic for protecting the walled garden revenue. Why Sony STILL won't allow cross-play! Further, Sony has even aggressively locked users into the ecosystem. The company enforced a near-total monopoly on PlayStation Store's digital game sales, prohibiting any third-party retailers from selling the digital codes, unlike its competitors. Popularly known as Sony Tax, this move allows the company to artificially inflate prices. This was clearly evidenced during the UK £5 billion ($6.35 billion approx.) lawsuit. Therein, it was alleged that digital games cost 47% more than the PlayStation's physical copies. Additionally, Sony was even fined €13.5 million ($14.85 million approx.) previously by the French regulators. It was due to their deliberate attempt to sabotage the third-party PS4 controllers via software updates, while continuing to maintain an opaque licensing program, which stifled the entire competition. When any licensing dispute arises, like 2023's removal of the purchased Discovery content, users even lose access entirely. It even highlighted Sony's ownership fragility within the digital domain, serving as one of the most egregious examples of how Sony handheld digital purchases. The entire case was highlighted as Warner Bros. Discovery content got pulled in 2023, from user libraries, without any offered refunds. PlayStation DELETING 1200 Titles - NO REFUND 🤯 (All Discovery Content) With all being said and considered, the past trends clearly show that Sony is not the one to back down. It will continue to push its anti-consumer policies as and when it gets a chance. Especially with major competition from the console market, it's highly likely to see that such practices are repeated or, probably, soon, there will be some new way to own a monopoly. Why does PlayStation stand alone in shifting the Console landscape? Controversial Xbox Strategy: Moving Exclusive Games to PlayStation The console landscape has dramatically shifted, and the traditional console war is now dynamically crumbling. Microsoft has already made a fundamental shift in strategy, moving some major exclusives, including 'Indiana Jones and the Great Circle' and 'Sea of Thieves,' to PlayStation. The company is now heavily promoting Game Pass accessibility across varied devices—mobile and Fire TV. They are signaling to a future that is beyond pure hardware sales. Xbox now competes within an ecosystem, not just the consoles. Meanwhile, Nintendo is thriving on a unique hybrid model and the family-friendly IP. It's operating in a distinct market segment instead of directly competing for hardcore gamers. Its lower price point is a huge appeal to a broad and casual audience. While some of the franchises here, like Zelda, Mario and Animal Crossing, cater to different demographics than the cinematic and mature exclusives of PlayStation. The focus of Nintendo on affordability and portability, together with its reluctance to engage in a hardware arms race and subscription wars, means it can coexist with PlayStation instead of directly opposing it. Not to mention, as Sony continues to chase high-fidelity graphics and the live-service dominance, Nintendo thrives on nostalgia and accessibility. It ensures Nintendo remains insulated from any cutthroat competition between PlayStation and Xbox. With the changing dynamics, PlayStation now seems to be the only major player that's solely focused on publishing premium-priced and dedicated console hardware. With Xbox 'embracing the multiplatform strategy' and Nintendo 'doing its own thing', Sony now faces diminished pressure from competition, for giving priority to consumer-friendly policies. The company's dominance within traditional console hardware is now looking to be increasingly uncontested. Sooner, it might allow Sony to enforce some policies, like raising PS Plus subscription price without any addition of meaningful value. It could be riskier in the contested market. Sony's digital dominance and ownership erosion Sony's control over PlayStation Store is the cornerstone of a potential exploitation in the future. Inability to purchase digital games from third-party retailers, including CD Keys like PC platforms or Xbox, creates a captive audience. Such a monopoly would allow Sony to set high prices and resist discounting pressures. The threat extends much beyond pricing. The terms of service of the company explicitly state that users only license the digital content. They do not own it. It was starkly demonstrated as Warner Bros. Discovery content got removed from the user libraries due to expired licensing. With physical media fading, Sony now wields absolute power to revoke access to all purchased media or games, making the libraries of players inherently insecure. PlayStation Loyalty faces rising cost, subscription squeeze and proprietary lock-in Sony Is Being Sued For Trying To Monopolize Digital Games Pricing strategies employed by Sony have grown quite aggressive. The new first-party PlayStation games are now retailing at $70, while the digital versions often cost significantly more than the physical copies. It goes up to 47% more in some of the regions, as per a Dutch lawsuit that sought €1 billion ($1.17 billion approx.) in damages from Sony. The company has even restricted digital game sales to its storefront. It eliminates price competition. On Xbox, players could purchase digital codes from retailers like CDKeys or Amazon, but PlayStation instead locked buyers into Sony's inflated pricing. Note: The price hikes with the Premium tier taking a jump to $160 annually come with a little justification, especially as Sony has removed perks like PlayStation Plus Collection. Considering all of this, the price of PlayStation Plus now seems to be more strategic and merely inflationary. While it offers few tangible benefits, as compared to all past offerings, Sony now leverages the necessity of service for online play to bring in more revenue. New tiers—Essential, Extra and Premium lack compelling value, quite especially the underwhelming classic game library of Premium. It suggests that Sony's focus is on profit maximization rather than service enhancement. PlayStation is Anti Consumer Even hardware lock-ins now look like another tactic. The PlayStation Portal streaming device quite notably lacks standard Bluetooth audio support. It forces users to expensive and proprietary PlayStation Link headsets. It mirrors the costly proprietary memory cards of Vita—artificial banners that have been designed to generate accessory revenue in Sony's closed ecosystem. Sony's gamble on content control and live services comes with high manipulation tactics Sony's pursuit of live-service games has raised some red flags. While it promised many such titles, only a few materialized, and it was often laden with increased microtransactions. The launch controversy of Gran Turismo 7, where the in-game economy was altered drastically post-release to push MTX purchases after the published reviews, shows Sony's willingness to manipulate player experience just for profit. PlayStation's Greed Is OUT OF CONTROL... - Gran Turismo 7 MTX, Directors Cuts, Live Service, & MORE! Together with a lack of transparency over major first-party single-player releases, much beyond Wolverine and Spider-Man 2, the live-services push shows the future to all, where the players' engagement would get highly monetized, aggressively. All of it would be possible with Sony's control over the environment and, quite potentially, at the expense of complete game experiences. Roadmap ahead: Sony's monopoly and power bring consumer risk With the diminished competition within the traditional console hardware space, Sony now faces very little incentive to reverse its course. The current trajectory and past both point to Sony doubling down on anti-consumer practices, which can maximize its revenue in walled garden—high subscription cost, strict digital control, aggressive monetization within live-service titles and proprietary hardware dependencies. The 10 Worst Things Sony Has Ever Done While Sony offers acclaimed exclusives and powerful hardware, the path of PlayStation as a potential sole major hardware player risks prioritizing shareholder value over consumer ownership and choices. There will be a lot of vigilance required in the future from consumers and regulators. It is only then that Sony's dominance could be prevented from stifling the broader gaming ecosystem. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.

