logo
When the 'victim narrative' takes over minorities and the American Dream

When the 'victim narrative' takes over minorities and the American Dream

Fox News3 days ago
The historically Black University of the District of Columbia recently banned an on-campus event by conservative organization that would have asked, "Is the American Dream Alive for Black Americans?" Our America Foundation was the organizer behind the event, which would have featured FAIR Executive Director Monica Harris and Fox News contributor and Our America advisor Deroy Murdock — both hardly controversial figures. What apparently was controversial was that they dared ask if the American Dream was alive in the Black community.The complaint filed by Our America and FAIR alleges that the public university violated "the First Amendment by restricting protected speech based on viewpoint in a public forum."The complaint details how Monique Gamble, a political science professor, allegedly axed the debate by telling Our America that "Our university is comprised of many students whose identities actually do put them at risk in a society that has a known history of criminalizing race, gender, sexuality, immigration and socio-economic status." In addition, she said, "In my view, it's not enough to be 'part of the conversation.' These conversations should unequivocally acknowledge the risks that people with marginalized and politicized identities face in their lives daily. At UDC, we do not entertain these realities as debatable."
This is nothing more than minority fragility. This is nothing more than protecting the "victim narrative" that has been in place in America for the last 60 years. Do we really believe that Blacks and other minorities are so fragile that they cannot listen to a debate about the American Dream? Do we really believe they will crumble psychologically, or worse, from whatever paranoia she's stoking?
I have made it my mission over the last two decades to destroy the bad-faith myth that the American Dream is dead.
I've known people like Monique Gamble most of my life. They may have the title of professor but they truly are the guardians of the Black victim narrative. In the words of Shelby Steele, Gamble's Black power — I say Black because that is what she sees herself as — comes from using Black victimization to exploit White guilt. She cannot have anyone come in and challenge her narrative. She can't have anyone come in and tell her students about the glories of the American Dream. Anti-Americanness is her power.
When you read Gamble's response to the complaint, the striking thing is how she reduces everyone to identities of immutable characteristics. That is all she sees her students as. And she assumes false nobility by acting as the protector of her students who will shield them from "risks." But what "risks" is she talking about here? The only thing at risk here is the fragility of her anti-American narrative which reduces minorities to victim status.
For those who know me, I preach the American Dream on the South Side of Chicago, where I pastor every day. For decades, people like Gamble told the youth in my neighborhood that the American Dream was dead for them. That is why you'll hear people here talk about the White man or how the system isn't built for them. There isn't anything out there for them but living by the hand of the government.I have made it my mission over the last two decades to destroy this bad-faith myth that the American Dream is dead. I preach over and over the very simple American virtues of responsibility, accountability, perseverance, resilience, and never ever giving up one's belief in oneself.
When kids throw back in my face that the American Dream is dead, I tell them to look at what God gave them: two feet that can go anywhere, two hands that can make anything, a mouth that can move worlds, two eyes that can see possibility, and a brain that can dream up a life for oneself. I tell them that America is the land where they can put all of God's gifts to work and make themselves into somebodies.These debates about the American Dream need to happen everywhere and we must push back against the Gambles and others like her. Their bad faith has done profound damage and for far too long. That is why, when I launched my plans for the walk across America, I decided on the tagline: Reviving the American Dream for Every Block.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court temporarily pauses rollbacks to Voting Rights Act
Supreme Court temporarily pauses rollbacks to Voting Rights Act

Axios

time5 hours ago

  • Axios

Supreme Court temporarily pauses rollbacks to Voting Rights Act

The Supreme Court paused a lower court's ruling that would have weakened the Voting Rights Act on Thursday, granting Native American groups that brought the suit a temporary win. Why it matters: If the Supreme Court ultimately sides with the lower court, the legal battle could further diminish the landmark voting rights law when the Trump administration is already moving away from bringing civil rights cases in court. Had the lower court's decision been permitted to take effect, it would have prevented private groups in seven states from challenging race discrimination in election maps perceived to be violating the 1965 law. The intrigue: None of the justices provided reasoning for their votes, but the order did note that Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch would have denied the tribal nations' application. Catch up quick: The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, Spirit Lake Tribe and three Native American voters filed a lawsuit against North Dakota's Secretary of State in 2022, claiming that the state's redistricting plan unfairly diluted Indigenous voting power. The groups brought a lawsuit under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to allow voters to sue if they think the government has diluted or denied their voting rights on the basis of race or color, according to SCOTUSblog. A district court sided in favor of the Indigenous groups and ruled that the redistricting maps violated this section of the act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reviewed the case after the district court, and ruled 2-1 that only the government can bring challenges under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. What we're watching: The two tribal nations are preparing to ask the Supreme Court to complete a full review of their case so that North Dakota can finalize which redistricting plan the state should use for elections in 2026. The intrigue: The ruling comes just weeks before the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 signed by President Johnson following the bloody beatings of civil rights marchers in Selma, Alabama. Since the signing of that law, the number of Black Americans elected in the U.S. has shot up from just a few in 1964 to about 9,000. A majority of Black Americans are aligned with the Democratic Party, but Black Republicans have won high-profile races in Kentucky, New Mexico and California. The bill also helped elect Native Americans, but Indigenous leaders say Native communities continue to face voter suppression, racial discrimination and systemic barriers to the ballot box. Context: A number of states with GOP-controlled legislatures have passed bills in recent years that critics argue impose new restrictions on Indigenous voters. Some GOP proposals seek to impose new address requirements despite many Native Americans lacking addresses.

Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans

Fast Company

time11 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans

Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin
Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin

Washington Post

time11 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers says he won't seek third term in battleground Wisconsin

MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin's Democratic governor, Tony Evers, announced Thursday that he will not seek a third term in 2026, creating the first open race for governor in the battleground state in 16 years. It will be Wisconsin's highest profile race next year, as Democrats also angle to take control of the Legislature thanks to redrawn election maps that are friendlier to the party. They are also targeting two congressional districts as Democrats nationwide try to retake the House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store