
Banking on university finance clubs: How undergraduates see joining as fast-track to industry job
That's why a growing number of undergraduates are turning to university finance clubs as a coveted stepping stone to their dream job in the sector.
But getting accepted into these student-led clubs, which can offer vital inside knowledge and know-how, is no walk in the park. Some clubs accept fewer than 10 per cent of applicants.
The NUS Asset and Wealth Management Club, for example, had 400 students apply to join last year but less than 10 per cent were accepted.
The process can involve meticulous screenings of resumes, case studies that must be submitted within a week as multi-page presentation decks with supporting spreadsheet calculations, and in-person interviews covering industry knowledge and pitch delivery.
Students interviewed by CNA TODAY acknowledged the process can be gruelling but said it was worth it, given what they gained from joining a finance club.
These university finance clubs are student-led groups that offer undergraduates opportunities to explore careers in finance, build practical skills and connect with industry professionals.
Students said these clubs typically meet weekly and activities often include guest talks, workshops, internal and external case competitions, as well as office visits to financial institutions.
The clubs offer early exposure to the industry and a chance to apply what they learn beyond the classroom.
Many clubs also focus on specific areas within finance, allowing students to deepen their knowledge in niche fields such as sustainable finance, investment banking, or asset and wealth management.
Data shows that while more business graduates are entering the workforce, a smaller proportion are landing full-time permanent roles after graduation.
According to the Singapore Department of Statistics, the number of graduates from business and administration courses has been climbing steadily over the past decade – reaching 3,596 in 2023, up from 3,308 in 2022 and 2,933 in 2021.
Yet employment outcomes over this period have weakened.
Figures from the Joint Graduate Employment Survey – conducted by the six autonomous universities and published by the Ministry of Education – show that 84.4 per cent of fresh business graduates in 2024 secured full-time permanent jobs. This was down from 88.3 per cent in 2023 and 91 per cent in 2022.
One possible reason: a marked slowdown in hiring in the financial and insurance services sector – a key destination for business graduates.
In 2022, the sector hired 13,900 people. This fell to 9,300 in 2023, and slumped further to 4,900 in 2024, according to data published online by the Singapore Department of Statistics.
Against this backdrop, human resource experts told CNA TODAY that competition for graduate entry-level roles in the finance sector has intensified.
Mr Kenji Naito, group chief executive officer at recruitment firm Reeracoen, said the hiring landscape has grown more competitive for several reasons.
These include an oversupply of finance graduates from both local and overseas institutions, greater student interest in finance careers, and rising employer expectations that new hires will possess digital skills such as data analysis and automation.
Mr Naito also pointed to hiring freezes and role consolidation in some parts of the industry, as well as more selective evaluation processes introduced since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Reeracoen supports hiring for a range of financial sector clients, including global investment banks, Big Four accounting firms, insurance groups, family offices and fintech companies.
Mr Naito said applications for entry-level finance roles have jumped in recent years. Around 2018 and 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic, it was common to see 150 to 400 applications per role.
While those numbers dipped slightly in 2020 and 2021 amid a hiring slowdown, they have since rebounded strongly, he said.
Today, competitive graduate finance roles – particularly in front-office or analyst positions – can attract between 300 and 800 applications per role, he said.
As competition for entry-level banking roles heats up, Ms Lim Chai Leng, general manager at recruitment agency Randstad Singapore, said hiring managers now have higher expectations and are casting a wider net when screening applicants.
"(They) would prefer to interview a broader pool of candidates to identify those who best fit the company's needs and culture," she added.
To this end, participation in campus finance clubs can give candidates a "distinct edge" when pursuing a career in the industry.
"Involvement in these clubs is often seen as a valuable addition to a resume, as it showcases both a genuine interest in the industry and a proactive approach to professional development," said Ms Lim.
FIRST STEP INTO THE INDUSTRY
As such, to stand out in the crowded field, several business and finance undergraduates told CNA TODAY they chose to join a campus finance club.
Many view joining these clubs as a first step into the industry – a way to demonstrate their interest and commitment, particularly when applying for their first internship in finance.
Mr Tommy Ang, 22, business undergraduate at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), said he felt the need to bolster his credentials after his first year of university.