Mentorship is a privilege and a responsibility, believes Arjun Nohwar
Mentorship is a privilege and a responsibility, believes Arjun Nohwar

Mint

timea day ago

  • Mint

Mentorship is a privilege and a responsibility, believes Arjun Nohwar

Travel and sports have been constant guides for Arjun Nohwar. His father's posting with the Indian Air Force took him across the country from Pathankot to Ooty and Jamnagar to Tezpur, handing him the opportunity to soak in the diversity and culture along the way. As captain of the college basketball and tennis teams, he learned to overcome the fear of losing and the importance of team work in winning. 'Perhaps my professional journey is a reflection of my growing years, with consistent shifts and dealing with the unfamiliar. I have gained an appreciation to understand the fundamentals and pressure points of businesses relatively quickly, having strong convictions but holding on to them lightly. And most importantly, building teams and culture that drive success," says Mumbai-based Nohwar, 42, Managing Director, South Asia, Warner Bros. Discovery. Content is at the heart of what Nohwar does these days. He believes that audiences are drawn to compelling, bold and authentic narratives, and in terms of depth of stories, character development and world building, Indian content is rapidly gaining ground to be on par with the best in the world. He's observed preference for credible narrators like Manoj Bajpayee and Amish Tripathi, who relive epic tales and thrilling adventures, while kids too have taken to homegrown heroes like Chhota Bheem and Little Singham. 'Indians yearn to learn more and consume stories about our vibrant and rich legacy, which we try to embody into our characters and narratives. In the future, AI could turbocharge content ideation, generation and personalisation at scale. It would also collapse timelines of bringing new ideas to screen and could contextualise stories across cultures with locally relevant renditions. The heart of great storytelling though will always remain human," he says. Nohwar talks to Lounge about delegating work and why mentorship is both a privilege and a responsibility. Who do you consider your mentor? I have had the good fortune of having four strong mentors – my parents, Arun Maira and the late Cyrus Mistry. They have helped shape my perspective, self-belief and convictions. One major insight you worked on with your mentor's guidance. Delegation. Done right, it is delightful; done wrong, it's dreadful. Having played several team sports, I was always comfortable sharing the ball with the team, but to hand it over to them and not being on-court myself felt unnerving and had its own learning curve. This was a necessary skill set I learnt in-part by being thrust into a professional setting that necessitated delegation, but also through meaningful conversations with mentors and a willingness to seek and apply feedback. It is a skill I have grown into and one that continues to evolve. What does being a mentor mean to you? How do you mentor your colleagues at work? It is both a privilege and a responsibility, and it means committing time. It broadly involves providing consistent guidance on a specific issue or on work-life in general. I set aside time specifically for this and set up a cadence of check-ins. Outside of structured company mentorship programs, these evolve organically even if we move on to separate organisations. What is your morning schedule like? I am an early riser and typically start my day at 5.30am with a workout at the gym. It is a great way to energise for the day ahead. I then enjoy breakfast with my daughter before she heads off to school, a special part of my morning routine. I am off to the office thereafter. On weekends, I swap the desk for the fairway and spend the morning on the golf course. What are some of the productivity principles you follow that have made your professional and personal life much easier? Professionally, effective delegation with empowerment is the biggest productivity unlock. Also, controlling where to spend your time during a workday is paramount as one tends to get pulled into various meetings, many of which might be important, but not necessary. Funnily enough, this works well for my personal life as well! What is the one positive work routine you have developed during the pandemic? Start early and wind up early. Except for a few must-take late night calls with the US, I have become more disciplined with my work hours. This has helped optimise my meeting selections, focussing 80% of my time on needle-moving tasks and 20% on the procedural, and has definitely helped me get more efficient and productive. Any book or podcast you would recommend about mentorship and growth? There are several but the one I enjoy the most are Lex Friedman's podcasts where he spends hours in conversation with a wide array of experts, thinkers and leaders on fascinating topics. How do you unwind? Do you pursue any serious hobbies? When I am not at work or with family I am usually at the golf course. The sport is my primary passion and a reliable release. It really helps me unwind, except when I am playing it competitively! 'Monday Motivation' is a series in which business leaders discuss their mentors and their work ethics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store