UK airport shuts for good after 95 years to make way for thousands of homes – despite ‘contamination' fears
A UK airport has closed for good after 95 years to make may for thousands of homes – despite fears the area is "contaminated".
The privately-run airport shut on June 6 after a developer served notice on the operator of the site.
1
Nottingham City Airport also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance
The Vistry Group, which owns Tollerton Airfield In Nottingham, plans to build 1,600 homes and a school at the site.
Home to Nottingham City Airport and a number of other businesses, the site also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance.
Vistry served notice on operator Truman Aviation to vacate the site, but said it would continue to provide a landing zone for the air ambulance during the initial phase of development.
The site's closure follows a year-long battle from campaigners against Vistry.
Campaigners believe that more than 1,200 aircraft containing radioactive materials were burnt and buried at the ex-RAF base leading to contamination.
Concerns were raised after campaigners found evidence that the
ex-
in
Site owner Brian Wells, who was sent notice to vacate the area in March, previously said developers were "determined to have everywhere shut down for when they came to planning".
"We agreed we'd have two to five years here before they would take over," he told NottinghamshireLive. "They even suggested they could keep one runway open for us.
Most read in The Sun
"But the main board of developers say they've had enough of all these people protesting and decided to shut it down sooner rather than later."
David Lammy confirms first batch of Brits have left Tel Aviv by RAF plane amid boiling tensions in the Middle East
He added that "it's very sad" how things have developed much quicker than hoped for, and said the closure will mean "numerous redundancies".
The
During World War 2 it was acquired by the Air Ministry and became RAF Tollerton.
What would happen if the site is contaminated?
Campaigners for the airport have referred to other cases where ex-RAF airfields like Tollerton were used as "burn, bash, and bury" sites and then deemed potentially hazardous.
If the grounds were disturbed, an extensive clean-up process would have to be done.
An example of this is Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland, a stretch of coastline used for the same purposes as Tollerton AIrfield.
Traces of radium-226 found in the ground required a two-year clean-up project at the site. Other examples include RAF Newton, RAF Carlisle and RAF Kinloss.
A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: 'Our Environment Agency officers advised Rushcliffe Borough Council (the planning authority) in May 2024 that a condition of planning permission is that developers have a plan in place to identify and deal with the risks associated with potential contaminants.
"In addition, we have advised that the site will need to be assessed for potential contaminants at routine stages as the development progresses.'
Rushcliffe Borough Council has confirmed applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments.
A spokesperson for Rushcliffe Borough Council said: "We are aware of the previous uses of the wider site, including the airfield and the potential for land contamination associated with these uses.
"Both current applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
20 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
High-flying husband and wife are BOTH in race to be the next chief of the Royal Air Force
A HIGH-FLYING husband and wife are in the race to be the next chief of the Royal Air Force, 'we can reveal. Air Marshal Al Marshall and Air Vice-Marshal Suraya Marshall are the most senior serving couple in UK Armed Forces' history . Advertisement 2 Air Marshal Al Marshall is one half of the RAF's most senior serving couple in history Credit: AS1 Tomas Barnard RAF 2 Air Vice-Marshal Suraya Marshall is also in contention to become the head of the RAF Credit: RAF Both are tipped as potential successors to Air Chief Marshal Sir Rich Knighton, who has been promoted to Chief of Defence Staff to lead all three Armed Forces this autumn. Al, who joined up in 1991, is Air and Space Commander responsible for all air operations in the UK and overseas. He flew Harrier jump jets in Iraq, Afghanistan and Bosnia. Former Tornado navigator Suraya, who joined up in 1993, is Assistant Chief of the Air Staff. Advertisement READ MORE ON THE RAF She was the first female weapons instructor and first woman to command one of the RAF's two operational groups. She led No 2 Group, which included all RAF cargo squadrons, in 2021 — the same time Al led No 1 Group, with all the combat aircraft. A source said: 'Talk about a power couple. 'Between them they've commanded every plane in the Air Force. Advertisement Most read in The Sun 'Al is one rank senior so it would be more of a jump for Suraya but the leap's been made before.' RAF insiders said the couple, who have two children, are up against Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff Air Marshal Harv Smyth, who is favourite to replace Sir Rich. First non-pilot to lead RAF is picked to command all three armed forces
The Irish Sun
4 days ago
- The Irish Sun
UK airport shuts for good after 95 years to make way for thousands of homes – despite ‘contamination' fears
