Rustad faces ‘hot and uncomfortable summer' amid months-long leadership review
BC Conservative Leader John Rustad is staring down a 'very hot and uncomfortable summer' as he undergoes an unusually long leadership review, according to a UBC political scientist.
The review, mandated by the party constitution, kicked off over the weekend — and comes amid messy infighting on British Columbia's political right.
The process will see party members in each of B.C.'s 93 ridings vote on whether they want Rustad to stay as leader, a process Rustad said should wrap by December.
1:51
Conservative leader accuses political rivals of blackmail
'To go through every riding in a kind of mini-review seems like, in some ways, a worst-case scenario for a leader who is besieged, because it just means that it gives opponents time, space to organize,' UBC political science lecturer Stewart Prest told Global News.
Story continues below advertisement
'It gives everyone with a grievance (a chance) to air that and to see whether others are feeling the same sort of thing. So it is going to be a very hot and uncomfortable summer, I would think, for Mr. Rustad.'
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The review comes as the province's political right, which unified behind Rustad and his upstart BC Conservatives ahead of last year's provincial election, faces fragmentation.
Rustad is facing pressure over a leaked letter to the BC Conservative caucus accusing a group of former MLAs of 'blackmail.'
Meanwhile, two former MLAs — Dallas Brodie, who was kicked out of the party for comments about residential schools, and Tara Armstrong, who quit in solidarity — have formed their own new OneBC party, with social and economic policies challenging Rustad's party's right flank. OneBC is also accusing Rustad of trying to manipulate the party's recent annual general meeting.
2:02
3 former B.C. Conservative MLAs speaking out
Jordan Kealy, a third Conservative MLA who quit in solidarity but remains an independent, has also called for Rustad to step down.
Story continues below advertisement
And on Wednesday, B.C. business leader Ryan Beedie took aim at Rustad's leadership in a LinkedIn post, arguing the party needs to rebrand itself to appeal to centrist voters.
At the same time, former BC United MLA Karin Kirkpatrick has launched her own party, CentreBC, hoping to attract those centrist voters.
'This isn't just behind-the-scenes backroom politics; it is out in the open, we have a BC Conservative Party that is fragmented,' Prest said.
'As long as the conservative movement is essentially eating its own and dealing with the infighting, the NDP more or less gets to skate through.'
Prest said British Columbia's political right tends to only come together and unify around the promise of victory, and to get the party's populist and moderate wings back on the same page Rustad needs to find a way to change the conversation from his own leadership to that of the NDP government.
It's a challenge he said will be magnified by the lengthy leadership review process.
Rustad is scheduled to speak with the media following a caucus meeting Wednesday evening.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Starmer faces down a revolt over welfare reform after a troubled first year in office
LONDON (AP) — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer marks a year in office this week, fighting a rebellion from his own party over welfare reform and reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings. It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's center-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government. In the last 12 months Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading U.S. President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on U.K. goods. But at home his agenda has run onto the rocks as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised. Inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy. John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said Starmer has had 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister.' Rebellion over welfare reform On Tuesday, Starmer faces a vote in Parliament on welfare spending after watering down planned cuts to disability benefits that caused consternation from Labour lawmakers. Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030. After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill, the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change. It pledged to consult with disability groups about the changes, and do more to help sick and disabled people find jobs. Some rebels said they would back the bill after the concessions, but others maintained their opposition. The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. Last week, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. 'It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,' said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester. 'I can't think of many examples of a prime minister in postwar politics suffering such a big setback when presiding over such a strong position in the Commons.' It also makes it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes. The government estimated the welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has ballooned since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's only likely to save about half that amount. Starmer acknowledges errors The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system. But it has also raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular. In recent days Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told the Sunday Times that he was 'heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East' while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure,' he said. UK politics is in flux Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Starmer's struggles are all the more ignominious because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers. But British politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support – and some of Labour's – shifted in this year's local elections to Reform U.K., a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage. Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls, ahead of Labour and pushing the right-of-center Conservatives into third place. If the shift continues it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties. Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He does not have to call an election until 2029. 'There's still plenty of time to turn things around,' Ford said. But he said the Labour lawmakers' rebellion 'will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make in government. 'Barring some magical unexpected economic boom … there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,' he said.
