
Political leadership is all about respecting and honouring conscientious well-wishers
Leadershipis an enduring engagement, not an entitlement, continuous dialogue with people, place, and purpose. Indian democracy has lasted largely due to the collective consciousness and moral seriousness of previous and our generations. Over time, political leadership has become a fascination in transactional politics, drowned in noise, and distanced from true distinction. The political approach of large number of leaders is in gaining power and influence for indiscriminate personal gain or specific benefits. This decline of passion and spirit that once fueled ideology-driven movements, stems from erosion of values and weakening sense of accountability.
Leaders, who are consistently available, genuinely accessible, and possess the sacred capacity to sincerely listen to conscientious well-wishers have become a rare breed. Most political leaders, in power or not, surround themselves with 'yes-men' and isolate the wise, which is a grave, even suicidal, mistake. The soul of political leadership committed to democratic spirit, is found in the ability to touch minds, move emotions, and change lives. Vision, dedication, and relentless assurance to people-first approach is leadership.
Leaders define, design, and deliver meaningful thought courses. Leadership in its highest form is not flamboyant, but quiet, persistent, and purposeful. It stands tall when storms hit but knows when to bow in humility. It is not charisma but character, not slogans but service, not optics but outcomes. Leaders walk that extra mile to consult, to confront facts, and to transcend personal agendas.
As observed by the Supreme Court on July 14, 2025, that the 'Freedom of Expression' was being 'Abused,' most leaders commit 'Extreme Suicidal Mistake' by indiscriminately deploying 'Social Media Warriors' who forget that it is not color of the shirt but wisdom of the heart that matters, before abusing and snubbing meaningful critics, often with filthy language.
A real skill and challenge for a sincere leader is discipline and accountability, especially when party's broad agenda is disseminated to people. It must be 'Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound (SMART).' Evading execution after gaining power, or avoiding a responsive role in opposition, is betrayal of leadership.
A true leader need not always head the government, but must be capable of leading the shadow government, as in the case of United Kingdom. Leadership is not about impressing but about groundwork, and certainly not about hiding when circumstances demand. A good leader should stand steadfast, speak truthfully and act in a transparent manner.
Political decision-making is no longer a collective intellectual process or shaped by inner-party democracy and shared wisdom. The diktat of a single person is consensus these days. Dissent is branded as scrupulous disloyalty. Civility has been replaced with contempt, patience with provocation, and humility with hubris, a trait of 'Overconfident Pride combined with Arrogance.' The moral compass of leadership is without needles.
Only leaders who are 'available, accessible and open to consultation' can make a huge difference.
BJP State president Naraparaju Ramchander Rao has put it rightly, 'Intellectuals possess moral and analytical clarity needed to inform the public, raise awareness and counter misinformation.'
A great leader believes that failure is only a suspended success. Rudyard Kipling in his 'IF Poem' wrote 'Triumph and disaster the two impostors represent success and failure' and both can be deceptive'.
Though Alexandre Dumas said, 'Nothing succeeds like success', a visionary leader embraces failure as the crucible of growth. Leadership is not about convenience, but about consequence, conscience, and character.
Transformative frameworks and critical qualities that define true leadership, set forth by Jim Collins in his book 'Good to Great' are worth absorbing by any leader.
Such 'level five' Leaders embrace brutal facts, build teams based on 'first who, then what,' and drive transformation through discipline and vision. With such qualities they channel ambition into legacy. Such Leaders are desperately required. The journey from good to great does not occur overnight. It demands deliberate nurturing of strategic depth, consistent values, adaptability, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths. It calls for visionary (political) leadership, cultivating a culture of discipline.
An effective leader with vision, humility, passion, and people-driven clarity will be capable of inspiring change.
As my illustrious political science Professor late VS Murthy told me, 'Task accomplishment and Target Fulfilment' is more important to them, than conforming to orthodox rules. Only such a leader treats every individual with respect. Their words are not theatrics but repositories of evidence, reasoning, literary finesse, and multilingual richness, coupled with subtle humor. When they communicate it will be backed with intensive memory power. They are highly capable of multitasking, impromptu responses, and switch-tasking with strategic clarity.
Equally important for a true leader is the attitude of 'Treating politics as a task but not a game' as often put by Telangana's first chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao. True leaders are also to be stewards of public trust, and should know when to be firm, to be flexible, and to say, 'Thus far, and no further' but unambiguously with a high degree of rationale. Fearlessly walking an extra mile, if that path ensures justice or secures progress, is what leadership is all about and not shying away from criticism or confrontation. Strategic political acumen enables leaders to convert vulnerabilities into strengths.
Leaders must embody statesmanship, while political leadership should serve as a living lesson, a daily example, and a moral compass for generations, rooted in principles, driven by people and dedicated to posterity.
