logo
The 36 safest cars you can buy right now, according to experts

The 36 safest cars you can buy right now, according to experts

Yahoo20-03-2025

When buying a new vehicle, safety is paramount. But how can you be sure that shiny new car isn't just a hunk of junk?
That's where the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) steps in. The group just released its latest annual safety awards for dozens of vehicles, each of which has been tested across a series of tests.
Just 48 models qualified for the IIHS' awards as of March 13, down from 71 models last year. Thirty-six of those vehicles won the nonprofit's highest designation — Top Safety Pick+ — while the remaining 12 were named a Top Safety Pick.
Most of the selected models were SUVs; just two large pickups and a little more than a handful of small and midsize cars also won awards. That's likely because the IIHS' updated tests emphasize back seat protection, according to the group.
'We're once again challenging automakers to make their new models even safer than those they were building a year ago,' IIHS President David Harkey said in a statement.
'Every vehicle that earns a 2025 award offers a high level of safety in both the front seat and the second row,' he added.
These are some of the safest vehicles currently on the market, according to the IIHS' ratings.
The Honda (HMC) Civic hatchback, Accord midsize car, and HR-V SUV received the highest designation from the IIHS, the Top Safety Pick+ award.
The Accord was only docked points when tested for how well it could detect adult pedestrians at night. It failed to give any warning before hitting a test dummy when being driven at 37 miles per hour, at night, and with low beam headlights on.
The Civic hatchback had similar issues, but was also hit for quiet alerts when a seat belt wasn't being used or was disengaged. The HR-V was docked points for headlights that are not curve-adaptive and that create some glare when using low beams, a difficult-to-find child seat tether anchor, and its performance on vehicle-to-vehicle collisions.
Two other models, the Civic sedan and Pilot SUV, were given the lesser Top Safety Pick award. Acura's Integra hatchback and MXD luxury SUV were also given those designations.
Mazda (MZDAY) went home with the most Top Safety Pick+ awards — eight. One model, the CX-30 SUV, had perfect marks, according to the IIHS.
'Kudos to Mazda for meeting this challenge with eight Top Safety Pick+ winners, the most of any brand,' Harkey, the IIHS president, said in a statement.
Six models — the CX-70 SUV and its plug-in hybrid variant, the CX-90 SUV and its plug-in hybrid variant, the 3 sedan, and the 3 hatchback — were dinged for less-than stellar headlights. However, that varied by trim for all but the plug-in hybrid models.
The CX-50 SUV also had headlight issues and lost points over front crash prevention exams. When a motorcycle was in front of the CX-50, it failed to provide a timely warning in all but one of the tests. It also failed to deliver a timely warning in one test conducted with a semitrailer.
'Mazda's dedication to keeping our customers and their passengers safe in the pursuit of eliminating traffic fatalities is evidenced in these latest awards from IIHS,' Tom Donnelly, the CEO of Mazda's North America division, said in a statement.
Mercedes-Benz's (MBGYY) C-Class midsize car, GLC luxury SUV, and GLE-Class SUV with optional front crash prevention were all named Top Safety Pick+ models.
The C-Class model got docked points for its headlights — which had some limitations at lower tiers — and was too slow to react to an adult pedestrian at night. The GLC and GLE SUVs had similar issues reacting to pedestrians, but their headlights performed better than the C-Class'.
Toyota's (TM) Camry midsize car and Tundra pickup truck also received Top Safety Pick+ awards.
The Camry was docked points for its low beam headlights, which delivered only fair visibility on straight roads, as well as inadequate visibility when curving left, the IIHS said. The high-beams compensate for some of the low beams' limitations, the group added.
The Tundra — one of just two pickups included in the IIHS' top rankings — was docked points for how quickly it reduced speed when encountering an adult pedestrian at night, along with difficult-to-find child seat tethers. The IIHS also noted that the low beam headlights included in a few trims created some glare.
Genesis (HYMTF) — the luxury division of Hyundai Motor Group, which also owns the Hyundai and Kia name brands — had four SUVs receive Top Safety Pick+ designations. That includes the GV60, GV80, and the electrified GV70. The gasoline-powered GV70 also was recognized, but only for units built after April 2024.
The GV60 and GV80 both lost points over backseat tether anchors for child seats that were too deep in the seat, according to the IIHS. Both GV70 variants were docked points for crash prevention systems that failed to provide quick enough warnings for the vehicle to avoid hitting an adult pedestrian at night.
Hyundai had five vehicles notch Top Safety Pick+ awards from the IIHS. That includes the electric Ioniq 5 midsize car and Ioniq 6 SUV, Kona SUV, and the Tucson SUV. Santa Fe SUVs built after November 2024 were also given that distinction.
The Tucson was docked points for child seat anchors buried too deeply in the rear seats and a forward collision avoidance software that failed to provide a timely warning in most tests. Headlights on some trims were also given a lower score because they aren't curve-adaptive.
