Lucy Letby lawyer claims killer nurse learned of new charges in jail 'gossip'
Lucy Letby discovered she had yet more charges over the deaths of babies in hospital from prison 'gossip' instead of police, her lawyer complained.
Letby's barrister Mark McDonald said cops failed to inform his team of the charges and did not 'have the courtesy' to tell them it was handing a new file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
It is understood to concern new baby deaths and non-fatal collapses at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital when Letby worked there between 2012 and 2016. He said she was forced to find out through "gossip". He told The Telegraph: 'One could be cynical and say that the police are afraid of what will happen when Lucy's conviction is overturned.'
'We will cross every bridge when we get to it, but if Lucy is charged I know we have a whole army of internationally renowned medical experts who will totally undermine the prosecution's unfounded allegations.'
The 35-year-old from Herefordshire was convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to kill seven more whilst she worked as a nurse at the Countess of Chester in 2015 and 2016. She is currently serving 15 whole-life orders and is Britain's most prolific child killer. She is serving her sentences behind bars at Low Newton, a Durham prison.
The CPS said had received "a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary" asking the force to consider further allegations against the woman dubbed 'The Angel of Death'.
It said these were "in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital". It comes after three of Letby's bosses were arrested on Tuesday, in a turn of events that cast doubt over Letby's future. The ex members of the senior leadership team at a hospital where Letby worked were arrested in connection with alleged manslaughter.
The three were in leadership roles at the Countess of Chester Hospital in 20015 and 2016 but have not been named. They were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter.
However, Letby's lawyer McDonald told the Telegraph that the police didn't tell Letby's legal team about the new file. In a statement, a spokesman for the CPS said: "We will now carefully consider the evidence to determine whether any further criminal charges should be brought.
"As always, we will make that decision independently, based on the evidence and in line with our legal test."
A spokeswoman for Cheshire Police confirmed the force had submitted "a full file of evidence to the CPS for charging advice regarding the ongoing investigation". Investigators are looking into the deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neo-natal units of both hospitals as part of Operation Hummingbird.
This process to determine whether Letby will face further charges is expected to take several week s and involve consultation with many of Britain's most senior legal brains.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Rules on sunbathing naked in your garden in heatwave as police issue warning
If you're looking to get a back garden glow while avoiding tan lines, think twice before stripping off. Police have warned that you could be breaking the law As temperatures rise across the nation, many of us will be taking advantage of the sunny weather at beaches, parks, and other outdoor areas this weekend. And if you're fortunate enough to have a garden, what could be better than enjoying the balmy weather in your own private space, away from crowded public areas and scantily clad strangers? If you're planning on sunbathing in your garden, you might consider going au naturel to avoid unsightly tan lines. However, caution is advised as police warn that nudity in your own private garden could potentially breach the law. In England and Wales, public nudity is not inherently illegal, but there are stipulations. It becomes an offence under Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 if nudity is intended to cause "distress or alarm". The Crown Prosecution Service states: "In the case of naturism, a balance needs to be struck between the naturist's right to freedom of expression and the right of the wider public to be protected from harassment, alarm and distress." While you may be within your own property when in your garden, those residing in terraced houses will know that it's often quite easy to get a peek into your neighbour's garden, even without intending to pry. Although you may not be physically exposing yourself in public, there's a risk of causing "distress or alarm" to your neighbours when you're sans attire in your own garden - it's only deemed illegal if there was an intent behind the action. So, how do you go about safely sunbathing naked without stirring the pot with those who live next door? The police recommend giving the neighbours a heads up if you're planning to soak up the rays in the buff, and to try and find a spot that's hidden from prying eyes for your naked retreat. There was a case in Reigate where Surrey Police addressed this very topic after a dispute erupted among residents. They cautioned: "If you want to wander around your garden naked and you are overlooked by neighbours then you have to be careful - an Englishman's home is not quite his castle and your garden is not exempt from the law." "In an ideal world, your relationship with your neighbours would be such that they would not object to you gardening in the buff and they would never dream of calling the police. In the real world, however, you would be well advised to take some simple precautions." But despite these warnings, the law stipulates that an offence only occurs if the individual in question intended to cause alarm or distress. British Naturism says there is "no obligation" to inform neighbours of one's disposition towards naturalist sunbathing. They said: "There is no law against being naked in public, and so stripping off and enjoying the sun on your skin in your own garden cannot lead to arrest nor can your neighbours make you cover up. "Being neighbourly might mean you tell your neighbours that you plan to sunbathe naked but there is no obligation to do so, so don't hesitate. "Studies have shown that spending time naked is good for you, and so we encourage everyone to take advantage of the wonderful weather and celebrate their uniqueness."