The era of modest and principled political leaders who lived simply and thought greatly is a bygone memory. Such leaders became Chief Ministers, Speakers, Presidents, and Prime Ministers not because they sought power, but because power trusted them. Degeneration in politics is a typical phenomenon, a feeling of deep sadness, shock, and worry. Ultimately, political leadership is not about rising to power but about raising the people; not about winning elections but winning hearts even after losing. It is about the courage to be right, the humbleness to listen and the wisdom to act.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Will approach court if assent not given to establish college in Kalaignar's name: Higher Education Minister
The Tamil Nadu government will seek legal recourse, if necessary, to obtain the Governor's assent to a resolution passed in the Assembly to establish a college in memory of former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi in Kumbakonam, Higher Education Minister Govi. Chezhiaan said here on Monday. Speaking at a book release event at his official residence, Mr. Chezhiaan stated that he and the Higher Education Secretary had sought an appointment with the Governor to discuss this issue but did not receive a response. 'If the assent is not given soon, the CM has already stated that we will approach the court and seek assent,' he told reporters. He stated that the State government had attempted to contact the Governor by phone and had also written to him, but there was no response. 'The reason is he squirms when he hears the name of Kalaignar, or Tamil or Semmozhi. The people of Tamil Nadu know about this trait well.' He recalled that the Supreme Court had already laid down guidelines for the Governor's actions based on a case filed by the Tamil Nadu government.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
MUDA Case: SC Ruling Brings Relief For Siddaramaiah Amid Power-Sharing Dispute With Shivakumar
The order, which criticised the ED for being used in political battles, has landed in CM Siddaramaiah's favour at a time when his hold over the CM's chair was being questioned The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Karnataka High Court's ruling, which quashed the ED's plea to issue notices and summon Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's wife BM Parvathi in the MUDA land allotment case, has brought temporary legal relief and fresh political momentum. For Siddaramaiah, the timing could not have been more strategic. The pressure from his deputy DK Shivakumar's camp to honour an 'unwritten" power-sharing formula has been intense. The Supreme Court order, which criticised the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for being used in political battles, has landed squarely in Siddaramaiah's favour, strengthening his position just when his hold over the chief minister's chair was being questioned. 'This is a shot in the arm. The timing couldn't be better," said a close aide of Siddaramaiah, as talk of a mid-term transfer of power to Shivakumar resurfaced in party circles. At the heart of the controversy is the decision to allot 14 sites worth Rs 56 crore to BM Parvathi as compensation for land inherited from her family and acquired by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Although this decision was made during the BJP's tenure, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India flagged procedural irregularities, opening the door for political attacks. The issue escalated when the ED entered the scene, summoning Parvathi and minister Byrathi Suresh under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). This brought the fight to the chief minister's doorstep, marking the first time a member of his family was directly in the spotlight. For someone who has built his reputation on a clean image without corruption charges, the MUDA case damaged his image. Even within the Congress, there were murmurs about whether he had slipped. The Supreme Court, however, firmly dismissed the ED's appeal while the Chief Justice of India (CJI) made a blunt remark: 'Let political battles be fought amongst the electorate. Why are you being used for it?" Siddaramaiah called it the 'slap of justice" on the face of the BJP and accused the Centre of engineering a political vendetta. The emotional tone of his response, that the case caused 'immense mental distress" to his family, was also politically calculated. He is once again positioning himself as the Congress CM who can stare down the BJP. A senior Congress leader, on condition of anonymity, said: 'He's the only one who can look Modi in the eye and say what he wants. The CBI and ED can't touch him as he has remained non-corrupt, and this verdict reinforces that image. He'll use this to raise his profile in the state as well as nationally." In Delhi, the messaging has been equally clear. At the recent Congress OBC Advisory Council meeting in Bengaluru, Siddaramaiah not only presided but did so with the weight of someone not planning to exit. Party chief Mallikarjun Kharge and senior Congress leaders pronounced Siddaramaiah as the CM, while insiders said that he made it clear to the high command, during the closed-door meetings, that he will abide by their decision but hopes to finish his five-year term. The Shivakumar factor, however, remains unresolved. What will be the stance when the high command asks Siddaramaiah to hand over the reins to his current deputy? At a Sadhana Samavesha event in Mysuru, Siddaramaiah's refusal to even name his deputy on stage raised eyebrows and confirmed what many have suspected. When reminded by a party worker to include Shivakumar's name in his speech, he said: 'DK Shivakumar is in Bengaluru and not on stage. We only welcome those present here. We cannot extend greetings to someone sitting at home." It wasn't just irritation. It was a signal. With pressure building from Shivakumar's supporters and talk of rotation agreements resurfacing, Siddaramaiah's very public rebuke made one thing clear: he's not going anywhere. The MUDA case had put Siddaramaiah in a tight spot, not just as CM, but on a personal level. It also came at a time when he took over the reins as the Congress CM for the second time, particularly as a strong OBC leader alongside Kharge. The fact that it involved his wife, even if the land was later returned, complicated the narrative and the 'clean record" he had spent years cultivating. 'The best part about Siddaramaiah is his moral clarity. He's never wavered from his support for marginalised communities and backward classes. He represents a voice that has long been ignored and maligned," said political analyst Harish Ramaswamy. 