Likewise, the Ioniq 6, Kona, and Santa Fe lost points because of their headlights and child seat anchors.
The Ioniq 5 shared the child seat anchor issues and had glaring low beam headlights on some trims. Forward collision avoidance software equipped to Ioniq 5 SE and SEL models also failed to deliver timely warnings when encountering an adult pedestrian at night.
Kia's Telluride SUV and EV9 all-electric SUV both received the IIHS' Top Safety Pick+ award. They both got top marks on the group's tests.
'IIHS Top Safety Pick and Top Safety Pick+ awards reinforce our dedication to building vehicles that not only perform but also provide peace of mind,' Kia America COO Steven Center said in a statement.
Subaru's (FUJHY) Solterra all-electric SUV was its only vehicle to be awarded the IIHS's top safety award for 2025. The Solterra, which was co-developed with Toyota (which sells the mostly identical bz4x), is the brand's first electric car. It scored top marks on all of the IIHS's tests.
Two other Subaru models, the 2025 Ascent and Forester, were given the Top Safety Pick award. Both lost points for potential injuries to rear passengers during a crash involving two vehicles driving in opposite directions at just under 40 miles per hour.
'It's an honor for Solterra, Ascent and Forester to be recognized by IIHS' new, increasingly rigorous testing for both driver safety and passenger safety,' Jeff Walters, the president and chief operating officer of Subaru of America, said in a statement.
Ford's (F) Mustang Mach-E electric SUV, which grew more popular last year, was the Detroit automaker's only vehicle included in the IIHS' rankings, receiving a Top Safety Pick+ designation.
The model scored top marks when tested for crashworthiness, crash avoidance, and crash mitigation, but was docked some points for its child seat attachments. The IIHS said that tether anchors could be confused for other hardware. Ford is also being sued over the Mustang Mach-E's electric latches, which replaced the typical door handles most vehicles have.
Lincoln, Ford's luxury division, saw its popular Nautilus midsize SUV receive the Top Safety Pick+ award from the IIHS. It scored top marks across all categories tested.
Audi (VWAGY), the luxury brand owned by Volkswagen Group, won a Top Safety Pick+ award for its Q7 SUV. The model performed well during the IIHS' crashworthiness tests, but had middling results during crash avoidance and mitigation exams.
The $77,900 Prestige trim's headlights performed well when tested. However, the headlights used by the $60,500 and $64,300 Premium and Premium Plus trims were found to have glaring low beams and weren't curve-adaptive.
The Q7 also failed to deliver a timely warning when it was too close to a motorcycle driving ahead of it. But the IIHS said it did not test the SUV's automatic brakes. It was also docked points for how well it detected an adult pedestrian at night.
BMW's X5 midsize luxury SUV was given a Top Safety Pick+, scoring top marks on all but one category tested. The model's low beam headlights created 'some glare,' the IIHS said.
Electric truck maker Rivian (RIVN) had two of its models receive awards from the IIHS, the R1T pickup and the R1S SUV.
The RIS was given the Top Safety Pick+ designation, achieving top marks in all but one category, according to the IIHS' ratings. The group had an issue with the SUV's headlights, stating that its low beams created 'some glare.'
The IIHS also notes that its award only applies to units made after last August. In early 2024, the company retooled its manufacturing process to cut more than 50 parts from the design of its vehicles, 52 pieces from the body shop, and more than 100 steps from the battery-making process, CEO RJ Scaringe told Reuters.
The R1T was awarded the Top Safety Pick designation, achieving top scores on all but two categories. Like the R1S, the R1T lost points for its headlights. It also had a poorer score during a crash test.
Infiniti's (NSANY) QX80 SUV was named a Top Safety Pick+, while its QX60 luxury SUV was given a Top Safety Pick rating. The QX80 scored top marks on the IIHS' tests.
The QX60 also scored highly, but was docked points during a moderate overlap front test. The model scored an 'acceptable,' the second-to-best rating, for potential injuries to a rear passenger during a head-on crash.
Volvo Cars (GELYF), the Swedish brand owned by Chinese giant Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, had two cars receive the IIHS' awards, although it only applies to vehicles made before December 2024.
The XC90 midsize luxury SUV was given the Top Safety Pick+ award, while its plug-in hybrid counterpart was named a Top Safety Pick.
The XC90 performed well during a crash, but scored poorly in the IIHS' categories under crash avoidance and mitigation. It was docked points for low beam headlight performance, along with how well its forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking systems performed in the presence of a motorcycle, children, and adults. The IIHS also docked the model for its poor tether anchors for child seats.
Nissan's Pathfinder was the only model from the Japanese automaker to receive a Top Safety Pick+ award from the IIHS. The midsize SUV performed well in all areas tested except its headlights. The IIHS said visibility was only fair when using low-beams and high-beams on curved roads.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blind Zones Block Drivers' Vision In Newer Vehicles, Study Shows
Blind Zones Block Drivers' Vision In Newer Vehicles, Study Shows

