Make general strike on July 9 a success, leaders of All Party Trade Unions urge people
Leaders of All Party Tade Unions called upon workers and the general public to make the proposed All India general strike on July 9, a success. A meeting of the All Party Trade Unions was held at the CITU Office at Jagadamba Junction here on Tuesday.
Condemning the 'pro-corporate' and 'anti-worker' policies of the Union government, the speakers alleged that 29 labour laws were amended and four labour codes were brought out to the detriment of the workers. They said, if these labour codes were implemented, the workers would lose their right to strike, right to form a trade union and their primary right to bargain for a fair wage.
They noted that the general strike was being held to demand fixation of minimum wage for workers at ₹26,000, withdrawal of the plan to privatise Visakhapatnam Steel Plant(VSP), taking back the 4,000 contract workers, who were terminated from service in VSP, against privatisation of public sector LIC, banks, ports and airports, oil PSUs, defence, space and mines. They also sought bringing out a comprehensive Act to provide PF, ESI and insurance to unorganised sector workers like auto drivers, muta workers, pushcart vendors and motor workers. They also demanded filling up of the vacancies in government and public sector organisations. The speakers demanded that the minimum pension for EPS pensioners be fixed at ₹9,000 and a comprehensive Act be brought out to protect the interests of domestic workers.
They said that as a run up to the general strike, from June 25 to 30, workers would distribute pamphlets at their work spots and in residential colonies to create awareness among the general public on the need to make the strike a success. Gate meetings would be held at all industries from July 1 to 4. A bike rally would be held in the city on July 5, and in the industrial area on July 7. A rally would be held from Dondaparthy to the Gandhi statue, near GVMC, where a public meeting would be held on July 9.
A poster on the All India General Strike on July 9 was released on the occasion. AITUC district president M. Manmadha Rao, INTUC district secretary Eswara Rao, CFTUI All India president N. Kanaka Rao, IFTUI State secretary M. Venkateswarlu, APFTU district secretary K. Deva, Public Sector Coordination Committee convener K.M. Srinivas, co-conveners Jyothiswara Rao and Kumara Mangalam, and AITUC senior leader Sk. Rahaman were among those who participated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The crisis before the crisis — how a failing economy was one of the triggers for the Emergency
While a swelling Opposition campaign and an Allahabad High Court order setting aside Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's election to the Lok Sabha in 1971 were the immediate trigger for the imposition of Emergency, trouble had been brewing for the better part of a decade in the non-political sphere. After a strong 1963-64 and 1964-65, over which GDP growth averaged 6.7%, the Indian economy was hit by a phenomenon not seen in 75 years of official data — two consecutive years of decline in overall economic activity. In 1965-66, India's GDP shrunk by 2.6%. This was followed by a 0.1% decline in 1966-67. It was because of another rare occurrence — consecutive droughts. According to a 2005 India Meteorological Department paper, the previous 130 years had only seen one such other case, in 1904 and 1905. Inflation, as a result, shot up to nearly 16% in 1966-67. The twin droughts came at a time when India was already a huge importer of foodgrain. With grain output crushed by a fifth, India leaned heavily on the US's PL-480 scheme for grain – under which the US distributed foreign food aid – and was soon the programme's biggest beneficiary. Not helping matters was the tension with Pakistan, with the Budget for 1965-66 estimating that of the total revenue expenditure of Rs 2,116 crore, Rs 749 crore or roughly 35% would be spent on defence services. 'With two wars (1962 and 1965), a series of poor harvests including two droughts, and an unstable external environment, the 1960s were years of severe strain for the Indian economy,' as per the second volume of the History of The Reserve Bank of India (RBI). India also required significant financial assistance from Western countries and the World Bank. As its current account deficit rose to 3.7% of GDP in 1966-67 and foreign exchange reserves declined, there were concerns about how India would meet its external debt repayments. In June 1966 — just a few months after taking over as PM – Mrs Gandhi had already approved the devaluation of the rupee by 36.5%, to Rs 7.50 per dollar from Rs 4.76 per dollar. In the 10 years starting 1965-66, the economy averaged just 2.6% growth. The share of the biggest employer, agriculture, in India's GDP fell to 31.5% in 1966-67 from over 40% a decade ago. Come 1974-75, agriculture's share had changed little, being about 31.1%, while the share of manufacturing had edged up by 60 basis points to 13.8%. To say that Mrs Gandhi inherited a flailing economy in January 1966 would be an understatement. But the years that followed were not easy either, with her government's first challenge being the peasant movement in Naxalbari, which hit its peak in May 1967. While growth somewhat recovered in the late 1960s and averaged 5.7% in the four years ending 1970-71, by then Mrs Gandhi, having survived a split in the Congress, had nationalised banks, abolished privy purses and privileges and hiked income tax rates to above 90%. Her government had also approved a licence for her son Sanjay Gandhi to manufacture an 'Indian Volkswagen'. Amid all the tumult, Indira announced that the next general elections would be held a year early, in 1971. 