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
I was sure Lucy Letby was guilty… then spent weeks poring over evidence & now I'm convinced NO babies were murdered
Sun man Oliver Harvey reveals the moment he went from believing Letby was a wicked baby killer to being convinced the truth lay behind the NHS crisis 'NHS SCAPEGOAT' I was sure Lucy Letby was guilty… then spent weeks poring over evidence & now I'm convinced NO babies were murdered Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SHE'S Britain's most prolific child killer, serving 15 whole life orders for the sickening murders of seven innocent babies and attempting to kill seven others. And last week it emerged Lucy Letby could be facing more charges over the deaths of babies at hospitals she worked at. 8 Killer nurse Lucy Letby could face even more charges but some question her guilt Credit: pixel8000 8 Sun man Oliver Harvey thinks Letby has been let down by the legal system Credit: Peter Jordan Letby, 35, is understood to have carried out two work placements at Liverpool Women's Hospital - where she trained as a student - between October and December 2012, and January and February 2015. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had received "a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary asking us to consider further allegations in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital". It comes after three people - who were in senior leadership roles at the Countess of Chester Hospital - were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter as part of an investigation into the baby deaths. But while evidence continues to stack up against her, there are also a growing number of people - including some prominent politicians - who have publicly expressed doubts over her guilt. Yesterday we told how journalist Nigel Bunyan, who attended Lucy Letby's main trial and the retrial that followed it, is convinced justice was served because Letby is "a nailed-on serial killer of tiny, defenceless babies". But The Sun's Chief Features Writer Oliver Harvey is in the opposite camp, concerned "an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history". Here he puts forward his argument for why he's convinced Lucy Letby is not guilty of her harrowing crimes, and why a fresh appeal is needed immediately. STARING at Lucy Letby's washed out mugshot on the day of her conviction, I believed she was a wicked baby killer. Justice was done, I assumed, so let this monster rot in hell. Hadn't the 'Angel of Death' even admitted her own guilt in scrawled notes? Months later, after being commissioned to write an article about Letby 'truthers' - the internet army of sleuths pleading her innocence - I did a deep dive into the evidence stacked against her. Top doc whose work was used to nail Letby reveals why he KNOWS she's innocent Much of it involves complex medical and statistical information. It required strong coffee, a string of late nights and expert advice. Now, I believe an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history. And, in my view, no babies were murdered or harmed at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Last week prosecutors revealed they were considering fresh charges against Letby - currently rotting in prison as she serves 15 life sentences. Cheshire Police have been investigating further 'deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies'. 8 Staring at Lucy Letby's washed out mugshot on the day of her conviction, Oliver believed she was a wicked baby killer Credit: PA 8 The writer has since changed his mind after being commissioned to write an article about Letby 'truthers' Credit: PA So why do I believe Letby - already caged for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others - has been wrongfully convicted? And could two jury trials and two Appeal Court hearings really have misread things so badly? A solemn truth is that English justice - long admired across the world - sometimes gets it wrong. After nearly 30 years working in Fleet Street, including reporting for a news agency at the Old Bailey and the High Court, I've witnessed my share of wrongful convictions firsthand. I saw the Bridgewater Three - James Robinson and cousins Vincent and Michael Hickey - emerge blinking in the sunlight after 18 years behind bars for a crime they didn't commit. After nearly 30 years working in Fleet Street, including reporting for a news agency at the Old Bailey and the High Court, I've witnessed my share of wrongful convictions firsthand Oliver Harvey Wrongly convicted for murdering 13-year-old paperboy Carl Bridgewater, James spoke of the 'long, lonely years that we've cried and wept' as 'people have looked at us with hate' and 'called us child-killers'. Words delivered with such raw emotion stay with you. Then there was Angela Cannings, wrongly convicted of murdering two of her babies. During her 18-months incarceration I got to know her salt-of-the-earth husband Terry. Visiting him at home in Salisbury, Wiltshire, he told me: 'The trial was horrific, I don't know how Angela coped. "After she was jailed I just sobbed and sobbed on my sofa.' Angela's conviction was overturned by the Appeal Court in 2003 after it emerged medical evidence against her was flawed and that her babies had actually perished from cot death. 