"I felt that my understanding of finance was lagging behind that of many of my peers, and I didn't feel well-prepared for the workforce. At the same time, I found finance to be an interesting field but wasn't sure where or how to begin."
This prompted Mr Ang, who is pursuing a specialisation in risk analytics, to join two finance clubs at the university: the NTU Investment Banking Club and its Risk Advisory and Analytics Club.
Some students also join clubs aligned with their specific areas of interest, such as investment banking or asset management, to build deeper, sector-specific knowledge.
This was the case for Mr Darren Loo, a 23-year-old undergraduate at Singapore Management University (SMU), who joined the university's Sustainable Investment Club.
A third-year student at SMU's College of Integrative Studies, Mr Loo is pursuing an individualised major in sustainable finance and analytics.
Mr Loo said being in the club allowed him to delve into the intersection of finance and sustainability – something he felt was missing from the core finance curriculum when he was in his first year.
Through the club, Mr Loo, who serves as research director, also received mentorship from alumni working in sustainable finance, collaborated with sustainability practitioners on a research paper, and secured an internship at a nature technology firm.
He said: "(The seniors') experience also gives me an indication of what I should be doing as an ideal candidate."
Several other students also told CNA TODAY that campus finance groups offer valuable networking opportunities especially with alumni who offer to serve as mentors.
Mr Ethan Khoo, a 22-year-old undergraduate at the National University of Singapore (NUS), recalled browsing LinkedIn before entering university and noticing a trend – many alumni from certain finance clubs had gone on to secure roles he aspired to.
Mr Khoo, who is vice-president of the NUS Asset and Wealth Management Club, said that beyond following a similar career trajectory, he also hoped to connect with industry mentors who could guide him throughout his four years at university.
And that was exactly what the club offered. As part of its mentorship programme, first-year student analysts are paired with a mentor on a one-to-two basis. These mentors may be seniors in their third or final year of university, or alumni who are now working full-time in the industry.
At times, former club members who have gone on to work in finance firms also share with their human resource teams the skills and experiences they gained through the club – highlighting how these could add value to the organisation, said Mr Khoo.
In some cases, finance clubs also partner with external companies – offering students access to exclusive hiring opportunities and industry exposure.
FINANCE CLUBS "NOT THE BE-ALL AND END-ALL"
While finance professionals, human resource experts and employers agree that student finance clubs can be a valuable stepping stone, they also note that these are not the only pathways into banking roles.
Some undergraduates choose to set themselves apart from other candidates by pursuing prestigious internships – sometimes even opting for a leave of absence from school to take them on.
Mr Jordan Ang, 25, who recently graduated from SMU's School of Economics, said he took a year off from school to pursue two six-month internships – one in investment banking and another in venture capital.
His decision paid off. Mr Ang said the internships gave him valuable real-world experience and a clearer understanding of the field – which eventually helped him secure a full-time position in investment banking after graduation.
This sentiment is echoed by Mr Gabriel Siow, a business management alumnus from SMU.
As an undergraduate, Mr Siow was part of the university's Student-Managed Investment Fund (SMIF) – a student-run public equity fund with a broad investment mandate spanning multiple sectors. The fund provides students with real-world investing experience and the opportunity to manage actual capital while still in school.
Mr Siow also complemented this experience with other activities to holistically build his portfolio.
Now 32, he works at August Global Partners – an independent fund management firm spun off from EDB Investments, a Singapore state-owned strategic fund. He said the SMIF experience broadened his perspective and offered valuable industry exposure, thanks to the programme's rigour and the insights shared by seniors and alumni.
"In my opinion, being in a finance club is not the be-all and end-all for securing roles in financial institutions after graduation," he said.
While the experience helped him build a foundation of relevant technical skills and boosted his chances of landing internships – giving him an initial foothold in the industry – Mr Siow believes it was ultimately the combination of various experiences that strengthened his prospects of entering the finance sector.
"I feel that the internships that I have completed was a crucial component for me stepping into the finance industry, with my first job being a result of a conversion from a previous internship, launching my work life while I was in my last semester with SMU," he added.
Others, like Ms Adlynna Aziz, 26, an assistant manager in trustee and fiduciary services at HSBC Singapore, found their way into the finance industry through a mix of experiences – despite not having joined any finance clubs during her schooling years.