A UK airport has closed for good after 95 years to make may for thousands of homes – despite fears the area is "contaminated". The privately-run airport shut on June 6 after a developer served notice on the operator of the site. 1 Nottingham City Airport also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance The Vistry Group, which owns Tollerton Airfield In Nottingham, plans to build 1,600 homes and a school at the site. Home to Nottingham City Airport and a number of other businesses, the site also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance. Vistry served notice on operator Truman Aviation to vacate the site, but said it would continue to provide a landing zone for the air ambulance during the initial phase of development. The site's closure follows a year-long battle from campaigners against Vistry. Campaigners believe that more than 1,200 aircraft containing radioactive materials were burnt and buried at the ex-RAF base leading to contamination. Concerns were raised after campaigners found evidence that the ex- in Site owner Brian Wells, who was sent notice to vacate the area in March, previously said developers were "determined to have everywhere shut down for when they came to planning". "We agreed we'd have two to five years here before they would take over," he told NottinghamshireLive. "They even suggested they could keep one runway open for us. Most read in The Sun "But the main board of developers say they've had enough of all these people protesting and decided to shut it down sooner rather than later." David Lammy confirms first batch of Brits have left Tel Aviv by RAF plane amid boiling tensions in the Middle East He added that "it's very sad" how things have developed much quicker than hoped for, and said the closure will mean "numerous redundancies". The During World War 2 it was acquired by the Air Ministry and became RAF Tollerton. What would happen if the site is contaminated? Campaigners for the airport have referred to other cases where ex-RAF airfields like Tollerton were used as "burn, bash, and bury" sites and then deemed potentially hazardous. If the grounds were disturbed, an extensive clean-up process would have to be done. An example of this is Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland, a stretch of coastline used for the same purposes as Tollerton AIrfield. Traces of radium-226 found in the ground required a two-year clean-up project at the site. Other examples include RAF Newton, RAF Carlisle and RAF Kinloss. A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: 'Our Environment Agency officers advised Rushcliffe Borough Council (the planning authority) in May 2024 that a condition of planning permission is that developers have a plan in place to identify and deal with the risks associated with potential contaminants. "In addition, we have advised that the site will need to be assessed for potential contaminants at routine stages as the development progresses.' Rushcliffe Borough Council has confirmed applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments. A spokesperson for Rushcliffe Borough Council said: "We are aware of the previous uses of the wider site, including the airfield and the potential for land contamination associated with these uses. "Both current applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments".
The Irish Sun
5 days ago
- The Irish Sun
The 13 UK seaside towns where feeding seagulls could land you with on-the-spot £100 fine
IF you're planning a trip to the seaside this summer, be careful not to make this costly mistake. While feeding seagulls may seem like harmless fun, it can actually result in hefty fines. 2 Feeding seagulls in certain UK seaside towns can results in hefty fines (stock image) Credit: Getty As summer kicks into gear, a lot of Brits are planning staycationers at scenic beaches. But be warned because this little known coastal rule could turn your fish and chip supper into a serious expense. In some seaside towns across the country, feeding seagulls is not just discouraged; it is punishable by law. Read More On Seaside Towns So even if these cheeky birds are begging for a chip, resist the urge to feed them. In Aldeburgh, Suffolk, visitors are greeted by signs warning that anyone caught feeding gulls could face prosecution. This is enforced under public health and anti-social behaviour by-laws. Introduced in 2009, this rule is a result of rising public complaints about nuisance behaviour from gulls — including swooping attacks, persistent begging, and damage to bins and property. Most read in News Travel And it's far from an isolated case; a series of restrictions has emerged across the UK and the Channel Islands. Many councils have introduced Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) or similar measures to clamp down on gull feeding. Inside colourful flat in seaside town featured on Scotland's Home of the Year Measures have been introduced along the North Yorkshire coast, with towns like The fine, introduced under environmental protection legislation, is part of a broader effort to manage behaviour in high-footfall coastal towns. And while the maximum penalty is rarely issued, local councils use it as a strong deterrent. This effort is more common than most Brits realise. Similar bans are now in place across the South West, including East Devon, where feeding seagulls is prohibited under PSPOs. Fine amounts for feeding seagulls in UK seaside towns Exmouth: £80 - £100 Budleigh Salterton: £80 - £100 Sidmouth: £80 - £100 Beer: £80 - £100 Seaton: £80 - £100 Lyme Regis: Up to £100 West Bay: Up to £100 Bridport: Up to £100 St Ives: Up to £100 Whitby: Up to £100 Scarborough: Up to £100 Eastbourne: Up to £100 Hastings: Up to £100 Fixed penalties of £80 can be issued on the spot, with the possibility of higher fines for repeat offences or failure to pay. In West Dorset, towns like Lyme Regis and Bridport have adopted comparable policies. St Ives in Cornwall banned gull feeding in 2018 following multiple incidents of birds injuring visitors while attempting to grab food. A rep for Luxury Group Stay said that the rise in local fines and by-laws "catching guests off guard" has seen a change in customer preferences. "We're seeing growing demand for private stays where families can relax, dine outdoors, and enjoy themselves without worrying about unexpected restrictions," they explained. With rules varying from town to town and signage often easy to miss, travellers are advised to check local guidance carefully. Plus, seven major And a common A holiday destination that's popular with Brits has And a 2 Anyone planning a seaside trip this summer is advised to read up on local by-laws to avoid fines (stock image) Credit: EPA
