Oklahoma Sooners 2025 preview: Wide receivers poised for a big season
The top five WRs who were projected to get the most snaps and have the biggest impact last year all missed most or all of the 2024 season. Of those five players, Nic Anderson, Andrel Anthony and Jalil Farooq all transferred elsewhere this offseason, while Deion Burks and Jayden Gibson stayed put in Norman.
The players that were forced to step up couldn't fill those big shoes, and plenty of them have moved on as well. Backups like Brenen Thompson, J.J. Hester, and Jaquaize Pettaway hit the portal to go elsewhere.
Needless to say, wide receivers coach Emmett Jones' room needed a clean bill of health and a rebuild.
The Sooners brought in plenty of new faces at WR in the portal, but how will they fit in along with the returners on the depth chart come late-August? That's what we'll attempt to unpack today.
In new offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle's Air Raid offense, great wide receiver play will be paramount. Sooner fans are familiar with the Air Raid, and with seeing four, or even five wideouts on the field at the same time. However, there will also be the presence of the tight end position when the Sooners take the field this fall, so we'll only include three WRs on the depth chart to begin the season.
Quarterback
Running Back
Offensive Line
Tight End
X-Wide Receiver
Starter: Javonnie Gibson
Javonnie Gibson is one of Jones' newcomers via the portal in 2025. Of the portal additions, he was the one who popped the most in spring football, before he broke his leg late in the spring. If he's healthy when the season begins, he probably did enough in his abbreviated spring to earn the starting X-WR spot.
Backups: JerMichael Carter, Zion Kearney
JerMichael Carter was a late offseason portal add for the coaching staff after Gibson broke his leg. He also provides size in the passing game. Zion Kearney returns for his sophomore season after getting extended playing time in 2024. With Gibson's status still up in the air, there are a lot of directions Jones could go at X-WR. Sophomore Ivan Carreon is another name to watch after a nice Armed Forces Bowl performance against Navy, as is true freshman Manny Choice.
Z-Wide Receiver
Starter: Jayden Gibson
Jayden Gibson didn't play at all last year due to injury. If he's healthy this season, he could have a significant impact for the Sooners. He got plenty of run in this spot in 2023 after Andrel Anthony got hurt, and he played well down the stretch of OU's 10-win season. Here's hoping both Gibsons are ready to go for Week 1
Backups: Elijah Thomas, Keontez Lewis
Elijah Thomas is a true freshman from the 2025 recruiting class who has turned heads since arriving on campus. The Sooners got burned when relying on first-year players a season ago, so they hope Thomas is different. Keontez Lewis is another portal addition that will push for playing time, especially if there are injuries to other wide receivers. Once again, it's hard to tell what direction Jones goes here, considering the injury status of Gibson. Keep your eye on Josiah Martin and Zion Ragins, who both bring plenty of speed to the field.
Slot Wide Receiver
Starter: Deion Burks
Deion Burks is the closest thing OU has to a lock at wide receiver. If he's healthy, he'll be one of the featured targets for Arbuckle's system. He was Oklahoma's best wide receiver last season. Unfortunately, he didn't play much due to injury. He came back for one more shot to impress NFL scouts, but to do that, you have to be on the field, not on the sidelines.
Backups: Isaiah Sategna, Jacob Jordan
Isaiah Sategna is another portal addition that Jones brought in this offseason. He'll help out in the return game and offers another speedy option when Burks is off the field. Jacob Jordan was one of the few players the Sooners had on the field last year who could get open with any consistency. Guys like that typically find their way into the action.
Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Where does Gaylord Family Oklahoma Memorial Stadium rank among SEC Stadiums?