'The millions who demand food, shelter, and jobs are pressing for action. Power in a democracy resides with the people. That is why we have decided to go to our people and seek a fresh mandate from them,' she said in December 1970 in a broadcast to the nation. As the Opposition came up with the slogan 'Indira Hatao', she countered with 'Garibi Hatao (remove poverty)'. While this worked, the tide was already turning before an old foe struck again – India saw another drought in 1972. 'As famine loomed in rural India, Indira's slogan 'Garibi Hatao'…came back to haunt her. She told her growing chorus of critics that poverty could not be eradicated overnight. They said she was not removing poverty; she was removing the poor,' American biographer Katherine Frank wrote in her 2001 book Indira: The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi. The domestic unrest was fuelled further by the 1973 oil crisis, which pushed up wholesale inflation to more than 20%. The government responded by cutting expenditure and enforcing mandatory savings on salaries. Corruption was rife, factories shut down, and strikes became regular. Pressure further increased against the Indira Gandhi government with the successful Navnirman Andolan in Gujarat and a 1974 Railway strike led by George Fernandes, then president of the All India Railwaymen's Federation. The rail strike was cited by Mrs Gandhi as an attempt by the Opposition to paralyse the country for political gains. It was crushed with wide-scale firings and evictions from staff quarters, among other measures. However, the end was nigh. June 12, 1975, was a particularly difficult day for Indira. First, her confidant and then Ambassador to the Soviet Union, D P Dhar, died in hospital. Then came the results of the Gujarat Assembly elections, with a united Opposition under the Janata Morcha defeating the Congress. Finally, in the afternoon, came the Allahabad High Court order. Less than two weeks later, the Emergency was declared.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Indira Gandhi endgame: What impelled her to call elections?
Prodipto Ghosh has vivid recollection of the evening of January 18, 1977. He was listening to the radio when he heard Indira Gandhi announce that fresh general elections will be held in March that year. The then 28-year-old additional district magistrate (ADM) in South Delhi, Ghosh had gone through a tumultuous period during the Emergency, uneasy about several detentions he had to carry out. That evening's broadcast came as a huge relief to him – also as a surprise, since at the local administration level, no one had any inkling of Mrs Gandhi's move. In the higher echelons of power though, the buzz of the Emergency being relaxed had been doing the rounds. Kuldip Nayar, who was then an editor with The Indian Express, had just two days ago broken a story in the paper, published under the headline 'Lok Sabha elections likely in March'. 'The Indian Express took a massive risk by publishing it,' remembers Devsagar Singh, 76, who was the university beat reporter at the Express at that time. Nayar, who had got a tip-off from a Punjab Police officer, was aware of the consequence – that he might be again sent to jail. Once Mrs Gandhi called the Lok Sabha polls, Devsagar recalls, the Express newsroom rejoiced. Like Ghosh, even 50 years later, a crucial mystery remains as to why Mrs Gandhi called the elections when she did. Over the years, several scholars have proposed various theories. Historian Srinath Raghavan, who recently came out with the book Indira Gandhi and the years that transformed India, points to two assessment reports prepared for Mrs Gandhi between June and October 1976 outlining the Emergency's impact during the previous year. 'The thrust of both these reports was to suggest that the first year of the (Emergency's) anniversary has gone off well – popular unrest and protests have come to a halt, economy has been stabilised, inflation is kept in check, the 20 point programme has given hope to the poor in rural India, and that political opposition continues to remain in disarray,' says Raghavan. However, the reports also suggested that the benefits of the Emergency might be tapering off due to some of its more coercive programmes such as the forced sterilisation campaign. The October 1976 report in particular, , Raghavan says, flagged that the Congress was losing support in Uttar Pradesh among its traditional voters, including the poor and minorities, due to the sterilisation drive. 'In the broader context of things, the Prime Minister had come to internalise that the benefits of the Emergency might be slowly wearing off and, before things turned adverse, it was better to go into elections,' Raghavan states. Others suggest that the only reason Mrs Gandhi declared fresh elections was because she was confident she would win. In his book India after Gandhi, historian Ramachandra Guha notes that the gossip in Delhi coffee houses then was that the PM's intelligence chief had assured her of being re-elected with a clear majority. Guha also cites the criticism Mrs Gandhi drew from western observers as a reason. What particularly stung was criticism by those who had known her father Jawaharlal Nehru, and made comparisons between the two. British socialist politician Fenner Brockaway, for instance, writing in The Times, deplored the conversion of 'the world's greatest democracy' into 'a repressive dictatorship'. He appealed to Mrs Gandhi to end the denial of freedom and liberty in memory of her father. Another British writer, John Grigg, recalled Nehru's commitment to free press and elections. 'Nehru's tryst with destiny seems to have been turned into a tryst with despotism – and by his own daughter,' he wrote in The Spectator. Raghavan also says Mrs Gandhi was disturbed by the negative reportage in the international press. In his book, he cites a letter that she wrote to the Indian High Commissioner in London, in which she rebuked the British press for 'maligning' her and her son Sanjay Gandhi. However, Raghavan doesn't believe the negative press affected her much. 