After graduating from Nanyang Polytechnic in 2021 with a diploma in banking and finance, she secured a one-year apprenticeship programme at JPMorgan Chase, which is designed for polytechnic graduates.
Human resource experts and employers in the banking, finance and accountancy sectors said that while participation in finance clubs can showcase a candidate's enthusiasm and commitment, students can also demonstrate these qualities through other avenues.
Recruiters said they look at a range of factors when considering an application, including GPA, internships, competitions won, adding up to a mix of things that build the story of someone as a potential hire.
The banks – including JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Citigroup – as well as Big Four accounting firms told CNA TODAY that they ultimately take a holistic approach when it comes to evaluating entry-level candidates.
Mr Justin Loi, Asia-Pacific head of early careers at JPMorgan Chase, said finance clubs often offer hands-on experiences that deepen a candidate's understanding of real-world financial scenarios and help them build a network of industry contacts.
"Participation in finance or consulting clubs offers candidates a unique opportunity to immerse themselves in the industry beyond academic coursework," said Mr Loi.
"Overall, involvement in these clubs showcases a candidate's enthusiasm and dedication to potential employers, signaling their commitment to pursuing a career in finance or consulting."
However, Mr Loi noted that it is 'equally important' for students to pursue internship opportunities to gain early exposure and demonstrate genuine interest in the field.
Ms Lian Ying Ying, Singapore's head of human resources at global giant Deutsche Bank, said the first thing the firm looks for in an application is whether a candidate's skill set matches the role.
As such, it often seeks a 'well-balanced profile' – one that may include strong academic performance, such as a high Grade Point Average (GPA), relevant work experience, or a demonstrated passion for extracurricular activities through participation in student clubs and case competitions.
Firms added that being well-rounded in both technical and soft skills – even beyond traditional financial competencies – can also give applicants a competitive edge.
Ms Shelley Chan, a partner at KPMG Singapore, said the Big Four firm also identifies talent through student leadership roles, campus ambassador programmes and competitions.
"These platforms allow us to observe key attributes such as teamwork, communication and analytical thinking in action," she said.
Mr Byron Becker, co-president at the NUS Asset and Wealth Management Club, said: "I know there's a lot of talk about how crucial it is to be in a finance club.
"I think at the end of the day, every student has to decide for themselves how they develop the skills needed to excel in the role that they want to apply for. And the finance clubs are one way to do it – and I would say a good way – but certainly not the only way," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
No clarity yet on baseline or pharmaceutical tariffs with US: DPM Gan
Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. SINGAPORE – The US government did not negotiate its tariffs on Singapore and did not want to commit on whether the 10 per cent baseline tax could rise or fall in the future, said Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong. DPM Gan, who visited the US from July 20 to 26 , added that he did not get to further discussions on pharmaceutical tariffs being contemplated by the Trump administration. He told the SG60 IPS-SBF Conference on July 29 that these talks did not take place as he did not get the chance to meet Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. He did, however, meet other officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. They discussed ways to keep up the long and mutually beneficial bilateral economic relationship, as well as potential collaboration in areas like the digital economy. DPM Gan also met business leaders in New York, and congressional leaders handling trade issues in Washington. He also visited an ST Engineering aerostructures factory in Maryland. The US administration was 'not in the mood to discuss any discount to the baseline tariff', DPM Gan said at a dialogue moderated by Mr David Rennie, The Economist's geopolitics editor. 'We also wanted to know whether the baseline tariff will stay at 10 per cent or will it be higher or lower? The answer was non-committal. They are still reviewing the tariff and, in time to come, they will make the appropriate announcement. So we just have to wait and see.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Grace Fu apologises for Tanjong Katong sinkhole, says road may stay closed for a few more days Singapore Terrorism threat in Singapore remains high, driven by events like Israeli-Palestinian conflict: ISD Singapore Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from alleged scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates Singapore Man on trial for raping woman who hired him to repair lights in her flat Sport IOC president Kirsty Coventry a 'huge supporter' of Singapore Singapore 7, including child and firefighter, taken to hospital after fire breaks out in Toa Payoh flat Singapore S'pore can and must meaningfully apply tech like AI in a way that creates jobs for locals: PM Wong Singapore Doctor who forged certificates for aesthetic procedures gets 4 months' jail DPM Gan, who is also Minister for Trade and Industry, said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are key exports from Singapore to the US, are currently exempt from baseline tariffs. But US President Donald Trump had earlier in 2025 threatened to end an exemption for pharmaceutical imports, saying tariffs would be imposed 'at a level that you haven't really seen before'. The US is a major market for Singapore-based drugmakers including American multinationals like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. DPM Gan said official-level discussions between Singapore and the US Department of Commerce, which commenced before his trip, are still ongoing. 