The Oklahoma Sooners enter their second season in the Southeastern Conference in 2025. After a long run spent dominating the Big 12 Conference, it's safe to say OU is still adjusting to life in its new league. One of the many adjustments the program is making is the increased stadium capacities and rowdy atmospheres that college football's premier conference has to offer. In the Big 12, the Sooners were the toughest place to play in the conference. They had one of the highest capacities, and teams knew they had to play a nearly flawless game if they were going to come to Norman and upset Oklahoma. However, as great as OU's home field advantage is, just about every atmosphere in the SEC is a tough one to play in. The Sooners got an up-close look at places like Auburn, Ole Miss, Missouri, and LSU in 2024, and they'll visit South Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama this year. Blake Toppmeyer, who covers college football for USA TODAY Sports, decided to rank each SEC football stadium, taking a look at the many unique atmospheres in the nation's best league. Toppmeyer ranked Gaylord Family - Oklahoma Memorial Stadium as the ninth-best stadium in the SEC. That puts Oklahoma in the bottom half of the league, but ahead of such schools as Texas, Arkansas and Ole Miss. Oklahoma's stadium fits neatly into the SEC tapestry, and the Sooner Schooner cruising the field paints a scene fit for the nation's premier football conference. With a capacity of 80,126, the 'Palace on the Prairie' doesn't match the SEC's top colossuses, but it holds its own. - Toppmeyer, USA TODAY Sports. The Sooners may not be able to match other SEC schools when it comes to stadium capacity, as many stadiums have over 100,000 seats. While Oklahoma has a passionate fan base, the insanity of a place like LSU during a night game isn't necessarily happening in Norman. However, OU has a football pedigree that almost no other school in all of college football can match. The Sooners are one of the truest blue bloods in the sport. With time in the SEC, perhaps Oklahoma can begin to acclimate and rise closer to the top of similar lists in the future. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
MLB Draft Tracker 2025: Sooner State shines on first day of the draft
The first day of the Major League Baseball Draft was a good one for Sooners. Sunday proved it was a special year to be a baseball player from the Sooner State. The first day of the Major League Baseball Draft concluded Sunday night with several Oklahomans selected, including No. 1 overall pick Eli Willits from Fort Cobb-Broxton High School. Willits is the younger brother of Sooners infielder Jaxon Willits and son of ex-MLB outfielder and ex-Sooners outfielder Reggie Willits. Willits was the first of a number of players with ties to Oklahoma who were selected by MLB clubs. Most of those taken on Sunday will ultimately sign with their professional teams. However, any could choose to continue or, in the case of high-schoolers selected, start their collegiate careers. Odds are long that the Witherspoon brothers will return to Norman. Kyson Witherspoon went in the top 15, and his elder brother Malachi was taken in the second round. Their catcher, Easton Carmichael, joined them as one of the OU baseball players taken on the first day. Here's a look at all the players with Oklahoma ties who have been taken in the Draft. Note: the list will update periodically as the draft continues on Monday. Eli Willits, shortstop - Fort Cobb-Broxton High School Round 1, Pick 1 - Washington Nationals Willits is the third youngest player ever taken No. 1 overall behind only Ken Griffy Jr. in 1987 and Tim Foli in 1968. Nationals general manager Mike DeBartolo said Willits ranked as both the best hitter and the best fielder in the draft by Washington's scouts. The son of former MLB outfielder Reggie Willits, Eli signed with the Sooners earlier this year, but almost certainly won't make it to Norman after his selection. *Ethan Holliday, shortstop - Stillwater High School Round 1, Pick 4 - Colorado Rockies Some prognosticators had Holliday, the son of former MLB outfielder Matt Holliday, as the possible No. 1 overall selection. Instead, Holliday fell to Colorado, where Matt Holliday broke out during his time in the bigs, at pick No. 4. Holliday projects as having more power than Willits but not as consistent a bat. Though not an Oklahoma commit, Holliday's selection is a sign that America's Pasttime is alive and well in the State of Oklahoma. Kyson Witherspoon, pitcher - University of Oklahoma Round 1, Pick 15 - Boston Red Sox Kyson Witherspoon was the first collegiate right-handed pitcher taken in the draft and ultimately landed about where projections had him, in the middle of the first round. Kyson Witherspoon was stellar for the Sooners in 2025, racking up 124 strikeouts against just 23 walks over 95 innings. With his selection, Kyson Witherspoon became the first picher taken by the Red Sox in the first round since Tanner Houck in 2017. Malachi Witherspoon, pitcher - University of Oklahoma Round 2, Pick 62 - Detroit Tigers Malachi Witherspoon's selection in the second round came as a surprise to most projections. rated him the 121st prospect in the draft and FanGrafs tabbed him at No. 98. The Tigers took him a whole round, or two, above expectation. Like Kyson Witherspoon, Malachi throws hard, but will need to work on command after walking 32 batters in 74 1/3 innings last year with the Sooners. Easton Carmichael, catcher - University of Oklahoma Round 3, Pick 82 - Pittsburgh Pirates Carmichael landed around expectations after being rated as the 93rd-ranked prospect in the draft by A three-year starter at catcher, Carmichael will leave OU ranked in the top 10 in several hitting categories. The native Texan was the fourth collegiate catcher taken on the day.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
EA College Football 26 Review: The Good, The Bad And The Bottom Line