'Unlike many OBC leaders, Lalu and others, who've been tainted by scams, Siddaramaiah has largely kept a clean image. That's what gives him the moral strength to challenge even PM Modi." Ramaswamy said in the MUDA case, too, his wife should have avoided the allotment altogether. 'That is one visible weak spot. When I've met him, even in his own home, it's clear that he keeps his wife away from public life. So, this case came as a surprise. Fourteen sites allotted to her raised questions. It perplexed many," he said. So, will the Supreme Court ruling help him in the long run? It looks like. 'It definitely will. He's the kind of leader who knows how to use a moment like this. He speaks his mind, takes on the RSS and BJP openly, and nobody can intimidate him, not the CBI, not any agency, as he prides himself on his clean, corruption-free image," he added. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : muda scam Siddaramaiah view comments Location : Bengaluru, India, India First Published: July 22, 2025, 00:58 IST News politics MUDA Case: SC Ruling Brings Relief For Siddaramaiah Amid Power-Sharing Dispute With Shivakumar Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Why our flag matters
Every country has a flag, but few flags have a story as powerful, as emotional, and as deeply symbolic as India's. The Indian national flag, also known as the Tiranga (which means "tricolour" in Hindi), is not just a piece of fabric fluttering in the wind. It is a symbol of sacrifice, unity, struggle, and freedom — woven together by history and the dreams of a nation. Long before independence, India had no official national flag. During British rule, flags represented the British Empire, not the people of India. But as the freedom movement gained strength in the early 20th century, leaders began to imagine a flag that could represent the Indian people. One of the earliest versions was created in 1906, with three horizontal bands of green, yellow, and red. Later, other versions followed, reflecting different ideas and political movements. The flag we know today began to take shape in 1921. A young man named Pingali Venkayya, a freedom fighter and designer from Andhra Pradesh, proposed a two-colour flag — red and green — to represent the two major communities of India. Mahatma Gandhi supported the idea but suggested adding a white band to represent other communities and peace, and a spinning wheel or "charkha" in the centre to represent India's self-reliance. This version became widely accepted among Indian nationalists, but it was still not official. When India gained independence from British rule on 15 August 1947, a final version of the flag was adopted. The spinning wheel was replaced with the Ashoka Chakra, a navy blue wheel with 24 spokes, taken from the Lion Capital of Ashoka, an ancient sculpture from 3rd century BCE. The modern Indian flag consists of three horizontal stripes: saffron at the top, white in the middle, and green at the bottom. Each colour has a deep meaning. Saffron symbolises courage and sacrifice. White stands for peace and truth. Green represents faith, fertility, and the land's rich greenery. The Ashoka Chakra in the centre is a symbol of the eternal wheel of law and progress. Its 24 spokes represent 24 qualities such as patience, courage, kindness, and selflessness. But the Indian flag is not just about design and colour. It is about the emotions it stirs in people's hearts. It reminds millions of Indians of the long, painful struggle for independence. It honours those who sacrificed their lives for the country. And it unites over a billion people, across languages, religions, and regions, under a common identity. There are also very specific rules about how the Indian flag should be displayed. The Flag Code of India governs everything from the size of the flag to how and when it can be hoisted. For many years, only government buildings and institutions were allowed to fly the national flag. But in 2002, the rules changed, and now any Indian citizen can proudly hoist the flag, provided they follow the guidelines with respect and dignity. The flag is also made in a special way. It must be made of khadi, a hand-spun and handwoven cloth promoted by Gandhi during the freedom movement. The production of the flag is strictly controlled, and only one organisation, the Karnataka Khadi Gramodyoga Samyukta Sangha in Hubballi, is officially authorised to manufacture the Indian national flag. The Indian flag has flown high in many historic moments. It was hoisted on 15 August 1947 as the country celebrated its first day of independence. It fluttered at the top of Mount Everest with Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary in 1953. It soared into space with Rakesh Sharma, the first Indian in space, in 1984. It stands tall in international sports arenas, embassies around the world, and on the uniforms of Indian soldiers. But it's not just about big events. The flag is part of everyday life in India. On Republic Day and Independence Day, schools, homes, and public buildings are decorated with tricolours. Children sing the national anthem and proudly wear flag pins. The Tiranga is printed on kites, sweets, clothes, and even painted on faces — a celebration of identity, freedom, and pride. For young Indians, the flag is a reminder of the past and a hope for the future. It tells the story of how people came together to build a nation. Spinning wheel The original design proposed by Mahatma Gandhi in 1921 featured a charkha (spinning wheel) at the centre to symbolise self-reliance. It was later replaced by the Ashoka Chakra to represent progress and dharma. Three colours aren't just about religion Saffron stands for courage and sacrifice, white for truth and peace, and green for growth and fertility. The flag was deliberately designed to represent ideals, not religions. Precise geometry The flag's proportions are always 3:2 (length to height), and the Ashoka Chakra has 24 equally spaced spokes — representing 24 hours in a day and the timeless wheel of law. Flag code India has an official Flag Code that governs how the flag must be made, displayed, and disposed of — from public buildings to school parades. A woman helped design the first version Bhikaji Cama, a prominent freedom fighter, was the first to unfurl a version of the Indian flag in 1907. It looked different from today's flag and included symbols like the sun and crescent — a symbol of unity in diversity long before independence.