'I can't go into detail because negotiation is ongoing and there's a bit of a confidentiality we need to maintain on both sides,' he said when asked what the US was looking to secure through these talks. He added that the US generally had concerns about what the country experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, when supplies of critical pharmaceuticals were disrupted. 'They want to make sure that they have a secure supply line of pharmaceuticals. They do want to see whether they can onshore this production, so that they can produce (it) themselves. But they also know that it's not possible to onshore everything, because some of the raw materials are actually (from) outside of America,' he said. 'They do need to think about how they can work with partners, trusted partners, to make sure that their supply chain is secure and reliable. So that is what they are looking for in their partners, including Singapore,' he added. 'I think the administration's focus now is to finish the negotiation of reciprocal tariffs. Then it will start to engage countries on specific sectoral tariffs in pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.' DPM Gan said Singapore has yet to engage the US on the prospect of semiconductor tariffs . However, he added that discussions to preserve the country's access to artificial intelligence equipment and semiconductors are under way. Speaking at the same conference earlier in the day, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said Singapore's trade and investment relationship with America, even with the tariffs, remains important. 'We would prefer to have zero tariffs of course, but if it is the baseline rate, then we are at the lowest category. We can live with it, and we can still do business and there will still be many opportunities for trade with the US, because whatever is happening in America now, the economy is still resilient, and there is still tremendous innovation happening in American companies, and so there will still be opportunities there,' he said. DPM Gan in his dialogue said the US economy continues to be relatively resilient. He said that based on the feedback from US businessmen he met on his trip, the outlook for the US economy seems cautiously optimistic, adding that Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill , which includes tax cuts and business support measures, may have contributed to this. He said Singapore continues to have a good working relationship with the US. The US was Singapore's second-largest trading partner in 2024, while Singapore was its 16th-largest trading partner. Singapore was also the third-largest Asian investor in the US. More than 250 Singapore companies operate across 45 states, supporting around 350,000 jobs in the US, according to the Republic's Ministry of Trade and Industry. The US also has a longstanding trade surplus and free trade agreement with Singapore. The recent deals between the US and several countries, as well as the European Union economic bloc, are good news, DPM Gan said. 'This gives us a sense that there's good progress in the tariff negotiation. But I also come back with the sense that there remains significant uncertainty. I'm not sure whether the uncertainty has really been eliminated or even reduced,' he added. He cited the lack of clarity on the rules of origin that will be used to determine where products originate from. He also said it is unclear how reciprocal tariffs will be implemented, and how components from different countries and transshipped goods will be assessed. This comes on top of the uncertainty around sectoral tariffs, which are yet to be determined. There is also uncertainty about whether the investments that countries have pledged to the US under tariff deals are new contributions, or money that is currently invested in another country, DPM Gan said. 'For example, the EU has committed to make an investment... over a period of time. Japan has also committed investments into the US. Japan has been a major investor in Singapore. Whether the Japanese investment in Singapore will be diverted to the US is a question that is yet to be seen,' he said. 'There are (also) uncertainties as to how countries will respond to the outcome of the tariff negotiation. Some countries have also committed to purchase more from the US, and they would have been purchasing these products from other countries. Whether now, instead of purchasing from country A, country B, they will now purchase from the US, and therefore exports from these countries to affected countries will be changed,' he added. 'I think these uncertainties (are) second derivative uncertainties. No one is paying much attention yet, because we need to have a tariff settled, then we work out how the secondary impact would be.' Global supply chains will also be restructured if countries move their investments from destinations facing higher US tariffs to those facing lower tariffs, he added. 'The overall global trading system, what we call the rules-based multilateral trading system, that we depend on rules, respecting trade agreements with one another, and not change at will, is something that has been challenged,' DPM Gan said. 'Today, we can agree with one another on a certain tariff, but tomorrow, something happens. We start to change our tariff rate, and that is something that is very uncertain, and that has been seen over the last few months.'