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Blind Zones Block Drivers' Vision In Newer Vehicles, Study Shows

In some newer vehicles, blind zones are getting bigger and blocking drivers' vision. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety The blind zones of six popular passenger vehicles – Chevrolet Suburban, Ford F-150, Honda Accord, Honda CR-V, Jeep Grand Cherokee and Toyota Camry – grew substantially over the past 25 years and resulted in a decrease in forward visibility. Those are the main take-a-ways of a new study that evaluated the role newer vehicle design plays in driver visibility, released on Thursday by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) , a nonprofit financed by the insurance industry. The research found that in some newer vehicles, blind zones are getting bigger and blocking drivers' vision. 'The across-the-board decrease in visibility for this small group of models is concerning. We need to investigate whether this is a broader trend that may have contributed to the recent spike in pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities,' David Harkey, the Insurance Institute's president, said in a statement. The study to assess how newer vehicle designs can block drivers' vision was conducted by the United States Department of Transportation's Volpe Center using a new technique of measuring a driver's direct area of vision around a vehicle that was developed by the Insurance Institute. The new method uses computational software and a portable camera rig to create a blind zone map and is more efficient than traditional blind zone mapping, the Institute said. Researchers examined and compared how the designs of the six top-selling vehicles changed over model years 1997 to 2023. Visibility reductions were most pronounced for the SUVs. Forward visibility within a 10-meter radius fell as much as 58% for three popular SUVs, according to the study. The most dramatic reduction came for the Honda CR-V, as the vehicle's hood, mirrors and A-pillars all obstructed a greater portion of the driver's view over time. Drivers of the 1997 model were able to see 68% of the area 10 meters in front of the vehicle, while drivers of the 2022 model can see only 28%. For the Honda CR-V (and the 2000 Suburban) the biggest changes in the blind zone were due to a higher hood that blocked more of the frontal plane and larger side mirrors that obscured the views at their front corners. In contrast, the early models of the two cars provided relatively good visibility that fell less than 8% in later generations, researchers said. The visibility reductions for the two cars were less severe. The smallest decrease came for the Accord, which permitted the driver to see 65% of the area 10 meters in front of the vehicle in 2003 and 60% in 2023. For the Camry, visibility decreased from 61% in 2007 to 57% in 2023. 'These results are notable because we already know that the portion of SUVs in the U.S. fleet grew substantially over these years as well,' Becky Mueller, senior research engineer at the Insurance Institute, said in a statement. She led the development of the new mapping technique and is a co-author of the Volpe Center study. 'If further research confirms that these changes reflect a general change, that would suggest that declining visibility in SUVs has compounded the effects of taller, blunt-nosed vehicles that IIHS has already documented,' Mueller added. The results of the study point to a troubling trend during the 25-year period assessed, according to the report, a time when pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities on U.S roads soared. Insurance Institute researchers noted that little is known about what role driver visibility has played in the increase, but they are in the process of conducting additional research to understand how blind zones affect pedestrian crash rates and insurance claims. For more information about the research, click here .