8 Angela Cannings was wrongly convicted of killing her children and freed by the court of appeal Credit: Reuters 8 The Bridgewater Three were wrong convicted of murder Credit: PA:Press Association It's a pertinent example of how police, prosecutors and juries can get it wrong when dealing with complex medical issues. I believe evidence used to convict Letby was also catastrophically flawed and doesn't stand up to scrutiny. A central plank of the prosecution case - placed before the jury at the beginning of Letby's first 10-month trial - was an apparently damning shift rota. The chart showed a cluster of 25 suspicious baby deaths and collapses matched against the shift rota of the 38 nurses who worked on the unit. Only Letby was at the scene for every death and collapse. Yet the jury wasn't told about six other baby deaths in the period for which she faced no charges. Statisticians also say the chart covers far too narrow a period of time. Professor Richard Gill, whose expertise is medical statistics, told me the spreadsheet was 'ludicrous' and that he believes Letby is innocent. Fatal flaws 8 MP David Davis has come out in support of Letby as has retired medic Dr Shoo Lee Credit: Ben Whitley/PA Wire 8 Dr Dewi testified that Letby had injected insulian or air into bloodstreams or feeding tubes Credit: PA When a case has been built around what the professor says are flawed statistics, then I believe the whole evidential edifice starts to crumble. So what about the science? Expert witness Dr Dewi Evans said that on the majority of occasions babies were killed or harmed, Letby injected air or insulin into their bloodstreams or feeding tubes. A string of respected neonatologists called Dr Evans's theory that Letby injected air into babies via their nasal feeding tubes as 'implausible' and 'ridiculous'. Dr Evans had cited a 1989 academic paper which said skin discolourations occur with air bubbles in blood vessels, and he believed this was evident in several of the babies. But the paper's co-author, Dr Shoo Lee says none of the descriptions of the babies' skin blemishes given by witnesses matched those that he had noted. In February, Dr Lee chaired a panel of 14 leading international experts who had examined 17 cases at the heart of Letby's prosecution. Their conclusion? "We did not find any murders. In all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care," he revealed. Remember Letby - who has always pleaded her innocence - was never seen injecting a baby or harming them in any way. That Letby's case is likely to rumble on for years is heartbreaking for the bereaved families Oliver Harvey Police found no internet searches for her alleged murder techniques while no motive or psychological profile of a serial killer was ever presented to the court. And Letby's so-called confessions notes - in which she'd written, 'I'm evil I did this' - were scrawls produced on the advice of counsellors to help the nurse deal with extreme stress. The ramblings also included: 'WHY ME? I haven't done anything wrong.' They were written as part of her therapy after she was removed from her nursing duties following a cluster of baby deaths. Used as a 'gotcha' moment at her first trial, the 'I'm evil I did this' sentiment may simply have been her insecurity at so many babies dying on her ward. Letby also kept 257 confidential shift handover sheets from the ward under her bed. Twenty-one of the documents related to 13 children prosecutors said she had harmed. Campaigner and former Cabinet Minister David Davis told me: 'If you didn't know that she was accused of murder, you'd just think she was being excessively conscientious.' Revelations that she searched bereaved families on Facebook perhaps shows she was concerned for those grieving. It certainly doesn't amount to evidence she was a baby killer. The Countess of Chester - which treated critically ill and very premature babies clinging to life - was plagued by staff shortages and a superbug, while a leading medic described its neonatal unit as 'out of its depth'. With so many clustered baby deaths, I believe blame was subconsciously shifted to a convenient scapegoat - the young, female, guileless nurse Lucy Letby. The prospect of fresh charges and a trial may actually work in her favour. A better marshalled defence could call on a wealth of expert witnesses deployed to debunk bad science and iffy statistics. That Letby's case is likely to rumble on for years is heartbreaking for the bereaved families. A fresh appeal is needed immediately. The threshold for criminal conviction - being beyond reasonable doubt - hasn't, in my opinion, been close to being reached. Justice may be blind, but it is not infallible.