EA College Football 26 EA College Football 26 dropped this past week on early access and full retail. I've been putting the game through the paces as much as time would allow for the past three days, and I'm mostly pleased with what I see, feel, and hear. There are 10 key points about the new title. Here's what EA has presented, along with my thoughts on each new or improved feature and a few takes. Here's the good, the bad, and the bottom line on EA College Football Football 25 captured the vibe of its sport better than any sports game ever created, and this year's game tops that. CF 26 brings deeper immersion with 34 new mascots, 88 band songs, unique runouts, and stadium traditions like the Sooner Schooner and Cockaboose. The pageantry and detail are augmented by the overall beauty of the game. I'm not overselling here—College Football 26 is the most visually attractive sports video game ever made. Player models, grass, crowd, the dynamic lighting (it's a real thing), you name it. All of it is real coaches takes this team/school authenticity thing to another level. I think EA did a solid job with most of the coach likenesses, though there are a few that still need to be updated over the course of the season. As for the signature playcalling styles, I need to see a few more games vs. the CPU to give a definitive statement, but so far, I've had Michigan try to cram the ball down my Illinois Fighting Illini's throat with the run game and seen a bit of an aerial assault from the Texas Tech Red Raiders, so that checks out. I love the new depth with recruiting pipelines and unlockable abilities that affect Dynasty outcomes. Having the recruiting interactions happen with real coaches deepens the playbooks are bottomless. There are 2,800+ plays and 45 new formations. Each team's handcrafted playbooks lean into the concept of real-life tendencies. I've only used three teams so far, but I can see the difference in playbooks. While I see the larger playbooks, I'll say this is one of the features that was a bit oversold. Maybe it'll be a quality-of-life feature, but over the course of the review period, it was more of a slight nod than a true head bop.I felt like I could see some differences in the way older quarterbacks played compared to freshmen and other underclassmen. I cannot vouch for shorter QBs struggling with sightlines, but that's likely going to take some time to compare and was trying to do away with the INTs that come from defenders who seemingly have their eyes away from the ball, only to snap into awareness in time to snag a pass out of the sky. In this year's game, defenders won't make INTs unless they're looking at the ball. The idea was to reduce cheap turnovers and to increase fairness. What I've seen through my time with the game is defenders behaving blindly and dropping a ton of balls that should have been picks. This is a fixable issue that doesn't ruin the experience, but I'm not sure this is working as Wear and Tear concept was one of my favorite additions to sports video games in 2024. I love to see EA building on it and also seeing the concept making its way to Madden this year. This year, the damage is supposed to be based on physics. I am enjoying this, and I can see as my Dynasty moves along it will become a bigger factor in my there was a primary criticism of College Football 25, it was that it was nearly impossible to defend in the wide-open game. It made for some exciting plays and contests, but EA is right to try and level the playing field. This year, route commits, zone depth changes, block steering, and stunts/twists now give defenders real-time tools to counter spam tactics. Also, ballhandlers aren't as impossible to line up for a tackle or hit. However, the stiff arm for some running backs has the power of Mjölnir. That's already been a topic of discussion in the game's community. This YouTube Short highlights it. I think it'll get nerfed in an upcoming patch. Once that happens, we may have a bit more features include formation subs, 160 trophies to chase, protected rivalries, and the ability to break NCAA records dating back to 1869. CFB 26 also introduces 'Dynamic Dealbreakers' that evolve player needs, 2,000 annual transfers, and revamped recruiting with proximity-based visit costs. The recruiting should be the benchmark for all forthcoming recruiting and free-agency engines in sports video games. To put it plain, Dynasty Mode is mostly fantastic as EA even expanded the already strong Team Builder feature to improve team creation. That said, you still can't create or edit players on existing schools. I understand the caution and limitation, but it doesn't change the fact that this reality creates a lesser experience for true sandbox players.I applaud EA's approach to gamify the high school portion without having users play through full prep games. It's more mission-based, and the quick feedback you get from schools makes it move at a solid pace. You can even recreate your high school while you traverse through the journey of being signed on National Signing Day. I enjoyed RTG a lot, including the varying has done decently well with CUT, but there are two major issues. I like sports collector modes that don't break their sport in the name of increasing power. When that happens, it creates a no-rules, all-out dash for power cards that ultimately gets ridiculous about six months after release. I'm not a microtransaction hater. Like it or not, it's how developer studios stay afloat, devs keep their jobs, and it funds new projects. Gamers benefit from them, even though they don't realize it. So this isn't a slap at the spending aspect of CUT. It's more about the mode needing a safe space that is more governed by rules that keeps things from always being about pure power. The second issue is EA's insistence on keeping legends locked exclusively in Ultimate Team. I cannot tell you how irrational that is from a holistic standpoint. Perhaps higher-ups believe that allowing fans to unlock—or even purchase—the legends will cost them money. I contend it will open up a new revenue stream that they're not currently collecting. Some franchise mode fans would love to simply buy a legends pack that unlocks them for use in the base game. They would happily fork over $19.99 for the legends. If we're talking about a hardcore franchise mode gamer, chances are they aren't setting foot in Ultimate Team anyway. So as it is, you're not getting anything from them beyond the base price for the Standard Edition. If the MVP and Digital Deluxe Editions also included legends unlocked for base game and franchise mode, I believe EA would see an increase in pre-orders above their already strong total—and it wouldn't negatively impact spend in Ultimate Team. But I digress. It's a philosophical pattern that EA Sports games follow, and I believe it's an annual misstep that also creates unnecessary hostility toward Ultimate Team. The RTCF flow is quick and exciting. Opponent tendencies are now visible before the game, and away games apply pressure that affects performance and point totals. It all flows into the pageantry and presentation, but the impact on gameplay is a nice addition. EA College Football 26 won't be judged as softly as last year's game because fans aren't simply fired up to have college football back. That said, EA's dev team hasn't rested on its success, and they've delivered a strong follow-up with noteworthy improvements. The issues are mostly out of the dev's hands and based on the handling of legends or legalities that limit in-game customization.