You're Not Imagining Things: Cheap Used Cars Are Vanishing
You're Not Imagining Things: Cheap Used Cars Are Vanishing

Miami Herald

time17 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

You're Not Imagining Things: Cheap Used Cars Are Vanishing

If you're struggling to find a decent used car for under $20,000, you're not alone, and you're not imagining things. A new study from iSeeCars finds that the number of affordable, late-model used vehicles has dropped off a cliff in recent years. Back in 2019, nearly half (49.3%) of all 3-year-old used cars were priced at or below $20,000. Today, that number has shriveled to just 11.5%. The average price of a 3-year-old used car is now $32,635 - a staggering 40.9% jump from 2019, when it was just $23,159. While the pandemic may feel like old news, its economic aftershocks are still distorting the car market. "The pandemic may be a fading memory, but the lack of new car production five years ago has created a 'pandemic hangover' effect," said Karl Brauer, executive analyst at iSeeCars. The most affordable segment of the used market - cars under $20,000 - has shrunk dramatically across all major vehicle types. Passenger cars saw the steepest increase in price, climbing 48.7% since 2019. That means entry-level sedans that once anchored the affordable used car market are now largely out of reach. In 2019, more than 70% of 3-year-old passenger cars were priced under $20,000. In 2025? Just 28.1%. SUVs fared even worse, dropping from 39.2% to a mere 8.1% share in the sub-$20K category. The shift in pricing is especially evident in once-affordable bestsellers. A few years ago, it wasn't hard to find a lightly used Honda Civic or Toyota Camry for under $20,000. Now, those same models are averaging well over that threshold. The Civic's average price jumped 44.6% to $23,813, while the Camry rose 43.5% to $23,755. Some of the biggest price leaps came from small sedans: Nissan Sentra: Up 45.7% to $18,224Toyota Corolla: Up 37.7% to $19,792Chevy Equinox: Up 27.5% to $22,228 These were once the go-to models for frugal shoppers. Today, they're inching closer to new-car pricing, without the warranties or latest tech. The used car market has been rising for three straight months, and there's little indication prices will fall significantly anytime soon. The pandemic-related slowdown in new car production from 2020 to 2022 created a ripple effect that still limits the supply of newer used vehicles. Yet demand remains strong, especially for reliable models from Toyota, Honda, and Subaru. For buyers with a strict $20,000 budget, the result is clear: you'll likely need to shop older, higher-mileage vehicles, or rethink what kind of car you can afford. As Brauer put it, "Many car buyers are now priced out of late-model used cars, forcing them to consider older models with more miles to fit within their budget." Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

How Mazda Plans To Outsmart America's Harsh Tariffs
How Mazda Plans To Outsmart America's Harsh Tariffs

Miami Herald

time21 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

How Mazda Plans To Outsmart America's Harsh Tariffs

Manufacturers importing vehicles and related components into the United States are all trying to find inventive ways to mitigate the effect of the Trump administration's tariffs, which are expected to increase the price of a new car by almost $2,000. Among the hardest-hit brands are European and Japanese, as they rely more heavily on imports. Mazda is part of this group, which is why the Japanese marque has hatched a new plan to reduce the impact of tariffs in the USA, but it may not be one you expect. Mazda's plan involved increasing sales in its domestic market of Japan by a third. Currently, the brand sells around 150,000 models annually in Japan, but it wants to boost that number to 200,000 units "as early as possible," reports Automotive News. Using its experience of growing the brand in the United States, Mazda will grow domestic sales, too. This process will go beyond its range of cars, as Mazda will also optimize its sales network and relook at its marketing strategy. "Considering various situations including the most recent tariffs, we think there is a pressing need to rebolster and accelerate our domestic business," said Tadashi Miura, Mazda president. After the USA, Japan is Mazda's biggest market, but it only makes up approximately 10 percent of the brand's global sales. Five other Japanese brands all outsell Mazda domestically, these being Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Suzuki, and Daihatsu. It all means that there is room for Mazda to increase sales in Japan. The 25% tariffs impact most of Mazda's US lineup, from the CX-5 to the CX-70 and CX-90, all popular crossovers. These models are produced in Japan, as is the MX-5 Miata sports car. An exception is the CX-50, which became the first Mazda to be produced at the Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA plant in Huntsville, Alabama. Jointly owned by Mazda and Toyota, the plant also builds the subcompact Toyota Corolla Cross. As Toyota's relationship with Mazda deepens, the possibility exists for more Mazda models to be produced at the Huntsville plant. However, this could take a lot of time, which is why it's wise for Mazda to look at multiple opportunities, including the drive to boost sales in Japan. Last month, Mazda sales declined by over 6% in the USA compared to May 2024, indicating that the effect of tariffs are already being felt, just as the brand predicted. It remains to be seen how quickly and effectively Mazda can halt this trend, and that may come down to its initiative in Japan. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store