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
I was sure Lucy Letby was guilty… then spent weeks poring over evidence & now I'm convinced NO babies were murdered
SHE'S Britain's most prolific child killer, serving 15 whole life orders for the sickening murders of seven innocent babies and attempting to kill seven others. And last week it emerged Lucy Letby could be facing more charges over the deaths of babies at hospitals she worked at. 8 8 Letby, 35, is understood to have carried out two work placements at Liverpool Women's Hospital - where she trained as a student - between October and December 2012, and January and February 2015. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had received "a full file of evidence from Cheshire Constabulary asking us to consider further allegations in relation to deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital". It comes after three people - who were in senior leadership roles at the Countess of Chester Hospital - were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter as part of an investigation into the baby deaths. But while evidence continues to stack up against her, there are also a growing number of people - including some prominent politicians - who have publicly expressed doubts over her guilt. Yesterday we told how journalist Nigel Bunyan, who attended Lucy Letby's main trial and the retrial that followed it, is convinced justice was served because Letby is "a nailed-on serial killer of tiny, defenceless babies". But The Sun's Chief Features Writer Oliver Harvey is in the opposite camp, concerned "an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history". Here he puts forward his argument for why he's convinced Lucy Letby is not guilty of her harrowing crimes, and why a fresh appeal is needed immediately. STARING at Lucy Letby's washed out mugshot on the day of her conviction, I believed she was a wicked baby killer. Justice was done, I assumed, so let this monster rot in hell. Hadn't the 'Angel of Death' even admitted her own guilt in scrawled notes? Months later, after being commissioned to write an article about Letby 'truthers' - the internet army of sleuths pleading her innocence - I did a deep dive into the evidence stacked against her. Top doc whose work was used to nail Letby reveals why he KNOWS she's innocent Much of it involves complex medical and statistical information. It required strong coffee, a string of late nights and expert advice. Now, I believe an innocent young woman has been jailed in one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British legal history. And, in my view, no babies were murdered or harmed at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Last week prosecutors revealed they were considering fresh charges against Letby - currently rotting in prison as she serves 15 life sentences. Cheshire Police have been investigating further 'deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies'. 8 8 So why do I believe Letby - already caged for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others - has been wrongfully convicted? And could two jury trials and two Appeal Court hearings really have misread things so badly? A solemn truth is that English justice - long admired across the world - sometimes gets it wrong. After nearly 30 years working in Fleet Street, including reporting for a news agency at the Old Bailey and the High Court, I've witnessed my share of wrongful convictions firsthand. I saw the Bridgewater Three - James Robinson and cousins Vincent and Michael Hickey - emerge blinking in the sunlight after 18 years behind bars for a crime they didn't commit. Wrongly convicted for murdering 13-year-old paperboy Carl Bridgewater, James spoke of the 'long, lonely years that we've cried and wept' as 'people have looked at us with hate' and 'called us child-killers'. Words delivered with such raw emotion stay with you. Then there was Angela Cannings, wrongly convicted of murdering two of her babies. During her 18-months incarceration I got to know her salt-of-the-earth husband Terry. Visiting him at home in Salisbury, Wiltshire, he told me: 'The trial was horrific, I don't know how Angela coped. "After she was jailed I just sobbed and sobbed on my sofa.' Angela's conviction was overturned by the Appeal Court in 2003 after it emerged medical evidence against her was flawed and that her babies had actually perished from cot death. 