Calgary Herald
4 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney will have no choice but to kill supply management
Article content For a while there, things were going so well. Prime Minister Mark Carney — aka 'the Trump whisperer' — had morphed from critic to texting buddy of the U.S. President. Over the past three months, Carney had been chatting with Donald Trump, building backchannel goodwill. After the successful G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., hopes were high that Ottawa would strike a deal with Washington in 30 days, and that the rhetoric of making us the '51st state' had finally been retired. Article content Article content Until last Friday, when everything fell apart. Article content Article content Article content That's when President Trump abruptly cut off trade negotiations with Canada over our three per cent digital services tax, set to take effect June 30. Aimed at U.S. tech giants Amazon, Meta, Google and AirBNB, the tax was retroactive to 2022 and would have cost them an estimated $2 billion in back payments. The tech bros howled, the president barked, and Carney blinked. Sunday night, he backed down and cancelled the tax: Monday morning, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick thanked him for the climbdown, as did the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. Negotiations were back on. Article content But if you thought that was the last bump in the road, you couldn't be more wrong. In an interview broadcast Sunday morning on Fox, Trump mentioned a veritable mountain: supply management. That's the system that protects Canadian dairy, poultry and egg industries from foreign competition through quotas and tariffs, including Trump's favourite bugaboo, a 200-plus per cent markup on U.S. dairy products. Article content Article content It's true that the tariff only kicks in after the U.S. exports 50,000 zero-tariff metric tons of milk and 12,500 metric tons of cheese per year — levels it is nowhere near approaching. But supply management was already a sticking point with Trump in the CUSMA negotiations under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and Republican lawmakers and U.S. dairy producers continue to demand its elimination. Article content Article content In our country, unfortunately, it has become a hill on which political careers go to die. Case in point: People's Party Leader Maxime Bernier, whose ambition to lead the Conservative party in 2017 was thwarted by the Quebec dairy lobby after he promised to ditch the policy. And the sacred cow lives on: in June, the House of Commons and Senate passed a Bloc Québécois bill with all-party support to prevent bargaining supply management away. Article content Carney knows that he owes his recent election victory in large part to Quebec voters — and with a minority, needs the support of opposition parties like the Bloc to stay in power. But if Canada wants a serious trade deal with a Trump White House, supply management will have to go. Not just for the sake of negotiations, but because it's a cartel policy that has had its day.
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
Trump admin sues Los Angeles, claims it's hindering immigration enforcement
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration filed suit Monday against Los Angeles, claiming the city is obstructing the enforcement of immigration laws and creating a lawless environment with its sanctuary policies that bar local police from sharing information on people without legal status. The lawsuit in U.S. District Court says Los Angeles' ' sanctuary city' ordinance hinders White House efforts to crack down on what it calls a 'crisis of illegal immigration.' It is the latest in a string of lawsuits against so-called sanctuary jurisdictions — including New York, New Jersey and Colorado — that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The Los Angeles policy bars city resources from being used for immigration enforcement. The court filing calls the city ordinance 'illegal' and asks that it be blocked from being enforced. Chad Mizelle, chief of staff for U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, said in announcing the latest lawsuit that the administration will not tolerate any interference with the federal government's crackdown. Story continues below advertisement 'We will keep enforcing federal immigration law in Los Angeles, whether or not the city's government or residents agree with it,' Mizelle said in a social media post on the platform X. 3:07 'These aren't the criminals': L.A. mayor urges Trump administration to stop ICE raids Messages seeking comment on the lawsuit were sent to the offices of Mayor Karen Bass and City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez, a co-author of the Los Angeles sanctuary law, said Monday that the city would do everything in its power to protect its residents. He said in a statement that 'Trump is tearing families apart' and trying to force cities and towns across the country to help him carry out his agenda. 'We refuse to stand by and let Donald Trump deport innocent families,' he added. Story continues below advertisement The Los Angeles lawsuit claims Trump 'won the presidential election on a platform of deporting the millions of illegal immigrants.' Over the past three weeks, immigration agents have swarmed Southern California, arresting hundreds of people and prompting protests. Tens of thousands of people participated in rallies over immigration raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines. Los Angeles police have arrested over 100 people on various charges from throwing rocks at federal officers to setting fire to Waymo cars equipped with self-driving technology. 'The practical upshot of Los Angeles' refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities has, since June 6, 2025, been lawlessness, rioting, looting, and vandalism,' the court filing says. On June 18, the mayor lifted a curfew she had imposed a week earlier to prevent vandalism and break-ins during nighttime protests. The demonstrations had been largely concentrated in a few downtown blocks that are home to several federal and local government buildings.