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Despite profit dip, Bursa Malaysia's IPO growth attracts Singapore firms' interest
[KUALA LUMPUR] Bursa Malaysia is emerging as a key listing venue for Singapore-based companies, even as the bourse operator reported a 19.3 per cent year-on-year (yoy) drop in net profit to RM125.5 million (S$37.8 million) for the first half of 2025. The exchange is seeing rising interest from Singapore companies seeking secondary or dual listings, buoyed by its strong performance in the Asean initial public offering (IPO) market. These developments come despite weaker overall trading volumes that have weighed on Bursa's financial performance. Fad'l Mohamed, chief executive officer of Bursa Malaysia, told a results briefing on Tuesday (Jul 29): 'We are seeing more interest from Singapore companies. One of them is UMS Integration , which will be listed on the main market... this Friday.' The high-precision engineering and manufacturing company is pursuing a secondary listing on Bursa Malaysia through an introductory route to broaden its investor base and boost stock liquidity. No new shares will be issued; instead, initial liquidity will be supported by a market-making arrangement involving shares borrowed from CEO Andy Luong. The listing's reference price will be pegged to UMS Integration's Jul 31 closing price on the Singapore Exchange, ahead of its debut on Bursa Malaysia on Aug 1. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Meanwhile, Oiltek International and Q&M Dental Group – also Singapore-based companies – have proposed secondary listings on Bursa as well. Precision manufacturing and assembly solutions provider Grand Venture Technology was also pursuing a secondary listing on Bursa's main market but halted the plan in June , despite receiving approval from Securities Commission Malaysia approval months earlier. 'Bursa Malaysia continued to top other bourses in Asean in the first half of 2025 across three key metrics of IPOs: number of IPOs, total IPO market capitalisation, and total IPO funds raised,' noted Fad'l. The exchange hosted 32 IPOs in H1, raising RM4 billion and posting a total IPO market capitalisation of RM17.4 billion. This compares with 21 IPOs and RM2.2 billion raised during the same period in 2024. According to Deloitte, Bursa Malaysia captured over 67 per cent of the IPO proceeds in South-east Asia , which overall had 53 IPOs and raised more than US$1.4 billion in H1 2025. 'We have a healthy pipeline of IPOs in the coming months and are well on track to achieve our annual target of 60 IPOs and RM40.2 billion in total market capitalisation by end-2025,' Fad'l added. Profit squeeze from lower trading activity Despite the strong IPO pipeline, Bursa Malaysia's financial results were hit by a downturn in trading activity amid global market headwinds. H1 revenue fell 7.8 per cent to RM357 million, dragged by a 15.5 per cent drop in trading revenue to RM213 million. Second-quarter net profit fell 29 per cent yoy to RM57.1 million, while revenue declined 13.9 per cent to RM172.6 million. 'Global developments, including the United States' ongoing tariff negotiations with its trading partners and persistent geopolitical tensions, impacted market sentiment and weighed on equity markets,' Fad'l explained. Securities market trading revenue dropped nearly 24 per cent to RM146.4 million, with average daily trading value down 24.8 per cent at RM2.5 billion. Trading velocity also fell to 32 per cent from 42 per cent a year earlier. Nevertheless, Bursa Malaysia declared an interim dividend of 14 sen per share, translating to a total payout of RM113.3 million, or 90.3 per cent of net profit – offering a yield of 3.7 per cent. Optimism for second half Bursa Malaysia's financial results for H1 2025 were impacted by a downturn in trading activity. PHOTO: BT FILE Despite the current conditions, Fad'l remains optimistic, anticipating improved market sentiment in the coming quarters. 'Funds are currently sitting on cash, but we anticipate they will start deploying it, capitalising on forward-looking catalysts and expected growth opportunities in 2026,' he said. He noted that the second half of the year will be the prime time for fund managers to capture the upside of 2026. 'With this elevated cash being injected into the market, it's set to propel the average daily trading value.' Citing analysts' estimates, he believes that the average daily trading value will increase to RM2.6 billion in H2. Therefore, Bursa is maintaining its 2025 profit before tax target at the RM369 million to RM408 million range, a key performance indicator. Derivatives, Islamic and data segments show growth Bursa's derivatives market revenue rose 8.1 per cent to RM56.1 million in H1, supported by active trading in crude palm oil futures. The exchange also relaunched its Single Stock Futures contracts in March with new specifications to widen its investor base. Revenue from the Islamic capital market jumped 23 per cent year on year to RM11 million, while non-trading revenue – covering listing, issuer and depository services – increased by 7.6 per cent to RM130.5 million. Data business revenue grew 6.4 per cent to RM40.5 million, driven by expanding licensing subscriptions and rising demand for high-quality, actionable financial and sustainability data. As at Jun 30, Bursa Malaysia's total market capitalisation stood at RM1.9 trillion, down 6.1 per cent from a year earlier.


Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'Why do some Singaporeans feel more entitled than others?'
SINGAPORE: In the Lion City, where social policies intend to strike a sense of balance between fairness and practicality, few schemes have triggered as much discussion as the CDC coupons. These government-issued vouchers are aimed at easing the load of escalating living costs, yet an ostensibly modest gesture of assistance has kindled a bigger discussion about equality, privilege, and the public's perception of prosperity. Recently, a Redditor voiced curiosity about the mounting bitterness observed online. 'I am by no means a wealthy person,' the poster wrote, 'but I keep seeing comments about how it's unfair that someone living in a landed property gets the same vouchers as someone in an HDB flat. I genuinely want to understand—why do people feel entitled to more?' It's a question that opened the floodgates to a variety of outlooks and perceptions, demonstrating that the problem isn't just about dollars and cents—it's about ideals, insights, and messaging. The problem with equality in benefits A common response from commenters was the strain between fairness and equity. While the government gives the same amount of CDC vouchers to rich and poor citizens alike, the lived reality of Singaporeans extensively differs. As one commenter clarified, 'Should poor people get more monetary benefit from the government than rich people? That's a far more complex issue than 'poor people are entitled.'' See also Cost of living issues at the top of voters' minds in GE2025 runup Unquestionably, while some contend that equal dispersal mirrors national harmony, others feel the system should account for need. A S$300 voucher might hardly register for a high-income home, but for households earning the minimum wage, it could mean a week's worth of groceries. It's not just the money—it's the message A vital aspect, according to netizens, is how the government sets these vouchers. The official description is that the CDC vouchers are intended to 'alleviate the cost of living.' That kind of messaging, many claim, sets the belief that the more economically disadvantaged one is, the more help one should receive. 'If it was, say, a tax rebate,' one Redditor pointed out, 'the rich get more and no one complains, because it's seen as a discount on taxes—something they already pay more of. But when vouchers are positioned as support, people feel it should be given based on need, not equality.' Another added, 'If the message was simply, 'we're returning a budget surplus to all citizens,' I don't think people would be as upset.' What do people really want? Underneath the discussion, there's a sense that the real issue isn't just about coupons—it's about acknowledgment and reprieve. Lower-income people often feel the pinch of mounting expenditures more intensely and want that hardship addressed in concrete ways. 'The vouchers can cover a month's worth of basic expenses for some families,' one netizen wrote. 'So, when others use it to buy luxuries, it feels like a slap in the face.' However, it's not only the 'have-nots' who are disgruntled. As one noted, even high-income earners sometimes complain they're being deceitfully overtaxed or that the system doesn't reward them sufficiently, even though many of them have benefited from scholarships or overseas funding in the past. 'There will always be people unhappy,' one Redditor wisecracked. 'They lack contentment—so it's not just the lower income.' Gratitude vs entitlement The most surprising insight came from a commenter who thought that gratitude has become increasingly rare across all income brackets. 'People will never be grateful for what's being given,' he said. 'It doesn't matter if they're high-income or low-income.' It's a sceptic's mindset, but it can lead to a deeper challenge for legislators — even benevolent initiatives can provoke hatred if the public sees them as skewed from actual realities and societal values. A question of perspective Eventually, the poster wasn't aiming to attack or protect any side but was trying to understand why ' people feel entitled to more.' Yes, all Singaporeans work hard, but hardship is not always gauged in hours—it's gauged in values and outcomes. When someone living paycheck to paycheck gets the same aid as someone with financial resources, the result can feel more like nominal equality than real equity. And that's the actual core of the debate — not who deserves what, but how we describe fair-mindedness in a society that strives for both meritocracy and sympathy.