8 It's a pertinent example of how police, prosecutors and juries can get it wrong when dealing with complex medical issues. I believe evidence used to convict Letby was also catastrophically flawed and doesn't stand up to scrutiny. A central plank of the prosecution case - placed before the jury at the beginning of Letby's first 10-month trial - was an apparently damning shift rota. The chart showed a cluster of 25 suspicious baby deaths and collapses matched against the shift rota of the 38 nurses who worked on the unit. Only Letby was at the scene for every death and collapse. Yet the jury wasn't told about six other baby deaths in the period for which she faced no charges. Statisticians also say the chart covers far too narrow a period of time. Professor Richard Gill, whose expertise is medical statistics, told me the spreadsheet was 'ludicrous' and that he believes Letby is innocent. Fatal flaws 8 8 When a case has been built around what the professor says are flawed statistics, then I believe the whole evidential edifice starts to crumble. So what about the science? Expert witness Dr Dewi Evans said that on the majority of occasions babies were killed or harmed, Letby injected air or insulin into their bloodstreams or feeding tubes. A string of respected neonatologists called Dr Evans's theory that Letby injected air into babies via their nasal feeding tubes as 'implausible' and 'ridiculous'. Dr Evans had cited a 1989 academic paper which said skin discolourations occur with air bubbles in blood vessels, and he believed this was evident in several of the babies. But the paper's co-author, Dr Shoo Lee says none of the descriptions of the babies' skin blemishes given by witnesses matched those that he had noted. In February, Dr Lee chaired a panel of 14 leading international experts who had examined 17 cases at the heart of Letby's prosecution. Their conclusion? "We did not find any murders. In all cases, death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care," he revealed. Remember Letby - who has always pleaded her innocence - was never seen injecting a baby or harming them in any way. Police found no internet searches for her alleged murder techniques while no motive or psychological profile of a serial killer was ever presented to the court. And Letby's so-called confessions notes - in which she'd written, 'I'm evil I did this' - were scrawls produced on the advice of counsellors to help the nurse deal with extreme stress. The ramblings also included: 'WHY ME? I haven't done anything wrong.' They were written as part of her therapy after she was removed from her nursing duties following a cluster of baby deaths. Used as a 'gotcha' moment at her first trial, the 'I'm evil I did this' sentiment may simply have been her insecurity at so many babies dying on her ward. Letby also kept 257 confidential shift handover sheets from the ward under her bed. Twenty-one of the documents related to 13 children prosecutors said she had harmed. Campaigner and former Cabinet Minister David Davis told me: 'If you didn't know that she was accused of murder, you'd just think she was being excessively conscientious.' Revelations that she searched bereaved families on Facebook perhaps shows she was concerned for those grieving. It certainly doesn't amount to evidence she was a baby killer. The Countess of Chester - which treated critically ill and very premature babies clinging to life - was plagued by staff shortages and a superbug, while a leading medic described its neonatal unit as 'out of its depth'. With so many clustered baby deaths, I believe blame was subconsciously shifted to a convenient scapegoat - the young, female, guileless nurse Lucy Letby. The prospect of fresh charges and a trial may actually work in her favour. A better marshalled defence could call on a wealth of expert witnesses deployed to debunk bad science and iffy statistics. That Letby's case is likely to rumble on for years is heartbreaking for the bereaved families. A fresh appeal is needed immediately. The threshold for criminal conviction - being beyond reasonable doubt - hasn't, in my opinion, been close to being reached. Justice may be blind, but it is not infallible.