'The objective fact is that neither the British government nor the American government actually put any pressure on her to end the Emergency.' Historian Gyan Prakash, however, believes that Mrs Gandhi was conscious of her international image. 'The Emergency had broken many of the ties she had, including friendship with American writer Dorothy Norman, as one can see from their exchange of letters,' he says. Mrs Gandhi's secretary P N Dhar, writing several years later, offered another explanation — that, being the PM, she had started yearning for the public connect she had established. 'She was nostalgic about the way people reacted to her in the 1971 campaign and she longed again to hear the applause of the multitudes,' Dhar wrote. Arguing along similar lines, Prakash says: 'Indira Gandhi, in the end, wanted legitimacy to her role and thought that the elections would legitimise her power, including the Emergency… If one thinks of Indira Gandhi's long career, it is true that the way she had ruled was to try and secure popular support for her power. She was not prepared to rule as an authoritarian figure in the long run.' Given that Gandhi's private papers have yet to be made accessible, there is no conclusive way to know what persuaded her to begin the process of ending the Emergency. However, as she spoke on the radio on January 18, 1977, her opponents were being released from jails across the country. The following day, the leaders of four Opposition parties — Morarji Desai's Congress (O), Jana Sangh, Bharatiya Lok Dal and Socialist Party — met at Desai's residence in Delhi. The next day Desai announced to the press that they would fight the elections under a common party and its symbol. On January 23, the Janata (People's) Party was launched in the presence of Jayaprakash Narayan or JP. The speed with which the Opposition parties merged to form the Janata Party stunned Mrs Gandhi. She had calculated that there would not be sufficient time for these parties to fulfill legal and technical requirements meant for creation of a new party. 'JP had been trying to bring everyone together since 1974 itself,' says Abhishek Choudhary, who authored the book Vajpayee: the Ascent of the Hindu Right 1924-1977. In 1977, however, they were desperate, and scared that unless they presented themselves as a united force, they would be defeated. Choudhary states that despite being united, the Opposition was far from sure of victory. What shifted the mood in the Opposition camp was the resignation of Jagjivan Ram from the Congress. One of the country's tallest Dalit leaders, Jagjivan, popularly known as 'Babuji', was a Congress stalwart whose defection dealt a blow to the party and boosted the Opposition's morale. The newspapers called it the moment when the 'J-bomb' exploded. Much has been written about the election rallies that turned increasingly fiery and eventful in the ensuing days. So was the day of the results. Journalist Coomi Kapoor, who was a reporter at the Express at the time, recalls, in her memoir on The Emergency, the evening of March 20, 1977, when the poll results started pouring in. Outside the Express office, she notes, there was a billboard where the latest results were put up manually. Each time a fresh Janata Party win was shown on the board, wild cheers erupted. Coins were showered on the man updating the results. 'Some people were doing the bhangra, while others were laughing and joking, 'Mummy meri car gayi', 'Beta meri sarkaar gayi',' writes Kapoor. By late evening, when the Express announced that Gandhi was trailing in her Rae Bareli constituency, the crowd burst firecrackers. 'Old-timers said they had not witnessed such public exuberance since Independence Day in 1947,' Kapoor adds. The election outcome saw the Janata Party emerging as the victor, which set the stage for the formation of the country's first non-Congress government. Most of the ministers lost their seats. Next day, at an early-morning Cabinet meeting held by Mrs Gandhi, the Emergency was revoked. Adrija Roychowdhury leads the research section at She writes long features on history, culture and politics. She uses a unique form of journalism to make academic research available and appealing to a wide audience. She has mastered skills of archival research, conducting interviews with historians and social scientists, oral history interviews and secondary research. During her free time she loves to read, especially historical fiction. ... Read More
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Silence to surprise
At a recent meeting with Congress leaders from tribal communities, Rahul Gandhi asked them about their 'main issue'. As the leaders fell silent, Gandhi is learnt to have said that he would answer the question himself. He said the 'biggest issue' for such Congress leaders is that they are not given much importance within the party. Surprised, many leaders nodded in agreement. Office Office Although the Union government has long been planning to relocate the Ministry of Rural Development, among several others, to the Common Central Secretariat (CCS) at Kartavya Path, officials have still been upgrading their current offices at Krishi Bhawan. The latest instance is that of an official of the ministry whose room was renovated a few weeks ago. Meanwhile, the ministry has been allotted space on the ground floor of CCS building no. 3 and will likely shift by August 15. Request Denied A senior AGMUT-cadre IPS officer was recently transferred from Delhi to Lakshadweep. As he was overseeing a special police project, the officer requested his transfer be withheld at least until March 2026. Delhi Police Commissioner Sanjay Arora forwarded his representation to the Union Home Ministry, and, in an unusual move, also attached his own letter echoing the request. The Home Ministry turned down the request this month.
